References

• Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A.(2018). Digital turn, digital geographies?. Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierl, B. H.(2008). The Sympathetic Imagination and the human—animal bond: Fostering empathy through reading imaginative literature. Anthrozoös, 21(3), 213–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J.(2013). Understanding a photograph. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, J. (2019). Virtual menageries: Animals as mediators in network cultures. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blattner, C. E., Donaldson, S., & Wilcox, R.(2020). Animal agency in community. Politics and Animals, 6(0), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, H., & Morris, C. (2003). Farm animal welfare: A new repertoire of nature‐society relations or modernism re‐embedded? Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. (2004). Seeing through the ‘Good Farmer’s’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. J., Forney, J., Stock, P., & Sutherland, L. (2021). The good farmer: Culture and identity in food and agriculture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, R., Kuczera, C., & Schwarz, G. (2008). Exploring Farmers’ Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D., & Holloway, L.(2016). Technology and restructuring the social field of dairy farming: Hybrid capitals,‘stockmanship’and automatic milking systems. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 513–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, S. (2023). Bouncing back? kangaroo-human resistance in contemporary Australia. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(1), 331–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221084194
   Google Scholar
• Charles, N. (2014). ‘Animals just love you as you are’: Experiencing kinship across the species barrier. Sociology, 48(4), 715–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513515353
   Google Scholar
• Convery, I., Bailey, C., Mort, M., & Baxter, J. (2005). Death in the wrong place? Emotional geographies of the UK 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, M. M. (2019). When care is defined by science: Exploring veterinary medicine through a more‐than‐human geography of empathy. Area, 51(3), 470–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einspänner, J., Thimm, C., & Dang-Anh, M. (2014). Computer-assited content analysis of X data. In K. Weller & J. Burgess (Eds.), X and society (pp. 97–108). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2016). Boundary Labor and the production of emotionless commodities: The case of beef production. The Sociological Quarterly, 55(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N., & Yarwood, R.(1998). New places for” old spots”: The changing geographies of domestic livestock animals. Society & Animals, 6(2), 137–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T., & Platt, L. (2018). Just) a walk with the dog? Animal geographies and negotiating walking spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1274047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Communication Research, 47(5), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215617506
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K. (2020). The afterlives of the lively commodity: Life-worlds, death-worlds, rotting-worlds. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20944417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, R. (2021). Animal geographies in a pandemic, COVID-19 and similar futures. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Taylor, N. (2017). People writing for animals, ethnography after humanism. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L. (2001). Pets and protein: Placing domestic livestock on hobby-farms in England and Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00045-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L. (2007). Subjecting cows to robots: Farming technologies and the making of animal subjects. Environment and Planning D-Society & Space, 25(6), 1041–1060. https://doi.org/10.1068/d77j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L., & Morris, C. (2014). Viewing animal bodies: Truths, practical aesthetics and ethical considerability in UK livestock breeding. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.851264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, M., Riley, M., & Kallis, G. (2023). Keeping on [line] farming: Examining young farmers’ digital curation of identities,(dis)connection and strategies for self-care through social media. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 142, 103749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J., Hodson, J., & Mittelman, R. (2022). Pup-ularity contest: The advertising practices of popular animal influencers on Instagram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarlenkaski, T.(2014). Of cows and women: Gendered human-animal relationships in Finnish agriculture. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 2(2), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. (2013). Beyond the screen: Methods for investigating geographies of life ‘online’. Geography Compass, 7(8), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12062
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. (2019). Platform affects of geolocation. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 107, 207–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linné, T. (2016). Cows on Facebook and Instagram. Television & New Media, 17(8), 719–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416653811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. (2022). Imag(in)ing place: Reframing photography practices and affective social media platforms. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 129, 172–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J.(2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), 911–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. R., & Farrokhi, B. (2022). Digital Geographies and everyday life: Space, materiality, agency. In S. A. Lovell,S. Coen,& M. Rosenberg (Eds.),The Routledge handbook of methodologies in human geography (pp. 196–206). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, J. (2020). The secret life of pet Instagram accounts: Joy, resistance, and commodification in the Internet’s cute economy. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3332–3348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820956345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: X users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrow-Young, A. (2021). Approaching Instagram data: Reflections on accessing, archiving and anonymising visual social media. Communication Research & Practice, 7(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2020.1847820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, E., & Casey, J. (2022). On “finishing” a visual memoir of care and death on an Irish cattle farm. Visual Anthropology Review, 38(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/var.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele, M. (2016). The making of the brave sheep or … the laboratory as the unlikely space of attunement to animal emotions. GeoHumanities, 2, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2016.1167617
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C., & Holloway, L. (2008). Genetic technologies and the transformation of the geographies of UK livestock agriculture: A research agenda. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, N. (2022). Homemade pet celebrities: The everyday experience of micro-celebrity in promoting the self and others. Celebrity Studies, 14(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2022.2070714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NVivo. (2020). NVivo User guide. https://help-nv.qsrinternational.com/20/win/Content/projects-teamwork/saveand-copy-projects.htm
   Google Scholar
• Riley, M. (2011). ‘Letting them go’ – agricultural retirement and human–livestock relations. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 42(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, M. (2016a). How does longer term participation in agri-environment schemes [re] shape farmers’ environmental dispositions and identities? Land Use Policy, 52, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, M. (2016b). Still being the ‘Good Farmer’: (non-)retirement and the preservation of farming identities in older age. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, M., & Robertson, B. (2021). # farming365–exploring farmers’ social media use and the (re)presentation of farming lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, M., & Robertson, B. (2022). The virtual good farmer: Farmers’ use of social media and the (re) presentation of “good farming”. Sociologia Ruralis, 62(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. J. (2016). Police presentational strategies on X in Canada. Policing and Society, 26(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.922085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. (2014). Blogging situated emotions in human–horse relationships. Emotion, Space and Society, 13, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergi, V., & Bonneau, C. (2016). Making mundane work visible on social media: A CCO investigation of working out loud on X. Communication Research & Practice, 2(3), 378–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1217384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setten, G., & Brown, K. M.(2009). Moral landscapes. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 7, 191–195.
   Google Scholar
• Shifman, L.(2013). Memes in digital culture. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016) Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. Available at: https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M.(2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, J., Searle, A., & Adams, W. M. (2020). Quarantine encounters with digital animals: More-than-human geographies of lockdown life. Journal of Environmental Media, 1(Supplement 1), 6.1–6.10. https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00027_1
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wei, L. (2020). Fear and hope, bitter and sweet: Emotion sharing of cancer community on X. Social Media & Society, 6(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbur, A., & Gibbs, L. (2020). ‘Try it, it’s like chocolate’: Embodied methods reveal food politics. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(2), 265–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1489976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie, R. (2005). Sentient commodities and productive paradoxes: The ambiguous nature of human–livestock relations in Northeast Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood, R., & Evans, N. (2006). A lleyn sweep for local sheep? Breed societies and the geographies of Welsh livestock. Environment and Planning A, 38(7), 1307–26. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar