The Ukraine Crisis as a Conflict over Europe’s Political, Economic and Security Order

References

• Allison, R. 2016. Security policy, geopolitics and international order in EU-Russia relations during the Ukraine Crisis, in: Avoiding a New ‘Cold War’: the Future of EU-Russia Relations in the Context of the Ukraine Crisis (Dahrendorf Forum and London School of Economics, Special Report SR020). Accessed February 21, 2017. http://www.lse.ac.uk/IDEAS/publications/reports/pdf/LSE-IDEAS-Avoiding-a-New-Cold-War.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Averre, D. 2009. Competing rationalities: Russia, the EU and the “Shared Neighbourhood”. Europe-Asia Studies 61 (10):1689–713. doi:10.1080/09668130903278918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. M. 2004. President of the European commission: ‘The European Union and the Emerging World Order – Perceptions and Strategies’, Speech held at the 7th ECSA (European Community Studies Association) World Conference, Brussels, November 30.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskotter, F. 2007. Thinking about power. In Power in world politics, eds. F. Berenskotter and M. J. Williams. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, S. 2016. Leading from behind? The Obama Administration’s failed European policy. In Key actors in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Competing perspectives on geostrategic tensions. FIIA Report 47, eds. K. Raik and S. Saari, 71–88. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• De France, O., and N. Witney. 2013. Europe’s Strategic Cacophony, ECFR Policy Brief. Accessed February 21, 2017. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR77_SECURITY_BRIEF_AW.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. 1997. Geopolitics and change. In New thinking in international relations theory, eds. M. W. Doyle and G. J. Ikenberry. Colorado & Oxford: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. 2005. Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering “Normative Power Europe”. Millennium 33 (3):613–36. doi:10.1177/03058298050330031701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragneva, R., and K. Wolczuk. 2014. The EU-Ukraine association agreement and the challenges of inter-regionalism. Review of Central and East European Law 39:213–44. doi:10.1163/15730352-00000019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. Wider Europe — Neighbourhood: A new framework for relations with our eastern and southern neighbours. Accessed February 21, 2017. http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2016. Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Accessed February 21, 2017. https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/global-strategy-foreign-and-security-policy-european-union.
   Google Scholar
• Glazyev, S. 2015. Russia and the Eurasian Union. In Eurasian Integration – The View from Within, eds. P. Dutkiewicz and R. Sakwa, 84–96. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. 2016. The Obama doctrine. The Atlantic. Accessed February 21, 2017. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. 2012. Which geopolitics? In The return of geopolitics in Europe? Social mechanisms and foreign policy identity crises, ed. S. Guzzini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haukkala, H. 2010. The EU-Russia strategic partnership: The limits of post-sovereignty in international relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haverluk, T., K. Beauchemin, and A. Mueller. 2004. The three critical flaws of critical geopolitics: Towards a neo-classical geopolitics. Geopolitics 19 (1):19–39. doi:10.1080/14650045.2013.803192.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A. 2008. A ‘tragic’ actor? A realist perspective on ‘ethical power Europe. International Affairs 84 (1):29–44. doi:10.1111/inta.2008.84.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2014. The illusion of geopolitics. Foreign Affairs 93 (3):80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., and J. S. Nye. 1977. Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I., and M. Leonard. 2015. Europe’s shattered dream of order. Foreign Affairs 94 (3):48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropatcheva, E. 2016. Russia and the Collective security treaty organisation: Multilateral policy or unilateral ambitions? Europe-Asia Studies 68 (9):1526–52. doi:10.1080/09668136.2016.1238878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2007. Geopolitics reframed: Security and identity in Europe’s eastern enlargement. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2004. EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4):680–700. doi:10.1080/1350176042000248098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, M. 2008. Russia and the EU: Strategic partners or strategic rivals? Journal of Common Market Studies 46:7–27. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00808.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liik, K. 2014. Introduction: Russia’s pivot to (Eur)Asia. In Russia’s “Pivot” to Eurasia, ed. K. Liik. London: European Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed August 3, 2017. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR103_RUSSIA_COLLECTION_290514_AW.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Lo, B. 2009. Medvedev and the new European security architecture, Policy Brief. London: Centre for European Reform. Accessed August 3, 2017. http://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/pbrief_medvedev_july09-741.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Makarychev, A. 2014. Russia and the EU in a Multipolar World: Discourses, Identities, Norms. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Makarychev, A. 2016. Russia’s neighbourhood policy: Conflictual contexts and factors of change. In Key Actors in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Competing perspectives on geostrategic tensions. FIIA Report 47, eds. K. Raik and S. Saari, 37–50. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mankoff, J. 2011. Russian foreign policy: The return of great power politics, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, W. R. 2014. The return of geopolitics: The revenge of the revisionist powers. Foreign Affairs 93(3): 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Tuathail, G. 1996. Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, N. 2010. EU Foreign Policy and Post-Soviet Conflicts: Stealth Intervention. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, N., and A. Wilson. 2009. The limits of enlargement-lite: European and Russian power in the troubled neighbourhood. London: European Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed February 2, 2016. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR14_The_Limits_of_Enlargement-Lite._European_and_Russian_Power_in_the_Troubled_Neighbourhood.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rácz, A., and A. Moshes. 2014. Not another Transnistria: How sustainable is separatism in Eastern Ukraine? FIIA Analysis 4. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Raik, K. 2012. The EU and mass protests in the neighbourhood: Models of Normative (In) action. European Foreign Affairs Review 17 (4):553–75.
   Google Scholar
• Raik, K., N. Helwig, and T. Iso-Markku. 2015. Crafting the EU global strategy: Building blocks for a stronger Europe, Briefing Paper 188. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Raik, K., and S. Saari. 2016. Introduction. In Key Actors in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Competing perspectives on geostrategic tensions. FIIA Report 47, eds. K. Raik and S. Saari, 13–34. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Raik, K., and T. Tamminen. 2014. Inclusive and exclusive differentiation: Enlargement and the European neighbourhood policy. In Multi-speed Europe? Differentiated integration in the external relations of the European Union, FIIA Report 38, ed. J. Jokela, 45–62. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, S. 2010. Promoting democracy and human rights in Russia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2015. Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholvin, S., 2016. Geopolitics: An overview of concepts and empirical examples from international relations, FIIA Working Paper 91. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. E. 2011. A liberal grand strategy in a realist world? Power, Purpose and the EU’s Changing Global Role. Journal of European Public Policy 18:144–63. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.544487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, S., 2009. Russia and the Eastern Partnership: Loud criticism, quiet interest in cooperation, SWP Comments 2009/C 07. Accessed February 21, 2017. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2009C07_stw_ks.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sushko, O. 2016. Ukraine’s new strategic determination. In Key Actors in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Competing perspectives on geostrategic tensions. FIIA Report 47, eds. K. Raik and S. Saari, 121–32. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Svarin, D. 2016. The construction of ‘geopolitical spaces’ In Russian foreign policy discourse before and after the Ukraine crisis. Journal of Eurasian Studies 7:129–40. doi:10.1016/j.euras.2015.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. 2010. Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the world, 1972–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toje, A. 2011. The European Union as a small power. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1):43–60. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02128.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Togt, T., Montesano, F. S. and Kozak, I.. 2015. From competition to compatibility: Striking a Eurasian balance in EU-Russia relations. Clingendael Report. Clingendael Report. Accessed February 21, 2017. http://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/Eurasian_Union_Report_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vimont, P. 2015. The path to an upgraded EU foreign policy, Policy Outlook, Carnegie Europe. http://carnegieeurope.eu/2015/06/30/path-to-upgraded-eu-foreign-policy/ib7p. Accessed February 21, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Wolczuk, K. 2011. Perceptions of, and attitudes towards, the Eastern partnership amongst the partner countries’ political elites. Eastern Partnership Review (5). Retrieved December 8, 2017 https://eceap.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/5_Review_No51.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., ed.. 2010. The European Union and democracy promotion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. 2015. The European Union: Inclusion as geopolitics. In Geopolitics and democracy in the Middle East, ed. K. Kausch. Madrid: FRIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. 2017. Europe’s Eastern Crisis: The geopolitics of asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. 2011. The EU as an international actor: Unique or ordinary? European Foreign Affairs Review 16 (3):281–301.
   Google Scholar