Football, fandom and consumption

Bibliography

• Armstrong, G. Football Hooligans: Knowing the Score . Oxford: Berg, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, G. , and R. Harris . ‘Football Hooligans: Theory and Evidence’. Sociological Review 39, no. 3 (1991): 427–458. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1991.tb00861.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. Simulacra and Simulation . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. ‘“Not for sale?” the Destruction and Reformation of Football Communities in the Glazer Takeover of Manchester United’. Soccer & Society 8, no. 4 (2007): 614–635. doi:10.1080/14660970701440972.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R.B. , R.J. Borden , A. Thorne , M.R. Walker , S. Freeman , and L.R. Sloan . ‘Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34, no. 3 (1976): 366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. After Empire: Multiculture or Postcolonial Melancholia . Londo: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R. ‘Supporters, Followers, Fans, and Flaneurs: A Taxonomy of Spectator Identities in Football’. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 26, no. 1 (2002): 25–46. doi:10.1177/0193723502261003.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity . New York: Simon and Schuster, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Redhead, S. Post-fandom and the Millennial Blues: The Transformation of Soccer Culture . London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, W.R. ‘Active Audience Theory: Pointless Populism’. Media, Culture & Society 14, no. 2 (1992): 301–311. doi:10.1177/016344392014002010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapp, A. , and J. Clowes . ‘From “Carefree casuals” to “Professional wanderers” Segmentation Possibilities for Football Supporters’. European Journal of Marketing 36, no. 11–12 (2002): 1248–1269. doi:10.1108/03090560210445164.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. ‘Mediation between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA’. Discourse Studies 8, no. 1 (2006): 179–190. doi:10.1177/1461445606059566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar