Medical Signbank as a model for sign language planning? A review of community engagement

References

• Angelelli, C. (2003). The visible co-participant: The interpreter's role in doctor–patient encounters. In M. Metzger, S. Collins, V. Dively, & R. Shaw (Eds.), From topic boundaries to omission: New research on interpretation (pp. 3–26). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). 2011 census quickfacts. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/
   Google Scholar
• Bahan, B. (1997, July). Developing the Deaf nation. Paper presented at the Deaf Nation Symposium, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
   Google Scholar
• Bahan, B. (2007). Upon the formation of a visual variety of the human race. In H. Dirksen & L. Baumann (Eds.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking (pp. 83–99). London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R. B., Jr. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7, 147–170. doi:10.2167/cilp092.0 doi: 10.2167/cilp092.0
   Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. C. E. (2012). Language justice for sign language peoples: The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Language Policy, 11, 253–272. doi:10.1007/s10993-012-9245-8 doi: 10.1007/s10993-012-9245-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behares, L. E., Brovetto, C., & Crespi, L. P. (2012). Language policies in Uruguay and Uruguayan Sign Language (LSU). Sign Language Studies, 12, 519–542. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0008
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (2002). Participatory workshops: A sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, S., Watts, V., McCormick, A., & Young, S. (2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1398–1406. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/academic-search-premier doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.125757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely, D. (2005). Shifting positionality: A critical examination of the turning point in the relationship of interpreters and the Deaf community. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Interpreting and interpreting education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1667–1676. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/ doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct93/vol51/num02/Through-the-Lens-of-a-Critical-Friend.aspx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (1989). Distinguishing language contact phenomena in ASL. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 85–102). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (1990). Linguistic transference and interference: Interpreting between English and ASL. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues (pp. 308–321). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, J. (1991). Australia's language: The Australian language and literacy policy. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Eichmann, H. (2009). Planning sign languages: Promoting hearing hegemony? Conceptualizing sign language standardization. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10, 293–307. doi:10.1080/14664200903116287 doi: 10.1080/14664200903116287
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L. (2010, September–October). Signs and symptoms: Exploring the lexicalization of health vocabulary in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Paper presented at the TISLR 10, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L. (2011, March). Exploring the role of fingerspelling in Auslan health-related conversations. Paper presented at the first Auckland Postgraduate Conference on Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L. (2012). The grammar of depiction: Exploring gesture and language in Australian Sign Language (Auslan) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. A. (1994). Critiques of language planning: A minority languages perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15, 91–99. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/01434632.1994.9994559 doi: 10.1080/01434632.1994.9994559
   Google Scholar
• Geraci, C. (2012). Language policy and planning: The case of Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 12, 494–518. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0006
   Google Scholar
• Ghearáin, H. N. (2011). The problematic relationship between institutionalised Irish terminology development and the Gaeltacht speech community: Dynamics of acceptance and estrangement. Language Policy, 10, 305–323. doi:10.1007/s10993-011-9216-5 doi: 10.1007/s10993-011-9216-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatoss, A. (2006). Community-level approaches in language planning: The case of Hungarian in Australia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7, 287–306. doi:10.2167/cilp099.0 doi: 10.2167/cilp099.0
   Google Scholar
• Hult, F. M., & Compton, S. E. (2012). Deaf education policy as Language Policy: A comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. Sign Language Studies, 12, 602–620. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0014
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M., & Power, D. (1991). The use of Australian Sign Language by deaf people. Unpublished research report no. 1. Nathan, Queensland, Australia: Griffith University, Faculty of Education, Centre for Deafness Studies and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M., Power, D., & Lloyd, K. (2006). Comments on “W(h)ither the Deaf community?”. Sign Language Studies, 6, 190–201. doi: 10.1353/sls.2006.0004
   Google Scholar
• Jeanes, R. C., & Reynolds, B. E. (Eds.). (1982). Dictionary of Australasian Signs for communication with the deaf. Melbourne: Victorian School for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (Ed.). (1989). Auslan dictionary: A dictionary of the sign language of the Australian deaf community. Sydney: Deafness Resources Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2003). Language standardization and signed language dictionaries. Sign Language Studies, 3, 431–468. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2006). W(h)ither the Deaf community? Population, genetics, and the future of Australian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 6, 137–173. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2006.0006
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., & Napier, J. (2010). Medical Signbank: Bringing deaf people and linguists together in the process of language development. Sign Language Studies, 10, 258–275. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-massmedia-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.0.0042
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (1999). On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2, 115–185. doi:10.1075/sll.2.2.03joh doi: 10.1075/sll.2.2.03joh
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian sign language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jokkinen, M. (2000, July). Deaf education: A linguistic human rights perspective. World Federation of the Deaf position paper. Paper presented at the International Congress of Educators of the Deaf, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Baldauf, R. B. Jr. (1997). Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilungual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding Deaf culture: In search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, P., Gulliver, M., & Batterbury, S. C. E. (2003). Reassessing minority language empowerment from a deaf perspective: The other 32 languages. Deaf Worlds, 19(2), 6–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B. (1996). A journey into the Deaf-world. San Diego, CA: DawnSign Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. (1987). National policy on languages. Retrieved from the Australian National University website http://www.anu.edu.au/linguistics/nash/aust/policy.html
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, A., Dzebisova, Z., Karapish, D., Kovacevic, B., Ogbebor, F., & Okonkwo, E. (2009). Arranging and negotiating the use of informal interpreters in general practice consultations: Experiences of refugees and asylum seekers in the west of Ireland. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 210–214. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.022 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, G. (2013). Not just 'how the doctor talks’: Healthcare interpreting as relational practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Major, G., Napier, J., Ferrara, L., & Johnston, T. (2012). Exploring lexical gaps in Australian Sign Language for the purposes of health communication. Communication & Medicine, 9, 37–47. doi:10.1558/cam.v9i1.37
   Google Scholar
• Major, G., Napier, J., & Stubbe, M. (2012). “What happens truly, not text book!”: Using authentic interactions in discourse training for healthcare interpreters. In K. Malcolm & L. Swabey (Eds.), Examining the education of healthcare interpreters (pp. 27–53). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, R., Major, G., & McKee, D. (2008). Lexical variation and interpreting in New Zealand Sign Language. In C. Roy (Ed.), Diversity and community in the worldwide sign language interpreting profession: Proceedings of the second conference of the World Association of Sign Language Interpreters (pp. 89–106). Coleford: Douglas McLean Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. (1999). Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mien-Chun Lin, C., Gerner de García, B., & Chen-Pichler, D. (2009). Standardizing Chinese Sign Language for use in post-secondary education. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10, 327–337. doi:10.1080/14664200903162521 doi: 10.1080/14664200903162521
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). (Eds.). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., Young, T., Bachleda, B., & Karchmer, M. (2006). How many people use ASL in the United States? Why Estimates Need Updating. Sign Language Studies, 6(3), 306–335. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2006.0019
   Google Scholar
• Mühlhäusler, P. (2000). Language planning and language ecology. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1, 306–367. doi:10.1080/14664200008668011 doi: 10.1080/14664200008668011
   Google Scholar
• Müller de Quadros, R. (2012). Linguistic policies, linguistic planning, and Brazilian Sign Language in Brazil. Sign Language Studies, 12, 543–564. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0010
   Google Scholar
• Napier, J. (2002). University interpreting: Linguistic issues for consideration. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 281–301. doi:10.1093/deafed/7.4.281 doi: 10.1093/deafed/7.4.281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Napier, J., & Kidd, M. (2013). Barriers to access to health care information by deaf people who use Auslan as their primary language. Australian Family Physician, 42(12), 896–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, J., Major, G., & Ferrara, L. (2011). Medical signbank: A cure-all for the aches and pains of medical sign language interpreting? In L. Leeson, S. Wurm, & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Signed language interpreting: Preparation, practice and performance (pp. 110–137). Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, J., Sabolcec, J., Hodgetts, J., Linder, S., Rose-Mundy, G., Turcinov, M., & Warby, L. (2014). Direct, translated or interpreter-mediated? A qualitative study of access to preventative and on-going healthcare information for Australian Deaf people. In B. Nicodemus & M. Metzger (Eds.), Investigations in healthcare interpreting (pp. 51–89). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Béarra, F. (2009). An Ghaeilge Nua agus Triail na Gaeilge. In M. NicCraith & P. ÓhÉalaí (Eds.), Diasa Díograise: Aistíi gcuimhne ar Mháirtín ÓBriain (pp. 257–276). Indreabhán: ClóIar-Chonnachta.
