Performing Border Externalisation: Media Deterrence Campaigns and Neoliberal Belonging

References

• Achiume, E. T. 2022. Racial borders. The Georgetown Law Journal 110 (3):445–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amores, J. J., C. Arcila-Calderón, and B. González-De-Garay. 2020. The gendered representation of refugees using visual frames in the main Western European Media. Gender Issues 37 (4):291–314. doi:10.1007/s12147-020-09248-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. C. 2020. An international analysis of governmental media campaigns to deter asylum seekers. International Journal of Communication 14:1092–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojarski, S. 2021. ‘Don’t Come,’ US embassy tells Haitians, in puzzling tweets. The Haitian Times, March 24, 2021. http://haitiantimes.com/2021/03/24/dont-come-us-embassy-tells-haitians-in-puzzling-tweets/.
   Google Scholar
• Brachet, J. 2016. Policing the desert: The IOM in Libya beyond war and Peace. Antipode 48 (2):272–92. doi:10.1111/anti.12176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2017. Undoing the demos. Princeton: Princeton UP.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., E. Floristán, R. Thornton, O. Wolf, and S. Riva. Forthcoming. Being Held in the Words of Others: Collectivising Reflexivity Against Neoliberal Academia. Emotions, Space and Society Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Cappi, V., and P. Musarò. 2022. Awareness campaigns to deter migrants: A neoliberal industry for symbolic bordering. Refugee Externalisation Policies: Responsibility, Legitimacy and Accountability. In Eds. A. Nethery, A. Hirsch, and A. Dastyari, pp. 171–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cappi, V., and P. Musarò. 2022. Awareness campaigns to deter migrants: A neoliberal industry for symbolic bordering. In Refugee Externalisation Policies, ed. A. Dastyari, A. Nethery, and A. Hirsch, 171–88. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003167273-15
   Google Scholar
• Carling, J., and M. Hernández-Carretero. 2011. Protecting Europe and protecting migrants? Strategies for managing unauthorised migration from Africa. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 13 (1):42–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00438.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBP Launches Digital Ad Campaign. 2022. ’Say No to the Coyote’ to warn migrants about Smuggler Lies | U.S. customs and border protection. US Customs and Border Protection. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-launches-digital-ad-campaign-say-no-coyote-warn-migrants-about.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2011. Spectacles of Migrant ‘Illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7):1180–98. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.783710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, S., and P. Dannecker. 2017. Managing migration with stories the IOM ‘I am a migrant’ campaign. Open Research Online (The Open University) XXXIII (1):75–101. doi:10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-33-1-75.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. 2003. The twilight of equality: Neoliberalism, cultural politics and the attack on democracy. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• El Kotni, M., L. Z. Dixon, and V. Miranda. 2020. Introduction: Co-Authorship as feminist writing and practice. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/introduction-co-authorship-as-feminist-writing-and-practice.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4):51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escamilla Garcia, A. A. 2022. Knowledge, Place, and Experience in the Migrant Journey: How Central American Migrant Youth Negotiate Violence in Mexico. Dissertation, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Fleay, C., J. Cokley, A. Dodd, L. Briskman, and L. Schwartz. 2016. Missing the Boat: Australia and asylum seeker deterrence messaging. International Migration 54 (4):60–73. doi:10.1111/imig.12241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franko, K. 2021. The two-sided spectacle at the border: Frontex, NGOs and the theatres of sovereignty. Theoretical Criminology 25 (3):379–99. doi:10.1177/13624806211007858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frowd, P. M. 2020. Producing the ‘transit’ migration state: International security intervention in Niger. Third World Quarterly 41 (2):340–58. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1660633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, C. 2023. Precarious protections: Unaccompanied minors seeking asylum in the United States. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, I. 2017. Saving the security state: Exceptional citizens in twenty-first-century America. Durham: Duke UP. doi:10.1215/9780822372554.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, R. 2021. Crossing: How we label and react to people on the move. Stanford: Stanford UP. doi:10.1515/9781503627888.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2007. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Hegde, R. S. 2016. Mediating migration. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, C. 2014. Perception management – deterring potential migrants through information campaigns. Global Media and Communication 10 (3):303–18. doi:10.1177/1742766514552355.
   Google Scholar
• Hesford, W. 2011. Spectacular rhetorics: Human rights visions, recognitions, feminisms. Durham: Duke UP. doi:10.1215/9780822393818.
   Google Scholar
• Hesford, W. 2021. Violent exceptions: Children’s human rights and humanitarian rhetorics. Columbus: Ohio State UP. doi:10.26818/9780814214688.
   Google Scholar
• Infantino, F. 2021. State sovereignty, risk, and security when private companies practice border control. In Security and safety in the Era of global risks. ed. R. Compel and R. Arcala-Hall. 39–50. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003128250-3
   Google Scholar
• Jakulevičienė, L., and L. Biekša. 2022. Trends in the qualification of asylum claims related to gender-based violence under international and European Law. The International Journal of Human Rights 26 (5):833–55. doi:10.1080/13642987.2021.1978981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, M. 2014. Introduction: Life/rights narrative in action. In We shall bear witness: Life narratives and human rights, ed. M. Jensen and M. Jolly, 3–24. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaneti, M., and M. Prandini Assis. 2016. (Re)branding the State: Humanitarian border control and the moral imperative of state sovereignty. Social Research 83 (2):295–325. doi:10.1353/sor.2016.0032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlikowske, G. 2014. Our comprehensive response at the border, by the numbers. Whitehouse Gov. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/09/15/our-comprehensive-response-border-numbers.
   Google Scholar
• Kosnick, K. 2014. Mediating migration: New roles for (Mass) media. The French Journal of Media Studies (5). 10.4000/inmedia.761
   Google Scholar
• Lugo-Lugo, C., and M. Bloodsworth-Lugo. 2014. ‘Anchor/Terror Babies’ and Latina bodies: Immigration Rhetoric in the 21st century and the feminization of terrorism. Journal of Interdisciplinary Feminist Thought 8 (1): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lynes, K., T. Morgenstern, I. A. Paul, K. Lynes, T. Morgenstern, and I. A. Paul. 2020. Moving images: Mediating migration as crisis. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. doi:10.1515/9783839448274.
   Google Scholar
• Marez, C. 2004. Drug Wars: The political economy of narcotics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Guzmán, I., and L. Cacho. 2014. Historical mapping contemporary intersectional feminist media studies. In The routledge companion to media & gender, ed. C. Carter, L. Steiner, and L. McLaughlin, 71–80. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musarò, P. 2019. Aware Migrants: The role of information campaigns in the management of migration. European Journal of Communication 34 (6):629–40. doi:10.1177/0267323119886164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, B. C., R. Gomez, and V. E. Guajardo. 2016. Information seeking, technology use, and vulnerability among migrants at the United States–Mexico border. The Information Society 32 (3):176–91. doi:10.1080/01972243.2016.1153013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeppen, C. 2016. ‘Leaving Afghanistan! Are you sure?’ European efforts to deter potential migrants through information campaigns. Human Geography 9 (2):57–68. doi:10.1177/194277861600900206.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, M., Ó. Pérez-Latorre, and R. Besalú. 2018. ‘Choose, collect, manage, win!’: Neoliberalism, enterprising culture and risk society in video game covers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 24 (6):607–22. doi:10.1177/1354856516680324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacciardi, A., and J. Berndtsson. 2022. EU border externalisation and security outsourcing: Exploring the migration industry in libya. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (17):4010–28. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2022.2061930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagogna, R., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2021. Disciplining migration aspirations through migration information campaigns. Geography Compass 15 (7). doi:10.1111/gec3.12585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paynter, E. 2022a. Testimony on the move: Navigating the borders of (In)visibility with migrant -led soundwalks. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 37 (1):129–52. doi:10.1080/08989575.2022.2038930.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, E. 2022b. Writing against border imperialism: Epistemologies of Transit. Italian Studies in Southern Africa/Studi d’Italianistica nell’Africa Australe 35 (1):92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, E., and S. Riva. 2020. Border agency recruitment: Circulating Narratives that criminalize asylum and erase border violence. Discover Society 7 (2020). https://archive.discoversociety.org/2020/10/07/border-agency-recruitment-circulating-narratives-that-criminalize-asylum-and-erase-border-violence/.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. 2012. Les Campagnes d’information de l’Organisation internationale Pour Les migrations. Le Sujet Dans La Cité Actuels Actuels n° 1 (1):36–49. doi:10.3917/lsdlc.hs01.0036.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. 2018. What do we know about the International Organization for Migration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10):1621–38. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2000. Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (1):12–40. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyles, L. 2009. Neoliberalism, INGO practices and sustainable disaster recovery: A post-Katrina case study. Community Development Journal 46 (2):168–80. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsp058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva, S. 2017. Across the border and into the cold: Hieleras and the punishment of asylum-seeking central American women in the United States. Citizenship Studies 21 (3):309–26. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1277981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva, S. 2023. Thickening the border: A transnational sovereign assemblage and the privatization of sovereignty. Open Research Europe 3 (92):92. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.16022.1.
   Google Scholar
• Riva, S., and G. Hoffstaedter. 2021. The aporia of refugee rights in a time of crises: The role of brokers in accessing refugee protection in transit and at the border. Journal of Comparative Migration Studies 9 (1). doi:10.1186/s40878-020-00212-2.
   Google Scholar
• Riva, S., and E. Routon. 2020. Reinforcing and contesting neoliberal citizenship: Legal advocates and the Asylum interview at the U.S.-Mexico border. Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (1):149–72. doi:10.1093/jrs/feaa066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A. 2019. European attempts to govern African youths by raising awareness of the risks of migration: Ethnography of an encounter. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (5):735–51. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1415136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2000. Government and control. British Journal of Criminology 49 (2):321–39. doi:10.1093/bjc/40.2.321.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, H. 2015. Anti-immigration as austerity policy: The rejection of maternalist governance in Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law. Feminist Formations 27 (2):98–120. doi:10.1353/ff.2015.0019.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, L., M. T. Grasso, P. Karampampas, S. English, and P. English. 2016. Neoliberal narrative in times of economic crisis: A political claims analysis of the U.K. Press, 2007-14. Politics & Policy 44 (3):553–76. doi:10.1111/polp.12161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. 2018. The ‘Global South’ Is a terrible term. Don’t use it! RE-DESIGN (blog). November 6, 2018. http://re-design.dimiter.eu/?p=969.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2023. Global Trends Report: Forced Displacement in 2022. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2022.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 2014. CBP commissioner discusses dangers of crossing U.S. border, Awareness Campaign. July 2, 2014. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-commissioner-discusses-dangers-crossing-us-border-awareness.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 2015. Southwest border unaccompanied Alien children FY 2014. US Customs and Border Protection. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-border-unaccompanied-children/fy-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vammen, I. M. S. 2022. When migrants become messengers’: Affective borderwork and aspiration management in Senegal. Geopolitics 27 (5):1410–29. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1913408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, J. 2019. International delegation and agency in the externalization process of eu migration and asylum policy: The role of the IOM and the UNHCR in Niger. European Journal of Migration and Law 21 (4):435–58. doi:10.1163/15718166-12340060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, J. 2021. Externalization through ‘awareness-raising’: The border spectacle of EU migration information campaigns in Niger. Territory, Politics, Governance 11 (4):749–69. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1974535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. 2017. Australia’s irregular migration information campaigns: Border externalization, spatial imaginaries, and extraterritorial subjugation. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (3):282–303. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1284692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. 2017. Always on top? The ‘responsibility to protect’ and the persistence of colonialism. In The Postcolonial World, ed. G. S. Jyotsna and D. K. David, 308–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. 2020. Affecting migration: Public information campaigns and the intimate spatialities of border enforcement. Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space 38 (7–8):1198–215. doi:10.1177/2399654419833384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., and K. Coddington. 2023. Deterring transnational migration public information campaigns affective governmentality and the family. International Feminist Journal of Politics 25 (2):201–22. doi:10.1080/14616742.2022.2134046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N., G. Wemyss, and K. Cassidy. 2019. Bordering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zolberg, A. 2003. The archaeology of remote control. In Migration control in the North Atlantic world: The evolution of state practices in Europe and the United States from the French revolution to the inter-war period, ed. A. Fahrmeir, O. Faron, and P. Weil, 195–222. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar