Grave Finds: Mortuary-Derived Antiquities from England and Wales

Bibliography

• Bland, R. 2005. A Pragmatic Approach to the Problem of Portable Antiquities: The Experience in England and Wales. Antiquity , 79(304): 440–47. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00114218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, R. 2009a. The Development and Future of the Treasure Act and the Portable Antiquities Scheme. In: S. Thomas and P. Stone , eds. Metal Detecting and Archaeology . Woodbridge : The Boydell Press, pp. 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, R. 2009b. The United Kingdom as a Source Country: Some Problems in Regulating the Market in UK Antiquities and the Challenge of the Internet. In: S. Mackenzie and P. Green , eds. Criminology and Archaeology: Studies in Looted Antiquities . Oxford : Hart Publishing, pp. 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Brickley, M. & McKinley, J. eds. 2004. Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains . IFA Paper No. 7. Southampton : University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology (BABAO) . 2010a. BABAO Code of Ethics for Archaeological Human Remains [online] [accessed 13 June 2019]. Available at: http://www.babao.org.uk/index/ethics-and-standards .
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology (BABAO) . 2010b. BABAO Code of Practice [online] [accessed 13 June 2019]. Available at: http://www.babao.org.uk/index/ethics-and-standards .
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, N. 2012. Uncovering the Antiquities Market. In: R. Skeates , C. McDavid and J. Carman , eds. The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology . Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 230–52.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. 2005. Against Cultural Property: Archaeology, Heritage and Ownership . London : Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. 2018. Links: Going Beyond Cultural Property. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress , 14(1): 164–83. doi: 10.1007/s11759-018-9337-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester-Kadwell, M. 2009. Early Anglo-Saxon Communities in the Landscape of Norfolk . BAR British Series 481. Oxford : British Archaeological Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Chippindale, C. & Gill, D. 1993. Material and Intellectual Consequences of Esteem for Cycladic Figures. American Journal of Archaeology , 97(4): 601–59. doi: 10.2307/506716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chippindale, C. & Gill, D. 1995. Cycladic Figures: Art versus Archaeology? In: K. W. Tubb , ed. Antiquities Trade or Betrayed: Legal, Ethical & Conservation Issues . London : Archetype, pp. 131–42.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. 1999. Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods. Police Research Series Paper 112. London: Home Office Policing and Reducing Crime Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. 2010. Repatriation and the Concept of Inalienable Possession. In: P. Turnbull and M. Pickering , eds. The Long Way Home: The Meaning and Values of Repatriation . New York : Berghahn Books, pp. 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Daubney, A. 2016. Portable Antiquities, Palimpsests, and Persistent Places . Leiden: Sidestone Press .
   Google Scholar
• Daubney, A. 2017. Floating Culture: The Unrecorded Antiquities of England and Wales. International Journal of Heritage Studies , 23(9): 785–99. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1325770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) . 2005. Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums . London : DCMS.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) . 2016. The Portable Antiquities Scheme Annual Report 2016 . London : British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Ekengren, F. 2013. Contextualising Grave Goods. In: L. Nilsson Stutz and S. Tarlow , eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial . Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 173–92.
   Google Scholar
• English Heritage . 2004. Human Bones from Archaeological Sites: Guidelines for Producing Assessment Documents and Analytical Reports . London : English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• English Heritage . 2011. Introduction to Heritage Assets: Pre-Christian Cemeteries . London : English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, K. 2014. Girdle-hangers in 5th- and 6th-century England: A Key to Early Anglo-Saxon Identities. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, N. 2016. Lost in Translation: Discussing the Positive Contribution of Hobbyist Metal Detecting. Open Archaeology , 2: 115–26. doi: 10.1515/opar-2016-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, D. 2008. A Coordinated Legal and Policy Approach to Undiscovered Antiquities: Adapting the Cultural Heritage Policy of England and Wales to Other Nations of Origin. International Journal of Cultural Property , 15: 347–70. doi: 10.1017/S094073910808020X
   Google Scholar
• Fincham, D. 2010. Fraud on Our Heritage: Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce , 37(1): 145–206.
   Google Scholar
• Frerking, C. & Gill-Frerking, H. 2017. Human Remains as Heritage: Categorisation, Legislation and Protection. Art, Antiquity and Law , 22(1): 49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Garratt-Frost, S. 1992. The Law and Burial Archaeology . Institute of Field Archaeologists Technical Paper 11. Birmingham: Institute of Field Archaeologists .
   Google Scholar
• Giesen, M. ed. 2013. Curating Human Remains: Caring for the Dead in the United Kingdom . Woodbridge : Boydell.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, D. 2015. Egyptian Antiquities on the Market. In: F. A. Hassan , G. J. Tassie , L. S. Owens , A. De Trafford , J. van Wetering and O. El Daly , eds. The Management of Egypt’s Cultural Heritage . London : ECHO and Golden House Publications 2, pp. 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, K. 2006. Why and When Do Human Remains Matter: Museum Dilemmas. In: J. Lohman and K. Goodnow , eds. Human Remains and Museum Practice . London : Museum of London and UNESCO, pp. 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, L. , Daubney, A. & Booth, A. 2018. Identifying Sites at Risk from Illicit Metal Detecting: From CRAVED to HOPPER. International Journal of Heritage Studies , 24(10): 1038–52. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2018.1475408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halling, C. L. & Seidemann, R. M. 2016. They Sell Skulls Online?! A Review of Internet Sales of Human Skulls on eBay and the Laws in Place to Restrict Sales. Journal of Forensic Sciences , 61(5): 1322–26. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. R. 2011. Looting of the Fort Craig Cemetery: Damage Done and Lessons Learned. American Antiquity , 76(3): 429–45. doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.76.3.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. 2018. Metal-Detecting for Cultural Objects until ‘There is Nothing Left’: The Potential and Limits of Digital Data, Netnographic Data and Market Data for Open-Source Analysis. Arts , 7(3): 1–36. doi: 10.3390/arts7030040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harke, H. 2014. Grave Goods in Early Medieval Burials: Messages and Meanings. Mortality , 19(1): 41–60. doi: 10.1080/13576275.2013.870544
   Google Scholar
• Hellewell, E. 2015. An Investigation into the Placement of Disarticulated Human Remains into Shell Middens During Prehistory. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Historic Environment Scotland . 2016. The Treatment of Human Remains in Archaeology . Historic Scotland Operational Policy Paper 5. Edinburgh : Historic Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Huffer, D. 2014. Bones of Contention: The Global Trade in Archaeological and Ethnographic Human Remains. Saving Antiquities for Everyone [online] [accessed 4 December 2018]. Available at: http://savingantiquities.org/bones-contention-global-trade-archaeological-ethnographic-human-remains/ .
   Google Scholar
• Huffer, D. &. Graham, S. 2017. The Insta-Dead: The Rhetoric of the Human Remains Trade on Instagram. Internet Archaeology , 45(5). doi: 10.11141/ia.45.5
   Google Scholar
• Huffer, D. & Graham, S. 2018. Fleshing Out the Bones: Studying the Human Remains Trade with Tensorflow and Inception. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology , 1(1): 55–63. doi: 10.5334/jcaa.8
   Google Scholar
• Hutt, S. & Riddle, J. 2007. The Law of Human Remains and Burials. In: V. Cassmanm , N. Odegaard and J. Powell , eds. Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions . Plymouth : AltaMira Press, pp. 223–43.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, A. K. & Finnegan, M. 2004. Human Remains Sold to the Highest Bidder! A Snapshot of the Buying and Selling of Human Skeletal Remains on eBay, an Internet Auction Site. Journal of Forensic Science , 49(1): 17–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kars, M. 2013. The Early Medieval Burial Evidence and Concepts of Possession: Questioning Individual Identities. Neue Studien zur Sachsenforschung , 4: 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, R. & Wallace, G. 2006. Is Culture a Commodity? In: C. Scarre and G. Scarre , eds. The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–68.
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, O. 2006. Who Guards the Guardians? In: C. Scarre and G. Scarre , eds. The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2004. Treaties, Time Limits and Treasure Trove: The Legal Protection of Cultural Objects in Singapore. Art , Antiquity and Law , 9(3): 237–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2013. A Presence of the Past: The Legal Protection of Singapore’s Archaeological Heritage. International Journal of Cultural Property , 20(3): 257–88. doi: 10.1017/S094073911300012X
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. 2013. The PAS — A Rather British Solution: The Mandatory Reporting and Voluntary Recording of Archaeological Objects in England and Wales. In: A. Largerlof , ed. Who Cares? Perspectives on Public Awareness, Participation and Protection in Archaeological Heritage Management . European Archaeological Council, Occasional Paper 8 (Swedish National Heritage Board), pp. 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. 2016. A Detectorist’s Utopia? Archaeology and Metal-detecting in England and Wales. Open Archaeology , 2: 127–39. doi: 10.1515/opar-2016-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. 2015. Human Remains as ‘Artistic Expression’ and the Common Law Offence of Outraging Public Decency: ‘Human Earrings’, Human Rights and R. v Gibson Revisited. In: R. Redmond-Cooper , ed. Human Remains and the Law . London : Institute of Art and Law, pp. 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Liddle, P. & Middleton, S. 1994. An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Wigston Magna, Leicestershire. Leicestershire Archaeological and Historical Society Transactions , 68: 64–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lilley, J. M. 1994. The Jewish Burial Ground at Jewbury . York : Council for British Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. & Yates, D. 2016. What is Grey about the “Grey Market” in Antiquities? In: J. Beckert and M. Dewey , eds. The Architecture of Illegal Markets: Towards an Economic Sociology of Illegality in the Economy . Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 70–86.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T. 2015. The Cruciform Brooch and Anglo-Saxon England . Woodbridge : The Boydell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marzinzik, S. 2011. Anglo-Saxon Archaeology and the Public. In: D. A. Hinton, S. Crawford and H. Hamerow, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Anglo-Saxon Archaeology . Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 1025–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, S. 2017. Guidance for Best Practice for the Treatment of Human Remains Excavated from Christian Burial Grounds in England. Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England, Second Edition [online] [accessed 13 June 2019]. Available at: http://www.archaeologyuk.org/apabe/pdf/APABE_ToHREfCBG_FINAL_WEB.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, C. T. 2002. Repatriation in the USA: A Decade of Federal Agency Activities under NAGPRA. In: C. Fforde , J. Hubert and P. Turnbull , eds. The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in Principle, Policy and Practice . London : Routledge, pp. 108–32.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. 2004. Compiling a Skeletal Inventory: Disarticulated and Co-mingled Remains. In: M. Brickley and J. McKinley , eds. Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains . IFA Paper No. 7. Southampton : University of Southampton, pp. 1025–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P. D. & Brickley, M. n.d. Updated Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains . BABAO/Institute of Field Archaeologists.
   Google Scholar
• Moshenska, G. & Dhanjal, S. eds. 2011. Community Archaeology: Themes, Methods and Practices . Oxford : Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mulk, I. 2009. Conflicts over the Repatriation of Sami Cultural Heritage in Sweden. Acta Borealia: A Nordic Journal of Circumpolar Societies , 26: 194–95. doi: 10.1080/08003830903372092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Parks Service , n.d. FAQ [online] [accessed 13 June 2019]. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/nagpra/FAQ/ .
   Google Scholar
• New Hampshire Cultural Resources . 2009. Sale of Human Remains and Grave Goods Prohibited in N.H. [online] [accessed 13 June 2019]. Available at: https://www.nh.gov/nhculture/mediaroom/2009/remains_bill.htm .
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, C. 2009. Sámi Prehistories. The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in Northernmost Europe. Occasional Papers in Archaeology 47, Institutionen for arkeologi och antik historia. Uppsala : Uppsala Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Archaeology . 2009. Nighthawks and Nighthawking. Damage to Archaeological Sites in the UK and Crown Dependencies Caused by Illegal Searching and Removal of Antiquities. Strategic Study Final Report [online] [accessed 2 February 2017]. Available at: http://www.helm.org.uk/guidance-library/nighthawks-nighthawking/ .
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M. P. , Schadla-Hall, T. & Moshenska, G. 2011. Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology , 21: 5–9. doi: 10.5334/pia.369
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. 2016. Protecting North America’s Past: The Current (and Ineffective) Laws Preventing the Illicit Trade of Mexican Pre-Columbian Antiquities and How We Can Improve Them. Texas Law Review , 94: 785–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfern, R. & Clegg, M. 2017. Archaeologically Derived Human Remains in England: Legacy and Future. World Archaeology , 49(5): 574–87. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2017.1357494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. A. 2009. Human Remains in Archaeology: A Handbook . York : Council for British Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Satz, D. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets . New York : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, D. 2010. Ethics in Burial Archaeology . London : Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, D. & Walter, J. 2016. Digging the Dead in a Digital Media Age. In: H. Williams and M. Giles , eds. Archaeologists and the Dead: Mortuary Archaeology and Contemporary Society . Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 367–95.
   Google Scholar
• Scarre, G. 2006. Can Archaeology Harm the Dead? In: C. Scarre and G. Scarre , eds. The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–98.
   Google Scholar
• Scull, C. & Naylor, J. 2016. Sceattas in Anglo-Saxon Graves. Medieval Archaeology , 60(2): 205–41. doi: 10.1080/00766097.2016.1221262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, A. J. 1991. Artefact Distributions as Activity Areas: Examples from South-East Hampshire. In A. Schofield , ed. Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology . Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Serchisu, F. 2014. Textile Fibre Preservation and Statistical Variation in Burials: Clothing Evidence in Anglo-Saxon and Roman Inhumations. PhD thesis, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Shelbourn, C. 2015. Remains, Research and Respect: Some Reflections on Burial Archaeology and the Treatment of the ‘anciently dead’. In: R. Redmond-Cooper , ed. Heritage, Ancestry and Law. Principles, Policies and Practices in Dealing with Historical Human Remains . London : Institute of Art and Law, pp. 135–50.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. 2012a. Archaeologists and Metal-detector Users in England and Wales: Past, Present and Future. In: R. Skeates , C. McDavid and J. Carman , eds. The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology . Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 60–81.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. 2012b. Searching for Answers: A Survey of Metal-detector Users in the UK, International Journal of Heritage Studies , 18(1): 49–64. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2011.590817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. 2013. Editorial: Portable Antiquities: Archaeology, Collecting, Metal Detecting. Internet Archaeology , 33. doi: 10.11141/ia.33.12
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. 2015. Multiple-Role Actors in the Movement of Cultural Property: Metal-Detector Users. Current Trends in Archaeological Heritage Preservation: National and International Perspectives . British Archaeology Reports International Series 2741. Oxford : Archaeopress, pp. 117–24.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. , Seitsonen, O. & Herva, V. 2016. Nazimemorabilia, Dark Heritage and Treasure Hunting as ‘alternative’ Tourism: Understanding the Fascination with the Material Remains of World War II in Northern Finland. Journal of Field Archaeology , 41(3): 331–43. doi: 10.1080/00934690.2016.1168769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubb, K. W. 2006. Artefacts and Emotion. In: N. Brodie , M. Kersel , C. Luke and K. Tubb , eds. Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade . Florida : University Press of Florida, pp. 284–302.
   Google Scholar
• Warwickshire County Council , n.d. Origins: Shining a Light on Britain’s Roman Past [online] [accessed 13 June 2019]. Available at: http://heritage.warwickshire.gov.uk/archaeology/welcome-to-archaeology-warwickshire/case-study/oriens-shining-a-light-on-britains-roman-past/ .
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. 2005. Artefacts, Archaeologists and American Indians. Public Archaeology , 4(2–3): 187–91. doi: 10.1179/pua.2005.4.2-3.187
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, J. 2002. Objects with Attitude: Biographical Facts and Fallacies in the Study of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Warrior Graves. Cambridge Archaeological Journal , 12: 217–32. doi: 10.1017/S0959774302000112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H. 2018. Introduction: Public Archaeologies of Death and Memory. AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology , Special Volume 3: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H. & Atkin, A. 2015. Virtually Dead: Digital Public Mortuary Archaeology. Internet Archaeology , 40. doi: 10.11141/ia.40.7.4
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H. & Giles, M. eds. 2016. Archaeologists and the Dead: Mortuary Archaeology in Contemporary Society . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski, T. 2017. Peruvian Antiquities and the Collecting of Cultural Goods. Markets , Globalization & Development Review , 2(4): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. 2006. Cultures and the Ownership of Archaeological Finds. In C. Scarre and G. Scarre , eds. The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–31.
   Google Scholar