United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral project: Results of professional rating scales and parent questionnaires

References

• Allen, C., Nikolopoulos, T.P., Dyar, D., O'Donoghue, G.M. 2001. Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 22(5): 631–633. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M.C., Nikolopoulos, T.P., O'Donoghue, G.M. 1998. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 19(6): 742–746.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Lutman, M.E., Marshall, D. 1995. Categories of auditory performance. In: M. Clark, R.C.S. Cowan (eds.) International cochlear implant, speech and hearing symposium (Vol. 104 Suppl 166). Melbourne: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, p. 312–314.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Lutman, M.E., Nikolopoulos, T. 1998. Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability. British Journal of Audiology, 32(1): 7–12. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beadle, E.A., McKinley, D.J., Nikolopoulos, T.P., Brough, J., O'Donoghue, G.M., Archbold, S.M. 2005. Long-term functional outcomes and academic-occupational status in implanted children after 10 to 14 years of cochlear implant use. Otology & Neurotology, 26(6): 1152–1160. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000180483.16619.8f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichey, B.G., Miyamoto, R.T. 2008. Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 138(5): 655–661. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, S.J., Murphy, J., Wild, D.C., Emmett, S.R., O'Donoghue, G.M., Writing for the, U. K. N. P. C. I. S. A. G. 2014. Results of a prospective surgical audit of bilateral paediatric cochlear implantation in the UK. Cochlear Implants International, 15(5): 246–253. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, S.M., Labadie, R.F., Dietrich, M.S., Haynes, D.S. 2004. Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 131(4): 413–422. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colletti, V., Carner, M., Miorelli, V., Guida, M., Colletti, L., Fiorino, F.G. 2005. Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: report on 10 patients. The Laryngoscope, 115(3): 445–449. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157838.61497.e7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colletti, L., Mandala, M., Zoccante, L., Shannon, R.V., Colletti, V. 2011. Infants versus older children fitted with cochlear implants: performance over 10 years. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 75(4): 504–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington, H.E., Bele, D., Brinton, J.C., Cooper, S., Daft, M., Harding, J., et al. 2016. United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral project: demographics and results of localisation and speech perception testing. Cochlear Implants International, Submitted. doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1265055
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cummins, R.A. Proxy responding for subjective well-being: a review international review of research in mental retardation (Vol. Volume 25, pp. 183–207). London: Academic Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Damen, G.W., Beynon, A.J., Krabbe, P.F., Mulder, J.J., Mylanus, E.A. 2007. Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 136(4): 597–604. :10.1016/j.otohns.2006.11.044. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.11.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damen, G.W., Krabbe, P.F., Archbold, S.M., Mylanus, E.A. 2007. Evaluation of the parental perspective instrument for pediatric cochlear implantation to arrive at a short version. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71(3): 425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Raeve, L. 2010. A longitudinal study on auditory perception and speech intelligibility in deaf children implanted younger than 18 months in comparison to those implanted at later ages. Otology & Neurotology, 31(8): 1261–1267. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f1cde3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Pethick, S., Renda, C., Cox, J.L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S. 2000. Short-form versions of the MacArthur communicative development inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21: 95–116. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400001053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., Noble, W. 2004. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 43(2): 85–99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A.E., Moog, J.S., Biedenstein, J., Brenner, C., Hayes, H. 2009. Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(3): 371–385. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, L. 2010. The inter-rater reliability of categories of auditory performance-II (CAP)-II. (MSc), University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, K.A., Papsin, B.C. 2009. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 30(3): 319–331. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a8f4c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., De Beukelaer, C., Daemers, K., De Ceulaer, G., Yperman, M., Somers, T., et al. 2002. Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years. Otology & Neurotology, 23(6): 885–890. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200211000-00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkonen, K., Kivekas, I., Rautiainen, M., Kotti, V., Sivonen, V., Vasama, J. P. 2015. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation improves working performance, quality of life, and quality of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol, 135(5): 440–446. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.990056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinderink, J.B., Krabbe, P.F., Van Den Broek, P. 2000. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 123(6): 756–765. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.108203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., Nahm, E.A., Liberatos, P., Shi, Q., Kim, A.H. 2014. A new comprehensive cochlear implant questionnaire for measuring quality of life after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 35(3): 407–413. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, K.I. 2000. Challenges in the clinical investigation of cochlear implant outcomes. In J. Niparko, K.I. Kirk, N.K. Mellon, A.M. Robbins, D.L. Tucci, B.S. Wilson (eds.) Cochlear implants: principles & practices. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, p. 225–267.
   Google Scholar
• Lazard, D.S., Vincent, C., Venail, F., Van de Heyning, P., Truy, E., Sterkers, O., et al. 2012. Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PLoS One, 7(11): e48739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux, T., Vinck, B., Butler, I., Cass, N., Louw, L., Nauta, L., et al. 2016. Predictors of pediatric cochlear implantation outcomes in South Africa. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 84: 61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moog, J.S., Geers, A.E. 2003. Epilogue: major findings, conclusions and implications for deaf education. Ear and Hearing, 24(1 Suppl): 121s–125s. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000052759.62354.9F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. 2009. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance 166. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness: National Health Service National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Pretzlik, U., Ilicak, S. 2005. Validation of a parent outcome questionnaire from pediatric cochlear implantation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(4): 330–356. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, C., Lutman, M.E., Archbold, S.M., Gregory, S., Nikolopoulos, T.P. 2004. Parents and their cochlear implanted child: questionnaire development to assess parental views and experiences. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68(2): 149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olze, H., Grabel, S., Haupt, H., Forster, U., Mazurek, B. 2012. Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and tinnitus. Otology & Neurotology, 33(7): 1169–1175. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825e799f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., Hassanzadeh, S., Kosaner, J., Martin, J., Deibl, M., Anderson, I. 2009. Comparing auditory perception and speech production outcomes: non-language specific assessment of auditory perception and speech production in children with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 10(2): 92–102. doi: 10.1179/cim.2009.10.2.92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pisoni, D.B., Conway, C.M., Kronenberger, W.G., Horn, D.L., Karpicke, J., Henning, S.C. 2008. Efficacy and effectiveness of cochlear implants in deaf children. In M. Marschark P.C. Hauser (eds.) Deaf cognition: foundations and outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 52–101.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, V., Gamble, C., Cullington, H., Bathgate, F., Bennett, E., Coop, N., et al. 2016. Brief Assessment of Parental Perception (BAPP): Development and validation of a new measure for assessing paediatric outcomes after bilateral cochlear implantation. International Journal of Audiology, 55(11): 699–705. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1204669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarant, J., Harris, D., Bennet, L., Bant, S. 2014. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes. Ear Hear, 35(4): 396–409. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherf, F.W., van Deun, L., van Wieringen, A., Wouters, J., Desloovere, C., Dhooge, I. et al., 2009. Functional outcome of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in young children: 36 months postoperative results. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 73(5): 723–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, Y.E., van Zon, A., Stegeman, I., van Zanten, G.A., Rinia, A.B., Stokroos, R.J., et al. 2016a. Cost-utility of bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Otology & Neurotology, 37(1): 38–45. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, Y.E., van Zon, A., Stegeman, I., van Zanten, G.A., Rinia, A.B., Stokroos, R.J., et al. 2016b. Cost–utility of bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized controlled trial: Erratum. Otology & Neurotology, 37(5): 610. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparreboom, M., Snik, A. F., Mylanus, E. A. 2012. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: quality of life. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 138(2): 134–141. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summerfield, A.Q., Barton, G.R., Toner, J., McAnallen, C., Proops, D., Harries, C., et al. 2006. Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Audiology, 45(Suppl 1): 99–107. doi: 10.1080/14992020600783079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, A.S., Brinton, J.C. 2003. Speech intelligibility rating of cochlear implanted children: inter-rater reliability. Cochlear Implants International, 4(1): 22–30. doi: 10.1179/cim.2003.4.1.22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Robbins, A.M., Osberger, M.J. 2000. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 185: 42–43. doi: 10.1177/0003489400109S1217
   Google Scholar