465
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The agentive role of preschool leaders in language policy enactment: case studies of acceptance and resistance

Pages 225-242 | Received 30 Jun 2019, Accepted 26 Nov 2019, Published online: 06 Dec 2019

References

  • Babino, A., & Stewart, M. (2018). Remodeling dual language programs: Teachers enact agency as critically conscious language policy makers. Bilingual Research Journal, 41(3), 272–297. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2018.1489313
  • Baldauf, R. (2008). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in language ecology. In A. Liddicoat & R. Baldauf, Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy: Language planning in local contexts (pp. 18–44). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Ball, S. J. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
  • Brooks, K., Adams, S., & Morita-Mullaney, T. (2010). Creating inclusive learning communities for ELL students: Transforming school principals' perspectives. Theory into Practice, 49(2), 145–151.
  • Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183–190.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (Eds.). (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • DeMatthews, D., & Izquierdo, E. (2015). Dual language education: Teaching and leading in two languages. Cham: Springer.
  • DeMatthews, D., & Izquierdo, E. (2016). School leadership for dual language education: A social justice approach. The Educational Forum, 80(3), 278–293.
  • DeMatthews, D., & Izquierdo, E. (2018). The importance of principals supporting dual language education: A social justice leadership framework. Journal of Latinos and Education, 17, 53–70.
  • Farr, M., & Song, J. (2011). Language ideologies and policies: Multilingualism and education. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 650–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00298.x
  • Fenton-Smith, B., & Gurney, L. (2015). Actors and agency in academic language policy and planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 72–87.
  • Gilmetdinova, A. (2019). Principals as gatekeepers of language policy implementation in Kazan, Russia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 120–137. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2016.1231772
  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.
  • Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–83). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
  • Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8, 139–159. doi: 10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9
  • Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221–243. doi: 10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z
  • Kloss, H. (1998). The American bilingual tradition. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
  • LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research: An introduction (2nd ed.). Plymouth: AltaMira Press.
  • Levinson, B., & Sutton, M. (2001). Policy in/as practice: Sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In M. Sutton & B. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Towards a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1–22). London: Ablex Publishing.
  • Liddicoat, A. J. (2019). Constraints on agency in micro-language policy and planning in schools: A case study of curriculum change. In J. Bouchard & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 149–170). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Liddicoat, A. J., & Baldauf, R. (2008). Language planning in local contexts: Agents, contexts and interactions. In A. Liddicoat & R. Baldauf, Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy: Language planning in local contexts (pp. 3–17). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Martin-Jones, M., & Heller, M. (1996). Introduction to the special issue on education in multilingual settings: Discourse, identities, and power. Linguistics and Education, 8(1), 3–16.
  • McCarty, T. (2004). Dangerous difference: A critical-historical analysis of language education policies in the United States. In J. Tollefson & A. Tsui (Eds.), Medium of instruction policies (pp. 71–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Menken, K. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Menken, K., & García, O. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Menken, K., & Solorza, C. (2014). No child left bilingual: Accountability and the elimination of bilingual education programs in New York City schools. Educational Policy, 28(1), 96–125.
  • Menken, K., & Solorza, C. (2015). Principals as linchpins in bilingual education: The need for prepared school leaders. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(6), 676–697.
  • Mifsud, C. L., & Vella, L. A. (2018). Teacher agency and language mediation in two Maltese preschool bilingual classrooms. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 31(3), 272–288. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2018.1504400
  • Mohamed, N. (2019). From a monolingual to a multilingual nation: Analysing the language education policy in the Maldives. In A. Kirkpatrick & A. Liddicoat (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • National Bureau of Statistics. (2019). Statistical yearbook of the Maldives. Retrieved from: http://statisticsmaldives.gov.mv/
  • National Institute of Education. (2015). National curriculum framework. Maldives: National Institute of Education.
  • Ng, P. C. L., & Boucher-Yip, E. F. (2017). Teacher agency and policy response in English language teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Nguyen, H. T. M., & Bui, T. (2016). Teachers’ agency and the enactment of educational reform in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 88–105. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1125664
  • Nguyen, V. H., Hamid, M. O., & Renshaw, P. (2016). Language education policy enactment and individual agency. Language Problems and Language Planning, 40(1), 69–84.
  • Philipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ricento, T. (2006). An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
  • Rodriguez, M., & Alanis, I. (2011). Negotiating linguistic and cultural identity: One borderlander's initiative. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 103–117.
  • Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. New York, NY: SAGE.
  • Scanlan, M., & López, F. (2012). ¡Vamos! How school leaders promote equity and excellence for bilingual students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 583–625.
  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Human rights and language policy in education. In S. May & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 107–119). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Spillane, J. P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63–87.
  • Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–762.
  • Vukelich, C., & Christie, J. (2009). Building a foundation for preschool literacy: Effective instruction for children’s reading and writing development. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Wiley, T. (2014, March). Historical orientations to language policy in the United States. Language Policy Research Network Brief. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/
  • Zhao, S., & Baldauf, R. B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1075/lplp.36.1.01zha

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.