Geopolitics and the ‘New’ State Capitalism

References

• Abrams, P. 1988. Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977). Journal of Historical Sociology 1 (1):58–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x.
   Google Scholar
• Alami, I. 2019. Money power and financial capital in emerging markets: Facing the liquidity tsunami. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alami, I. 2021. State theory in the age of state capitalism 3.0? Science and Society 85 (2):162–70. doi:10.1521/siso.2021.85.2.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami, I., and A. D. Dixon. 2020a. State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies. Competition & Change 24 (1):70–94. doi:10.1177/1024529419881949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami, I., and A. D. Dixon. 2020b. The strange geographies of the ‘new state capitalism’. Political Geography 82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami, I., A. D. Dixon, and E. Mawdsley. 2021. State Capitalism and the New Global D / development Regime. Antipode, online first.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2020. Merely feminist: Politics, partiality, gender, and geography. Progress in Human Geography 0309132520911570. doi:10.1177/0309132520911570.
   Google Scholar
• Babic, M., J. Garcia-Bernardo, and E. M. Heemskerk. 2020. The rise of transnational state capital: State-led foreign investment in the 21st century. Review of International Political Economy 27 (3):433–75. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1665084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brautigam, D. 2009. The dragon’s gift: The real story of China in Africa. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I. 2010. The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations? New York: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2011. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cammack, P. 2019. The OECD and the world market: Antecedents of deep marketization. Globalizations 16 (6):804–18. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1560184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. 2015. “Access to finance” and the death of development in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary Asia 45 (1):139–66. doi:10.1080/00472336.2014.907927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T., R. Gonzalez-Vicente, and D. S. L. Jarvis. 2019. Capital, conflict and convergence: A political understanding of neoliberalism and its relationship to capitalist transformation. Globalizations 16 (6):778–803. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1560183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K., C. Carson, M. Fennema, E. Heemskerk, and J. P. Sapinski. 2010. The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the twenty-first century. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Charnock, G., and G. Starosta. 2016. The new international division of labour: Global transformation and uneven development, International political economy series. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. J. 2009. Sovereign wealth funds and national security: The Great Tradeoff. International Affairs 85 (4):713–31. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00824.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaff, N. 2020. China Inc. goes global. Transnational and national networks of China’s globalizing business elite. Review of International Political Economy 27 (2):208–33. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1675741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaff, N., and D. Valeeva. Forthcoming. Chinese Corporations in Europe – Emerging networks of Sino-European corporate elite interlocks.
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, A. 2017. Perspectives on the emerging role of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. International Affairs 93 (5):1061–84. doi:10.1093/ia/iix156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2017. Diplomatic material: Affect, assemblage, and foreign policy. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, A. D. 2017. The state as institutional investor: Unpacking the geographical political economy of sovereign wealth funds. In Handbook of the geographies of money and finance, ed. R. Martin and J. Pollard, 279–97. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. 2008. Sovereign welath funds and the (in)security of global finance. Journal of International Affairs 62 (1):115–30.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and A. L. Newman. 2019. Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security 44 (1):42–79. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B. 2013. Beyond the developmental state: An introduction. In Developmental state: Industrial policy into the twenty-first century, ed. B. Fine, J. Saraswati, and D. Tavasci, 1–32. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, K. C., N. Aminian, X. Fu, J. H. Rhee, and C. Y. Tung. 2020. “Silicon trade policies” and a comparative analysis of China-U.S. and Japan-U.S. trade conflicts. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 18 (1):29–50. doi:10.1080/14765284.2020.1731785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. P., and A. Irwin. 2015. China’s economic statecraft in Latin America: Evidence from China’s policy banks. Pacific Affairs 88 (1):99–121. doi:10.5509/201588199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. 2016. Assessing nord stream 2: Regulation, geopolitics & energy security in the EU, Central Eastern Europe & the UK.EUCERS Strategy Papers (10):1-40.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Vicente, R. 2019. Make development great again? Accumulation regimes, spaces of sovereign exception and the elite development paradigm of China’s belt and road initiative. Business and Politics 21 (4):487–513. doi:10.1017/bap.2019.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., L. Jones, and J. Heathershaw. 2019. Reframing the rising powers debate: State transformation and foreign policy. Third World Quarterly 40 (8):1397–414. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1594182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, E. M., and F. W. Takes. 2016. The corporate elite community structure of global capitalism. New Political Economy 21 (1):90–118. doi:10.1080/13563467.2015.1041483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMF. 2020. State-owned enterprises: The other government. In Fiscal monitor, ed. IMF. Washington, DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, A., R. Squire, J. Bruun, and P. Thornton. 2020. Unearthing feminist territories and terrains. Political Geography 80:102180. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, N. 2019. In China’s wake: How the commodity boom transformed development strategies in the global south. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., and Y. Zou. 2017. Rethinking the role of state-owned enterprises in China’s rise. New Political Economy 22 (6):743–60. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1321625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2012. State encounters. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 30 (5):805–21. doi:10.1068/d9110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. B. 2016. Banking unconditionally: The political economy of Chinese finance in Latin America. Review of International Political Economy 23 (4):643–76. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1216005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B.-K., and I. Hyug-Baeg. 2001 ‘Crony capitalism’ in South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan: Myth and reality. Journal of East Asian Studies 1 (1):5–52. doi:10.1017/S1598240800000230.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2013. Geopolitics and expertise knowledge and authority in European diplomacy. RGS-IBG book series. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W. 1974. Karl Marx and enclosures in England. Review of Radical Political Economics 6 (2):1–59. doi:10.1177/048661347400600205.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-O. 2014. The production of territory in North Korea: ‘Security first, economy next’. Geopolitics 19 (1):206–26. doi:10.1080/14650045.2013.847432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-O. 2017. Free trade agreements and “economic territory” as a geoeconomic imaginary in South Korea. Critical Asian Studies 49 (4):569–86. doi:10.1080/14672715.2017.1377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital: A critique of political economy, Vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E., W. E. Murray, J. Overton, R. Scheyvens, and G. Banks. 2018. Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity”: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era. Development Policy Review 36 (S1):O25–O43. doi:10.1111/dpr.12282.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2018. Performing diplomatic decorum: Repertoires of “appropriate” behavior in the margins of international diplomacy. International Political Sociology 12 (4):362–81. doi:10.1093/ips/oly021.
   Google Scholar
• Medby, I. A. 2018. Articulating state identity: ‘Peopling’ the Arctic state. Political Geography 62:116–25. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. 2019. Chinese direct investment in Europe: Economic opportunities and political challenges. In Handbook on the international political economy of China, ed. K. Zeng, 98–112. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., and A. Paasi. 2013. From geopolitical to geoeconomic? The changing political rationalities of state space. Geopolitics 18 (2):267–83. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.723287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2005. To be a diplomat. International Studies Perspectives 6 (1):72–93. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00194.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ed. 2014. Multinational corporations from emerging markets: State capitalism 3.0. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., T. Ten Brink, S. Claar, and C. May. 2015. Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations 21 (3):538–67. doi:10.1177/1354066114553682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B.-G. 2005. Spatially selective liberalization and graduated sovereignty: Politics of neo-liberalism and “special economic zones” in South Korea. Political Geography 24 (7):850–73. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B.-G., S.-O. Lee, and S. Cho. 2017. 특구: 국가의 영토성과 동아시아의 예외공간 [Special zones: Spaces of exception in East Asia]. Seoul: Alt.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2019. Combination. In Keywords in : Antipode radical geographyat 50, ed. Antipode Editorial Collective. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34 (3):380–404. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2016. Macroeconomic geographies. Area Development and Policy 1 (3):305–22. doi:10.1080/23792949.2016.1237263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieke, F. 2020. China through European eyes. Institute of Chinese Studies Occasional Papers 41.
   Google Scholar
• Pirie, I. 2018. Korea and Taiwan: The crisis of investment-led growth and the end of the developmental state. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (1):133–58. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1375136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., H. C. Moraes, and V. Ferguson. 2019. Toward a geoeconomic order in international trade and investment. Journal of International Economic Law 22 (4):655–76. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgz036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, S., and J. Miguel Kanai. 2019. Getting the territory right: Infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies. Regional Studies 1–12. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, B. 2016. Elite development theory: A labour-centred critique. Third World Quarterly 37 (5):781–99. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1120156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobodian, Q. 2018. Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Brink, T. 2019. China’s capitalism. A paradoxical route to economic prosperity. Philadelphia: University Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E. 2016. Developmental mindset: The revival of financial activism in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Apeldoorn, B., N. De Graaff, and H. Overbeek. 2012. The reconfiguration of the global state–capital nexus. Globalizations 9 (4):471–86. doi:10.1080/14747731.2012.699915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihma, A. 2018. Geoeconomic Analysis and the limits of critical geopolitics: A new engagement with Edward Luttwak. Geopolitics 23 (1):1–21. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1302928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R. H. 2018. The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change 49 (2):518–46. doi:10.1111/dech.12381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. 1959. Man, the state, and war; A theoretical analysis, Topical studies in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. 2007. The brave new world of state capitalism. Financial Times, October 16.
   Google Scholar
• Woon, C. Y. 2015. “Peopling” geographies of peace: The role of the military in peacebuilding in the Philippines. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 (1):14–27. doi:10.1111/tran.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38 (2):341–63. doi:10.5465/256683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar