The Twenty Years’ Crisis of European Energy Security: Central and Eastern Europe and the US

References

• Austvik, O. G. 2016. The energy union and security-of-gas supply. Energy Policy 96:372–82. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baczynska, G., and A. de Carbonnel 2016. Duda says nord stream 2 pipeline undermines EU solidarity. Reuters, January 18. Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/poland-energy-eu-nordstream/duda-says-nord-stream-2-pipeline-undermines-eu-solidarity-idUSL8N1521RZ.
   Google Scholar
• Baev, P. K. 2007. Russia aspires to the status of ‘energy superpower’. Strategic Analysis 31 (3):447–65. doi:10.1080/09700160701415735.
   Google Scholar
• Baev, P. K., and I. Øverland. 2010. The south stream versus Nabucco pipeline race: Geopolitical and economic (ir) rationales and political stakes in mega-projects. International Affairs 86 (5):1075–90. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00929.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmaceda, M. M. 1998. Gas, oil and the linkages between domestic and foreign policies: The case of Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies 50 (2):257–86. doi:10.1080/09668139808412535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmaceda, M. M. 2013. The politics of energy dependency: Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian pressure. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balmaceda, M. M. 2017. The fall of the Soviet Union and the legacies of energy dependencies in Eastern Europe. In Cold war energy. A transnational history of soviet oil and gas, ed. J. Perović, 401–420. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Balzer, H. 2005. The Putin thesis and Russian energy policy. Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (3):210–25. doi:10.2747/1060-586X.21.3.210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran, Z. 2007. EU energy security: Time to end Russian leverage. Washington Quarterly 30 (4):131–44. doi:10.1162/wash.2007.30.4.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechev, D. 2018. Bulgaria. In Understanding energy security in central and eastern Europe, ed. W. Ostrowski and E. Butler, 138–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beltran, A., and J. P. Williot. 2017. Gaz de France and Soviet natural gas: Balancing technological Constraints with political considerations, 1950s to 1980s. In Cold war energy, ed. J. Perović,  231–251. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bielecki, T. 2019. Poland’s Baltic pipe project pumped full of EU cash. Deutsche Welle 15 (5).Accessed February 19, 2020. dw.com/en/polands-baltic-pipe-project-pumped-full-of-eu-cash/a-48332337
   Google Scholar
• Binhack, P., and L. Tichý. 2012. Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech–Russian energy relations. Energy Policy 45:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bösch, F. 2014. Energy diplomacy: West Germany, the Soviet Union and the oil crises of the 1970s. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 39 (4):165–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussena, S., and C. Locatelli. 2017. Gazprom and the complexity of the EU gas market: A strategy to define. Post-Communist Economies 29 (4):549–64. doi:10.1080/14631377.2017.1349667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzarovski, B., T. S. Herrero, S. Petrova, and D. Ürge-Vorsatz. 2016. Unpacking the spaces and politics of energy poverty: Path-dependencies, deprivation and fuel switching in post-communist Hungary. Local Environment 21 (9):1151–70. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1075480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brada, C. J. 1988. Interpreting the Soviet subsididzation of Eastern Europe. International Organization 42 (4):639–58. doi:10.1017/S0020818300034007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, M. 2009. The Kremlin, national champions and the international oil companies: The political economy of the Russian oil and gas industry. Geopolitics 3 (5):1920–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I. 2009. State capitalism comes of age-the end of the free market. Foreign Affairs 88:40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan, D. 2011. Expanding the European dimension in energy policy: The Commission’s latest initiatives. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, T. 2018. How Russian gas became Europe’s most divisive commodity. Financial Times, July 17.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, E. 2018. Hungary. In Understanding energy security in central and eastern Europe, ed. W. Ostrowski and E. Butler, 155–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantoni, R. 2017. What’s in a pipe?: NATO’s confrontation on the 1962 large-diameter pipe Embargo. Technology and Culture 58 (1):67–96. doi:10.1353/tech.2017.0002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Česnakas, G. 2018. Baltic States. In Understanding energy security in central and eastern Europe, ed. W. Ostrowski and E. Butler, 178–201. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charokopos, M., and A. Dagoumas. 2018. State capitalism in time: Russian natural gas at the service of foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies 70 (3):441–61. doi:10.1080/09668136.2018.1448367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernykh, L. 2008. Ultimate ownership and control in Russia. Journal of Financial Economics 88 (1):169–92. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyong, C. K., and V. Tcherneva 2015. Europe’s vulnerability on Russian gas. European Council on Foreign Relations, 17. Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_europes_vulnerability_on_russian_gas.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, G. 2017. Russia’s use of the “Energy weapon” in Europe. Issue Brief, 7., Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/russias-use-energy-weapon-europe/.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, H. A., J. Mina, R. Stefanov, and M. Vladimirov. 2016. The Kremlin playbook: Understanding Russian influence in Central and Eastern Europe. Rowman & Littlefield. London.
   Google Scholar
• Correlje, A., and C. Van der Linde. 2006. Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective. Energy Policy 34 (5):532–43. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąborowski, T. 2014. Breaking the boundaries. The transformation of central European gas markets. OSW Point of View Number 46. Warsaw, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Dannreuther, R. 2018a. Understanding Russia’s return to the Middle East. International Politics 56 (6):726–42. doi:10.1057/s41311-018-0165-x.
   Google Scholar
• Dannreuther, R. 2018b. Energy security in Central and Eastern Europe: An IR theoretical dimension. In Understanding energy security in central and eastern Europe, ed. W. Ostrowski and E. Butler, 15–31. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deyermond, R. 2013. Assessing the reset: Successes and failures in the Obama Administration’s Russia policy, 2009–2012. European Security 22 (4):500–23. doi:10.1080/09662839.2013.777704.
   Google Scholar
• Ditrych, O. 2014. Bracing for cold peace. US-Russia relations after Ukraine. The International Spectator 49 (4):76–96. doi:10.1080/03932729.2014.963958.
   Google Scholar
• Domjan, P., and M. Stone. 2010. ‘A comparative study of resource nationalism in Russia and Kazakhstan 2004–2008ʹ. Europe-Asia Studies 62 (1):35–62. doi:10.1080/09668130903385374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, H. D., and M. J. L. McClelland. 2013. Shale gas and the revival of American power: Debunking decline? International Affairs 89 (6):1411–28. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikeland, P. O. 2011. The third internal energy market package: New power relations among member states, EU institutions and non‐state actors? Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (2):243–63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02140.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy, H. 2015. Eastern Europe to confront Berlin over new Russian gas pipeline. Financial Times, November 29.
   Google Scholar
• Gens, B. 2019. Germany’s Russia policy and geo-economics: Nord Stream 2, sanctions and the question of EU leadership towards Russia. Global Affairs 5 (4–5):315–34. doi:10.1080/23340460.2019.1681013.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, B. S. December, 2018. How Trump made war on Angela Merkel and Europe. The New Yorker 24(31).Accessed December 27, 2018 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/12/24/how-trump-made-war-on-angela-merkel-and-europe 
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. 2008. Resurgent Russia? Rethinking energy Inc. Policy Review 147:53.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. 2013. The politics of natural gas development in the European Union. The Geopolitics of Natural Gas, 1–43. Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/MO-CES-pub-GeoGasEU-102513.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. 2016. Assessing nord stream 2: Regulation, geopolitics & energy security in the EU, Central Eastern Europe & the UK. European Center for Energy and Resource Security. Strategy Paper, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., and T. Boersma. 2014. The 2014 Ukraine-Russia crisis: Implications for energy markets and scholarship. Energy Research & Social Science 3:3–15. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., and N. Sitter. 2014. A liberal actor in a realist world? The commission and the external dimension of the single market for energy. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (10):1452–72. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.912251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., and N. Sitter. 2015. Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy 22 (5):941–65. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1008547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould-Davies, N. 2018. Sanctions on Russia are working. Why it’s important to keep up the pressure. Foreign Affairs, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, D. 2015. The price of oil and soviet/Russian aggressiveness. CEPS Commentary, January 16. Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.ceps.eu/publications/price-oil-and-sovietrussian-aggressiveness
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, T. 2012. Wheel of fortune. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, T. 2014. Crisis amid plenty: The politics of soviet energy under Brezhnev and Gorbachev. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harsem, Ø., and D. H. Claes. 2013. The interdependence of European–Russian energy relations. Energy Policy 59:784–91. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A. 2008. Under the Kremlin’s thumb: Does increased state control in the Russian gas sector endanger European energy security? Europe-Asia Studies 60 (9):1539–74. doi:10.1080/09668130802362292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 2016. Does Russia have a potent gas weapon? In The Palgrave handbook of the international political economy of energy, ed. T. Van de Graaf, B. K. Sovacool, A. Ghosh, F. Kern, and M. T. Klare,  461–486. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., and J. Sharples. 2018. Gazprom in Europe. Two “Anni Mirabiles” - but can it continue? The Oxford Insitute for Energy Studies29: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, E. A. 1982. The pipeline connection: Issues for the alliance. The Brookings Review 1 (1):15–20. doi:10.2307/20079761.
