Introduction to the Special Issue: Subterranean Geopolitics

References

• Adey, P. 2010. Vertical security in the megacity: Legality, mobility and aerial politics. Theory, Culture and Society 30:51–67. doi:10.1177/0263276410380943.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. 2013. Securing the volume/volumen: Comments on Stuart Elden’s Plenary paper ‘Secure the volume’. Political Geography 34:52–54. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angel, R. 2014. Community lost: The state, civil society, and displaced survivors of Hurricane Katrina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., and E. Gambino. 2019. Pipeline geopolitics: Subaquatic materials and the tactical point. Geopolitics. online published 14th March 2019. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1570921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bille, F., ed. 2019a. Volumetric States. Duke: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bille, F. 2019b. Volumetric sovereignty part 2: The subterranean realm. Society and Space. http://societyandspace.org/2019/03/12/volumetric-sovereignty-part-2-the-subterranean-realm/.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, R. 2011. Project ‘Transparent Earth’ and the autoscopy of aerial targeting the visual geopolitics of the underground. Theory, Culture & Society 27-8:70–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, K. 2017. Thinking permeable matter through feminist geophilosophy: Environmental knowledge controversy and the materiality of hydrogeologic processes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (1):21–37. doi:10.1177/0263775816660353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2000. Producing vertical territory: Geology and governmentality in Late Victorian Canada. Cultural Geographies 7:7–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2013. Territory, now in 3-D. Political Geography 34:55–57. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun, J. 2018. Invading the whiteness: Science, (sub)terrain, and US militarisation of the Greenland ice sheet. Geopolitics. online published 17 November 2018. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1543269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. 2015. An empire of air and water: Uncolonisable space in the British imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, J. 2019a. Deep sea mining threatens indigenous culture in Papua New Guinea. The Conversation. Accessed 10 April 2019. https://theconversation.com/deep-sea-mining-threatens-indigenous-culture-in-papua-new-guinea-112012.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, J. 2019b. Extraction in four dimensions: Time, space and the emerging geo(-)politics of deep-sea mining. Geopolitics. online published 14th June 2018. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1465041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. 2016. An empire of air and water: Uncolonizable space in the British imagination, 1750–1850. European Romantic Review 27 (1):87–90. doi:10.1080/10509585.2015.1124573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Dora, V. 2011. Anti-landscapes: Caves and apophasis in the Christian East. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (5):761–79. doi:10.1068/d3810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobraszczyk, P., C. A. Lopez-Galviz, and B. Garrett. 2015. Digging up and digging down: Urban undergrounds. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 2 (2):S26–S30. doi:10.1558/jca.v2i2.28454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2013. Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography 34:35–51. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endfield, G., and C. Van Lieshout. 2019. Water and vertical territory: Teh volatile and hidden historical geographies of Derbyshire’s lead mining soughs, 1650s–1830s. Geopolitics. online published 9th October 2018. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1486299.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, P. 2019. Security and the subsurface: Natural gas and the visualisation of possibility spaces. Geopolitics. online published 17th October 2018. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1513918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funnell, L., and K. Dodds. 2017. Geographies, genders and geopolitics of James Bond. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. 1999. The Paris sewers and the rationalization of urban space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24:23–44. doi:10.1111/tran.1999.24.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. 2011. Shallow excavation, a response to Bunkerology, Society and Space. Accessed 23 April 2019. http://societyandspace.org/2011/06/10/shallow-excavation-a-response-tobunkerology-bradley-l-garrett/
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B., and I. Klinke. 2018. Opening the bunker: Function, materiality, temporality. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. online published 11th December 2018. doi:10.1177/2399654418816316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2004. Vertical geopolitics: Baghdad and after. Antipode 36 (1):12–23. doi:10.1111/anti.2004.36.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2014. Super-tall and ultra-deep: The cultural politics of the elevator. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (7–8):239–265. doi:10.1177/0263276414554044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2016. Vertical: The city from satellites to bunkers. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and L. Hewitt. 2012. Getting off the ground: On the politics of urban verticality. Progress in Human Geography 37 (1):72–92. doi:10.1177/0309132512443147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2018. A volcanic incident’: Towards a geopolitical aesthetics of the subterranean. Geopolitics. online published 25th September 2018. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1399877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higman, B. 2017. Flatness. London: Reaktion.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and C. Johnson. 2016. Border militarisation and the re‐articulation of sovereignty. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (2):187–200. doi:10.1111/tran.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, S. 2011. Alter-geopolitics: Other securities are happening. Geoforum 42:274–84. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, E. 2019. Quake, Society and Space, volumetric sovresignty collection (edited by Franck Bille). Accessed 10 April 2019. http://societyandspace.org/2019/03/12/quake/.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2019. Volumetric urbanism: The production and extraction of Singapore’s territory. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. online published 20th February 2019. doi: 10.1177/0308518X19830699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo Zurita, M., P. George Munro, and D. Houston. 2018. Un-earthing the subterranean Anthropocene. Area 50 (3):298–305. doi:10.1111/area.12369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrom, C. 2014. Seeing underground: Maps, models and mining engineering in America. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, M. 2015. Exploring the vertical: Science and sociality in the field among cavers in Venezuela. Social and Cultural Geographies 16 (2):226–47. doi:10.1080/14649365.2014.973438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 2019. Deep routeing and the making of ‘Maritime Motorways’: Beyond surficial geographies of connection for governing global shipping. Geopolitics. online published 1st February 2019. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1567499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, K. 2004. One nation underground: The fallout shelter in American culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, H. 2008. Colonialism, landscape and the subterranean. Geography Compass 2:1853–69. doi:10.1111/geco.2008.2.issue-6.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, A. 2018. Disasters in conflict areas: Finding the politics. Disasters 42:161–72. doi:10.1111/disa.12302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slesinger, I. 2019. A cartography of the unknowable: Technology, territory and subterranean agencies in Israel’s management of the gaza tunnels. Geopolitics. online published 8th February 2018. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1399878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrensen, C. 2014. Making the subterranean visible: Security, tunnels, and the United States–Mexico border. Geographical Review 104 (3):328–45. doi:10.1111/gere.2014.104.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, R. 2016. Rock, water, air and fire: Foregrounding the elements in the Gibraltar-Spain dispute. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34:545–63. doi:10.1177/0263775815623277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, R. 2017. Do you dive?”: Methodological considerations for engaging with “volume”. Geography Compass 11:1–11. doi:10.1111/gec3.v11.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P., and K. Peters. 2015. Wet ontologies and fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33:247–64. doi:10.1068/d14148p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivia, G. 2015. Oil frictions and the subterranean geopolitics of energy regionalisms. Environment and Planning A 47 (7):1422–39. doi:10.1177/0308518X15595764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. 2002. The politics of verticality. Open democracy. Accessed 10 April 2019. http://www.opendemocracy.net/confictflpoliticsverticality/article_810.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. 2012. Hollow land: Israel’s architecture of occupation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 2008. Notes on the underground: An essay on technology, society and the imagination. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar