The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey

References

• Alkire S 2002 Valuing Freedoms. Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction New York Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Basu K Lopez‐Calva L ‘Functionings and capabilities’ forthcoming in K. Arrow, A. Sen and K. Suzumura (Eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare volume 2,, Elsevier Science, North Holland
   Google Scholar
• Brandolini A D'Alessio G ‘Measuring well‐being in the functioning space’, unpublished paper, 1998 Roma Banca d'Italia
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse H ‘Primary goods, capabilities, and the problem of the public criterion of justice’, paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2–5 September 2004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen GA ‘Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilities’ 1993 The Quality of Life Oxford Clarendon Press
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N 1999 Profit over People. Neoliberalism and Global Order New York Seven Stories Press
   Google Scholar
• Crocker D ‘Deliberating global development: ethics, capability and democracy’, unpublished book manuscript, University of Maryland 2004
   Google Scholar
• Deneulin , S and Stewart , F . 2002 . ‘Amartya Sen's contribution to development thinking’ . Studies in Comparative International Development , 37 (2) : 61 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Drèze J Sen A 2002 India: Development and Participation Oxford Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin , R . 1981 . ‘What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources’ . Philosophy and Public Affairs , 10 : 283 – 245 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin R 2000 Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality Cambridge Mass Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda‐Parr , S . 2003 . ‘The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen's ideas on capabilities’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 301 – 317 .
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda‐Parr S Shiva Kumar AK 2003 Readings in Human Development Delhi Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Gasper D 2004 The Ethics of Development Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press
   Google Scholar
• Gasper , D and van Staveren , I . 2003 . ‘Development as freedom — and as what else?’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 137 – 161 .
   Google Scholar
• Gore , Ch . 1997 . ‘Irreducible social goods and the informational basis of Amartya Sen's capability approach’ . Journal of International Development , 9 (2) : 235 – 250 .
   Google Scholar
• Hill , M . 2003 . ‘Development as empowerment’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 117 – 135 .
   Google Scholar
• Iversen , V . 2003 . ‘Intra‐household inequality: a challenge for the capability approach?’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 93 – 115 .
   Google Scholar
• Koggel , Ch . 2003 . ‘Globalization and women's paid work: expanding freedom?’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 163 – 183 .
   Google Scholar
• Kuklys W Robeyns I ‘Sen's capability approach to welfare economics’ 2004 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 0415, Cambridge University Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka W 2002 Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction 2nd edition Oxford Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kynch , J and Sen , A . 1983 . ‘Indian women: well‐being and survival’ . Cambridge Journal of Economics , 7 : 363 – 380 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon , N . 2002 . ‘Universalism without foundations?’ . Economy and Society , 31 (1) : 152 – 169 .
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M ‘Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution’ 1988 Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume pp., 145–184
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum , M . 1992 . ‘Human functioning and social justice. In defense of Aristotelian essentialism’ . Political Theory , 20 (2) : 202 – 246 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M ‘Human capabilities, female human beings’ 1995 in M. Nussbaum and J. Glover (Eds.), Women, Culture and Development Oxford Clarendon Press
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum , M . 1998 . ‘Public philosophy and international feminism’ . Ethics , 108 : 762 – 796 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M ‘The feminist critique of liberalism’, in her Sex and Social Justice 1999 55 80 New York, pp. 55–80 Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M 2000 Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach Cambridge Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum , M . 2003a . ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 33 – 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M Interview. Ethique économique/Ethics and Economics, 1(1), on‐line journal 2003b http://mapage.noos.fr/Ethique‐economique/html_version/Nussbauminterview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum , M . 2004 . ‘Beyond the social contract: capabilities and global justice’ . Oxford Development Studies , 32 (1) : 3 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M forthcoming Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
   Google Scholar
• Olsaretti S ‘Endorsement and freedom in Amartya Sen's capability approach’ forthcoming Economics and Philosophy
   Google Scholar
• Pettit , Ph . 2001 . ‘Capability and freedom: a defense of Sen’ . Economics and Philosophy , 17 : 1 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge T ‘Can the capability approach be justified? 2002 ’ Philosophical Topics 30 (2) 167 228
   Google Scholar
• Qizilbash , M . 2002 . ‘Development, common foes and shared values’ . Review of Political Economy , 14 (4) : 463 – 480 .
   Google Scholar
• Rawls J 1971 A Theory of Justice Cambridge Mass Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rawls J ‘Social unity and primary goods’ 1982 in A. Sen and B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond 159 186 Cambridge Cambridge University Press pp. 159–186
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns I ‘An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen's capability approach re‐examined’ 2000 CES discussion paper 00.30 Katholleke Universiteit, Leuven
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns , I . 2003a . ‘Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities’ . Feminist Economics , 9(2/3) : 61 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns I ‘The capability approach: an interdisciplinary introduction’, teaching material for the training course preceding the 3rd International Conference on the capability approach, Pavia, September 2003b
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns I ‘Assessing global poverty and inequality: income, resources, and capabilities’ 2005 Metaphilosophy 36 (1/2) forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Roemer J 1996 Theories of Distributive Justice Cambridge Mass Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Saith R ‘Capabilities: the concept and its operationalisation’ 2001 Queen Elizabeth House Working Paper 66 Oxford Oxford University
   Google Scholar
• Sen , A . 1979 . ‘Personal utilities and public judgements: or what's wrong with welfare economics?’ . The Economic Journal , 89 : 537 – 558 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘Equality of what?’ 1980 The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Utah Salt Lake City
   Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘Rights and capabilities’ 1984 in Resources, Values and Development, Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
   Google Scholar
• Sen A 1985a Commodities and Capabilities Amsterdam North Holland
   Google Scholar
• Sen , A . 1985b . ‘Well‐being, agency and freedom’ . The Journal of Philosophy , LXXXII (4) : 169 – 221 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘The standard of living’ 1987 in G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The Standard of Living Cambridge Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘The concept of development’ 1988 in H. Chenery and T.N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics Amsterdam Elsevier Science Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘Gender and cooperative conflicts’ 1990a in I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent Inequalities New York Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Sen , A . 1990b . ‘Justice: means versus freedoms’ . Philosophy and Public Affairs , 19 : 111 – 121 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A 1992 Inequality Re‐examined Oxford Clarendon Press
   Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘Capability and well‐being’ 1993 in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life Oxford Clarendon Press
   Google Scholar
• Sen A ‘Gender inequality and theories of justice’ 1995 in M. Nussbaum and J. Glover (Eds.), Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities Oxford Clarendon Press
   Google Scholar
• Sen A 1999a Development as Freedom New York Knopf
   Google Scholar
• Sen A 1999b Reason before Identity Oxford Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Sen A 2002a Rationality and Freedom Cambridge Mass Harvard University
   Google Scholar
• Sen , A . 2002b . ‘Response to commentaries’ . Studies in Comparative International Development , 37 (2) : 78 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen , A . 2004a . ‘Elements of a theory of human rights’ . Philosophy & Public Affairs , 32 (4) : 315 – 356 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen , A . 2004b . ‘Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation’ . Feminist Economics , 10 (3) : 77 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart , F . 1995 . ‘Basic needs, capabilities and human development’ . Greek Economic Review , 17 (2) : 83 – 96 .
   Google Scholar
• Stewart F ‘Groups and capabilities’ paper presented at the 4th International Capability Conference, Pavia, 5–7 September 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sugden , R . 1993 . ‘Welfare, resources, and capabilities: a review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen’ . Journal of Economic Literature , 31 : 1947 – 1962 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift A 2001 Political Philosophy: A Beginner's Guide for Students and Politicians Cambridge Polity Press
   Google Scholar
• UNDP 2004 Human Development Report Oxford Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Williams , A . 2002 . ‘Dworkin on capability’ . Ethics , 113 : 23 – 39 .
   Google Scholar