Translating EUrope’s Return Migration Regime to The Gambia: The Incorporation of Local CSOs

References

• Eurostat. 2021. Final decisions in appeal or review on applications by citizenship, age and sex - annual data (rounded). Accessed March 8, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Aguillon, M. D. 2020. La fabrique de la politique migratoire sénégalaise. Concevoir, négocier, contester. Anthropologie & développement 51 (51):51–67. doi:10.4000/anthropodev.957.
   Google Scholar
• Altrogge, J., and F. Zanker. 2019. The political economy of migration governance in The Gambia. Freiburg: Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. 2014. Illegality, Inc. clandestine migration and the business of bordering europe. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anholt, R. 2020. Resilience in practice: Responding to the refugee crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon. Politics and Governance 8 (4):294–305. doi:10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, I. 2017. ‘we must do it gently’. The contested implementation of the IOM’s migration management in Morocco. Migration Studies 5 (3):315–36. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, M., D. Córdoba, and P. Teunissen. 2020. (Re)searching with imperial eyes: Collective self-inquiry as a tool for transformative migration studies. Social Inclusion 8 (4):147–56. doi:10.17645/si.v8i4.3363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovitch, N., and N. Gordon. 2008. The political economy of transnational regimes: The case of human rights. International Studies Quarterly 52 (4):881–904. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00530.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L. 2012. Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of Europe: Libya and EU border work in the mediterranean. Geopolitics 17 (4):843–66. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.660579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., and E. Guild, eds. 2005. Controlling frontiers: Free movement into and within Europe. Aldershot, UK.: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bisong, A. 2020. Migration Partnership Framework and the Externalization of European Union’s (EU) Migration Policy in West Africa: The Case of Mali and Niger. In Regional Integration and migration governance in the global south, ed. G. Rayp, I. Ruyssen, K. Marchand, 217–37. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bisong, A. 2021. Invented, invited and instrumentalised spaces: Conceptualising non-state actor engagement in regional migration governance in West Africa. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–19. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2021.1972570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouilly, E. 2008. La couverture médiatique du collectif pour la lutte contre l’immigration clandestine de thiaroye-sur-mer (Dakar- Sénégal). une mise en abîme du discours produit au « nord » sur le « sud » [the media coverage of the collective fight against the clandestine immigration of Thiaroye-sur-Mer (Dakar - Senegal). A mise en abyme of the discourse/speech made in “the north” on “the South”]. Revue Asylon(s) 3. http://reseau-terra.eu/article721.html
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., H. Johnson, and D. Lisle. 2015. Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies. Security Dialogue 46 (4):307–25. doi:10.1177/0967010615578399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, ed. Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D., and H. Dijstelbloem. 2016. the datafication of mobility and migration management: the mediating state and its consequences. In Digitizing identities: doing identity in a networked world, ed. I. V. der Ploeg and J.Pridmore, 242–60. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1984. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl):196–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas-Cortes, M., S. Cobarrubias, and J. Pickles. 2013. Re-bordering the neighbourhood: Europe’s emerging geographies of non-accession integration. European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (1):37–58. doi:10.1177/0969776411434848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J. 2018. Beyond the Criminalisation of migration: A Non-Western perspective. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies 4 (4):397–411. doi:10.1504/IJMBS.2018.096756.
   Google Scholar
• Cham, O. N., and I. Adam. 2021. The politicization and framing of migration in West Africa: Transition to democracy as a game changer? Territory, Politics, Governance 1–20. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1990790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cold-Ravnkilde, S. M. 2021. Borderwork in the grey zone: everyday resistance within European border control initiatives in mali. Geopolitics 1–20. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1919627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. 2019. From preventive to repressive: The changing use of development and humanitarianism to control migration. In Handbook on critical geographies of migration, ed. K. Mitchell, R. Jones and Jennifer L. Fluri, 170–181. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad Suso, C. 2019. Backway or bust: Causes and consequences of Gambian irregular migration. The Journal of Modern African Studies 57 (1):111–35. doi:10.1017/S0022278X18000666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttitta, P. 2020. Non‐governmental/civil society organisations and the European Union‐externalisation of migration management in Tunisia and Egypt. Population, Space and Place 26:1–13. doi:10.1002/psp.2329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deridder, M., L. Pelckmans, and E. Ward. 2020. Reversing the gaze: West Africa performing the EU migration-development-security nexus. Introduction. Anthropologie & développement 51:9–32. doi:10.4000/anthropodev.938.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. P. 2014. ‘development’ as if we have never been modern: fragments of a latourian development studies. Development and Change 45:869–94. doi:10.1111/dech.12117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drotbohm, H., and N. Winters. 2020. The event in migrant categorization: exploring eventfulness across the americas. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 17:e17650.
   Google Scholar
• Freemantle, I., and B. Landau. 2020. Migration and the african timespace trap: more Europe for the world, less world for Europe. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1859479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frowd, P. M. 2018. Developmental borderwork and the international organization for migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10):1656–72. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaibazzi, P. 2020. Frontiers of externalisation: borders and temporality in the Euro-African zone. Paideuma 66.
   Google Scholar
• Gaibazzi, P., S. Dünnwald, and A. Bellagamba, eds. 2017. EurAfrican borders and migration management: political cultures, contested spaces, and ordinary lives. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud, eds. 2010. The politics of international migration management. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud, 2020. The international organization for migration. In The new ‘un migration agency’ in critical perspective, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-32976-1
   Google Scholar
• Glouftsios, G., and S. Scheel. 2021. An inquiry into the digitisation of border and migration management: Performativity, contestation and heterogeneous engineering. Third World Quarterly 42 (1):123–40. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1807929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. 2013. Development studies research and actor-network theory. Working Paper No. 1. Centre for Development Informatics Institute for Development Policy and Management, SED.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, K., A. Amelina, and K. Peters. 2017. Re-thinking the politics of migration. on the uses and challenges of regime perspectives for migration research. Migration Studies 5 (3):301–14. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IOM. 2017. Migration in the gambia. A country profile 2017. Accessed March 30, 2021. https://rodakar.iom.int/sites/default/files/document/publications/The%20Gambia%20Migration%20Profile.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L. 2016. Narrating entanglements: rethinking the local/global divide in ethnographic migration research. International Political Sociology 10 (4):383–97. doi:10.1093/ips/olw021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A. 2014. The politics and discourse of migrant return: the role of UNHCR and IOM in the governance of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6):905–23. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.855073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996a. Aramis, or the Love of Technology. United States of Amt'rica: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996b. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale welt 47, 369–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. an introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., and D. Mosse, eds. 2006. Development brokers and translators: The ethnography of aid and agencies. Bloomfield (Conn.): Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, R., and I. Lietaert 2022 The legitimization of the policy objective of sustainable reintegration. In Handbook on return migration, R. King and K. Kuschminder, ed. 167–184. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2015. Assemblages and actor-networks: rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass 9:27–41. doi:10.1111/gec3.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. 1998. The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum 29 (4):357–74. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okafor-Yarwood, I., and D. Belhabib. 2020. The duplicity of the European Union common fisheries policy in third countries: Evidence from the Gulf of Guinea. Ocean & Coastal Management 184. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ould Moctar, H. 2020. The proximity of the past in mauritania. EU border externalisation and its colonial antecedents. Anthropologie & développement 51:51–67. doi:10.4000/anthropodev.951.
   Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2021. Alter-geographies of everyday externalisation: shattering european attempts at policing mobility? Geopolitics 1–5. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.2008735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastore, F., and E. Roman. 2020. Framing migration in the southern mediterranean: how do civil society actors evaluate eu migration policies? the case of Tunisia. Comparative Migration Studies 8 (1):1–22. doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0160-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. 2018. What do we know about the international organization for migration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10):1621–38. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelizza, A. 2021. Identification as translation: The art of choosing the right spokespersons at the securitized border. Social Studies of Science 51 (4): 487–511. doi:10.1177/0306312720983932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pian, A. 2010. The discursive framework for development: From discourses and concrete political actions to the range of actions by deportee associations. University of Oxford, UK: International Migration Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pollozek, S. 2020. Mapping European border control: On small maps, reflexive inversion and interference. Social Inclusion 8 (4):157–68. doi:10.17645/si.v8i4.3354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roepstorff, K. 2020. A call for critical reflection on the localisation agenda in humanitarian action. Third World Quarterly 41 (2):284–301. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1644160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumford, C. 2012. Towards a multiperspectival study of borders. Geopolitics 17 (4):887–902. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.660584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapendonk, J. 2020. Finding ways through Eurospace.:West African movers re-viewing Europe from the inside. New York, USA: Berghahn Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. 2021. ‘request denied’: some elements of a sociology of translation and treason for border and migration studies. Geopolitics 1–27. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1973436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel, S., and P. Ratfisch. 2014. Refugee protection meets migration management: UNHCR as global police of populations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6):924–41. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.855074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciortino, G. 2004. Between phantoms and necessary evils: Some critical points in the study of irregular migrations to Western Europe. IMIS-Beiträge 24:17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. 2011. Subaltern geopolitics: Introduction. Geoforum 42 (3):271–73. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 2011. Graduated incarceration: the Israeli occupation in subaltern geopolitical perspective. Geoforum 42 (3):316–28. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalph, F. 2019. Hybrids, materiality, and black boxes: concepts of actor‐network theory in data journalism research. Sociology Compass 13 (11):e12738. doi:10.1111/soc4.12738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, I., A. Üstübici, and S. U. Schultz. 2019. Externalization at work: Responses to migration policies from the global South. CMS 7 (48). doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0157-z.
   Google Scholar
• Sylla, A., and S. M. Cold-Ravnkilde. 2021. En route to Europe? the anti-politics of deportation from North Africa to Mali. Geopolitics 1–20. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1995358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A. 2020. Decentering the study of migration governance: a radical view. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1839052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsianos, V., and S. Karakayali. 2010. Transnational migration and the emergence of the European border regime: An ethnographic analysis. European Journal of Social Theory 13 (3):373–87. doi:10.1177/1368431010371761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vammen, I. M. S. 2021. ‘When migrants become messengers’: affective borderwork and aspiration management in senegal. Geopolitics 1–20. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1913408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, J. 2019. International delegation and agency in the externalization process of eu migration and asylum policy: the role of the IOM and the UNHCR in Niger. European Journal of Migration and Law 21 (4):435–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, J. 2021. Externalization through ‘awareness-raising’: The border spectacle of EU migration information campaigns in niger. Territory, Politics, Governance 1–21. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1974535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Riemsdijk, M., M. H. Marchand, and V. M. Heins. 2021. New actors and contested architectures in global migration governance: Continuity and change. Third World Quarterly 42 (1):1–15. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1857235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. 2019. Detention and its discontents: Punishment and compliance within the U.K. detention estate through the lens of the withdrawal of assisted voluntary return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (13):2348–65. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1443805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2010. Foucault and frontiers: notes on the birth of the humanitarian border. In Governmentality, ed. U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, T. Lemke, 146–72. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, I. 2020. Contemporary application of ant: an introduction. In contemporary applications of actor network theory, ed. I. Williams, 1–13. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zanker, F., and J. Altrogge. 2017. The politics of migration governance in The Gambia. Freiburg: Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Zardo, F. 2020. The EU trust fund for Africa: geopolitical space making through migration policy instruments. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1815712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar