Light energy attenuation through orthodontic ceramic brackets at different irradiation times

References

• Abu Hajia SS. In vitro investigation of direct light energy density through ceramic brackets. (M.Clin. Dent. Dissertation), University of Edinburgh. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Albino LG, Rodrigues JA, Kawano Y, Cassoni A. Knoop microhardness and FT-Raman evaluation of composite resins: influence of opacity and photoactivation source. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25: 267–273. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242011000300013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2003; Chapter 15.
   Google Scholar
• Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Oonsombat C. Evaluation of a new curing light on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clinical Oral Invest 2014; 18: 1991–2000. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1177-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassoni A, Ferla JD, Shibli JA, Kawano Y. Knoop microhardness and FT-Raman spectroscopic evaluation of a resin-based dental material light-cured by an argon ion laser and halogen lamp: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 2008; 26: 531–539. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerveira GP, Berthold TB, Souto AA, Spohr AM, Marchioro EM. Degree of conversion and hardness of an orthodontic resin cured with a light-emitting diode and a quartz–tungsten–halogen light. Eur J Orthodont 2010; 32: 83–86. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWald JP, Ferracane JL. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 727–730. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660030401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn WJ, Bush AC. A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based light-curing units. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133: 335–341. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 1. Current status and projected future developments in bonding and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2006; 130: 445–451. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Residual monomer leaching from chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac 1995a; 108: 316–321. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70027-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliades T, Johnston WM, Eliades G. Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac 1995b; 107: 11–19. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70152-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami N, Söderholm KJ. How light irradiance and curing time affect monomer conversion in light-cured resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 536–542. doi: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00082.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewoldsen N, Demke RS. A review of orthodontic cements and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2001; 120: 45–48. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.117207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 11–14. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80058-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, Leyhausen G. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 41: 474–480. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<474::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann N, Hugo B, Schubert K, Klaiber B. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4: 140–147. doi: 10.1007/s007840000063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hooshmand T, Mahmoodi N, Keshvad A. Microhardness of a resin cement polymerized by light-emitting diode and halogen lights through ceramic. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 411–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00449.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jassé FF, Borges CH, Tonetto MR, de Souza Rastelli AN, Bagnato VS, de Campos EA, et al. Long-term surface hardness and monomer conversion of a nanofilled and a microhybrid composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14: 876–882. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1419
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofac 1997; 112: 34–40. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70271-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloukos D, Pandis N, Eliades T. Bisphenol-A and residual monomer leaching from orthodontic adhesive resins and polycarbonate brackets: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2013; 143: S104–S112. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G. The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 608–615. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Suevos F, Dickens SH. Degree of cure and fracture properties of experimental acid-resin modified composites under wet and dry conditions. Dent Mater 2008; 24(6): 778–785. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandall NA, Millett DT, Mattick CR, Hickman J, Macfarlane TV, Worthington HV. Adhesives for fixed orthodontic brackets. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 2: 1–18 CD002282.
   Google Scholar
• Manojlovic D, Radisic M, Vasiljevic T, Zivkovic S, Lausevic M, Miletic V. Monomer elution from nanohybrid and ormocer-based composites cured with different light sources. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miletic V, Santini A, Trkulja I. Quantification of monomer elution and carbon–carbon double bonds in dental adhesive systems using HPLC and micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Dent 2009; 37: 177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard J, Segner D. The use of visible light-curing composites in bonding ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac 1990; 97: 188–193. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80050-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson SM, Drummond JL, Evans CA, Begole EA. Comparison of bond strengths using different curing lights. J Clin Orthod 2006 May; 40(5): 309–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polydorou O, König A, Altenburger MJ, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Kuemmerer K. Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing. Am J Dent 2011; 24: 315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell JS. Current products and practice: aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthodont 2005; 32: 146–163. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santini A. Current status of visible light activation units and the curing of light-activated resin-based composite materials. Dental Update 2010; 37: 214–216, 218–220, 223–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santini A, Miletic V, Swift MD, Bradley M. Degree of conversion and microhardness of TPO-containing resin-based composites cured by polywave and monowave LED units. J Dent 2012; 40: 577–584. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MJ, Passos SP, Encarnação MO, Santos Junior GC, Bottino MA. Hardening of a dual-cure resin cement using QTH and LED curing units. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 110–115. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572010000200003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks). Scientific opinion on the safety of dental amalgam and alternative dental restoration materials for patients and users 2008; Section 3.4.8.1, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Soares LE, Martin AA, Pinheiro AL, Pacheco MT. Vicker’s hardness and Raman spectroscopy evaluation of a dental composite cured by an argon laser and a halogen lamp. J Biomed Opt 2004; 9: 601–608. doi: 10.1117/1.1688811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz ML. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1988; 22: 82–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4932–4937. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üşümez S, Büyükyilmaz T, Karaman AI˙, Gündüz B. Degree of conversion of two lingual retainer adhesives cured with different light sources. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 173–179. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjh085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal T, Basciftci FA, Sener Y, Botsali MS, Demir A. Conventional and high intensity halogen light effects on water sorption and microhardness of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 134–139. doi: 10.2319/020507-56.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel MF, Calheiros FC, Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials. J Dent 2005; 33: 773–779. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan YL, Kim YK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Changes in degree of conversion and microhardness of dental resin cements. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 203–210. doi: 10.2341/09-174-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap AU, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 460–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap AU, Wang HB, Siow KS, Gan LM. Polymerization shrinkage of visible-light-cured composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 98–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 1165–1173. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00970.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar