780
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Inter-National Conspiracy? Speculating on the Myitsone Dam Controversy in China, Burma, Kachin, and a Displaced Village

ORCID Icon

References

  • Aistrope, T., and R. Bleiker. 2018. Conspiracy and foreign policy. Security Dialogue 49 (3):165–82. doi:10.1177/0967010617748305.
  • Barbesgaard, M. Forthcoming. Landscapes of dispossession: Multiscalar resource frontiers in northern Tanintharyi, Myanmar. Geopolitics.
  • Boyer, D. 2006. Conspiracy, history, and therapy at a Berlin Stammtisch. American Ethnologist 33 (3):327–39. doi:10.1525/ae.2006.33.3.327.
  • Brenner, D. 2015. Ashes of co-optation: From Armed group fragmentation to the rebuilding of popular insurgency in Myanmar. Conflict, Security & Development 15 (4):337–58. doi:10.1080/14678802.2015.1071974.
  • Bryant, R. L. 1997. The political ecology of forestry in Burma 1824–1994. London: Hurst & Company.
  • Callahan, W. A. 2009. China: The pessoptimist nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chan, D. S. W. 2017. Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone dam controversy: Social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath. The Pacific Review 30 (5):674–91. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1293714.
  • Cheesman, N. 2017. Introduction: Interpreting communal violence in Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47 (3):335–52. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1305121.
  • Christensen, D., M. Nguyen, and R. Sexton. 2019. Strategic Violence during democratization: Evidence from Myanmar. World Politics 71(2):332–66.
  • Dean, K. 2005. Spaces and territorialities on the Sino–Burmese boundary: China, Burma and the Kachin. Political Geography 24 (7):808–30. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.06.004.
  • Dean, K. 2011. Spaces, territorialities and ethnography on the Thai-, Sino- and Indo-Myanmar Boundaries. In Ashgate research companion to border studies, ed. D. Wastl-Walter, 219–44. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Dittmer, J., and K. Dodds. 2008. Popular geopolitics past and future: Fandom, identities and audiences. Geopolitics 13 (3):437–57. doi:10.1080/14650040802203687.
  • Dossi, S. 2015. Regime change and foreign policy: Explaining the fluctuations in Myanmar’s economic cooperation with China. European Journal of East Asian Studies 14 (1):98–123. doi:10.1163/15700615-01401009.
  • Fan, S. 2015. 密松水电站搁置四年, 揭秘究竟谁在反对这个项目. The Paper 澎湃新闻. November 8. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1394261.
  • Faxon, H. O. Forthcoming. After the rice frontier: Producing state and ethnic territory in northwest Myanmar. Geopolitics.
  • Fink, C. 2018. Dangerous speech, anti-Muslim violence, and Facebook in Myanmar. Journal of International Affairs 71 (1.5):43–52.
  • Foran, T., L. Kiik, S. Hatt, D. Fullbrook, A. Dawkins, S. Walker, and Y. Chen. 2017. Large hydropower and legitimacy: A policy regime analysis, applied to Myanmar. Energy Policy 110:619–30. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.043.
  • Global Times. 2016. Pragmatism raises hope for Myitsone Dam. August 18, 2016. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1001371.shtml.
  • Gravers, M. 1999. Nationalism as political paranoia in Burma: An essay on the historical practice of power. Revised and expanded. Richmond: Curzon Press.
  • Hameiri, S., L. Jones, and Y. Zou. 2019. The development-insecurity nexus in China’s near-abroad: Rethinking cross-border economic integration in an era of state transformation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 49 (3):473–99. doi:10.1080/00472336.2018.1502802.
  • Han, E. 2019. Asymmetrical neighbors: Borderland state building between China and Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hedström, J. 2016. ‘Before I joined the army I was like a child’: Militarism and women’s rights in Kachinland. In War and peace in the borderlands of Myanmar: The Kachin Ceasefire, 1994–2011, ed. M. Sadan, 236–56. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  • Hedström, J. 2019. Myanmar in transition: China, conflict, and ceasefire economies in Kachin State. UI Paper, 4.
  • Hkawn Ja Aung. 2014. Social movement on Myitsone hydropower dam project in Kachin state, Burma/Myanmar. MA thesis, Chulalongkorn University. http://cuir.car.chula. ac.th/handle/123456789/44677.
  • Jiang, H. 2015. An evolving framework for outward investment: A Chinese approach to conflict sensitive business. Philadelphia: American Friends Service Committee (a modified translation of a 2013 book in Chinese). https://www.afsc.org/sites/default/files/documents/ChineseInvestment.pdf.
  • Johnson-Schlee, S. 2019. Playing cards against the state: Precarious lives, conspiracy theories, and the production of ‘irrational’ subjects. Geoforum 101 (May):174–81. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.013.
  • Jones, L. 2012. The Commonplace geopolitics of conspiracy. Geography Compass 6 (1): 44–59.
  • Jones, L., and Y. Zou. 2017. Rethinking the role of state-owned enterprises in China’s rise. New Political Economy 22 (6):743–60. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1321625.
  • KDNG [Kachin Development Networking Group]. 2007. Damming the Irrawaddy. http://www.kdng.org/damming-the-irrawaddy.
  • KDNG [Kachin Development Networking Group]. 2009. Resisting the flood: Communities taking a stand against the imminent construction of Irrawaddy dams. https://kdng.org/resisting-the-flood-2/.
  • Kempel, S. [Anonymous]. 2012. We all love the Ayeyarwady: Case study on the Myitsone dam advocacy campaign (Myanmar/Burma). Unpublished report.
  • Kiik, L. 2016a. Conspiracy, God’s plan and national emergency: Kachin popular analyses of the ceasefire era and its resource grabs. In War and peace in the borderlands of Myanmar: The Kachin Ceasefire, 1994–2011, ed. M. Sadan, 205–35. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  • Kiik, L. 2016b. Nationalism and anti-ethno-politics: Why ‘Chinese development’ failed at Myanmar’s Myitsone dam. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (3):374–402. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1198265.
  • Kiik, L. 2017. “They Do Not Count Us”: Resisting the Myitsone Dam beyond China, the US, and Big Geopolitics. Blog post. Tea Circle – A Forum for New Perspectives on Burma/Myanmar. April 17. https://teacircleoxford.com/2017/04/17/they-do-not-count-us-resisting-the-myitsone-dam-beyond-china-the-us-and-big-geopolitics
  • Kiik, L. 2020. Confluences amid conflict: How resisting China’s Myitsone dam project linked Kachin and Bamar nationalisms in war-torn Burma. Journal of Burma Studies 24 (2).
  • Kirchherr, J. 2018. Strategies of successful anti-dam movements: Evidence from Myanmar and Thailand. Society & Natural Resources 31 (2):166–82. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1364455.
  • Kirchherr, J., T. Disselhoff, and K. Charles. 2016. Safeguards, financing, and employment in Chinese infrastructure projects in Africa: The case of Ghana’s Bui Dam. Waterlines 35 (1):37–58. doi:10.3362/1756-3488.2016.005.
  • Lamb, V., and N. Dao. 2017. Perceptions and practices of investment: China’s hydropower investments in Vietnam and Myanmar. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement 38 (3):395–413. doi:10.1080/02255189.2017.1298519.
  • Lintner, B. 2015. Great Game East: India, China, and the struggle for Asia’s most volatile frontier. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Marcus, G. E. 1999. Paranoia within reason: A casebook on conspiracy as explanation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mathur, N. 2015. “It’s a conspiracy theory and climate change”: Of beastly encounters and cervine disappearances in Himalayan India. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1):87–111. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.005.
  • Min Zin. 2012. Burmese attitude toward Chinese: Portrayal of the Chinese in contemporary cultural and media works. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 31 (1):115–31. doi:10.1177/186810341203100107.
  • Nan Lwin. 2019. Foreign countries behind Myitsone dam opposition: Chinese ambassador. The Irrawaddy, May 22, 2019.
  • O’Morchoe, F. Forthcoming. Teak & lead: Making borders, resources, and territory in colonial Burma. Geopolitics.
  • Rakopoulos, T. 2018. Show me the money: Conspiracy theories and distant wealth. History and Anthropology 29 (3):376–91. doi:10.1080/02757206.2018.1458723.
  • Sadan, M. 2013. Being and becoming Kachin: Histories beyond the state in the borderworlds of Burma. Oxford: Oxford University Press (British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship Monographs).
  • Sadan, M., ed. 2016. War and peace in the borderlands of Myanmar: The Kachin Ceasefire, 1994-2011. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  • Sakwa, R. 2012. Conspiracy narratives as a mode of engagement in international politics: The case of the 2008 Russo-Georgian war. Russian Review 71 (4):581–609. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9434.2012.00670.x.
  • Sarma, J., Faxon, H. O. and Roberts, K. Forthcoming. Introduction: Remaking the resource frontier – Myanmar and beyond. Geopolitics.
  • Schissler, M. 2016. New technologies, established practices: Developing narratives of Muslim threat in Myanmar. In Islam and the state in Myanmar: Muslim-Buddhist relations and the politics of belonging, ed. M. Crouch, 211–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Selth, A. 2007. Burma, China and the myth of military bases. Asian Security 3 (3):279–307. doi:10.1080/14799850701568929.
  • Silverstein, P. A. 2002. An excess of truth: Violence, conspiracy theorizing and the Algerian Civil War. Anthropological Quarterly 75 (4):643–74. doi:10.1353/anq.2002.0068.
  • Skidmore, M. 2004. Karaoke fascism: Burma and the politics of fear. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Sun, Y. 2012. China’s strategic misjudgement on Myanmar. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 31 (1):73–96. doi:10.1177/186810341203100105.
  • Sun, Y. 2017. “China and Myanmar’s Peace Process.” United States Institute of Peace Special Report. https://www.usip.org/publications/2017/03/china-and-myanmars-peace-process.
  • Su Mon Thazin Aung. 2017. Governing the transition: Policy coordination mechanisms in the Myanmar core executive. 2011—2016. PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong.
  • Tang-Lee, D. 2017. Complex contestation of Chinese energy and resource investments in Myanmar. In In China’s backyard: Policies and politics of Chinese resource investments in Southeast Asia, ed. J. Morris-Jung, 204–28. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
  • Teera-Hong, E. 2019. Imagining political futures in Kachinland: The struggle for self-determination through legal activism and indigenous media. PhD thesis, Cornell University.
  • The Guardian 2011. WikiLeaks cables: Americans funded groups that stalled Burma dam project. September 30, 2011.
  • TNI [Transnational Institute]. 2016. China’s engagement in Myanmar: From Malacca dilemma to transition dilemma. 19. Myanmar Policy Briefing. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/chinas-engagement-in-myanmar-from-malacca-dilemma-to-transition-dilemma.
  • Wang, S. 2013. 近探密松. 中国能源报 (China Energy News), August 26. http://paper.people.com.cn/zgnyb/html/2013-08/26/content_1290349.htm.
  • Wang, Y. 2015. 一带一路: 机遇与挑战. Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.
  • West, H. G., and T. Sanders. 2003. Transparency and conspiracy: Ethnographies of suspicion in the new world order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Wikipedia. 2011. Myitsone Dam. Article edit recorded at: en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myitsone_Dam&diff=next&oldid=453493501.
  • Woods, K. 2011. Ceasefire capitalism: Military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China Borderlands. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):747–70. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607699.
  • Woods, K. 2018. The conflict resource economy and pathways to peace in Burma. 144. United States Institute of Peace Peaceworks Report.
  • Wouter, J. Forthcoming. Neoliberal capitalism and ethno-territoriality in highland northeast India: Resource-extraction, capitalist desires and ethnic closure. Geopolitics.
  • Yeophantong, P. 2016. China’s hydropower expansion and influence over environmental governance in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Rising China’s influence in developing Asia, ed. E. Goh, 174–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ye Htut. 2019. Myanmar’s political transition and lost opportunities (2010—2016). Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.