References

• Altruda, J. (2022, August). BorderXer. Hipfish Monthly, 23(282), 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., & Hall, A. (2010). Border theatre: On the arts of security and resistance. Cultural Geographies, 17(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474010368604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (2009). The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader (A. Keating, Ed.). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauder, H. (2014). The Possibilities of Open and No Borders. Social Justice, 39(130), 76–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bey, M. (2022). Black trans feminism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, J. A. (2011). The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coka, D. (October 29, 2019). CAIN [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUbb1SsuyF4
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas, T. J. (2018). Post-borderlandia: Chicana literature and gender variant critique. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. Y. (2011). Abolition democracy: Beyond empire, prisons, and torture. Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figueroa Serrano, D., & Bernal Valdés, A. E. (2021). Metáforas animales. El perro como representación creativa de la experiencia interespecie. Tabula Rasa, 40(40), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n40.08
   Google Scholar
• Gill, N. (2020). Border abolition and how to achieve it. In D. Cooper, N. Dhawan, & J. Newman (Eds.), Reimagining the state: Theoretical challenges and transformative possibilities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. (2017). Abolition geography and the problem of innocence. In G. T. Johnson & A. Lubin (Eds.), Futures of black radicalism (pp. 225–240). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, C., Pezzani, L., & Stierl, M. (2019). Toward a politics of freedom of movement. In R. Jones (Ed.), Open Borders: In defense of free movement (pp. 51–76). University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (2001). On the Grounds of Globalization: A topography for feminist political engagement. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(4), 1213–1234. https://doi.org/10.1086/495653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N. (2016). No Borders: The politics of immigration control and resistance. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Landau-Donnelly, F. (2022). Politics of (dis)assembling – (re)moving borders across Europe. Cultural Geographies, 29(4), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740221076523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyd, J. M. (2019). Prison abolitionist perspectives on No Borders. In R. Jones (Ed.), Open Borders: In defense of free movement (pp. 89–109). University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, V. A., & Williams, J. (2013). Feminist geopolitics: Redefining the Geopolitical, complicating (In)security. Geography Compass, 7(8), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12054
   Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. (2006). Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., & Hyndman, J. (2006). Feminist approaches to the global intimate. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 34(1/2), 446–463.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N. A. (2010). Borderlands studies and border theory: Linking activism and scholarship for social justice: Borderlands studies and border theory. Sociology Compass, 4(7), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00290.x
   Google Scholar
• Newman, C. (Director). (2022, June 10). Arts! Live & Local June 10, 2022, Interview with Patricia Vázquez Gómez [Audio Recording]. KMUN. https://kmun.org/series/arts-live-local/
   Google Scholar
• Portland Community College. (n.d.). BorderXer by Patricia Vázquez Gómez. Portland Community College. Retrieved November 9, 2020, from https://www.pcc.edu/galleries/2019/09/13/borderxer-by-patricia-vazquez-gomez/
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, A., & Kaufman, M. (2011). Sovereignty, Indigeneity, territory: Zapatista Autonomy and the new practices of decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 110(2), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1162561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, A. (2020). Against borders: Why the world needs free movement of people. Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Sheren, I. N. (2015). Portable borders: Performance art and politics on the U.S. Frontera since 1984. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, V. (2014). Desert ‘trash’: Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics. Political Geography, 39, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. (2008). ‘Trash-talk’ and the production of quotidian geopolitical boundaries in the USA-Mexico borderlands. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(8), 871–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802441424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szary, A.-L. A. (2012). Walls and border art: The politics of art display. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.687216
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H., Kramsch, O., & Zierhofer, W. (2005). Prologue: B/ordering space. In H. V. H. In, O. Kramsch, & W. Zierhofer (Eds.), B/ordering space (pp. 1–16). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez Gómez, P. (Director) (2019). BorderXer [Film].
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez Gómez, P. (2019, November 2). Interview with BorderXer Artist and Curator Patricia Vázquez Gómez ( K. Cohlmia, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://www.artdiscourse.net/borderxer/
   Google Scholar
• Walia, H. (2013). Undoing border imperialism. AK Press/Institute for Anarchist Studies.
   Google Scholar