   Google Scholar
• Högselius, P. 2013. Red gas: Russia and the origins of European energy dependence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jirušek, M., and P. Kuchyňková. 2018. The conduct of Gazprom in Central and Eastern Europe: A tool of the Kremlin, or just an adaptable player? East European Politics and Societies 32:818–44. doi:10.1177/0888325417745128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirušek, M., T. Vlček, and J. Henderson. 2017. Russia’s energy relations in Southeastern Europe: An analysis of motives in Bulgaria and Greece. Post-Soviet Affairs 33 (5):335–55. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2017.1341256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, A., T. Maltby, and D. J. Sharples. 2016. Challenging reductionism in analyses of EU-Russia energy relations. Geopolitics 21 (4):751–62. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1222520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, E. 2014. The Russian interventions in South Ossetia and Crimea compared: Military performance, legitimacy and goals. Contemporary Security Policy 35 (3):400–20. doi:10.1080/13523260.2014.963965.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S. 2008. Armageddon averted: The Soviet collapse: 1970–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacevic, A. 2009. The impact of the Russia-Ukraine gas crisis in Southeastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Krasnov, G. V., and C. J. Brada. 1997. Implicit subsidies in Russian‐Ukrainian energy trade. Europe-Asia Studies 49 (5):825–43. doi:10.1080/09668139708412475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krempin, D. 2017. Rise of western Siberia and the Soviet–West German energy relationship during the 1970s. In Cold war energy. A transnational history of soviet oil and gas, ed. J. Perović, 253–81. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. 2015. Facing reality: Getting NATO ready for a new cold war. Survival 57 (1):49–70. doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1008295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. 1999. The political economy of Russian oil. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. 2013. The capitalist transformation of state socialism: The making and breaking of state socialist society, and what followed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, K. O., and K. Westphal 2017. Nord stream 2: A political and economic contextualisation. SWP Research Paper, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2004. EU external governance in “wider Europe”. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4):680–700. doi:10.1080/1350176042000248098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. 2000. US hegemony and the perpetuation of NATO. The Journal of Strategic Studies 23 (3):59–91. doi:10.1080/01402390008437800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, D., and C. Mauch. 2004. The United States and Germany in the era of the cold war, 1945–1990: A handbook, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, D. W. 2010. The economic diplomacy of ostpolitik: Origins of NATO’s energy dilemma. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli, C. 2014. The Russian gas industry: Challenges to the ‘Gazprom model’? Post-Communist Economies 26 (1):53–66. doi:10.1080/14631377.2014.874232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, S., and K. Westphal 2019. US-Russia policy hits European energy supply: The consequences of unilateral sanctions and growing market competition. SWP Comment, No.6, February, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Loskot-Strachota, A. 2016. Nord stream 2: Policy dilemmas and the future of EU gas market. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Policy Brief 2.Warsaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Lough, J. 2011. Russia’s energy diplomacy. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Lough, J. 2018. Germany’s Russia challenge. NATO Defence College, Fellowship Monograph, February.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, E. 2014. The new cold war: Putin’s threat to Russia and the west. Palgrave Macmillan.London.
   Google Scholar
• Lukyanov, F. 2008. Russia–EU: The partnership that went astray. Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6):1107–19. doi:10.1080/09668130802181007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAskill, E. 2018. Angela Merkel hits back at Donald Trump at Nato summit. The Guardian, July 11.
   Google Scholar
• Maltby, T. 2015. Between amity, enmity and Europeanisation: EU energy security policy and the example of Bulgaria’s Russian energy dependence. Europe-Asia Studies 67 (5):809–30. doi:10.1080/09668136.2015.1046817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. 2017. Pay up, Europe: What Trump gets right about NATO. Foreign Affairs 96:108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, O. 2018. Donald Trump, U.S. have declared economic war on Russia with its toughest sanctions yet. Newsweek, September 17., Accessed November 16, 2018. https://www.newsweek.com/2018/09/28/trump-us-economic-war-russia-tough-sanctions-1122653.html.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, F. 1989. The single energy market and energy policy: Conflicting agendas? Energy Policy 17 (6):547–53. doi:10.1016/0301-4215(89)90134-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, F. 2011. Putting energy insecurity into historical context: European responses to the energy crises of the 1970s and 2000s. Geopolitics 16 (3):486–511. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.520857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, W. R. 2014. The return of geopolitics: The revenge of the revisionist powers. Foreign Affairs 93:69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mišík, M. 2016. On the way towards the Energy Union: Position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia towards external energy security integration. Energy 111:68–81. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mišík, M., and V. Prachárová. 2016. Before ‘independence’ arrived: Interdependence in energy relations between Lithuania and Russia. Geopolitics 21 (3):579–604. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1113402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myant, M., and J. Drahokoupil. 2011. Transition economies: Political economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Hoboken, NJ.: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Natorski, M., and K. Pomorska. 2017. Trust and decision‐making in times of crisis: The EU’s response to the events in Ukraine. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1):54–70. doi:10.1111/jcms.12445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nienaber, M. 2019. U.S. warns German companies of possible sanctions over Russian pipeline. Reuters, January 13. Accessed March 18, 2019. https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-germany-usa-russia-pipeline/u-s-warns-german-companies-of-possible-sanctions-over-russian-pipeline-idUKKCN1P70FR.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, M. E. 2018. What Trump gets wrong on allied burden-sharing. Brookings Institution, July 11. Accessed March 18, 2019. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/07/11/what-trump-gets-wrong-on-allied-burden-sharing/.
   Google Scholar
• Offshore Energy Today. 2017. Five energy majors to provide financing for Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Offshore Energy Today.COM, April 24. Accessed March 18, 2019. https://www.offshoreenergytoday.com/five-energy-majors-to-provide-financing-for-nord-stream-2-pipeline/.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrowski, W. 2018a. Introduction. In Understanding energy security in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. W. Ostrowski and E. Butler, 1–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrowski, W. 2018b. Poland. In Understanding energy security in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. W. Ostrowski and E. Butler, 116–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrowski, W., and E. Butler, eds. 2018. Understanding energy security in Central and Eastern Europe: Russia, transition and national interest. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Øverland, I. 2017. The hunter becomes the hunted: Gazprom encounters EU regulation. In Energy Union, ed. S. S. Andersen, A. Goldthau, and N. Sitter, 115–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, S. 1992. The single European energy market: The politics of realization. Journal of Common Market Studies 30 (1):53–76. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1992.tb00418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, S. D. 2017. From linkage to economic warfare: Energy, Soviet–American relations, and the end of the cold war. In Cold war energy. A transnational history of soviet oil and gas, ed. J. Perović, 283–318. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pallin, V. C., and F. Westerlund. 2009. Russia’s war in Georgia: Lessons and consequences. Small Wars & Insurgencies 20 (2):400–24. doi:10.1080/09592310902975539.
   Google Scholar
• Perović, J., and D. Krempin. 2014. “The key is in our hands”: Soviet energy strategy during détente and the global oil crises of the 1970s. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 39 (4):113–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, P. 2017. The trouble with nord stream 2: How the pipeline would benefit Russia at the EU’s expense. Foreign Affairs, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. 2018. Trump says Europe will buy more American gas: Is that possible? The New York Times, July 26.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S., and M. Schreuer 2018. E.U. settles with Russia’s Gazprom over antitrust charges. The New York Times, May 24.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2016. U.S. deeply concerned Nord Stream gas link is security threat. Reuters Commodities News, 6 May. Accessed September 18, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-gazprom-us/u-s-deeply-concerned-nord-stream-gas-link-is-security-threat-idUSKCN0XX1YG.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, M. P., and F. Holz. 2015. All quiet on the eastern front? Disruption scenarios of Russian natural gas supply to Europe. Energy Policy 80:177–89. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J. 2010. NATO burden-sharing redux: Continuity and change after the Cold War. Contemporary Security Policy 31 (2):319–38. doi:10.1080/13523260.2010.491391.
   Google Scholar
• Sabitova, N., and C. Shavaleyeva. 2015. Oil and gas revenues of the Russian federation: Trends and prospects. Procedia Economics and Finance 27:423–28. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01016-3.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Felzmann, A. 2014. ‘Is the EU’s failed relationship with Russia the member states’ fault? L’Europe En Formation 4:40–60. doi:10.3917/eufor.374.0040.
   Google Scholar
• Seputyte, M. 2014. Lithuania grabs LNG in effort to curb Russian dominance. Bloomberg Business.
   Google Scholar
• Sergounin, A. A. 1997. Russian domestic debate on NATO enlargement: From phobia to damage limitation. European Security 6 (4):55–71. doi:10.1080/09662839708407338.
   Google Scholar
• Sevastopulo, D., M. Peel, and T. Buck. 2018. Trump presses Nato allies to lift defence spending to 4% of GDP. Financial Times, July 12.
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. 2016. German foreign policy towards Russia in the aftermath of the Ukraine crisis: A new Ostpolitik? Europe-Asia Studies 68 (4):665–77. doi:10.1080/09668136.2016.1173879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. 2020. A contested hegemon? Germany’s leadership in EU relations with Russia. German Politics 29 (1):97–114. doi:10.1080/09644008.2018.1551485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Stegen, K. 2011. Deconstructing the “energy weapon”: Russia’s threat to Europe as case study. Energy Policy 39 (10):6505–13. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, J. 2006. Natural gas security problems in Europe: The Russian–Ukrainian crisis of 2006. Asia-Pacific Review 13 (1):32–59. doi:10.1080/13439000600697522.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J., S. Pirani, and K. Yafimava. 2009. The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: A comprehensive assessment. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, P. 2009. Transit troubles: Pipelines as a source of conflict. London: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Strzelecki, M. 2015. Poland opens LNG terminal, pledges to end Russian dependence. Bloomberg Business, 12 October. Accessed July 02, 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-12/poland-opens-lng-terminal-pledges-to-end-russian-gas-dependence.
   Google Scholar
• Torriti, J. 2010. Impact assessment and the liberalization of the EU energy markets: Evidence‐based policy‐making or policy‐based evidence‐making? Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4):1065–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02089.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf, T., and D. J. Colgan. 2017. Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science 24:59–64. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, D., and N. M. Victor 2004. The Belarus connection: Exporting Russian gas to Germany and Poland. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at the Center for Environmental Science and Policy Stanford Institute for International Studies, Working Paper 26, Accessed March 15, 2019. https://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/91501/the-belarus-connection-exporting-russian-gasto-germany-and-poland.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Wolczuk, K. 2016. Managing the flows of gas and rules: Ukraine between the EU and Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1):113–37. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1174072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. 2020. ‘Understanding’ for Russia in Germany: International triangle meets domestic politics. Cambridge review of international affairs, 1–24. Accessed January 6, 2020. http://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1703647
   Google Scholar