411
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Defined by the Flood: Alarmism and the Legal Thresholds of US Political Asylum

References

  • Agamben, G. 2005. State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ahmed, S. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
  • Aleinikoff, A. 2003. Protected Characteristics and Social Perceptions: An Analysis of the Meaning of 'Membership of a Particular Social Group', June 2003. Available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/470a33b30.html.
  • Andrioff, J. L. 1985. Proving the existence of persecution in asylum and withholding claims. Chicago Kent Law Review 62 (1):107–35.
  • Best, J. 2005. The limits of transparency: Ambiguity and the history of international finance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Bhabha, J. 1996. Embodied rights: Gender persecution, state sovereignty, and refugees. Public Culture 9 (1):3–32. doi:10.1215/08992363-9-1-3.
  • Bookey, B. 2006. Evolving standards and fair application of the law. Southwestern Journal of International Law 22:1–19.
  • Boyce, G. 2017. The border’s temporal reach and US immigration enforcement under Donald J. Trump. Society & Space. Accessed November 11, 2018. http://societyandspace.org/2017/07/04/the-borders-temporal-reach-and-us-immigration-enforcement-under-donald-j-trump/.
  • Braverman, I., N. Blomley, D. Delaney, and A. Kedar, eds. 2015. The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
  • Brickell, K., and D. Cuomo. 2017. Feminist geolegality. Progress in Human Geography 43 (1):104–122. doi:10.1177/0309132517735706.
  • Burridge, A., N. Gill, A. Kocher, and L. Martin. 2017. Polymorphic borders. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (3):239–51. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1297253.
  • Cadman, D. Asylum law is not intended for domestic violence. CIS.Org. Accessed June 6, 2018. https://cis.org/Cadman/Asylum-Law-Not-Intended-Domestic-Violence.
  • Chavez, L. R. 2008. The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
  • Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1984. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
  • Coleman, M. 2007. Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico-U.S. border. Antipode 39 (1):54–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00506.x.
  • Coutin, S. B. 2011. Falling outside: Excavating the history of Central American asylum seekers. Law & Social Inquiry 36 (3):569–96. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01243.x.
  • De Genova, N. 2018. Rebordering ‘the People’ notes on theorizing populism. South Atlantic Quarterly 117 (2):357–74. doi:10.1215/00382876-4374878.
  • De Genova, N., G. Garelli, and M. Tazzioli. 2018. Autonomy of asylum? The autonomy of migration undoing the refugee crisis script. South Atlantic Quarterly 117 (2):239–65. doi:10.1215/00382876-4374823.
  • De La Cruz, R. 2017. No asylum for the innocent: Gendered representations of Salvadoran refugees in the 1980s. American Behavioral Scientist 61 (10):1103–18. doi:10.1177/0002764217732106.
  • Delaney, D. 2015. Legal geography I: Constitutivities, complexities, and contingencies. Progress in Human Geography 39 (1):96–102. doi:10.1177/0309132514527035.
  • Department of Homeland Security. 2018. Unaccompanied alien children and family units are flooding the border because of catch and release loopholes. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/02/15/unaccompanied-alien-children-and-family-units-are-flooding-border-because-catch-and.
  • Fatin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1993. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
  • Foster, M. 2012. The “Ground with the Least Clarity”: A Comparative Study of Jurisprudential Developments Relating to “Membership of a Particular Social Group” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Accessed September 16, 2016.
  • Ghezelbash, D. 2018. Refuge lost. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilbert, E.2018. Elasticity at the Canada–US border: Jurisdiction, rights, accountability.Environment and planning C: Politics and space.doi:10.1177/2399654418787190
  • Gomez v. and Immigration and Naturalization Service 1991. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
  • Gorman, C. S. 2016. Containing Kassindja: Detention, gendered threats and border control in the United States. Gender, Place & Culture 23 (7):955–68. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2015.1090412.
  • Gorman, C. S. 2017. Redefining refugees: Interpretive control and the bordering work of legal categorization in U.S. Asylum Law. Political Geography 58 (May):36–45. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.006.
  • Gorman, C. S. 2018. Feminist legal archeology, domestic violence and the raced-gendered juridical boundaries of U.S. Asylum Law. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. doi:10.1177/0308518X18757507.
