Agency in language planning and policy

References

• Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, N. (1989). Language policy and national unity in South Africa/Azania. Buchu Books.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, N. (1992). Language planning from below. In R. K. Herbert (Ed.), Language and society in Africa (pp. 56–68). Witwatersrand University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1929/1994). Проблемы Творчества Достоевского [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. Next.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1965). Слово в романе. [Discourse in the novel]. Вопросы литературы [Questions of Literature], 8, 84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R. B. (1994). “Unplanned” language policy and planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 14, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002828
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R. B. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2&3), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp092.0
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barakos, E. (2012). Language policy and planning in urban professional settings: Bilingualism in Cardiff businesses. Current Issues in Language Planning, 13(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2012.722374
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science (3rd ed.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2012). Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy, 11(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9243-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2020). Legitimizing multilingual practices in the classroom: The role of the ‘practiced language policy’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1372359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, J., & Glasgow, G. P. (2019). Agency in language policy and planning: A theoretical model. In J. Bouchard, & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 22–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique [Outline of a theory of practice]. Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Cadier, L., & Mar-Molinero, C. (2012). Language policies and linguistic super-diversity in contemporary urban societies: The case of the City of Southampton, UK. Current Issues in Language Planning, 13(3), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2012.722376
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2016). What’s policy got to do with it? How the structure-agency debate can illuminate policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/685847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. L. (1984). Language planning, language spread and language change. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), Language planning and language education (pp. 23–50). Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Das Gupta, J. (1977a). Language associations in India. In J. Rubin, B. H. Jernudd, J. Das Gupta, J. A. Fishman, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Language planning processes (pp. 181–194). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Das Gupta, J. (1977b). Language planning in India: Authority and organization. In J. Rubin, B. H. Jernudd, J. Das Gupta, J. A. Fishman, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Language planning processes (pp. 57–78). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Djité, P. G. (2009). Language policy at major sporting events. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200802398747
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1919). Les Règles de la méthode sociologique [The rules of sociological method]. Alcon.
   Google Scholar
• Eggington, W. G. (2002). Unplanned language planning. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 404–415). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellman, J. (1974). The role of Eliezer Ben Yehuda in the revival of the Hebrew language: An assessment. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in language planning (pp. 427–445). Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Fellman, J., & Fishman, J. A. (1977). The Hebrew Academy: Solving terminological problems. In J. Rubin, B. H. Jernudd, J. Das Gupta, J. A. Fishman, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Language planning processes (pp. 79–95). Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. A. (Ed.). (1993). The earliest stage of language planning: The ‘first congress’ phenomenon. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison [Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison]. Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S. (2001). Beyond agency. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1994a). New alignments and old literacies: Critical literacy, post-modernism and fast capitalism. In P. O’Connor (Ed.), Thinking work (pp. 82–104). Albsac.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1994b). New alignments and old literacies: From fast capitalism to the canon. In B. Shortland-Jones, B. Bosich, & J. Rivalland (Eds.), Living literacy (pp. 1–35). Australian Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). Constitution of society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, M. M., & Han, Y. (2020). Exploring family language policy and planning among ethnic minority families in Hong Kong: Through a socio-historical and processed lens. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1748371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatoss, A. (2006). Community-level approaches in language planning: The case of Hungarian in Australia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2&3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp099.0
   Google Scholar
• Hult, F. M., & Källkvist, M. (2016). Global flows in local language planning: Articulating parallel language use in Swedish university policies. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1106395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernudd, B. H. (1977). Agency man. In J. Rubin, B. H. Jernudd, J. Das Gupta, J. A. Fishman, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Language planning processes (pp. 131–139). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902780706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C., & Ricento, T. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: Situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2013(219), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0002
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning: From practice to theory. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). The ideology of interculturality in Japanese language-in-education policy. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0720
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2013). Language-in-education policies: The discursive construction of intercultural relations. Multilingual matters.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2020a). Ideology in language policy and educational practice: An afterword. In A. S. M. Al-Issa & S.-A. Mirhosseini (Eds.), World English language education today: Ideologies, policies and practices (pp. 135–145). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2020b). Language policy and planning for language maintenance: The macro and meso levels. In A. Schalley, & S. Eisenchlas (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development (pp. 337–356). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. (2005). Including discourse in language planning theory. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. G. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honor of Robert B. Kaplan (pp. 255–264). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (2004). Two treatises of government, and a letter concerning toleration (I. Shapiro, Ed.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1689).
   Google Scholar
• Matras, Y., & Robertson, A. (2015). Multilingualism in a post-industrial city: Policy and practice in Manchester. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2015.1048925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (2001). L'institutionnalisme centré sur les acteurs [Institutionalism focused on the actors]. Politix, 14(55), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.2001.1174
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, P., & Jones, R. (2009). Symbols of justice’: The Welsh language society’s campaign for bilingual road signs in Wales, 1967–1980. Journal of Historical Geography, 35(2), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2008.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlhäusler, P. (1996). Ecological and non-ecological approaches to language planning. In M. Hellinger & U. Ammon (Eds.), Contrastive sociolinguistics (pp. 205–212). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T. M., & Bui, T. (2016). Teachers’ agency and the enactment of educational reform in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1125664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1986). The fragility of goodness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obiri-Yeboah, M. A. (2019). Multilingualism at church: Language practices in a Ghanaian context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1582946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda, T. (2019). Policy borrowing for a world-class university: A case of a writing center in Japan. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(5), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1543161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500010811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2006). Foreign language planning in England: The pupil perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2&3), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp094.0
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2007). Foreign language planning: Pupil choice and pupil voice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601179194
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. (2009). Émile, ou de l’éducation [Emile, or on education] (A. Charrak, Ed.). Flammrion. (Original work published 1762).
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (1977). Indonesian language planning and education. In J. Rubin, B. H. Jernudd, J. Das Gupta, J. A. Fishman, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Language planning processes (pp. 111–130). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sanden, G. R. (2020a). The second-class Norwegian: Marginalisation of Nynorsk in Norwegian business. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(2), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1697556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanden, G. R. (2020b). Ten reasons why corporate language policies can create more problems than they solve. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1553914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. (2015). Micro-level planning for a Papua New Guinean elementary school classroom: “Copycat” planning and language ideologies. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2015.1042828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siiner, M. (2016). University administrators as forced language policy agents. An institutional ethnography of parallel language strategy and practices at the University of Copenhagen. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(3-4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1204058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, A., Kwapong, A., & Woodham, M. (2012). Pentecostal and Catholic migrant churches in London – The role of ideologies in the language planning of faith lessons. Current Issues in Language Planning, 13(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2012.678977
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, H. (2019). Teacher agency in times of educational change: The case of transitioned teachers in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(5), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1553912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby, L. (2014). Meeting the challenges of heritage language education: Lessons from one school community. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.915457
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., & Baldauf, R. B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.36.1.01zha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Mei, Z. (2020). Two worlds in one city: A sociopolitical perspective on Chinese urban families’ language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1751491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar