Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users

References

• Adunka, O.F., Pillsbury, H.C., Adunka, M.C., Buchman, C.A. 2010. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet? Otol Neurotol, 31(7):1049–1054. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d8d6fe
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R.M. 2005. Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 16(7):419–438. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, R.M., Johnson, J.A., Xu, J. 2016. Impact of hearing aid technology on outcomes in daily life I: the patients’ perspective. Ear Hear, 37(4):e224–237. doi: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L.S., Firszt, J.B., Brenner, C., Cadieux, J.H. 2015. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients. J Am Acad Audiol, 26(4):393–407. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M.F., Gifford, R.H. 2010. Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 49(12):912–919. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.509113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M.F., Gifford, R.H., Spahr, A.J., McKarns, S.A. 2008. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurootol, 13(2):105–112. doi: 10.1159/000111782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M.F., Spahr, A.J., Loizou, P.C., Dana, C.J., Schmidt, J.S. 2005. Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). Ear Hear, 26(4):371–380. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraysse, B., Macias, A.R., Sterkers, O., Burdo, S., Ramsden, R., Deguine, O., et al. 2006. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol, 27(5):624–633. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000226289.04048.0f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, D.R., Runge-Samuelson, C. 2009. Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach. Trends Amplif, 13(2):124–138. doi: 10.1177/1084713809336422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu, Q.J., Galvin III, J.J., Wang, X. 2017a. Effect of carrier bandwidth on integration of simulations of acoustic and electric hearing within or across ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 142(6):El561. doi: 10.1121/1.5017530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q.J., Galvin III, J.J., Wang, X. 2017b. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears. Sci Rep, 7(1):12500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12298-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galvin III, J.J., Fu, Q.J., Shannon, R.V. 2009. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1169:518–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz, B.J., Hansen, M.R., Turner, C.W., Oleson, J.J., Reiss, L.A., Parkinson, A.J. 2009. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neurootol, 14(Suppl. 1):32–38. doi: 10.1159/000206493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz, B.J., Turner, C.W. 2003. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope, 113(10):1726–1730. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200310000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Davis, T.J., Sunderhaus, L.W., Menapace, C., Buck, B., Crosson, J., et al. 2017. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation with hearing preservation: effect of cochlear implant low-frequency cutoff on speech understanding and perceived listening difficulty. Ear Hear, 38(5):539–553. doi: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner, W.K., van de Heyning, P., O’Connor, A.F., Morera, C., Sainz, M., Vermeire, K., et al. 2008. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol, 128(9):968–975. doi: 10.1080/00016480701805471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H., Lee, J., Cho, S., Kim, J., Lee, K., Choi, W.D. 2011. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry. Int J Audiol, 50(1):59–62. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.526637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig, S., Baumann, U., Helbig, M., von Malsen-Waldkirch, N., Gstoettner, W. 2008. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation–eight months experience. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 70(6):359–365. doi: 10.1159/000163031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helbig, S., Van de Heyning, P., Kiefer, J., Baumann, U., Kleine-Punte, A., Brockmeier, H., et al. 2011. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Acta Otolaryngol, 131(6):585–595. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.544327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C., Albegger, K., Battmer, R., Burdo, S., Deggouj, N., Deguine, O., et al. 2005. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol, 125(5):481–491. doi: 10.1080/00016480510026197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, S.A., Turner, C.W., Brown, C.J., Jeon, E.K., Abbas, P.J., Gantz, B.J. 2013. Optimizing the combination of acoustic and electric hearing in the implanted ear. Ear Hear, 34(2):142–150. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318269ce87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., Pok, M., Adunka, O., Sturzebecher, E., Baumgartner, W., Schmidt, M., et al. 2005. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol, 10(3):134–144. doi: 10.1159/000084023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lee, J., Lee, K.W., Bahng, J., Lee, J.H., Choi, C.H., et al. 2015. Test-retest reliability of word recognition score using Korean standard monosyllabic word lists for adults as a function of the number of test words. J Audiol Otol, 19(2):68–73. doi: 10.7874/jao.2015.19.2.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenarz, T., Stover, T., Buechner, A., Lesinski-Schiedat, A., Patrick, J., Pesch, J. 2009. Hearing conservation surgery using the hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover. Audiol Neurootol, 14(Suppl. 1):22–31. doi: 10.1159/000206492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, K., Stillesjö, F., Rask-Andersen, H. 2014. Experiences and results from cochlear implantation in patients with long duration of deafness. Audiology and Neurotology Extra, 4(2):46–55. doi: 10.1159/000365274
   Google Scholar
• Ma, N., Morris, S., Kitterick, P.T. 2016. Benefits to speech perception in noise from the binaural integration of electric and acoustic signals in simulated unilateral deafness. Ear Hear, 37(3):248–259. doi: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Alexander, J., Brennan, M.A., Hoover, B., Kopun, J., Stelmachowicz, P.G. 2014. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35(4):440–447. doi: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C.W., Bates, E., Brennan, M. 2016. The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 55(5):305–312. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1137364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, M., Grayden, D., Dowell, R.C., Lawrence, D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49(2):338–351. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/027)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, A.C., Svirsky, M.A. 2013. Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing). Ear Hear, 34(5):553–561. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828e86e8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nopp, P., Polak, M. 2010. From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 67: 88–95. doi: 10.1159/000262600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinheiro, M.M., Iorio, M.C., Miranda, E.C., Dias, K.Z., Pereira, L.D. 2012. The influence of cognitive aspects and auditory processes on the hearing aid acclimatization in the elderly. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol, 24(4):309–315. doi: 10.1590/S2179-64912012000400004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polak, M., Lorens, A., Helbig, S., McDonald, S., McDonald, S., Vermeire, K. 2010. Fitting of the hearing system affects partial deafness cochlear implant performance. Cochlear Implants Int, 11: 117–121. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12671177544221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qin, M.K., Oxenham, A.J. 2006. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 119(4):2417–2426. doi: 10.1121/1.2178719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland Jr, J.T., Gantz, B.J., Waltzman, S.B., Parkinson, A.J. 2016. United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system. Laryngoscope, 126(1):175–181. doi: 10.1002/lary.25451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., McDermott, H.J., Dowell, R.C., Sucher, C., Briggs, R.J. 2009. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation. Int J Audiol, 48(2):63–73. doi: 10.1080/14992020802452184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A. 2010. Partial deafness treatment. Cochlear Implants Int, 11(Suppl. 1):29–41. doi: 10.1179/146701010x12671178390799
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Piotrowska, A., Anderson, I. 2007. Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach. Acta Otolaryngol, 127(1):41–48. doi: 10.1080/00016480500488917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski, H., van de Heyning, P., Agrawal, S., Arauz, S.L., Atlas, M., Baumgartner, W., et al. 2013. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol, 133:3–13. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, K.N., Hartley, D.E. 2008. Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union? Clin Otolaryngol, 33(6):536–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01822.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire, K., Anderson, I., Flynn, M., Van de Heyning, P. 2008. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear Hear, 29(1):76–86. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d6326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodson, E.A., Reiss, L.A., Turner, C.W., Gfeller, K., Gantz, B.J. 2010. The hybrid cochlear implant: a review. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 67:125–134. doi: 10.1159/000262604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoon, Y.S., Li, Y., Fu, Q.J. 2012. Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55(1):105–124. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0325)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y.S., Shin, Y.R., Gho, J.S., Fu, Q.J. 2015. Bimodal benefit depends on the performance difference between a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. Cochlear Implants Int, 16(3):159–167. doi: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar