References

• Anderson, B., & Skrede, J. (2017). Planning for a sustainable Oslo: The challenge of turning urban theory into practice. Local Environment, 22(5), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1236783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, A., & Varlet, A. (2004). Geographies of home, cultural geographies. 11(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474004eu289xx
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauvain, J. (2018). Social sustainability as a challenge for urban scholars. City, 22(4), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1507113
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba Azcárate, M. (2020). Stuck with tourism: Space, Power, and Labor in Contemporary Yucatan. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E., & Farley, J. (2004). Ecological economics: Principles and applications. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. C. (2021). Radical mobilities. Progress in Human Geography, 45(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519899472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debbage, L. (2018). Economic geographies of tourism: A critical and contested discourse, Ch 4. In C. Cooper, S. Volo, W. C. Gartner, & N. Scott (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Tourism Management: Theories, Concepts and Disciplinary Approaches to Tourism. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2022). National statistics: National Travel survey 2021: Trips by purpose, age and sex. Retreived August 31, 2022, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-travel-survey-2021/national-travel-survey-2021-trips-by-purpose-age-and-sex
   Google Scholar
• Doran, R., Pallesen, S., Böhm, G., & Ogunbode, C. A. (2022). When and why do people experience flight shame? Annals of Tourism Research, 92, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, K., & Murray, L. (2016). Discourses of mobility: Institutions, everyday lives and embodiment. Mobilities, 11(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.941257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The DRIVEN. (2020). Oslo city hits new milestone – most electric vehicles per capita. Retreived July 7, 2020, from https://thedriven.io/2020/07/07/oslo-city-hits-new-milestone-most-electric-vehicles-per-capita/
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2007). Mundane mobilities, performances and spaces of tourism. Social and Cultural Geography, 8(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701360089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., & Humpe, A. (2020). The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Norway. (2021). National accounts, the revised national budget. https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/economy/governments-revenues/
   Google Scholar
• Graburn, N. (2017). Key figure of mobility: The tourist. Social Anthropology, 25(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haandrikman, K., Costa, R., Malmberg, B., Rogne, A. F., & Sleutjes, B. (2021). Socio-economic segregation in European cities. A comparative study of Brussels, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Oslo and Stockholm. Urban Geography, 44(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1959778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2019). Imagining the post-fossil city: Why is it so difficult to think of new possible worlds? Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1510339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (2014). Second home tourism: An international review. Tourism Review International, 18(3), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427214X14101901317039
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, M. T., Sameshima, P., & Watson, F. (2015). Imagination as Method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691501400105
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, J. K. R., Farstad, E., Higham, J. E. S., Hopkins, D., & Landa-Mata, I. (2023). Travel discontinuities, enforced holidaying-at-home and alternative leisure travel futures after COVID-19. Tourism Geographies, 25(2–3), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2021.1943703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. (2022). Guided by data: A logistical approach to tourism in the platform economy. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100040
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K., & Thorén, K. H. (2016). Planning for a Green Oslo. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klöckner, C. A., Nayum, A., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2013). Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transportation Research Part D, 21, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölbel, A. (2020). Imaginative geographies of international student mobility. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1460861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto, X. Y., Kirillova, K., Wang, D., & Fu, X. (2023). Convergence of boundaries in tourism, hospitality, events and leisure: Defining the core and knowledge structure. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 48(3), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348022110866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemphers, N., Bernstein, S., Hoffmann, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (2022). Rooted in place: Regional innovation, assets, and the politics of electric vehicle leadership in California, Norway, and Québec. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linke, U. (2012). Mobile imaginaries, portable signs: Global consumption and representations of slum life. Tourism Geographies, 14(2), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2012.633218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, S. B., Clark, B., Shriver, T. E., & Clausen, R. (2016). Sustainability and environmental sociology: Putting the economy in its place and moving toward an integrative socio-ecology. Sustainability, 8(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Towards a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, N., Pritchard, A., Causevic, S., & Minnaert, L. (2018). Ten Years of critical tourism studies: Reflections on the road less travelled. Tourism Analysis, 23(2), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15210313504535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2021). Worlding geography: From linguistic privilege to decolonial anywhere. Progress in Human Geography, 45(6), 1440–1466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520979356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Saglie, I.-L., & Richardson, T. (2020). Urban sustainability: is densification sufficient? European Planning Studies, 28(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1604633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayum, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2022). I did my bit! The impact of electric vehicle adoption on compensatory beliefs and norms in Norway. Energy Research and Social Science, 89, 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Climate denial: Emotion, psychology, culture and political economy. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Regions and cities at a glance 2020. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/Norway-Regions-and-Cities-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022). OECD tourism trends and policies 2022. Norway. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/c41cef4a-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/c41cef4a
   Google Scholar
• Ohnmacht, T., Maksim, H., & Bergman, M. M. (2009). Mobilities and inequalities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki, R., Aoyagi, M., & Steward, F. (2022). Community sharing: Sustainable mobility in a post-carbon, depopulating society. Environmental Sociology, 8(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.2002000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2014). Governing Mobilities, Mobilising Carbon. Mobilities, 9(4), 570–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.961260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomäki, H., & Steger, M. B. (2010). Social imaginaries and big history: Towards a new planetary consciousness? Futures, 42(10), 1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernecky, T. (2023). Advancing critic-relational inquiry: Is tourism studies ready for a relational turn? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2211248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincetl, S.(2021). Cities treated as things: Imagining post-fossil cities. A friendly rejoinder to Hajer and Versteeg and Wachsmuth, territory. Politics & Governance, 9(1), 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Plyushteva, A. (2021). Commuting and the urban night: Nocturnal mobilities in tourism and hospitality work. In A. Smith & A. Eldridge (Eds.), Tourism and the night: Rethinking nocturnal destinations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. (2015). After nature: A politics for the anthropocene. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, W. E. (1997). Is ‘sustainable city’ an oxymoron? Local Environment, 2(3), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839708725535
   Google Scholar
• Remme, D., Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2022). Who benefits from sustainable mobility transitions? Social inclusion, populist resistance and elite capture in Bergen, Norway. Journal of Transport Geography, 105, 103475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J., & Cachelin, A. (2018). Critical sustainability: Incorporating critical theories into contested sustainabilities. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(4), 518–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0502-9
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J. R., & Gunnerud Berg, N. (2011). The second home phenomenon and Norwegian rurality. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 65(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2011.597873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, N. B. (2022). Labour migration and tourism mobilities: Time to bring sustainability into the debate. Tourism Geographies, 24(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1801827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuermans, N. (2016). White, middle-class South Africans moving through Cape Town: Mobile encounters with strangers. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1216156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segato, R. L., & McGlazer, R. (2018). A manifesto in four themes. Critical Times, 1(1), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-1.1.198
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2021). Mobility Justice and the Return of Tourism after the pandemic. Mondes du Tourisme, 19. https://doi.org/10.4000/tourisme.3463
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2004). Tourism mobilities: Places to play, places to stay. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. (2019). Travel survey. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/list/reise
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. (2022a). Immigrants and Norwegian-born to immigrant parents. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/innvandrere/statistikk/innvandrere-og-norskfodte-med-innvandrerforeldre
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. (2022b). Income and wealth statistics for households. Retrieved February 22, 2023, from https://www.ssb.no/en/inntekt-og-forbruk/inntekt-og-formue/statistikk/inntekts-og-formuesstatistikk-for-husholdninger
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. (2022c). Population. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/folketall/statistikk/befolkning
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, M., Barton, D. N., Cimburova, Z., Rusch, G. M., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Onaindia, M. (2020). Environmental justice and outdoor recreation opportunities: A spatially explicit assessment in Oslo metropolitan area, Norway. Environmental Science & Policy, 108, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12063
   Google Scholar
• Tribe, J. (2007). Critical tourism: Rules and resistance. In I. Ateljevic, A. Pritchard, & N. Morgan (Eds.), The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Innovative Research Methods. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, L., & Neilson, D. (2014). The neoliberalisation of sustainability. Citizenship, Social & Economics Education, 13(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.2304/csee.2014.13.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Taboada, M. (2021). Story-making: Re-imagining possible futures through collaborative world-building approaches, pivot 2021 virtual conference: Dismantling reassembling. OCAD University. July 22-23 2021.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future – call for action, UN, 4 August. 1987. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (2016). The 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2012). Do mobile lives have a future? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(5), 509–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00749.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter, Z. S., Figari, H., Krange, O., & Gundersen, V. (2023). Environmental justice in a very green city: Spatial inequality in exposure to urban nature, air pollution and heat in Oslo, Norway. Science of the Total Environment, 858, 160193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth, D. (2019). The territory and politics of the post-fossil city. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1595115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadham, H. (2020). Horse matters: Re-examining sustainability through human-domestic animal relationships. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(3), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar