346
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Interfacing as embodied practice: journeys between print, screen and beyond

La interfaz como práctica encarnada: viajes entre la imprenta, la pantalla y más allá.

L’interfaçage comme pratique concráte: trajets du papier áI’écran et au-delá de ceux-ci.

, ORCID Icon &
Received 17 Feb 2023, Accepted 21 Dec 2023, Published online: 31 Jan 2024

References

  • Abildgaard, M. S. (2018). My whole LIfe in telephones: Material artifacts as interview elicitation devices. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797795
  • Ash, J. (2015). The interface envelope: Gaming, technology, Power. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Ash, J. (2020). Post‐phenomenology and space: A geography of comprehension, form and power. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12331
  • Ash, J., Anderson, B., Gordon, R., & Langley, P. (2018). Unit, vibration, tone: A post-phenomenological method for researching digital interfaces. Cultural Geographies, 25, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017726556
  • Ash, J., & Simpson, P. (2016). Geography and post-phenomenology. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514544806
  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  • Barton, K. C. (2015). Elicitation techniques: Getting people to talk about ideas they Don’t usually talk about. Theory and Research in Social Education, 43(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034392
  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Drucker, J. (2013). Performative materiality and theoretical approaches to interface. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000143/000143.html
  • Galloway, A. R. (2012). The interface effect. Polity.
  • Galloway, R. (2011). What is new media? Ten years after “the language of new media”. Criticism, 53(8), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2011.0021
  • Hansen, M. B. N. (2004). New philosophy for new media. MIT press.
  • Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
  • Hay, J., & Couldry, N. (2011). Rethinking converngence/culture: An introduction. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600527
  • Hookway, B. (2014). Interface. MIT Press.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Welcome to convergence culture (Retrieved December 27, 2022: http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2006/06/welcome_to_convergence_culture.html
  • Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (updated ed.). New York University Press.
  • Keramidas, K. (2015). The interface experience: A User’s Guide. Bard Graduate Center: Decorative Arts, Design History, Material Culture.
  • Kinkaid, E. (2022). Positionality, post-phenomenology, and the politics of theory. Gender, Place & Culture, 29(7), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1891867
  • Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069
  • Madianou, M. (2015). Polymedia and ethnography: Understanding the social in social media. Social Media & Society, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578675
  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
  • Meckin, R., & Balmer, A. (2021). The pop-up stall: A Mass object-elicitation method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110167. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016720
  • Munster, A. (2006). Materializing new media: Embodiment in information aesthetics. Dartmouth.
  • Rose, G. (2015). Rethinking the Geographies of Cultural ‘Objects’ through Digital Technologies Interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515580493
  • Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage.
  • Rose, G., Degen, M., & Melhuish, C. (2014). Networks, interfaces, and computer-generated images: Learning from digital visualisations of urban redevelopment projects. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(3), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13113p
  • Scarles, C. (2010). Where words fail, visuals ignite: Opportunities for visual autoethnography in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 905–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.02.001
  • Scarles, C. (2011). Eliciting embodied knowledge and response: Respondent-led photography and visual autoethnography. In T. Rakic & D. Chambers (Eds.), An introduction to Visual Research Methods in tourism (pp. 70–91). Routledge.
  • Sumartojo, S., & Graves, M. (2021). Feeling through the screen: Memory sites, affective entanglements, and digital materialities. Social & Cultural Geography, 22(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1563711
  • Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lou, C., & Hui Min, V. L. (2019). Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy022
  • Van Duppen, J. (2020). Seeing patterns on the ground: Reflections on field-based photography. Open Arts Journal, 9, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.5456/issn.2050-3679/2020w06
  • Warren, S. (2005). Photography and Voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 861–882. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510627748
  • Willig, C. (2017). Reflections on the use of object elicitation. Qualitative Psychology, 4(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000054