References

• Abbott, C. (2007). Cyberpunk cities: Science fiction meets urban theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07305795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004). Collective feelings: Or, the impressions left by others. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(2), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404042133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., & Schneider, C. J. (2013). Ethnographic content analysis. In Qualitative Media Analysis (pp. 22–37). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452270043
   Google Scholar
• Antona, L. (2019). Making hidden spaces visible: Using drawing as a method to illuminate new geographies. Area, 51(4), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areschoug, S. (2019). Rural failures: Representations of (Im)mobile young masculinities and place in the Swedish Countryside. Boyhood Studies, 12(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.3167/bhs.2019.120106
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandlien, B. (2023). Tore Hund in Store norske lexikon[Large Norwegian lexicon]. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from. https://snl.no/Tore_Hund
   Google Scholar
• Baron, A. (2006). Masculinity, the embodied male worker, and the historian’s gaze. International Labor and Working-Class History, 69(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547906000081
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, T., Goods, C., & Veen, A. (2020). ‘I’m my own boss … ’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy. Environment and Planning A 52(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x20914346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2021). The role of customers in the gig economy: How perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services. Service Business, 15(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00432-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brice, S. (2018). Situating skill: Contemporary observational drawing as a spatial method in geographical research. Cultural Geographies, 25(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017702513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12134
   Google Scholar
• Buccitelli, A. B. (2019). Folklore and oral cultures. In SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036775726
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. (2024). Relational spaces of digital labor. In J. Glückler & R. Panitz (Eds.), Knowledge and Digital Technology (pp. 185–200). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39101-9_10
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M., & Lambros, F. (2021). The public and their platforms: public sociology in an era of social media Public sociology. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529201062
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, B., & Craig, L. (2019). Gender in the gig economy: Men and women using digital platforms to secure work in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 55(4), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319894060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Wood, J. (2005). Globalization and business masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 7(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260969
   Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Diamond, R., Hall, J. V., List, J. A., & Oyer, P. (2021). The gender earnings gap in the gig economy: Evidence from over a million rideshare drivers. Review of Economic Studies, 88(5), 2210–2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham, M. D. (2017). Caring moments and their men: Masculine emotion practice in nursing. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 12(3–4), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2017.1312954
   Google Scholar
• Drozdzweski, D. (2024). Mobile Mapping [video]. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529696295
   Google Scholar
• Drozdzweski, D., Sumartojo, S., & Waterton, E. (Eds.). (2021). Geographies of commenoration in a digital world. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Floros, K. (2024). Imperfect presents, uncertain future: Platform housecleaners in the danish gig economy. IT University of Copenhagen https://pure.itu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/105389367/Phd_Thesis_Final_version_Konstantinos_Flores.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Floros, K., & Bak Jørgensen, M. (2023). Danish is never a requirement for these jobs: Platform Housecleaning in Denmark through a Migration Lens. Glocalism, 2023, (3), 1. https://doi.org/10.12893/gjcpi.2022.3.5
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Z., Bennett, K., & De Sabbata, S. (2023). Virtual reality, place and affect. In T. Osborne & P. Jones (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Digital Geographies (pp. 69–82). Elgar Research Agendas.
   Google Scholar
• Gauffin, K., & Lyytinen, E. (2017). Working for integration: A comparative analysis of policies impacting labour market access among young immigrants and refugees in the Nordic countries: CAGE POLICY REPORT (1; CAGE POLICY REPORT). Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS) Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet.
   Google Scholar
• Gebrial, D. (2024). Racial platform capitalism: Empire, migration and the making of Uber in London. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1170–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221115439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L., Mellström, U., Shefer, T. (Eds.). (2020). Introduction: Mapping the field of masculinity studies. In Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies. Routledge (pp. 1–16).
   Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L., & Reeser, T. W. (2017). Introduction: Complicating the emotions of men and masculinities. NORMA, 12(3–4), 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2017.1378850
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2010). Encoding—Decoding (1980). In C. Greer (Ed.), Crime and media. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hänninen, S. (2019). The Nordic wWelfare State and the Challenge of dDifference. In S. Hänninen, K. Lehtelä, & P. Saikkonen (Eds.), The Relational Nordic Welfare State between Utopia and Ideology. Edward Elgar Publishing (pp. 29–49). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974653.00009
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Manifestly Haraway. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816650477.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. (2019). Geography’s creative (re)turn: Toward a critical framework. Progress in Human Geography, 43(6), 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518804341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. (2021). Geography, art, research: Artistic research in the geohumanities (p. 266). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367800000
   Google Scholar
• Healy, J., Pekarek, A., & Vromen, A. (2020). Sceptics or supporters? consumers’ views of work in the gig economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2017). Introduction. In A. Davisson & A. Hess (Eds.), Theorizing Digital Rhetoric (1st ed., p. 1–15). Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315203645-1
   Google Scholar
• Hincks, A. (2017). Fluidity in a Digital World: Choice, communities, and public values. In A. Hess, Davisson, A. (Ed.), Theorizing Digital Rhetoric (pp. 98–111). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, L., Blank, G., & Quan-Haase, A. (2020). The winners and the losers of the platform economy: Who participates? Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1720771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurdley, R. (2020). Drawing as a research method. In SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036838861
   Google Scholar
• Ilsøe, A., Larsen, T. P., Bach, E. S., Rasmussen, S., Kongshøj Madsen, P., Berglund, T., Hedenus, A., Håkansson, K., Isidorsson, T., Nätti, J., Ojala, S., Saari, T., Jonker-Hoffrén, P., Pyöriä, P., Nergaard, K., Olafsdottir, K., Stefansson, K., & Einarsdottir, A. (2021). Non-standard work in the Nordics -troubled waters under the still surface. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/temanord2021-503
   Google Scholar