   Google Scholar
• Parisot, A.-M., & Rinfret, J. (2012). Recognition of Langue des Signes Québécoise in Eastern Canada. Sign Language Studies, 12, 583–601. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0013
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, R., & Barnett, S. (2009). Health-related vocabulary knowledge among deaf adults. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0015771 doi: 10.1037/a0015771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, K. (1997). The state we're in: Some thoughts on professionalisation, professionalism and practice among the UK's sign language interpreters. Deaf Worlds, 13(3), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Quer, J. (2012). Legal pathways to the recognition of sign languages: A comparison of the Catalan and Spanish Sign Language Acts. Sign Language Studies, 12, 565–582. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0012
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, T. (2001). Language planning and policy. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 145–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reffell, H., & McKee, R. L. (2009). Motives and outcomes of New Zealand Sign Language legislation: A comparative study between New Zealand and Finland. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10, 272–292. doi:10.1080/14664200903116295 doi: 10.1080/14664200903116295
   Google Scholar
• Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies. Focus on English (pp. 9–24). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, C. (2000). Interpreting as a discourse process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schermer, T. (2003). From variant to standard: An overview of the standardization process of the lexicon of sign language of the Netherlands over two decades. Sign Language Studies, 3, 469–486. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2003.0017
   Google Scholar
• Schermer, T. (2012). Sign language planning in the Netherlands between 1980 and 2010. Sign Language Studies, 12, 467–493. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/communication-mass-media-complete doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0016
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1994). Collins Cobuild English learner’s dictionary. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Smolicz, J. J. (1999). Who is an Australian? Identity, core values and the resilience of culture. In M. Secombe & J. Zajda (Eds.), J.J. Smolicz on education and culture (pp. 11–49). Melbourne: James Nickolas.
   Google Scholar
• Snodden, K. (2009). Equity in education: Signed language and the courts. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10, 255–271. doi:10.1080/14664200903116303 doi: 10.1080/14664200903116303
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (2008). Whose interpreter is she anyway? Interpreting within the community or for the community. In C. Roy (Ed.), Diversity and community in the worldwide sign language interpreting profession: Proceedings of the second conference of the World Association of Sign Language Interpreters (pp. 75–88). Coleford: Douglas McLean.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, B. C., & Jamieson, J. R. (2004). Sign language vocabulary development practices and internet use among educational interpreters. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 53–67. doi:10.1093/deafed/enh012 doi: 10.1093/deafed/enh012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, C. L., & Pledger, L. M. (1993). Doctor–patient communication: Is patient knowledge of medical terminology improving? Health Communication, 5, 89–97. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0502_2 doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0502_2
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, S. (2006). Preserving dialects of an endangered language. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7, 269–286. doi:10.2167/cilp098 doi: 10.2167/cilp098.0
   Google Scholar
• Van Herreweghe, M., & Vermeerbergen, M. (2009). Flemish sign language standardization. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(3), 308–326. doi:10.1080/14664200903154874 doi: 10.1080/14664200903154874
   Google Scholar
• Wadensjö, C. (1998). Interpreting as interaction. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of the Deaf. (2009). WFD calls for the unification process of Sign Languages in the Arab region to cease immediately. Retrieved from the World Federation of the Deaf website: http://www.wfdeaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Statement-on-the-Unification-of-Arab-Sign-Languages-FINAL-091.pdf
   Google Scholar