Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception

References

• Agterberg, M.J., Snik, A.F., Hol, M.K., van Esch, T.E., Cremers, C.W., Van Wanrooij, M.M., et al. 2011. Improved horizontal directional hearing in bone conduction device users with acquired unilateral conductive hearing loss. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 12: 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0235-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J.M. 2013. Individual variability in recognition of frequency-lowered speech. Seminars in Hearing, 34: 86–109. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341346
   Google Scholar
• Blauert, J. 1997. Spatial hearing – the psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., Weenink, D. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10): 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnert, A., Nyffeler, M., Keilmann, A. 2010. Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology, 267: 1045–1053. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1170-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A.J., Smoorenburg, G.F. 1992. Woordenlijst voor spraakaudiometrie [compact disc]. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Audiologie. Doesburg, NL: Electro Medical Instruments b.v. & Gouda, NL: Veenhuis Medical Audio b.v.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., Kollmeier, B. 2002. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111: 2801–2810. doi: 10.1121/1.1479152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremen, P., van Wanrooij, M.M., van Opstal, A.J. 2010. Pinna cues determine orienting response modes to synchronous sounds in elevation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30: 194–204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2982-09.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalupper, J., Geissler, G., Büchner, A., Battmer, R. 2014. Tolerable processing delay in electro-acoustic stimulation. Poster presented at the 13th Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory Technologies, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y., van Wanrooy, E., Dillon, H. 2007. Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends in Amplification, 11: 161–192. doi: 10.1177/1084713807304357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson, L.S., Firszt, J.B., Brenner, C., Cadieux, J.H. 2015. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26: 393–407. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M.F., Zeitler, D., Cook, S.J., Loiselle, L., Yost, W.A., Wanna, G.B., et al. 2015. Interaural level difference cues determine sound source localization by single-sided deaf patients fit with a cochlear implant. Audiology and Neurotology, 20: 183–188. doi: 10.1159/000375394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, T., McDermott, H.J. 2013. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation. Ear and hearing, 34: 685–700. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d14cb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, T., Wouters, J. 2007. Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122: 2826–2831. doi: 10.1121/1.2783130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista, D., Scollie, S., Bagatto, M., Seewald, R., Parsa, V., Johnson, A. 2009. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: Clinical outcomes. International Journal of Audiology, 48: 632–644. doi: 10.1080/14992020902971349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goupell, M.J., Stoelb, C., Kan, A., Litovsky, R.Y. 2013. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133: 2272–2287. doi: 10.1121/1.4792936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, P.M., Van Riswick, J.G.A., Van Opstal, A.J. 1998. Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nature Neuroscience, 1: 417–421. doi: 10.1038/1633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube, I., Fredelake, S., Vlaming, M., Kollmeier, B. 2010. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). International Journal of Audiology, 49: 891–903. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.506889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., Koopman, J., Luts, H., Wagener, K.C., van Wieringen, A., Verschuure, H., Dreschler, W.A. 2014. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise. International Journal of Audiology, 53: 760–763. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.920111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, H., Johansson, B., Jönsson, R., Magnusson, L. 2012. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23: 722–732. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.9.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewley-Port, D., Burkle, T.Z., Lee, J.H. 2007. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122: 2365–2375. doi: 10.1121/1.2773986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Brennan, M.A., Hoover, B., Kopun, J., Stelmachowicz, P.G. 2013. Maximizing audibility and speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression by estimating audible bandwidth. Ear and Hearing, 34: E24–E27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0beb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, H., Henshall, K. 2010. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21: 380–389. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.6.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, A., Yeend, I., Hartley, L., Keidser, G., Nyffeler, M. 2010. Evaluation of frequency compression and high-frequency directionality. The Hearing Journal, 63(32): 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Owren, M.J., Cardillo, G.C. 2006. The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119: 1727–1739. doi: 10.1121/1.2161431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, L.R., Teagle, H.F.B., Buss, E., Roush, P.A., Buchman, C.A. 2012. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear. Ear and Hearing, 33: E1–E12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824a3b97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreau, A.E., Bentler, R.A., Tyler, R.S. 2013. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24: 105–120. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayleigh, L. 1907. On our perception of sound direction. Philosophical Magazine, 13: 214–232. doi: 10.1080/14786440709463595
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, L.A., Turner, C.W., Erenberg, S.R., Gantz, B.J. 2007. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 241–257. doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0077-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D.A. 1963. A method of measuring eye movements using a sclera search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Electronics, 10: 137–145. doi: 10.1109/TBMEL.1963.4322822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, E.A. 1974. Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56: 1848–1861. doi: 10.1121/1.1903522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., Hersbach, A.A., McDermott, H.J. 2005. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. International journal of audiology, 44: 281–292. doi: 10.1080/14992020500060636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., Hersbach, A.A., McDermott, H.J. 2006. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. International journal of audiology, 45: 619–629. doi: 10.1080/14992020600825508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straatman, L.V., Rietveld, A.C., Beijen, J., Mylanus, E.A., Mens, L.H. 2010. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128: 1884–1895. doi: 10.1121/1.3474236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G.A. 1985. A “rationalized” arcsine transform. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 28: 455–462. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theelen-van den Hoek, F.L., Houben, R., Dreschler, W.A. 2014. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 53: 817–828. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.922223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Barneveld, D.C., Van Wanrooij, M.M. 2013. The influence of static eye and head position on the ventriloquist effect. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37: 1501–1510. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R.J. 2012. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 288: 100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wanrooij, M.M., Van Opstal, A.J. 2004. Contribution of head shadow and pinna cues to chronic monaural sound localization. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24: 4163–4171. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0048-04.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., Wouters, J. 2008. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. International Journal of Audiology, 47: 348–355. doi: 10.1080/14992020801895144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugen, L.C., Chalupper, J., Snik, A.F., van Opstal, A.J., Mens, L.H. 2016a. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 136: 775–781. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1155233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugen, L.C., Chalupper, J., Snik, A.F., van Opstal, A.J., Mens, L.H. 2016b. Matching automatic gain control across devices in bimodal cochlear implant users. Ear and hearing, 37: 260–270. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugen, L.C.E., Hendrikse, M.M., van Wanrooij, M.M., Agterberg, M.J., Chalupper, J., Mens, L.H.M., Snik, A.F. and van Opstal, A.J. 2016c. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid. Hearing research, 336: 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., John, A., Schafer, E., Nyffeler, M., Boretzki, M., Caraway, T., Hudson, M. 2011. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology, 50: 396–404. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.551788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Dorman, M.F., Spahr, A.J. 2010. Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear and hearing, 31: 63–69. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b7190c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar