From manual to artificial intelligence fitting: Two cochlear implant case studies

References

• Battmer, R.D., Borel, S., Brendel, M., Buchner, A., Cooper, H., Fielden, C., et al. 2014. Assessment of “fitting to outcomes expert” FOXTM with new cochlear implant users in a multi-centre study. Cochlear Implants International, 16(2): 100–109. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baudhuin, J., Cadieux, J., Firszt, J.B., Reeder, R.M., Maxson, J.L. 2012. Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(5): 302–312. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.5.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo, I., Diez, F.J., Govaerts, P.J., Vaerenberg, B. 2013. A probabilistic graphical model for tuning cochlear implants. In: Peek, N., Marin Morales, R., Peleg, M., (eds.) Artificial intelligence in medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, p. 150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, P.A., Arora, K. 2016. Effects of threshold adjustment on speech perception in nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Ear and Hearing, 37(3): 303–311. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington, H., Kitterick, P., DeBold, L., Weal, M., Clarke, N., Newberry, E., et al. 2016. Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 6(5): e011342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Daemers, K., Yperman, M., De Beukelaer, C., De Saegher, G., De Ceulaer, G. 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International, 7(2): 92–106. doi: 10.1179/146701006807508106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Vaerenberg, B., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K., Schwauwers, K. 2010. Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming. Otology and Neurotology, 31(6): 908–918. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dd160b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L.K., Reeder, R.M., Firszt, J.B., Finley, C.C. 2011. Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the advanced bionics cochlear implant system. International Journal of Audiology, 50(4): 255–269. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.533200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvar, B., Alv, A.D., Tone, T.H., Dag, N. 2002. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52(2): 69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., Chang, X., Wu, Z., Li, J., Shao, G., Deng, X., et al. 2017. Autonomous collision-free navigation of microvehicles in complex and dynamically changing environments. American Chemical Society Nano, 11(9): 9268–9275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria, C.S., Maria, P.L.S. 2016. Variables that effect psychophysical parameters and duration to stability in cochlear implant mapping. Otolaryngology: Open Access, 6(2): 226. doi: 10.4172/2161-119X.1000226
   Google Scholar
• Meeuws, M., Pascoal, D., Bermejo, I., Artaso, M., De Ceulaer, G., Govaerts, P.J. 2017. Computer-assisted CI fitting: is the learning capacity of the intelligent agent FOX® beneficial for speech understanding? Cochlear Implants International, 18(4): 198–206. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1325093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orzan, E., Muzzi, E., Marchi, R., Falzone, C., Battelino, S., Ciciriello, E. 2016. Achieving early functional auditory access in paediatric cochlear implantation. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 36: 45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak-Osiñska, K., Linkowska, K., Grzybowski, T. 2018. Genes important for otoneurological diagnostic purposes - current status and future prospects. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italia, 38(3): 242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader, T., Doms, P., Adel, Y., Weissgerber, T., Strieth, S., Baumann, U. 2018. A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 57(7): 502–509. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1412519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr, A.J., Dorman, M.F. 2005. Effects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understanding. Ear and Hearing, 26(4): 2S–6S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Govaerts, P.J., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K., Schwauwers, K. 2011. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users. International Journal of Audiology, 50: 50–58. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.531294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Smits, C., De Ceulaer, G., Zir, E., Harman, S., Jaspers, N., et al. 2014. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art. The Scientific Journal World, 2014: 501738. doi: 10.1155/2014/501738
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., Schafer, E. 2015. Programming cochlear implants – second edition. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yücel, E., Aslan, F., Özkan, H.B., Sennaroğlu, L. 2015. Recent rehabilitation experience with pediatric ABI users. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 11(2): 110–113. doi: 10.5152/iao.2015.915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar