Participation and deliberation in language policy: the case of gender-neutral language

References

• Alvanoudi, A. (2020). Indexing gender, culture, and cognition: An introduction. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.40948
   Google Scholar
• Becker, L. (2019). Glotopolítica del sexismo: Ideologemas de la argumentación de Ignacio Bosque y Concepción Company Company contra el lenguaje inclusivo de género. Theory Now. Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought, 2(2), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.30827/tnj.v2i2.9827
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Bengoechea, M. (2011). Non-sexist Spanish policies: An attempt bound to fail? Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.541389
   Google Scholar
• Blaubergs, M. S. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 3(2–3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92071-0
   Google Scholar
• Bosque, I. (2012). Sexismo lingüístico y visibilidad de la mujer. Real Academia Española. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://bit.ly/2WaQHlb
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755647
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin, & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity (pp. 67–92). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2007). Deliberative democracy. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 219–236). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, F. L., Delli Carpini, M. X., & Jacobs, L. R. (2007). Who deliberates? Discursive participation in america. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (with Niemeyer, S.) (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I. (2020). Language rights and groups of immigrant origin: The case of language claims in the Spanish cities in North Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning, 44(2), 146–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I., Nocchi, S., & Ruane, M. (2020). Language policy-making in Ireland: A preliminary study of the consultation process of Languages Connect. TEANGA, the Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics, 27, 98–127.
   Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I., & Soler, J. (2021). Sociolinguists and their publics: Epistemological tension and disciplinary contestation over language in Catalonia. Journal of Sociolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12530
   Google Scholar
• Escandell-Vidal, M. V. (2020). En torno al género inclusivo. IgualdadES, 2(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/IgdES.2.08
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (2012). The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, M. E. (2004). Wild publics and grotesque symposiums: Habermas and bakhtin on dialogue, everyday life and the public sphere. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00472.x
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. F. (2003). Contemporary theories of liberalism: Public reason as a post-enlightenment project. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grijelmo, Á. (2019). Propuesta de acuerdo sobre el lenguaje inclusivo. Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2009). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Vol. 1, W. Rehg, Trans.). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellinger, M. (2001). English: Gender in a global language. In M. Hellinger, & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 105–112). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2009). Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 309–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619725
   Google Scholar
• Junyent, C. (2013). Visibilitzar o marcar: Repensar el gènere en la llengua catalana. Empúries.
   Google Scholar
• Junyent, C. (Ed.) (2021). Som dones, som lingüistes, som moltes i diem prou. Eumo.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S. (2008). Civil passions: Moral sentiment and democratic deliberation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2011). Feminist language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.548314
   Google Scholar
• Lledó, E. (2005). De llengua, diferència i context. Institut Català de les Dones.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. (2013). Role of deliberation in language policy and planning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 5004–5008). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. (2017). Resolving ethnolinguistic conflict in multi-ethnic societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(5), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomotey, B. A. (2018). Making Spanish gender fair: A review of anti-sexist language reform attempts from a language planning perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2017.1403217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mickan, A., Schiefke, M., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2014). Key is a llave is a Schlüssel: A failure to replicate an experiment from Boroditsky et al. 2003. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2014-0004
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. C. (2012). Acerca de la discriminación de la mujer y de los lingüistas en la sociedad: Reflexiones críticas. Pensamiento crítico. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from http://www.pensamientocritico.org/juamor0915.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Machado, S. (2020, January 20). La Constitución española es gramaticalmente “impecable”, según la RAE. EFE. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://www.efe.com/efe/espana/cultura/la-constitucion-espanola-es-gramaticalmente-impecable-segun-rae/10005-4154096
   Google Scholar
• Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (1998). Contemporary arguments against non-sexist language: Blaubergs (1980) revisited. Sex Roles, 39(5–6), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018827227128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, A. (2003). Linguistic sexism and feminist linguistic activism. In J. Holmes, & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 550–572). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, Y., & Bonotti, M. (2019). Sound reasoning: Why accent bias matters for democratic theory. The Journal of Politics, 81(2), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1086/701725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramberg, B. T. (2016). Shaping language: What deliberative legitimacy requires. Sociolinguistica, 30(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2016-0005
   Google Scholar
• Real Academia Española. (2020). Informe de la Real Academia Española sobre el lenguaje inclusivo y cuestiones conexas. RAE. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://www.rae.es/sites/default/files/Informe_lenguaje_inclusivo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, I. M. (2005). La gramática y la biología en el género del español. Revista Española de Lingüística, 35(1), 17–44. http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/1873
   Google Scholar
• Røyneland, U. (2016). Revision of the Nynorsk standard: Deliberation, decision and legitimisation. Sociolinguistica, 30(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2016-0006
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2014). Democratic theory and the challenge of linguistic diversity. Language Policy, 13(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9324-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. (1999). Enough deliberation: Politics is about interest and power. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 28–38). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2011). Priority gender equality guidelines. UNESCO. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/BSP/GENDER/GE%20Guidelines%20December%202_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wee, L. (2011). Language without rights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
   Google Scholar