  • Gorman, C. S. Forthcoming. Singled out: Scaling violence and social groups as legal borderwork in U.S. Asylum Law. The Geographical Review.
  • Gzesh, S. 2006. “Central Americans and asylum policy in the Reagan Era.” Migrationpolicy.Org. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/central-americans-and-asylum-policy-reagan-era.
  • Hathaway, J. 2012. Refugees and Asylum. In Foundations of International Migration Law, ed. B. Opeskin, R. Perruchoud, and J. Redpath-Cross, 177–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Imogen, T. 2006. ‘Welcome to Britain’: The cultural politics of asylum. European Journal of Cultural Studies 9 (2):185–202. doi:10.1177/1367549406063163.
  • In re A-M-E- & J-G-U-24 I&N Dec. 69 (BIA 2007).
  • Jepson, W. 2012. Claiming space, claiming water: Contested legal geographies of water in South Texas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3):614–31. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.641897.
  • Johnson, C., R. Jones, A. Paasi, L. Amoore, A. Mountz, M. Salter, and C. Rumford. 2011. Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography 30 (2):61–69. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002.
  • Jones, R. 2016. Violent borders: refugees and the right to move. London New York: Verso.
  • Kocher, A. 2017. Trump and immigration enforcement: Introduction. Society/Space http://societyandspace.org/2017/07/
  • Lee, G. B. 2007. Chinese migrants and the ‘Inundation’ metaphor. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1013961. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1013961.
  • Levy, M. 2013 January. Judging the flood of litigation. University of Chicago Law Review80:1007–77.
  • Loyd, J. M., and A. Mountz. 2018. Boats, borders, and bases: Race, the cold war, and the rise of migration detention in the United States. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Loyd, J. M., E. Mitchell-Eaton, and A. Mountz. 2016. The Militarization of islands and migration: Tracing human mobility through US bases in the Caribbean and the Pacific. Political Geography 53 (July):65–75. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.11.006.
  • Mamadouh, V. 2012. The scaling of the ‘Invasion’: A geopolitics of immigration narratives in France and the Netherlands. Geopolitics 17 (2):377–401. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.578268.
  • Manuel, K. M. 2014. “Asylum and gang violence: Legal overview.” Congressional Research Service R43716. www.crs.gov.
  • Matter of A-B- 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018).
  • Matter of Acosta, 19 I&N Dec. 211 (BIA 1985).
  • Matter of A-R-C-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014).
  • Matter of C-A-, 23 I&N Dec. 951 (BIA 2006).
  • Matter of E-A-G-, 24 I&N Dec. 591 (BIA 2008).
  • Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 227 (BIA 2014).
  • Matter of R-A-, Int. Dec. 3403 (BIA 1999),vacated (A.G. 2001).
  • Matter of S-E-G-, 24 I&N Dec. 579 (BIA 2008).
  • Matter of Vigil, 19 I&N Dec. 572 (BIA 1988).
  • Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2014).
  • Mountz, A. 2010. Seeking asylum: Human smuggling and bureaucracy at the border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mountz, A., and N. Hiemstra. 2014. Chaos and crisis: Dissecting the spatiotemporal logics of contemporary migrations and state practices. Chaos and Crisis: Dissecting the Spatiotemporal Logics of Contemporary Migrations and State Practices 104 (2):382–90.
  • Mountz, A., R. Wright, I. Miyares, and A. J. Bailey. 2002. Lives in limbo: Temporary protected status and immigrant identities. Global Networks 2 (4):335–56. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00044.
  • Musalo, K. 2007. Protecting victims of gendered persecution: Fear of floodgates or call to (principled) action? Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 14 (2):119–58.
  • Musalo, K. 2010. A short history of gender asylum in the United States: Resistance and ambivalence may very slowly be inching towards recognition of women's claims. Refugee Survey Quarterly 29 (2):46–63. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdq026.
  • National Immigrant Justice Center. 2016. Particular social group practice advisory: Applying for asylum after Matter of M-E-V-G- and Matter of W-G-R-. http://immigrantjustice.org/resources/resources-asylum-claims-based-membership-particular-social-group.
  • Nevins, J. 2010. Operation gatekeeper and beyond: The war on “Illegals” and the remaking of the U.S. – Mexico boundary. New York: Routledge.
  • Ngai, M. M. 2004. Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • O’Brien, G. 2003. Indigestible food, conquering hordes, and waste materials: Metaphors of immigrants and the early immigration restriction debate in the United States. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (1):33–47. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1801_3.
  • Purcell, M., and J. Nevins. 2005. Pushing the boundary: State restructuring, state theory, and the case of U.S.–Mexico border enforcement in the 1990s. Political Geography 24 (2):211–35. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.09.015.
  • Ramji-Nogales, R., and A. I. Schoenholtz, and P. G. Schrag. 2009. Refugee roulette: Disparities in Asylum adjudication and proposals for reform. New York: New York University Press.
  • Razack, S. 1999. Making Canada White: Law and policing of bodies of colour in the 1990s. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 14 (1):159–84. doi:10.1017/S0829320100005974.
  • Sanchez-Trujillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1986. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
  • Santa Ana, O. 1999. ‘Like an Animal I Was Treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society 10 (2):191–224. doi:10.1177/0957926599010002004.
  • Santa Ana, O. 2002. Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
  • Sessions, J. 2017. Attorney general Jeff Sessions delivers remarks to the executive office for immigration review. Accessed October 12, 2017. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-delivers-remarks-executive-office-immigration-review.
  • Sessions, J. 2018a. Attorney General Sessions delivers remarks on immigration enforcement. Accessed April 11, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-sessions-delivers-remarks-immigration-enforcement.
  • Sessions, J.2018b. Attorney General Sessions delivers remarks discussing the immigration enforcement actions of the Trump Administration. Accessed May 7, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-sessions-delivers-remarks-discussing-immigration-enforcement-actions.
  • Sessions, J. 2018c. Attorney General Sessions delivers remarks to the Western Conservative Summit. Accessed June 8, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-sessions-delivers-remarks-western-conservative-summit.
  • Sessions, J. 2018d. Attorney General Sessions delivers remarks to the criminal justice legal foundation. Accessed June 26, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-sessions-delivers-remarks-criminal-justice-legal-foundation.
  • Sinclair, W. 1980. U.S. formulated a Haitian Refugee ‘Solution’ 2 years ago. Washington Post, Accessed April 20, 1980.
  • Smoot, J. 2010. “The truth trickles out: There’s no reason to fear a ‘flood’ of women asylum seekers.” Tahirih Justice Center. http://www.tahirih.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Precarious-Protection_Tahirih-Justice-Center.pdf.
  • Stern, T. J. 2003. Federal judges and fearing the ‘Floodgates of Litigation’. Journal of Constitutional Law 6 (2):46.
  • Stuesse, R., and M. Coleman. 2014. Policing borders, policing bodies: The territorial and biopolitical roots of U.S. immigration control. In Placing the border in everyday life, ed. R. Jones and C. Johnson, 69–124. London: Ashgate.
  • Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) Immigration. 2016. Continued rise in asylum denial rates: Impact of representation and nationality Dec. 16. http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/448/
  • Trump, D. J. 2018. Our military is being mobilized Tweet. @realdonaldtrump. Accessed October 31, 2018. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1057614564639019009.
  • Walters, W. 2004. Secure borders, safe haven, domopolitics. Citizenship Studies 8 (3):237–60. doi:10.1080/1362102042000256989.
  • Williams, J. 2014. Intervention – ‘The spatial paradoxes of “Radical” activism’. Antipode Foundation.Org(blog) Accessed January 13, 2014. https://antipodefoundation.org/2014/01/13/the-spatialparadoxes-of-radical-activism/
  • Williams, J. M. 2017. Crisis, subjectivity, and the polymorphous character of immigrant family detention in the United States. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (3):269–81. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1284021.
  • Wong, T. K. 2015. Rights, deportation, and detention in the age of immigration control. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Yea, S. 2015. Trafficked enough? Missing bodies, migrant labour exploitation, and the classification of trafficking victims in Singapore. Antipode 47 (4):1080–100. doi:10.1111/anti.12144.
  • Zepeda Melendez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1984. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.