• Ilsøe, A., & Söderqvist, C. F. (2023). Will there be a Nordic model in the platform economy? Evasive and integrative platform strategies in Denmark and Sweden. Regulation & Governance, 17(3), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., & Osborne, T. (2023). Conclusion: Toward a research agenda for digital geographies. In T. Osborne & P. Jones (Eds.), A research agenda for digital geographies (pp. 225–230). Elgar Research Agendas.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkey, M., Perrons, D., Plomien, A., Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Ramirez, H. (2013). Migrants and male domestic work in the uk: the rise of the ‘Polish handyman. In M. Kilkey, D. Perrons, A. Plomien, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & H. Ramirez (Eds.), Gender, migration and domestic work: masculinities, male labour and Fathering in the UK and USA (pp. 65–93). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303936_4
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (2012). Manhood in America: A cultural history. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. (2014). The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513506270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/Space: Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, H. (2022). Women’s solidarity, communicative space, the gig economy’s social reproduction and labour process: The case of female platform drivers in China. Critical Sociology, 48(7–8), 1221–1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221101451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leer, J. (2019). New Nordic men: Cooking, masculinity and nordicness in rené redzepi’s noma and claus meyer’s almanak. Food, Culture & Society, 22(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2019.1582250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A., & Elwood, S. (2022). Glitch epistemologies for computational cities. Dialogues in Human Geography, 12(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206221075714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A., & Kong, V. (2022). Gentrification and the an/aesthetics of digital spatial capital in Canadian “platform cities”. Canadian Geographies/Géographies Canadiennes, 66(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12726
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. J., & Hildebrandt, K. (2019). Storytelling as qualitative research. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036754858
   Google Scholar
• Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (2020). Looking for work: Youth, masculine disadvantage and precarious employment in post-millennium England. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(8), 974–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1645949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, J., Maalsen, S., & Grech, A. (2017). Beyond the binaries: Geographies of gender-technology relations. In B. Warf (Ed.), Handbook on geographies of technology (pp. 36–49). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785361166.00008
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, S., Sumartojo, S., Closs Stephens, A., & Coward, M. (2020). Togetherness after terror: The more or less digital commemorative public atmospheres of the Manchester arena bombing’s first anniversary. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(3), 546–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819901146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montserrat Degen, M., & Rose, G. (2022). The new urban aesthetic: Digital experiences of urban change. Bloomsbury Visual Arts. London.
   Google Scholar
• Newlands, G. (2024). ‘This isn’t forever for me’: Perceived employability and migrant gig work in Norway and Sweden. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 56(4), 1262–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221083021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordvall, B. (2021). Down the rabbit hole: hololive myth, community, and digital geographies [ Independent/Masters thesis Advanced level]. Stockholm University. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-193836
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022). Skills and labour market integration of immigrants and their children in norway, working together for integration. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oppegaard, S. M. N. (2021). Regulating flexibility: Uber’s platform as a technological work arrangement. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.122197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2023). The digital undertow and institutional displacement: A sociomaterial approach. Organization Theory, 4(2), 26317877231180898. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231180898
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., & Jones, P. (2023). Introduction to a research agenda for digital geographies. In T. Osborne & P. Jones (Eds.), A research agenda for digital geographies (pp. 1–18). Elgar Research Agendas.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes La Bond, C. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 2053951717700924. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717700924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2016). Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ through digital technologies: Interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515580493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, L. (2020). Glitch feminism: A manifesto. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at Work: The Experiences of Men in Female Dominated Occupations. Work, Employment and Society 18(2), 249–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500172004042773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedsvik, B., Iacono, R., & D’Agostino, A. (2022). Immigration and social assistance: Evidence from the Norwegian welfare state. Social Policy & Administration, 56(4), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugg, K. (2015). The walking dead: Late liberalism and masculine subjection in apocalypse fictions. Journal of American Studies, 49(4), 793–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875815001723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S. (2023). Concepts for robot geographies. In T. Osborne & P. Jones (Eds.), A research agenda for digital geographies (pp. 41–52). Elgar Research Agendas.Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N., Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2023). Migration and migrant labour in the gig economy: An Intervention. Work, Employment and Society, 37(4), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221096581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N., & Vijay, D. (2024). Gig work as migrant work: The platformization of migration infrastructure. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211065049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, N. (2012). Mobile screens: The visual regime of navigation. Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B. (2017). Introduction: Geography, technology, society. In B. Warf (Ed.), Handbook on Geographies of Technology (pp. 1–14). Edgar Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, N. A., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Centering social-technical relations in studying platform urbanism: Intersectionality for just futures in European cities. Urban Transformations, 3(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00027-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster, N. A., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Intersectional understandings of the role and meaning of platform-mediated work in the pandemic Swedish welfare state. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100025
   Google Scholar
• Webster, N. A., Zhang, Q., Butler, O., Dissing Christensen, M., Duus, K., Floros, K., Kusk, K., & Roelofsen, M. (2023). Digital mediations and spatialities of platform based work: A roundtable reflection. In Kulturgeografiskt Seminarium 2023:1. Stockholm University, Department of Human Geography. Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1813283/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The gig economy: A critical introduction. Polity Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, O. (2021). Feminist geographies of online gaming. Digital Geography and Society, 2, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100015
   Google Scholar
• Worth, S. E. (2008). Storytelling and narrative knowing: An Examination of the epistemic benefits of well-told stories. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 42(3), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/25160289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. (2023). Disruptive spacemaking and extended reality. In T. Osborne & P. Jones (Eds.), A research agenda for digital geographies (pp. 187–198). Elgar Research Agendas.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Li, Z., & Liu, K. (2019). Labor control in the gig economy: Evidence from uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619854472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar