Performing the Cold War through the ‘The Best Board Game on the Planet’: The Ludic Geopolitics of Twilight Struggle

References

• Adey, P., and B. Anderson. 2012. Anticipating emergencies: Technologies of preparedness and the matter of security. Security Dialogue 43 (2):99–117. doi:10.1177/0967010612438432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alimia, S. 2019. Performing the Afghanistan-Pakistan border through refugee ID cards. Geopolitics 24 (2):391–425. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1465046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrault, S., and I. Varescon. 2016. Online and live regular poker players: Do they differ in impulsive sensation seeking and gambling practice? Journal of Behavioral Addictions 51 (1):41–50. doi:10.1556/2006.5.2016.015.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. 2007. Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. 2008. The rhetoric of video games. In The ecology of games, ed. K. Salen, 117–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. 2015. Game play: Paratextuality in contemporary board games. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Boria, E. 2008. Geopolitical maps: A sketch history of a neglected trend in cartography. Geopolitics 13 (2):278–308. doi:10.1080/14650040801991522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borit, C., M. Broit, and P. Olsen. 2018. Representations of colonialism in three popular, modern board games: Puerto Rico, Struggle of Empires, and Archipelago. Open Library of Humanities 4 (1):1–40. doi:10.16995/olh.211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, D. 2018. Answering the Call of Duty: Everyday encounters with the popular geopolitics of military-themed videogames. Political Geography 63:54–64. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J. 2020. Becoming Churchill: Mark Herman’s great statesmen series and the importance of getting into character. Punched 1. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.cardboardemperors.co.uk/issue1.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S., P. Kirby, and T. Woodyer. 2016. Ludic-or playful-geopolitics. In Children, young people and critical geopolitics, ed. M. Benwell and P. Hopkins, 61–74. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. 2016. Digital games as history. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. 2001. Mao’s China and the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Corbeil, P. 2011. History and simulation/gaming: Living with two solitudes. Simulation & Gaming 42 (4):418–22. doi:10.1177/1046878108325440.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D., and D. Dora. 2005. Mapping global war: Los Angeles, the Pacific, and Charles Owens’s pictorial cartography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2):373–90. 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00465.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallek, R. 1991. Lone star rising: Lyndon Johnson and his times, 1908-1960. Oxford, UK: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• de Zamaroczy, N. 2017. Are we what we play? global politics in historical strategy computer games. International Studies Perspectives 18 (2):155–74. doi:10.1093/isp/ekv010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSilva, J. 2019. Gaming to learn: Pedagogical uses of board games. Sixteenth Century Journal 50 (4):1135–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, J. 2021. White Revolution/Premier Assassinated. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1032467202/1979-revolution-in-iran/posts/3151130.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2013. Humour at the Model United Nations: The role of laughter in constituting geopolitical assemblages. Geopolitics 18 (3):493–513. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.742066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2015. Playing geopolitics: Utopian simulations and subversions of international relations. Geography Journal 80:909–23. doi:10.1007/s10708-015-9655-1.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J., and N. Gray. 2010. Popular geopolitics 2.0: Towards new methodologies of the everyday. Geography Compass 44 (11):1664–77. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A., and M. Kapell. 2013. Introduction: To build a past that will ‘stand the test of time’. In Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history, ed. M. Kapell and A. Elliott, 1–30. New York: Bloombury.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, N. 2006. How to win a war. New York Magazine, 12 October. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://nymag.com/news/features/22787/.
   Google Scholar
• Fjællingsdal, K., and C. Klöckner. 2020. Green across the board: Board games as tools for dialogue and simplified environmental communication. Simulation & Gaming 51 (5):632–52. 10.1177/1046878120925133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M., and Nissenbaum. 2016. Values at play in digital games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, K. 2020. Covid-19 is making way for a tabletop game renaissance. Quartz, 29 May. Accessed June 14, 2021, https://qz.com/1861475/covid-19-is-making-way-for-a-tabletop-game-renaissance/.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. 2016. ‘eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, eXterminate’: Affective writing of postcolonial history and education in Civilization V. Game Studies 16(2). Accessed June 14, 2021. http://gamestudies.org/1602/articles/ford.
   Google Scholar
• Frasca, G. 1999. Ludology meets narratology: Similitude and differences between (video)games and narrative. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://ludology.typepad.com/weblog/articles/ludology.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Frasca, G. 2003. Ludologists love stories, too: Notes from a debate that never took place. In Digital Games Research Conference 2003 Proceedings. Accessed June 14, 2021 http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/05163.01125.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. 2018. Shadow Cold War: The Sino-Soviet competition for the Third World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. 1998. Civilization and its discontents: Simulation, subjectivity, and space. In On a silver platter: CD-ROMs and the promises of a new technology, ed. G. Smith, 132–50. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. 2006. Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Haggman, A. 2019. Cyber wargaming: Finding, designing, and playing wargames for cyber security education. PhD. Dissertation, University of London. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/portal/files/33911603/2019haggmanaphd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harby, A. 2019. Little wars: The geopolitics of 20th century board games, Dissertation.University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, M. 2017. Churchill. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/gmtwebsiteassets/churchill/Churchill_Rules2ndEd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Freeland, F. 1998. Ritual, performance, media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huss, M. 2019. Mapping the occupation: Performativity and the precarious Israeli identity. Geopolitics 24 (3):756–70. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1393800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2004. Game design as narrative architecture. In First person: New media as story, performance, and game, ed. N. Wardrip-Fruin and P. Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. 2005. Cold War chess. Prospect, 19 June. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/coldwarchess.
   Google Scholar
• Kapell, M., and A. Elliot. 2013. Conclusion: Playing at true myths, engaging with authentic histories. In Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history, ed. M. Kapell and A. Elliott, 357–69. New York: Bloombury.
   Google Scholar
• Klinke, I. 2013. Chronopolitics: A conceptual matrix. Progress in Human Geography 37 (5):673–90. doi:10.1177/0309132512472094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosa, M. Spronck, P. 2018. What tabletop players think about augmented tabletop games: A content analysis [Conference session]. FDG '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 10.1145/3235765.3235782Accessed June 14, 2021,https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3235765.3235782.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, C. 2005. The semiotics of time structure in ludic space as a foundation for analysis and design. Game Studies 5 (1). Accessed June 14, 2021. http://www.gamestudies.org/0501/lindley/.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, F. 2008. Space and the atom: On the popular geopolitics of Cold War rocketry. Geopolitics 13 (4):611–34. doi:10.1080/14650040802275479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, D. 2001. The fantasy pole-playing game: A new performing art. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J., and A. Gupta 2005. Twilight Struggle. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.gmtgames.com/living_rules/TS_Rules_Deluxe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. 2018. Cold War spaces: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy in television and cinema. Journal of British Cinema and Television 15 (3):375–95.10.3366/jbctv.2018.0428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melley, T. 1999. Empire of conspiracy: The culture of paranoia in postwar America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2008. Reconsidering the concept of discourse for the field of critical geopolitics: Towards discourse as language and practice. Political Geography 27 (3):322–38. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogborn, M. 2011. The power of speech: Orality, oaths and evidence in the British Atlantic world, 1650-1800. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (1):109–25. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00412.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perla, P., and E. D. McGrady. 2011. Why wargaming works. Naval War College Review 64 (3):111–30.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R., A. Miller, and S. Fedorko. 2013. The same river twice: Exploring historical representation and the value of simulation in the total war, civilization, and patrician franchises. In Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history, ed. M. Kapel and A. Elliott, 33–48. New York: Bloombury.
   Google Scholar
• Rech, M. 2020. Ephemera(l) geopolitics: The material cultures of British military recruitment. Geopolitics 25 (5):1075–98. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1570920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejack, B. 2007. Toward a virtual reenactment of history: Videogames and the recreation of the past. Rethinking History 11 (3):411–25. doi:10.1080/13642520701353652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. 2015. Videogames and IR: Playing at method. In Popular culture and world politics: Theories, methods, pedagogies, ed. F. Caso and C. Hamilton, 91–100. Accessed June 14, 2021. http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pop-Culture-and-World-Politics-E-IR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roeder, O. 2014. Designing the best board game on the planet. FiveThirtyEight.com, 31 December. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/designing-the-best-board-game-on-the-planet/.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. 2011. The geographical imaginations of video games: . Diplomacy, Civilization, America’s Army, and Grand Theft Auto IV 16 (2):359–88. doi:10.1080/14650045.2010.538875.
   Google Scholar
• Schulzke, M. 2013. Refighting the Cold War: Videogames and speculative history. In Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history, ed. M. Kapel and A. Elliott, 261–75. New York: Bloombury.
   Google Scholar
• Sepinsky, J. 2021. Is it a wargame? it doesn’t matter: Rigorous wargames versus effective wargaming. War on the Rocks, 24 February. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://warontherocks.com/2021/02/is-it-a-wargame-it-doesnt-matter-rigorous-wargames-versus-effective-wargaming/.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. 2009. Critical geopolitics. In International encyclopedia of human geography, eds.S. R. Kitchin and N. Thrift 1st. ed., 358–362. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. 2010. Playing war. Social & Cultural Geography 11 (_8):789–803. doi:10.1080/14649365.2010.521855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, B. 1989. Enemy images: The psychology of U.S. attitudes and cognitions regarding the Soviet Union. American Psychologist 44 (6):903–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.6.903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, L. 2020. The ‘desk-chair countryside’: Affect, authenticity and the rural idyll in a farming computer game. Journal of Rural Studies 78:350–63. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. 2012. Eurogames: The design, culture, and play of modern European boardgames. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Woodyer, T., and S. Carter. 2020. Domesticating the geopolitical: Rethinking popular geopolitics through play. Geopolitics 25 (5):1050–74. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1527769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood, R. 2015. Miniaturisation and the representation of military geographies in recreational wargaming. Social & Cultural Geography 16 (6):654–74. doi:10.1080/14649365.2014.1001430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar