Teachers’ agency and the enactment of educational reform in Vietnam

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63. doi: 10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum: Teacher networks and curriculum implementation. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2001). Educating the “Right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R. (1982). The language situation in American Samoa: Planners, plans and planning. Language Planning Newsletter, 8(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 147–170. doi: 10.2167/cilp092.0
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R., & Nguyen, H. (2012). Language policy in Asia and the Pacific. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of language policy (Vol. 30, pp. 617–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, T. (2013). “Can a basket hide an elephant?” – Language policy and practices toward linguistic, educational, and socio-economic equity in Vietnam (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, T., & Nguyen, H. (2016). Standardizing English for educational and socio-economic betterment? A critical analysis of English language policy reforms. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English education policy in Asia. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H. (2006). Understanding educational leadership: People, power and culture. Abingdon: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, T. (2014). The impact of the ‘Teaching English through English’ policy on teachers and teaching in South Korea. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(3), 201–220. doi:10.1080/14664208.2015.970727
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, H. (Ed.), (2011). Developing countries and the English language: Rhetoric, risks roles and recommendations. London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cray, E. (1997). Teacher's perception of a language policy: “Teaching LINC”. TESL Canada Journal, 15(1), 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. (2009). A sociocultural framework for language policy and planning. Language Problems & Language Planning, 33(1), 22–42. doi: 10.1075/lplp.33.1.02cro
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2009). Agentive youth research: Towards individual, collective, and policy transformations. In T. G. Wiley., J. S. Lee., & R. Rumberger (Eds.), The education of language minority immigrants in the USA (pp. 202–239). London: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K., & Phyak, P. (2015). In the face of neoliberal adversity: Engaging language education policy and practices. L2 Journal, 7(3), 146–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1993). Changing forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. London: Palmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Sylvan, C. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 385–400. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, O. (2010). Globalisation, English for everyone and English teacher capacity: Language policy discourses and realities in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 289–310. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2011.532621
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, O., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Baldauf, R. (2013). Medium of instruction in Asia: Context, processes and outcomes. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/14664208.2013.792130
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, O., Zhu, L., & Baldauf, R. B., Jr. (2014). Norms and varieties of English and TESOL teacher agency. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(10), 77–95. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n10.6
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, B. (2011). Vietnam: Rising dragon. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hélot, C., & O'Laoire, M. (2011). Language policy for the multilingual classroom (Bilingual education and bilingualism). Clevedon, London: Channel View.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger, N., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2000). Revisiting the Continua of Biliteracy: International and critical perspectives. Language and Education, 14(2), 96–122. doi:10.1080/09500780008666781
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, B., Juhasz, A., Marken, J., & Ruiz, B. (1998). The ESL teacher as moral agent. Research in the Teaching of English, 32, 161–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, E. (2008). Contextualizing policy appropriation: Teachers’ perspectives, local responses, and English-only ballot initiatives. The Urban Review, 40(4), 350–370. doi: 10.1007/s11256-008-0085-y
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Baldauf, R. (2005). Language-in-education policy and planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 1013–1034). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., Baldauf, R., & Kamwangamalu, N. (2011). Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 105–124. doi:10.1080/14664208.2011.591716
   Google Scholar
• Le, D. (2012). English as a medium of instruction at tertiary education system in Vietnam. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(2), 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Le, V. (2001). Language and Vietnamese pedagogical contexts: How appropriate and effective are communicative language teaching methodologies in contemporary Vietnam. Teacher's Edition, 7, 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Le, V. (2007). A historical review of English language education in Vietnam. In Y. Choi & B. Spolsky (Eds.), English education in Asia: History and policies (pp. 167–79). Seoul: Asia TEFL.
   Google Scholar
• Le, V., & Barnard, R. (2009). Teaching grammar: A survey of teachers’ attitudes in Vietnam. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(3), 245–73.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2010). EFL teachers and English language education in the PRC: Are they the policy makers? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 439–51. doi: 10.3860/taper.v19i3.1852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A., & Baldauf, R. (2008). Language planning in local contexts: Agents, contexts and interactions. In A. Liddicoat & R. Baldauf, Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy: Language planning in local contexts (pp. 3–17). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city – Critical social thought. Florence, KY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. (2005a). Talking knowledge into being in an upriver primary school in Brunei. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice (pp. 225–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. (2005b). “Safe” language practices in two rural schools in Malaysia: Tensions between policy and practice. In A. Lin & P. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 74–97). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, T., & Wyman, L. (2009). Indigenous youth and bilingualism – Theory, research, praxis. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 8(5), 279–290. doi:10.1080/1534845090330503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–78. doi: 10.3102/01623737009002171
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16. doi: 10.3102/0013189X019009011
   Google Scholar
• Menken, K., & Garcia, O. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi: 10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C., Le, L., Tran, Q., & Nguyen, H. (2014). Inequality of access to English language learning in primary education in Vietnam. In H. Zhang, P. Chan, & C. Boyle (Eds.), Equality in education: Fairness and inclusion (pp. 139–153). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. (2013, September). Báo cáo về định hướng công tác thi, kiểm tra, đánh giá tiếng Anh và các môn ngoại ngữ trong hệ thống giáo dục quốc dân giai đoạn 2013–2020 [Report on orientations in testing and assessment of English and other foreign languages in the national education system during 2013–2020]. Paper presented at the Seminar on Strategies of the National Foreign Language Project 2020 in the period 2014–2020, Hanoi.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. (in press). Model of mentoring in language teacher education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, S. (2006). Solidarity, courage and heart: What teacher educators can learn from a new generation of teachers. Intercultural Education, 17(5), 457–73. doi:10.1080/14675980601060443
   Google Scholar
• Ollerhead, S. (2010). Teacher agency and policy response in the adult ESL literacy classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 44(3), 606–18. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.230742_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, L. (2011). English language ideologies in the Chinese foreign language education policies: A world-system perspective. Language Policy, 10(3), 245–63. doi: 10.1007/s10993-011-9205-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease-Alvarez, L., Samway, K. D., & Cifka-Herrera, C. (2010). Working within the system: Teachers of English learners negotiating a literacy instruction mandate. Language Policy, 9(4), 313–34. doi: 10.1007/s10993-010-9180-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phyak, P., & Bui, T. (2014). Youth engaging language policy: Ideologies and transformations from within. Language Policy, 13(2), 101–20. doi: 10.1007/s10993-013-9303-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. doi:10.2307/23253807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, V., & Morgan, B. (2007). TESOL and policy enactments: Perspectives from practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 447–463. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 8(2), 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949–965. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (1st ed.). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi: 10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stritikus, T. (2003). The interrelationship of beliefs, context, and learning: The case of a teacher reacting to language policy. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 2(1), 29–52. doi: 10.1207/S15327701JLIE0201_2
   Google Scholar
• Swanepoel, C. (2008). The perceptions of teachers and school principals of each other's disposition towards teacher involvement in school reform. South African Journal of Education, 28(1), 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throop, R. (2007). Teachers as language policy planners: Incorporating language policy planning into teacher education and classroom practice. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 22(2), 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Verplaetse, L. (2008). Developing academic language through an abundance of interaction. In L. Verplaetse & N. Migliacci (Eds.), Inclusive pedagogy for English language learners: A handbook of research-informed practices (pp. 167–180). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, L., & Nguyen, H. (2010). Critical friends group for EFL teacher professional development. ELT Journal, 64(2), 205–213. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongalis-Macrow, A. (2007). I, teacher: Re-territorialization of teachers’ multi-faceted agency in globalized education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(4), 425–39. doi: 10.1080/01425690701369376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2008). Language policy implementation: A look at teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 30(1), 1–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8381.2008.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2005). The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wedell, M. (2003). Giving TESOL change a chance: Supporting key players in the curriculum change process. System, 31(4), 439–456. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2003.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. (2015). Teacher mediated agency in educational reform in China. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., & Baldauf, J. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems & Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1075/lplp.36.1.01zha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar