1,052
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Contrasting a university's language policy with its linguistic landscape: a Norwegian case study

Pages 237-265 | Received 18 Apr 2023, Accepted 10 Nov 2023, Published online: 21 Nov 2023

References

  • Anderson, L. (2019). Internationalisation and linguistic diversity in a mid-sized Italian university. In J. Jenkins, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: Insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe (pp. 50–73). Routledge.
  • Barakos, E. (2016). Language policy and critical discourse analysis: Toward a combined approach. In E. Barakos, & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Discursive approaches to language policy (pp. 23–49). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Barakos, E., & Unger, J. W. (2016). Introduction: Why are discursive approaches to language policy necessary? In E. Barakos, & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Discursive approaches to language policy (pp. 1–9). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.01bar
  • Berezkina, M. (2018). ‘Language is a costly and complicating factor’: A diachronic study of language policy in the virtual public sector. Language Policy, 17(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9422-2
  • Gorter, D. (2019). Methods and techniques for linguistic landscape research: About definitions, core issues and technological innovations. In M. Pütz, & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp. 38–57). Multilingual Matters.
  • Gorter, D. (2021). Multilingual inequality in public spaces: Towards an inclusive model of linguistic landscapes. In R. Blackwood, & D. A. Dunlevy (Eds.), Multilingualism in public spaces: Empowering and transforming communities (pp. 13–30). Bloomsbury.
  • Graedler, A. (2014). Attitudes towards English in Norway: A corpus-based study of attitudinal expressions in newspaper discourse. Multilingua, 33(3-4), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0014
  • Gregersen, F. (2018). More parallel, please! Best practice of parallel language use at Nordic universities: 11 recommendations. Nordic Council of Ministers.
  • Han, Y., & Wu, X. (2020). Language policy, linguistic landscape and residents’ perception in Guangzhou, China: Dissents and conflicts. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1582943
  • House, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 556–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00242.x
  • Hult, F. M. (2018). Language policy and planning and linguistic landscapes. In J. W. Tollefson, & M. Pérez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 333–352). Oxford University Press.
  • Hult, F. M., & Johnson, D. C. (2015). Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hultgren, A. K. (2015). English as an international language of science and its effect on Nordic terminology: The view of scientists. In A. Linn, N. Bermel, & G. Ferguson (Eds.), Attitudes towards English in Europe: English in Europe, volume 1 (pp. 139–164). De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Hultgren, A. K. (2018). The Englishization of Nordic universities: What do scientists think? European Journal of Language Policy, 10(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2018.4
  • Hultgren, A. K., Gregersen, F., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). English in Nordic universities: Ideologies and practices. In A. K. Hultgren, F. Gregersen, & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), English in Nordic universities: Ideologies and practices (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins.
  • HVL. (2018a). Språkpolitiske retningslinjer for Høgskulen på Vestlandet (“Language political guidelines for HVL”). Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://hvl.no/om/sentrale-dokument/reglar/sprakpolitiske-retningslinjer/.
  • HVL. (2018b). Interaction – sustainability – innovation: Strategy 2019-2023. (Brochure)
  • HVL. (2019). Strategy HVL 2019-2023. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.hvl.no/en/about/strategy/.
  • HVL. (2020). Stort campusutviklingsprosjekt skal gjere HVL til ein meir attraktiv studiestad (“Large campus development project should make HVL a more attractive study location”). Retrieved November 8, 2021, from https://www.hvl.no/aktuelt/stort-campusutviklingsprosjekt-skal-gjere-hvl-til-ein-meir-attraktiv-studiestad/.
  • Jahr, E. H. (2018). Two centuries of Norwegian language planning and policy: Why and how it all started, and how it is divided into three different periods. In E. H. Jahr (Ed.), Perspectives on two centuries of Norwegian language planning and policy: Theoretical implications and lessons learnt (pp. 9–14). Kungliga Gustav Adolfs Akademien för Svensk Folkkultur.
  • Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing semiotic landscapes. In A. Jaworski, & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp. 1–40). Continuum.
  • Jenkins, J., Baker, W., Doubleday, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). How much linguistic diversity on a UK university campus? In J. Jenkins, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: Insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe (pp. 226–260). Routledge.
  • Jenkins, J., & Mauranen, A. (eds.). (2019). Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: Insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe. Routledge.
  • Johnson, D. C. (2016). Theoretical foundations for discursive approaches to language policy. In E. Barakos, & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Discursive approaches to language policy (pp. 11–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kretzer, M. M., & Kaschula, R. H. (2021). Language policy and linguistic landscapes at schools in South Africa. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1666849
  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). Ethnography and critical discourse analysis: Towards a problem-oriented research dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601630
  • Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
  • Linn, A. R. (2010). Voices from above – voices from below: Who is talking and who is listening in Norwegian language politics? Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.505070
  • Linn, A. R. (2014). Parallel languages in the history of language ideology in Norway and the lesson for Nordic higher education. In A. K. Hultgren, F. Gregersen, & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), English in Nordic universities: Ideologies and practices (pp. 27–52). John Benjamins.
  • Ljosland, R. (2011). English as an academic lingua franca: Language policies and multilingual practices in a Norwegian university. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.007
  • Ljosland, R. (2014). Language planning in practice in the Norwegian higher education sector. In A. K. Hultgren, F. Gregersen, & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), English in Nordic universities: Ideologies and practices (pp. 53–82). John Benjamins.
  • Ljosland, R. (2015). Policymaking as a multi-layered activity: A case study from the higher education sector in Norway. Higher Education, 70(4), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9832-z
  • Lou, J. J. (2017). Linguistic landscape and ethnographic fieldwork. In C. Mallinson, B. Childs, & G. van Herk (Eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications (2nd edition) (pp. 94–98). Taylor & Francis.
  • Mauranen, A., & Mauko, I. (2019). ELF among multilingual practices in a trilingual university. In J. Jenkins, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: Insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe (pp. 23–49). Routledge.
  • Motschenbacher, H. (2013). Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(3), 212–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213489993
  • Rindal, U. (2015). Who owns English in Norway? L2 attitudes and choices among learners. In A. Linn, N. Bermel, & G. Ferguson (Eds.), Attitudes towards English in Europe: English in Europe, volume 1 (pp. 241–269). De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Sanden, G. R. (2020). The second-class Norwegian: Marginalisation of Nynorsk in Norwegian business. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(2), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1697556
  • Savski, K. (2021). Language policy and linguistic landscape: Identity and struggle in two southern Thai spaces. Linguistic Landscape, 7(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.20008.sav
  • Shohamy, E. (2015). LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1-2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.09sho
  • Shohamy, E. (2019). Linguistic landscape after a decade: An overview of themes, debates and future directions. In M. Pütz, & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp. 25–37). Multilingual Matters.
  • Trudgill, P. (2018). “Norwegian as a normal language” and other studies in Scandinavian Linguistics. Novus Press.
  • Vikør, L. S. (2018). The Norwegian language situation: An overview. In E. H. Jahr (Ed.), Perspectives on two centuries of Norwegian language planning and policy: Theoretical implications and lessons learnt (pp. 15–28). Kungliga Gustav Adolfs Akademien för Svensk Folkkultur.