School buildings as performative machines: the new architectural devices of control

References

• Adams, E. (2022). Making sense of space: Mapping and materializing panoptic features in research with youth and teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1957156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, F., & Barrett, L. (2015). Clever classrooms: Summary report of the HEAD project. University of Salford.
   Google Scholar
• BDP. (2008). [School name]: Reserved matters design and access statement. Liverpool City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. (1995). The birth of the museum history, theory, politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., & Hyland, T. (1979). Open plan—Open education? British Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192790050202
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. State of Victoria Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, B. (2022). Building a Graphene City: Infrastructures of Technoscience in the Knowledge Economy [ Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, E. (2022). Intimate architectures: A cultural geography of doors. Social & Cultural Geography, 23(6), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2020.1821389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C. & Grosvenor, I. (2011). The hearing school: An exploration of sound and listening in the modern school. Paedagogica historica, 47(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.530273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C., & Könings, K. (2016). Recovering lost histories of educational design: A case study in contemporary participatory strategies. Oxford Review of Education, 42(6), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1232244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussert-Webb, K. (2004). The teacher’s testing panopticon. Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry & Reflective Practice, 18(3), 98–112.
   Google Scholar
• Cardellino, P., Leiringer, R., & Clements-Croome, D. (2009). Exploring the role of design quality in the building schools for the future programme. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(4), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2008.0086
   Google Scholar
• Casella, R. (2006). Selling us the fortress: The promotion of Techno-Security Equipment for Schools (1 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003416937
   Google Scholar
• Chiles, P. (2015). Building schools: Key issues for contemporary design. Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., Stables, A., Tse, H. M., & Cox, S. (2019). School design matters. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., Tse, H., Stables, A., & Cox, S. (2019). Design as a social practice: The experience of new-build schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1503643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Coninck-Smith, N. (2016). Making schools and thinking through materialities. Denmark 1890–1960. In K. Darain-Smith & J. Willis (Eds.), Designing schools. Space, place and pedagogy (pp. 113–131). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1990). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/778828.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972-1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2013). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi , Trans.) Bloomsbury Academic. Original work published 1988.
   Google Scholar
• den Besten, O., Horton, J., Adey, P., & Kraftl, P. (2011). Claiming events of school (re)design: Materialising the promise of building schools for the future. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.542480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek, M. (2000). Architecture of schools: The new learning environments (1st ed.). Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duobliene, L. (2018). Crossing or erasing territorial borders: Towards openness within the school space. In Benade & M. Jackson (Eds.), Transforming education: Design & governance in global contexts (pp. 169–181). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2020). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (M. Sheridan , Trans.) Penguin. Original work published 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2010). Are schools panoptic?. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4155
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. (2017). Experimenting with sound and silence: Sonorous bodies, sonic selves, acoustic topographies, and auditory histories of schooling. Paedagogica historica, 53(5), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2017.1335334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosvenor, I., & Rasmussen, L. R. (Eds.). (2018). Making education: Material school design and educational governance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Millard, E. (1994). The means of correct training? Teachers, Foucault and disciplining. Journal of Education for Teaching, 20(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747940200203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzberger, H. (2008). Space and learning. 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. L., Hubbard, P., Jöns, H., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2010). Geographies of education and the significance of children, youth and families. Progress in Human Geography, 34(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2000). Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology, 34(4), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000468
   Google Scholar
• Hope, A. (2010). Seductions of risk, social control, and resistance to school surveillance. In T. Monahan & R. Torres (Eds.), Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education (pp. 230–245). Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horne-Martin, S. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurdley, R. (2010). The power of corridors: Connecting doors, mobilising materials, plotting openness. The Sociological Review, 58(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01876.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. M. (2006). A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006eu354oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. J., Okely, A. D., Parrish, A. M. (2019). Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. Public Library of Science One, 14(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223607
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, C. (2015). Flexible space for learning. In P. Chiles (Ed.), Building schools: Key issues for contemporary design (pp. 70–90). Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P. (2006). Building an idea: The material construction of an ideal childhood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(4), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P. (2012). Utopian promise or burdensome responsibility? A critical analysis of the UK government’s building schools for the future policy. Antipode, 44 (3) , 847–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00921.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P. (2013). Geographies of alternative education: Diverse learning spaces for children and young people. Bristol University Press. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P., Andrews, W., Beech, S., Ceresa, G., Holloway, S. L., Johnson, V., & White, C. (2020). Geographies of education: A journey. Area, 54(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 264–280). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R., & Cardellino, P. (2011). Schools for the twenty-first century: School design and educational transformation. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 915–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.508512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Richardson, M. (2011). ‘Building schools for the future’: Reflections on a new social architecture. Journal of Education Policy, 26(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.513741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s `Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480697001002003
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, P. (2019). Molar and molecular mobilities: The politics of perceptible and imperceptible movements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818776976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, T., & Torres, R. D. (Eds.). (2010). Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, J. (2008). Foucault, space and primary school dining rooms. Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280802338114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn N. (2000). The National Grid for Learning: Panacea or Panopticon?. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/713655340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, H. (2015). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714536938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, L. (2010). The docile body in school space. In T. Monahan & R. D. Torres (Eds.), Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education (pp. 55–70). Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurðardóttir, A.K. and Hjartarson, T. (2018) ‘Design Features of Icelandic School Buildings: How Do They Reflect Changes in Educational Governance and Daily School Practice?’, in I. Grosvenor and L.R. Rasmussen (eds) Making Education: Material School Design and Educational Governance. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sobe, N. W. (2018). Boredom and classroom design: The affective economies of school engagement. In I. Grosvenor & L. R. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making education: Material school design and educational governance. (pp. 157–169). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2006). Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society, 35(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140600635755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafi-Prats, L. (2023). Mapping spatial practices and social distancing in smart schools: Sensory and digital ethnographic methods [ dataset]. MMU e-space. https://doi.org/10.23634/MMU.00631426
   Google Scholar
• Trafi-Prats, L., & de Freitas, E. (forthcoming). New possibilities for spatial research: Re-animating the built environment through speculative maps and models. Qualitative Inquiry, Special Issue: Creative Ecologies: Designing Sustainable Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2000). Exploring children and young people’s narratives of identity. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 31(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00047-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidler, A. (1978). Scenes from the street. In S. Anderson (Ed.), On streets (pp. 28–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2017). A School’s lived architecture: The politics and ethics of flexible learning spaces. [Doctoral Thesis] Education and Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2018). Selling new learning spaces: Flexibly anything for the twenty-first century. In L. Benade & M. Jackson (Eds.), Transforming education: Design & governance in global contexts (pp. 95–106). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980601094693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. (2010). The architectural as a type of connector. Perspecta: The Yale Architectural Journal, 42, 138–143. https://www.architecture.yale.edu/publications/67-perspecta-42
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. (2017). Five ways to make architecture political. An introduction to the politics of design practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar