Numerical simulation of double-bag progressive compression method of resin delivery in liquid composite moulding

References

• Kang MK, Lee WI, Hahn HT. Analysis of vacuum bag resin transfer molding process. Compos Pt A- Appl Sci Manuf. 2001;32:1553–1560. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubaud L, Achim V, Trochu F. Numerical simulation of resin infusion and reinforcement consolidation under flexible cover. Polym Compos. 2005;26:417–427. doi: 10.1002/pc.20069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels JFA, Jonker AS, Akkerman R. Fully 2.5D flow modeling of resin infusion under flexible tooling using unstructured meshes and wet and dry compaction properties. Compos Pt A- Appl Sci Manuf. 2007;38:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhang C, Liang R, et al. Modeling and analysis of thickness gradient and variations in vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process. Polym Compos. 2008;29:473–482. doi: 10.1002/pc.20439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcinkaya MA, Sozer EM. Effect of part thickness variation on the mold filling time in vacuum infusion process. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2014;33:2136–2150. doi: 10.1177/0731684414554938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirtautas J, Pickett AK, George A. Materials characterisation and analysis for flow simulation of liquid resin infusion. Appl Compos Mater. 2015;22:323–341. doi: 10.1007/s10443-014-9411-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia NC, Robitaille F, Long AC, et al. Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Pt A- Appl Sci Manuf. 2005;36:1645–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi D, Johnson M, Long A, et al. Investigation of pressure profile and flow progression in vacuum infusion process. Plast Rubber Compos. 2007;36:101–110. doi: 10.1179/174328907X177608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CH, Saouab A. Analytical modeling of composite molding by resin infusion with flexible tooling: VARI and RFI processes. J Compos Mater. 2009;43:1877–1900. doi: 10.1177/0021998309341848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackitt KD, Walsh SM. Experimental study of thickness gradient formation in the VARTM process. Mater Manuf Process. 2005;20:607–627. doi: 10.1081/AMP-200041896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenilmez B, Senan M, Sozer EM. Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:1710–1719. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulappan C, Duraisamy A, Adhikari D, et al. Investigations on pressure and thickness profiles in carbon fiber-reinforced polymers during vacuum assisted resin transfer molding. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2015;34:3–18. doi: 10.1177/0731684414560220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simacek P, Heider D, Gillespie Jr. JW, et al. Post-filling flow in vacuum assisted resin transfer molding processes: theoretical analysis. Compos Pt A- Appl Sci Manuf. 2009;40:913–924. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govignon Q, Bickerton S, Kelly PA. Experimental investigation into the post-filling stage of the resin infusion process’. J Compos Mater. 2013;47:1479–1492. doi: 10.1177/0021998312448500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YS, Youn JR. Numerical investigation on flow through porous media in the post-infusion process. Polym Compos. 2009;30:1125–1131. doi: 10.1002/pc.20668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MJ, Kosmatka JB. Analysis of the post-filling phase of the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process. J Compos Mater. 2014;48:1547–1559. doi: 10.1177/0021998313488150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayldon JM, Daniel IM. Flow modeling of the VARTM process including progressive saturation effects. Compos Pt A- Appl Sci Manuf. 2009;40:1044–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong CJ. Development of a process model for the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding simulation by the response surface method. Compos Pt A – Appl Sci Manuf. 2006;37:1316–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence JM, Frey P, Obaid AA, et al. Simulation and validation of resin flow during manufacturing of composite panels containing embedded impermeable inserts with the VARTM process. Polym Compos. 2007;28:442–450. doi: 10.1002/pc.20293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grujicic M, Chittajallu KM, Walsh S. Non-isothermal preform infiltration during the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. Appl Surf Sci. 2005;245:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascons M, Blanco N, Vives J, et al. Numerical implementation and experimental validation of a through-the-thickness temperature model for non-isothermal vacuum bagging infusion. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2011;30:1557–1570. doi: 10.1177/0731684411423321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Pellaton D, Hahn HT. A comparative study of vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) for sandwich panels. Polym Compos. 2003;24:672–685. doi: 10.1002/pc.10061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhan YT, Lee YJ, Chung CH. Resin flowing analysis in sandwich laminates under VARTM process. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2011;30:533–545. doi: 10.1177/0731684411399142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allende M, Mohan RV, Walsh SM. Experimental and numerical analysis of flow behavior in the FASTRAC liquid composite manufacturing process. Polym Compos. 2004;25:384–396. doi: 10.1002/pc.20032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alms J, Advani SG. Simulation and experimental validation of flow flooding chamber method of resin delivery in liquid composite molding. Compos Pt A – Appl Sci Manuf. 2007;38:2131–2141. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CY. Simulation of non-isothermal filling process in vacuum assisted compression resin transfer moulding process. Plast Rubber Compos. 2015;44:162–170. doi: 10.1179/1743289815Y.0000000002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CY, Li SY. Effect of process parameters on the surface quality of air cushion method. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2015;34:257–266. doi: 10.1177/0731684414568906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider D, Simacek P, Dominauskas A, et al. Infusion design methodology for thick-section, low-permeability preforms using inter-laminar flow media. Compos Pt A – Appl Sci Manuf. 2007;38:525–534. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Krehl J, Gillespie Jr. JW, et al. Process and performance evaluation of the vacuum-assisted process. J Compos Mater. 2004;38:1803–1814. doi: 10.1177/0021998304044769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niggemann C, Young SS, Gillespie JW, et al. Experimental investigation of the controlled atmospheric pressure resin infusion (CAPRI) process. J Compos Mater. 2008;42:1049–1061. doi: 10.1177/0021998308090650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies LW, Day RJ, Bond D, et al. Effect of cure cycle heat transfer rates on the physical and mechanical properties of an epoxy matrix composite. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67:1892–1899. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard JR, Okoli OI, Liang Z. Resin infusion between double flexible tooling: evaluation of process parameters. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2004;23:1767–1778. doi: 10.1177/0731684404041148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi MR, Antonucci V, Durante M, et al. A new cost-saving vacuum infusion process for fiber-reinforced composites: pulsed infusion. J Compos Mater. 2014;48:1365–1373. doi: 10.1177/0021998313485998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CY. Numerical study on filling process in progressive compression method. Adv Compos Mater. 2019;28:37–51. doi: 10.1080/09243046.2017.1423531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Dharan CKH. Mold fill time and void reduction in resin transfer molding achieved by articulated tooling. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:2267–2285. doi: 10.1177/0021998302036019536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CY, Chen WR. Influence of processing variables on quality of unsaturated polyester/E-glass fiber composites manufactured by double-bag progressive compression method. Adv Mech Eng. 2018;10:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robitaille F, Gauvin R. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composite manufacturing. I. Review of experimental results. Polym Compos. 1998;19:198–216. doi: 10.1002/pc.10091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CH, Pan YR. The study of injection/compression liquid composite molding. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;201:695–700. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar