6,644
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Introduction: Engaging Geopolitics through the Lens of the Intimate

References

  • Ackerly, B., M. Stern, and J. True, eds. 2006. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ahmed, S. 2004. The Cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
  • Barabantseva, E. 2015. When borders lie within: Ethnic marriages and illegality on the Sino-Vietnamese border. International Political Sociology 9 (4):352–68. doi:10.1111/ips.2015.9.issue-4.
  • Barabantseva, E., and C. Grillot. 2018. ‘Family visitors’: Myths and realities of Russian and Vietnamese wives in China. Cahiers De Genre 64. http://cahiers_du_genre.pouchet.cnrs.fr/FichesNumeros/numero64.html.
  • Bell, D., and J. Binnie. 2000. The sexual citizen: Queer politics and beyond. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Berlant, L. 1998. Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry 24 (2):281–88. doi:10.1086/448875.
  • Boehm, D. A. 2012. Intimate migrations: Gender, family, and illegality among transnational Mexicans. New York: New York University Press.
  • Bondi, L. 2005. The place of emotions in research. In Emotional geographies, ed. J. Davidson, L. Bondi, and M. Smith, 231–46. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Botterill, K., P. Hopkins, and G. Sanghera. 2018. Familial geopolitics and ontological security: Intergenerational relations, migration and minority youth (in)securities in Scotland. Geopolitics 1–26. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1512098.
  • Browne, K., J. Lim, and G. Brown, Eds.. 2007. Geographies of sexualities. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Brubaker, R. 2015. Grounds for difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cowen, D., and B. Story. 2013. Intimacy and the everyday. In the ashgate companion to critical geopolitics, ed. K. Dodds, M. Kuus, and J. Sharp, 341–58. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • D’Aoust, A. M. 2014. Love as a project of (im)mobility: Love, sovereignty and governmentality in marriage migration management practices. Global Society 28 (3):317–35. doi:10.1080/13600826.2014.900742.
  • Davidson, J., L. Bondi, and M. Smith, Eds. 2005. Emotional geographies. London: Routledge.
  • Dixon, D., and S. Marston. 2011. Introduction: Feminist engagements with geopolitics’. Gender, Place, And Culture 18 (4):445–53. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.583401.
  • Douglass, M. 2006. Global householding in Pacific Asia. International Development Planning Review 28 (4):421–45. doi:10.3828/idpr.28.4.1.
  • Douglass, M. 2010. Globalizing the household in East Asia. Whitehead Journal Of Diplomacy And International Relations (winter/spring) 11 (1):63–77.
  • Dowler, L., and J. Sharp. 2001. A feminist geopolitics? Space And Polity 5 (3):165–76. doi:10.1080/13562570120104382.
  • Eng, D. L., J. Halberstam, and J. Esteban Muñoz. 2005. Introduction: What’s queer about Queer Studies now? Social Text 23 (3–4):1–17. doi:10.1215/01642472-23-3-4_84-85-1.
  • England, K. 2003. Toward a feminist political geography? Political Geography 22 (2003):611–16. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(03)00065-9.
  • Friedman, S. L., and P. Mahdavi. 2015. Introduction: Migrant encounters. In Migrant encounters: Intimate labor, the state, and mobility across Asia, ed. S. L. Friedman and P. Mahdavi, 1–24. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Harker, C., and L. L. Martin. 2012. Familial relations: Spaces, subjects, and politics. Environment And Planning A 44:768–75. doi:10.1068/a4513.
  • Hyndman, J. 2004. Mind the gap: Bridging feminist and political geography through geopolitics. Political Geography 23 (3):307–22. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.014.
  • Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
  • Isin, E. F. 2012. Citizens without nations. Environment And Planning D 30:450–67. doi:10.1068/d19210.
  • Kuusisto-Arponen, A.-K., and M. Gilmartin. 2015. The politics of migration. Political Geography 48:143–45. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.06.008.
  • Laszczkowski, M., and M. Reeves. 2015. Introduction: Affective states: Entanglements, suspensions, suspicions. Social Analysis 59 (4):1–14. doi:10.3167/sa.2015.590401.
  • Ling, L. H. M. 2002. Postcolonial international relations: conquest and desire between Asia and the West. London: Palgrave.
  • Lowe, L. 2015. The Intimacies of four continents. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Makarychev, A. 2018. Bordering and identity-making in europe after the 2015 refugee crisis. Geopolitics 23 (4):747–53. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1499380.
  • Milanovic, B. May 2012. Global inequality: From class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Global Policy 3(2):125–34. doi: 10.1111/gpol.2012.3.issue-2.
  • Mountz, A., and J. Hyndman. 2006. Feminist approaches to the global intimate. Women’s Studies Quarterly 34 (1/2):446–63.
  • Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2012. The make-believe space: Affective geography in a postwar polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Ní Mhurchú, A. 2015. Ambiguous subjectivity, irregular citizenship: From inside/outside to being-caught-inbetween. International Political Sociology 9 (2):158–75. doi:10.1111/ips.2015.9.issue-2.
  • Ní Mhurchú, A. 2016a. Thinking with reproduction: Maternal time, citizenship, migration and political subjectivity. Subjectivity 9 (1):17–37. doi:10.1057/sub.2015.22.
  • Ní Mhurchú, A. 2016b. Unfamiliar acts of citizenship: Enacting citizenship in vernacular music and language. Citizenship Studies 20 (2):156–72. doi:10.1080/13621025.2015.1132566.
  • Oswin, N., and E. Olund. 2010. Guest editorial: Governing intimacy. Environment And Planning D: Society And Space 28:60–67. doi:10.1068/d2801ed.
  • Pain, R. 2009. Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics. Human Geography 33 (4):466–86. doi:10.1177/0309132508104994.
  • Pain, R. 2014. Gendered violence: Rotating intimacy. Area 46 (4):351–53. doi:10.1111/area.12138_4.
  • Pain, R., and L. Staeheli. 2014. Introduction: Intimacy-geopolitics and violence. Area 46:344–47. doi:10.1111/area.12138.
  • Pain, R., and S. J. Smith. 2008. Fear: Critical geopolitics and everyday life. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Peterson, V. S. 1999. Sexing political identities/nationalism as heterosexism. International Feminist Journal Of Politics Spring. 1 (1):34–65. doi:10.1080/146167499360031.
  • Peterson, V. S. 2010. Global Householding amid Global Crises. Politics And Gender 6:271–81. doi:10.1017/S1743923X10000073.
  • Peterson, V. S. 2014. Family matters: How queering the intimate queers the international. International Studies Review 16 (4):604–08. doi:10.1111/misr.2014.16.issue-4.
  • Peterson, V. S. January 2017. Towards queering the globally intimate. Political Geography 56:114–16. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.01.001.
  • Peterson, V. S. 2018. Intimacy, informalization and intersecting inequalities: Tracing the linkages. Labour And Industry 28 (2):130–45. doi:10.1080/10301763.2018.1448966.
  • Peterson, V. S., E. Barabantseva, and A. Ní Mhurchú. 2018. On Intimacy, geopolitics and discipline: Elena Barabantseva and Aoileann Ní Mhurchú in Conversation with V. Spike Peterson. International Feminist Journal Of Politics 20 (2):258–71. doi:10.1080/14616742.2018.1457882.
  • Povinelli, E. A. 2006. The Empire of love: Toward a theory of intimacy, genealogy, and carnality. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Pratt, G., and V. Rosner. 2012. The Global and the intimate: Feminism in our time. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Safri, M., and J. Graham. 2010. The global household: Toward a feminist postcapitalist nternational political economy. Signs 36 (1):99–125.
  • Shachar, A., and R. Hirschl. 2007. Citizenship as inherited property. Political Theory 35 (3):253–87. doi:10.1177/0090591707299808.
  • Sharp, J. 2009. Geography and gender: What belongs to feminist geography? Emotion, power and change. Progress In Human Geography 33 (1):74–80. doi:10.1177/0309132508090440.
  • Staeheli, L., E. Kofman, and L. Peake, Eds. 2004. Mapping women, making politics. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Stevens, J. 1999. Reproducing the state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Stoler, A. L. 2002. Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Stoler, A. L. 2016. Imperial durabilities in our times. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Sylvester, C. 2011. The Forum: Emotion and the feminist IR researcher. International Studies Review 13 (4):687–708. doi:10.1111/misr.2011.13.issue-4.
  • Turner, J. 2014. The family migration visa in the history of marriage restrictions: Postcolonial relations and the UK Border. The British Journal Of Politics And International Relations 17 (4):623–43. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12059.
  • Valentine, G. 2008. The ties that bind: Towards geographies of intimacy. Geography Compass 2:2097–110. doi:10.1111/geco.2008.2.issue-6.
  • Williams, J., and V. Massaro. 2013. Feminist geopolitics: Unpacking (in)security, animating social change. Geopolitics 18 (4):751–58. doi:10.1080/14650045.2013.816842.
  • Wright, M. 2006. Disposable women and other myths of global capitalism. New York: Routledge.
  • Wright, M. 2010. Gender and geography II: Bridging the gap – feminist, queer, and the geographical imaginary. Progress In Human Geography 34 (1):56–66. doi:10.1177/0309132509105008.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.