Geopolitics of Border Securitization: Sovereignty, Nationalism and Solidarity in Asylum Reception in Finland

References

• Ackleson, J. 2005. Constructing security on the US-Mexico border. Political Geography 24 (2):165–84. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2005. Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2):437–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2004. Collective feelings. Or, the impressions left by others. Theory, Culture and Society 21 (2):25–42. doi:10.1177/0263276404042133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, D., and M. Sandberg. 2012. Introduction. In The border multiple: the practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in a RE-scaling Europe, eds. D. Andersen, M. Klatt, and M. Sandberg, 1–23. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D., O. Kramsch, and M. Sandberg. 2015. Inverting the telescope on borders that matter: Conversations in Café Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (4):459–76. doi:10.1080/14782804.2015.1068164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2005. The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations 11 (2):171–201. doi:10.1177/1354066105052960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L., D. Campbell, S. Elden, S. Graham, A. Jeffrey, and A. Williams. 2007. Performing security: The imaginative geographies of current US strategy. Political Geography 26 (4):405–22. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. 2001. The Möbius ribbon of internal and external security(ies). In Identities, borders, orders: Rethinking international relations theory, ed. A. Mathias, 91–117. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2010. Walled states, waning sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2017. Border barriers as sovereign swords: Rethinking Ealled States in light of the EU migrant and fiscal crises. Political Geography 59:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publichers.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 1992. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casas-Cortes, M., S. Cobarrubias, and J. Pickles. 2016. ‘Good neighbours make good fences’: Seahorse operations, border externalization and extra-territoriality. European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (3):231–51. doi:10.1177/0969776414541136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. 2009. What counts as the politics and practice of security, and where? Devolution and immigrant insecurity after 9/11. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99 (5):904–13. doi:10.1080/00045600903245888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COM. 2016. Temporary reintroduction of border control. European Commissions Migration and Home Affairs. Accessed October 25, 2017 ps://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/reintroduction-border-control_en
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. 2007. States of exception on the Mexico–U.S. Border: Security, “Decisions,” and civilian border patrols. International Political Sociology 1 (2):113–37. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00008.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2018. Notifications of the temporary reintroduction of border control. European Commission: Migration and Home Affairs. Accesses August 7, 2018 https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/reintroduction-border-control/docs/ms_notifications_-_reintroduction_of_border_control_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EMN. 2016. European Migration Network. Key figures on immigration 2015. Published by European Migration Network & Finnish Immigration Service, Finland. Accessed October 25, 2017 http://www.emn.fi/files/1361/EMN_maahanmuuton_tunnusl_2015_EN_tumma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Patheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, eds. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 119–50. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• FRC. 2017. Finnish refugee council. Pakolaisuus Suomessa. Accessed October 24, 2017 http://pakolaisapu.fi/pakolaisuus/pakolaisuus-suomessa/
   Google Scholar
• Fregonese, S. 2012a. Urban geopolitics 8 years on. Hybrid sovereignties, the everyday, and geographies of peace. Geography Compass 6 (5):290–303. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00485.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fregonese, S. 2012b. Beyond the ‘weak state’: Hybrid sovereignties in Beirut. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (4):655–74. doi:10.1068/d11410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkli, J. 2005. Who is the Finn?: Globalization and identity in Finland. Journal of Finnish Studies 9 (2):12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Harle, V., and S. Moisio. 2000. Missä on Suomi?: Kansallisen identiteettipolitiikan historia ja geopolitiikka. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2000. The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (5):751–77. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2010. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2012. Border walls: Security and the war on terror in the United States, India, and Israel. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and C. Johnson. 2017. Corridors, camps, and spaces of confinement. In Interventions on the state of sovereignty at the border. Political Geography 59:1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M., and J. Agnew. 2008. Theorizing the state geographically: Sovereignty, subjectivity, territoriality. In The Sage handbook of political geography, eds. K. Cox, M. Low, and J. Robinson, 95–106. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, M. 2018. The politics of borders: Sovereignty, security, and the citizen after 9/11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2013. Sovereignty. In The Ashgate Companion to Critical Geopolitics, eds. K. Dodds, M. Kuus, and J. Sharp, 109-128. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and N. Rose. 2008. Governing the present. Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review 47 (1):74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2013. Reconfiguring geographies of sovereignty. Progress in Human Geography 37 (6):829–41. doi:10.1177/0309132513479076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2008. Reconsidering the concept of discourse for the field of critical geopolitics: Towards discourse as language and practice. Political Geography 28:330. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Orpo, P. (2015). “Petteri Orpo: Vastaanottokeskuksia voi tulla myös vastahakoisiin kuntiin”. Piia Elonen Helsingin Sanomat, September 2. https://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/art-2000002849386.html
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2016. Dancing on the graves: Independence, hot/banal nationalism and the mobilization of memory. Political Geography 54:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascucci, E., K. P. Kallio, and J. Häkli. 2019. “Delay and neglect”: The everyday geopolitics of humanitarian borders. In Borderless worlds for whom? Ethics, moralities and mobilities, eds. A. Paasi, E.-K. Prokkola, J. Saarinen, and K. Zimmerbauer, 93–107. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, D. 1995. Sovereignty: An Introduction and brief history. Journal of International Affairs 48 (2):353–68.
   Google Scholar
• Prokkola, E.-K. 2013a. Neoliberalizing border management in Finland and in Schengen. Antipode 45 (5):1318–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokkola, E.-K. 2013b. Technologies of border management: Performances and calculation of Finnish/Schengen border security. Geopolitics 13 (1):77–94. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.685791.
   Google Scholar
• Prokkola, E.-K. 2019. Asylum reception and the politicization of national identity in Finland: A gender perspective. In Borderless worlds for whom? Ethics, moralities and mobilities, eds. A. Paasi, E.-K. Prokkola, J. Saarinen, and K. Zimmerbauer, 108–19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, A., H. Raisio, E. Kokki, and J. Luhta. 2017. Kansalaismielipide: Turvapaikanhakijat ja turvapaikkapolitiikka. Sisäministeriön julkaisu 9/2017. Available at. accesses October 25, 2017 http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79477/09_2017_Kansalaismielipide%20Turvapaikanhakijat%20ja%20turvapaikkapolitiikka.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rumford, C. 2008. Citizens and borderwork in Europe. Space and Polity 12 (1):1–12. doi:10.1080/13562570801969333.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 1997/1922. Poliittinen teologia/Politische Theologie, 86. . Hamina: Researcher Association publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, A. 2015. The affective atmospheres of nationalism. Cultural Geographies 23 (2):181–98. doi:10.1177/1474474015569994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritzel, H. 2007. Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond. European Journal of International Relations 13 (3):357–83. doi:10.1177/1354066107080128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfahuney, M. 1998. Mobility, racism and geopolitics. Political Geography 17 (5):499–515. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00022-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baar, H. 2017. Evictability and the biopolitical bordering of Europe. Antipode 49 (1):212–30. doi:10.1111/anti.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houtum, H., and R. Pijpers. 2007. The European union as a gated community: The two-faced border and immigration regime of the EU. Antipode 39 (2):291–309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00522.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneswaran, C. 2013. Territory, migration and the evolution of the international system. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar