1,697
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Language learners as invisible planners: a case study of an Arabic language program in a Chinese university

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 371-393 | Received 29 Jun 2021, Accepted 05 Nov 2021, Published online: 30 Nov 2021

References

  • Baldauf, R. B. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2&3), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp092.0
  • Bolton, K. (2012). World Englishes and Asian Englishes: A survey of the field. In A. Kirkpatrick & R. Sussex (Eds.), English as an International language in Asia: Implications for language education. Multilingual Education (Vol. 1, pp. 13–26). Springer.
  • Bolton, K., & Graddol, D. (2012). English in China today. English Today, 28(3), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078412000223
  • Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2020). Legitimizing multilingual practices in the classroom: The role of the ‘practiced language policy’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1372359
  • Bouchard, J., & Glasgow, G. P. (2019). Agency in language policy and planning: A theoretical model. In J. Bouchard, & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 22–76). Routledge.
  • Chen, X., Tao, J., & Zhao, K. (2021). Agency in meso-level language policy planning in the face of macro-level policy shifts: A case study of multilingual education in a Chinese tertiary institution. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741234
  • Cheng, J., & Li, W. (2021). Individual agency and changing language education policy in China: Reactions to the new ‘guidelines on College English teaching’. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1700055
  • Deters, P. (2011). Identity, agency and the acquisition of professional language and culture. Continuum.
  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  • Fang, F., & Widodo, H. (2019). Critical Perspectives on global Englishes in Asia. Multilingual Matters.
  • Finardi, K. B., & Guimarães, F. F. (2021). Local agency in national language policies: The internationalization of higher education in a Brazilian institution. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1697557
  • Gao, X. (2013). Reflexive and reflective thinking: A crucial link between agency and autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836204
  • Gao, X., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Multilingualism and higher education in Greater China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(7), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1571073
  • Gil, J. (2016). English language education policies in the People’s Republic of China. In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policies in Asia (pp. 49–90). Springer.
  • Gladney, D. C. (2003). Islam in China: Accommodation or separatism? The China Quarterly, 174, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009443903000275
  • Goller, M. (2017). Human agency at work: An active approach towards expertise development. Springer VS.
  • Han, Y., Gao, X., & Xia, U. (2019). Problematising recent developments in non-English foreign language education in Chinese universities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(7), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1571072
  • Jernudd, B. H., & Neustupný, J. V. (1987). Language planning: For whom? In L. Laforge (Ed.), Proceedings of the international colloquium on language planning (pp. 69–84). Les Press de L Ùniversité Laval.
  • Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory. Multilingual Matters.
  • Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (2003). Language and language-in-education planning in the Pacific basin. Kluwer.
  • Kimura, G. C. (2014). Language management as a cyclical process: A case study on prohibiting sorbian in the workplace. Slovo a Slovesnost, 75(4), 255–270.
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
  • Liddicoat, A. J. (2019). Constraints on agency in micro-language policy and planning in schools: A case study of curriculum change. In J. Bouchard, & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 149–170). Routledge.
  • Liddicoat, A. J. (2020). Language policy and planning for language maintenance: The macro and meso levels. In A. Schalley, & S. Eisenchlas (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development (pp. 337–356). De Gruyter.
  • Liddicoat, A. J., & Baldauf, R. B. (2008). Language planning in local contexts: Agents, contexts and interactions. In A. J. Liddicoat, & R. B. Baldauf (Eds.), Language planning in local contexts (pp. 3–17). Multilingual Matters.
  • Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K. (2021). Agency in language planning and policy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1791533
  • Lv, L., Gao, X., & Teo, T. (2017). Intercultural orientation as Japanese language learners’ motivation in mainland China. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2016.1217739
  • Merriam, B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  • Nekvapil, J. (2009). The integrative potential of language management theory. In J. Nekvapil, & T. Sherman (Eds.), Language management in contact situations: Perspectives from three continents (pp. 1–11). Peter Lang.
  • Nekvapil, J. (2016). Language management theory as one approach in language policy and planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1108481
  • Neustupný, J. V., & Nekvapil, J. (2003). Language management in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(3-4), 181–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668057
  • Pakir, A. (1994). Education and invisible language planning: The case of English in Singapore. In T. Kandiah, & K. Kwan-Terry (Eds.), English and language planning: Southeast Asia contribution (pp. 158–181). Centre for Advanced Studies and Times Academic Press.
  • Payne, M. (2007). Foreign language planning: Pupil choice and pupil voice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601179194
  • Payne, M., & Almansour, M. (2014). Foreign language planning in Saudi Arabia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.915461
  • Phan, H. T. T., & Hamid, M. O. (2017). Learner autonomy in foreign language policies in Vietnamese universities: An exploration of teacher agency from a sociocultural perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1201231
  • Poudel, P. P., & Choi, T. H. (2021). Policymakers’ agency and the structure: The case of medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741235
  • Shen, Q. (2016). Saving Shanghai dialect: A case for bottom-up language planning in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5–6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0312-3
  • Shen, Q., & Gao, X. (2019). Multilingualism and policy making in Greater China: Ideological and implementational spaces. Language Policy, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9473-7
  • Shepherd, E., & McEntee-Atalisanis, L. (2021). Constraints of hierarchy on meso-actors’ agency: Evidence from Vietnam’s educational language policy reform. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1716577
  • Vennela, R., & Kandharaja, K. M. C. (2021). Agentive responses: A study of students’ language attitudes towards the use of English in India. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1744319
  • Wang, W. 王文斌, & Xu, H. 徐浩. (2018). 中国外语教育年度报告(2017) [Annual report on foreign language education in China (2017)]. 外语教学与研究出版社 [Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press].
  • Zhao, S. (2011). Actors in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, vol. 2 (pp. 905–923). Routledge.
  • Zhao, S., & Baldauf, R. B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.36.1.01zha
  • Zheng, Y. 郑咏滟. (2021).新冠疫情中上海危机沟通语言管理过程研究 [A study on language management process of shanghai’s crisis communication during the COVID-19]. 语言战略研究 [Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning], 6(3), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20210301
  • Zheng, Y., Lu, X., & Ren, W. (2020). Tracking the evolution of Chinese learners’ multilingual motivation through a longitudinal Q methodology. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12672