The ‘Pivot to the East‘ and China in Russian Discourse

References

• Berg, E., and O. Saima. 2000. Writing post-Soviet Estonia on to the world map. Political Geography 19:601–25. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00005-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. A. 2017. “Little Berlin Wall” for all: Discursive construction across scales. Europa Regional 24 (1–2):80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S., and K. Dodds. 2011. Hollywood and the “war on terror”: Genre‐geopolitics and “Jacksonianism” in The Kingdom. Environment and Planning 29 (1):98–113. doi:10.1068/d7609.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 1990. Creating the second cold war. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Diatlov, V. 2000. Migratsiia kitaitsev i diskussiia o ‘Zheltoi opasnosti’ v dorevoliutsionnoi Rossii. Bulletin of Eurasia 1:63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkink, G.-J. 1996. National identity and geopolitical visions: Maps of pride and pain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2010. Textual and discourse analysis. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography, ed. D. De Lyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, and L. McDowell, 274–86. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, K., and A. Pinkerton. 2009. Radio geopolitics: Broadcasting, listening and the struggle for acoustic spaces. Progress in Human Geography 33 (1):10–27. doi:10.1177/0309132508090978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garusova, L. N. 2012. Imidzhi Rossii i SSHA kak faktor mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij. Territory of New Opportunities. Bulletin of VSUES. 3:147–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska, К. 2018. Academic community and policymaking in Russia. Problems of Post-Communism 1–13. doi:10.1080/10758216.2018.1520603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, K. 2018. Geopolitics of cross-border cooperation at the EU’s external borders discourses of de-and re-bordering, territorial perceptions and actor relations within the Finnish-Russian ENI cooperation network. Oulu: Juvenes Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kolosov, V. 2003a. “High” and “Low” geopolitics: Images of foreign countries in the eyes of Russian citizens. Geopolitics 8 (1):121–48. doi:10.1080/714001015.
   Google Scholar
• Kolosov, V., ed. 2003b. Mir glazami rossiyan: Mify i vneshnyaya politika. Moscow: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kolosov, V. A. 2018. Paradoksy globalizacii i usilivayushchiesya bar’ernye funkcii granic v sovremennom mire. Regional Studies 3 (61):9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J. 2014. No news is good news? Making the finnish public image of Russia. GeoJournal 80:1. doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9539-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, J., and M. van der Velde. 2017. Spiritually ours, factually yours: Karelia and Russia in Finnish public consciousness. Europa Regional 24 (1):65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Larin, A. G. 2016. “Silk road Economic belt”: Economic content, structure, ideology. In Novyj Shelkovyj put’ i ego znachenie dlya Rossii, ed. V. E. Petrovsky, 38–57. Moscow: Deli plus.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, А. V. 2011. «Kitajskaya ugroza» i dualizm soznaniya. POLIS. Political Studies 2011 (6):183–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, А. V. 2018. Vozvyshayushchijsya Kitaj i budushchee Rossii. Moscow: International relations.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, B. 2017. Russia’s strategy “Pivot to the East”: Opportunities and challenges for connecting with Chinese transregional projects. Sravnitelnaya Politika 8 (2):82–97. (In Russ.). doi:10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-82-97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, Y. V. 2017. Problemy, prepyatstvuyushchie realizacii integracionnyh proektov Kitaya i Rossii v Evrazii. In Problems and prospects of implementing the Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative in the context of the SCO, ed. V. A. Matveev, 112–33. Moscow: IDV RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2008. Reconsidering the concept of discourse for the field of critical geopolitics: Towards discourse as language and practice. Political Geography 27 (3):322–38. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2010. Doing discourse analysis in critical geopolitic. L’Espace Politique 12 (2010–3). http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/1743.
   Google Scholar
• Nosov, M. 2020. Russia in the context of the Chinese project “One Belt - One Road”. Article one. Sovremennaya Evropa 5:33–45. (In Russ.).
   Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, J. Ó., G. Tuathail, and V. Kolosov. 2006. The geopolitical orientations of ordinary Russians: A public opinion analysis. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47 (2):129–52. doi:10.2747/1538-7216.47.2.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Tuathail, G. 2010. Localizing geopolitics: Disaggregating violence and return in conflict regions. Political Geography 29:256–65. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Tuathail, G., and J. Agnew. 1992. Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography 11 (2):190–204. Obshchestvennoe mnenie-2018. 2019. Мoscow: Levada-Center. Obshchestvennoe mnenie-2019. 2020. Мoscow: Levada-Center.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky, A. V. 2016. Kak podklyuchit’ Sibir’ i Dal’nij Vostok k Shelkovomu puti? In New Silk Road and its significance for Russia, ed. V. E. Petrovsky, 131–46. Moscow: Deli Plus.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, K., and V. Gel’man. 2019. Do elites matter in Russian foreign policy? The gap between self-perception and influence. Post-Soviet Affairs 1–11. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2019.1662185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, S. 2017. Understanding geography and war: Misperceptions, foundations, and prospects. NY: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Riazantsev, S. V. 2012. “Globalizaciya po-kitajski”: Investicii, migraciya, diaspora. International Processes 10 (3):20–41.
   Google Scholar
• Safronova, E. I. 2017. Proekt «Odin poyas, odin put’» — Kompleksnyj faktor «myagkoj sily» Kitaya. In Problems and prospects of implementing the Silk Road economic belt initiative in the context of the SCO, ed. V. A. Matveev, 60–77. Moscow: IDV RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Sazonov, S. L., and X. Chen. 2017. Ctroitel’stvo infrastruktury «poyasa i puti» kak osnovnaya model’ nacional’nogo ekonomicheskogo i vneshneekonomicheskogo razvitiya Kitaya. In Problems and prospects of implementing the Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative in the context of the SCO, ed. V. A. Matveev, 34–40. Moscow: IDV RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. 2000. Condensing the cold war: Reader’s digest and american identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharyshev, A. V. 2016. Strategic partnership between Russia and China: Importance and sustainability of bilateral relations. Comparative Politics 2 (23):112–17. doi:10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-2(23)-112-117.
   Google Scholar
• Uyanaev, S. V. 2016. Iniciativa KNR «Odin poyas, odin put’»: Evolyuciya, dokumenty, vzglyad iz Rossii. In New Silk Road and its significance for Russia, ed. V. E. Petrovsky, 11–37. Moscow: Deli Plus.
   Google Scholar
• Vardomskiy, L. B. 2018. Uchastie regionov v torgovle s Kitaem kak otrazhenie prostranstvennoj struktury rossijskoj ekonomiki. Regional Studies 4 (62):53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, D. 2016. Dinamika antiamerikanskih nastroenij v postsovetskoj Rossii i osnovnye kharakteristiki antiamerikanizma na segodnyashnij den. Bulletin of Public Opinion 3–4 (122):141–59.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, D., and S. Goncharov. 2017. Rossijskij medialandshaft: Osnovnye tendencii ispol’zovaniya SMI. Bulletin of Public Opinion 1–2 (124):105–29.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, D., and S. Goncharov 2020. Rossijskij medialandshaft-2020. http://momri.org/2020/momrinews/levada-centr-rossijskij-medialandshaft-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Zabiyako, A. P., R. A. Kobyzov, and L. A. Ponkratova. 2009. Russkie i kitajcy: Etnomigracionnye processy na Dal’nem Vostoke. Blagoveshchensk: Amur State University.
   Google Scholar