Computer-assisted CI fitting: Is the learning capacity of the intelligent agent FOX beneficial for speech understanding?

References

• Baskent, D., Eiler, C.L., Edwards, B. 2007. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 28(3): 370–380. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318047935e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battmer, R.D., Borel, S., Brendel, M., Büchner, A., Cooper, H., Fielden, C., et al. 2015. Assessment of “Fitting to Outcomes Expert” FOX with new cochlear implant users in a multicentric study. Cochlear Implants International, 16(2): 100–109. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bermejo, I. 2015. New types of probabilistic graphical models. Applications to medicine [PhD thesis]. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED).
   Google Scholar
• Bermejo, I., Diez, F.J., Govaerts, P.J., Vaerenberg, B. 2013. A probabilistic graphical model for tuning cochlear implants. In: Marin Morales R, Peleg M, Peek N, (eds.) Artificial intelligence in medicine. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, p. 150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, P., Arndt, P., Bergeron, F., Bredberg, G., Brimacombe, J., Facer, G., et al. 1996. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiology & Neurotology, 1(5): 293–306. doi: 10.1159/000259212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., et al. 2013. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiology & Neurotology, 18(1): 36–47. doi: 10.1159/000343189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briaire, J.J., de Vos, J.J., Biesheuvel, J.D., Boot, P.S., van Gendt, M.J., Dekkers, O.M., et al. 2016. Use of electrically evoked compound action potentials for cochlear implant fitting, a systematic review. In 9th international symposium on objective measures in auditory implants, Szeged, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A., Gervais, J. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing, 21(2): 151–163. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., Vaerenberg, B., Gazibegovic, D., Brendel, M., De Ceulaer, G., Govaerts, P., et al. 2014. Evaluation of the ‘Fitting to Outcomes Expert’ FOX with established cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 16(1): 39–46. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durant, E., Wakefield, G.H., Van Tasell, D., Rickert, M. 2004. Efficient perceptual tuning of hearing aids with genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 12(2): 144–155. doi: 10.1109/TSA.2003.822640
   Google Scholar
• Eiler, C., Baskent, D., Recker, K., Edwards, B. 2008. Genetic algorithms: are they the future of hearing aid fittings? The Hearing Journal, 61(12): 16–18. doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000343021.84357.78
   Google Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Somers, T., Offeciers, E. 1998. Box and whisker plots for graphic presentation of audiometric results of conductive hearing loss treatment. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 118(6): 892–895. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70293-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Daemers, K., Yperman, M., De Beukelaer, C., De Saegher, G., De Ceulaer, G. 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§e): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International, 7(2): 92–106. doi: 10.1179/146701006807508106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Vaerenberg, B., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K., De Beukelaer, C., Schauwers, K. 2010. Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming. Otology & Neurotology, 31(6): 908–918. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dd160b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, A.E., Shrivastav, R., Krause, L., Siburt, H.W., Schwartz, E. 2012. Speech based optimization of cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 51(11): 806–816. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.705899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, F., Liu, K., Yang, S. 2014. Clinical application of electrically evoked compound action potentials. Journal of Otology, 9: 117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2014.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Roditi, R.E., Poissant, S.F., Bero, E.M., Lee, D.J. 2009. A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Otology & Neurotology, 30(4): 449–454. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819d3480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S., Norvig, P. 2003a. Chapter 15 “Probabilistic reasoning systems”. In Artificial intelligence. A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, p. 436–471.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., Norvig, P. 2003b. Chapter 16 “Making simple decisions”. In Artificial intelligence. A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, p. 471–498.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J.W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B. 2014. Programming cochlear implants for auditory performance [PhD thesis]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Govaerts, P.J., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K., Schauwers, K. 2011. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users. International Journal of Audiology, 50(1): 50–58. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.531294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., De Ceulaer, G., Szlávik, Z., Mancini, P., Buechner, A., Govaerts, P.J. 2014a. Setting and reaching targets with computer-assisted cochlear implant fitting. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: Article ID 646590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Smits, C., De Ceulaer, G., Zir, E., Harman, S., Jaspers, N., et al. 2014b. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the State of the Art. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: Article ID 501738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, J.L., Sainz, M., Roldan, C., Alvarez, I., de la Torre, A. 2012. Long-term evolution of the electrical stimulation. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 5(4): 194–200. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.4.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, G.H., van den Honert, C., Parkinson, W., Lineaweaver, S. 2005. Genetic algorithm for adaptive psychophysical procedures: recipient-directed design of speech processor MAP's. Ear and Hearing, 26(4): 57–72. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, J., Damman, W., Bosmans, A. 1995. Evaluation of Flemish-Dutch materials for speech audiometry. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Audiology; Noorderwijkerhout, The Netherlands, pp. 417–420.
   Google Scholar