Cochlear implant telemedicine: Remote fitting based on psychoacoustic self-tests and artificial intelligence

References

• Battmer, R.D., Borel, S., Brendel, M., Büchner, A., Cooper, H., Fielden, C., et al. 2015. Assessment of “Fitting to Outcomes Expert” FOX with new cochlear implant users in a multicentric study. Cochlear Implants International, 16(2): 100–109. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bexelius, C., Honeth, L., Ekman, A., Eriksson, M., Sandin, S., Bagger-Sjöbäck, D., Litton, J.E. 2008. Evaluation of an internet-based hearing test-comparison with established methods for detection of hearing loss. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(4): e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchner, A., Vaerenberg, B., Gazibegovic, D., Brendel, M., De Ceulaer, G., Govaerts, P., Lenarz, T. 2014. Evaluation of the ‘Fitting to Outcomes Expert’ FOX with established cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 16(1): 39–46. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi, J.M., Lee, H.B., Park, C.S., Oh, S.H., Park, K.S. 2007. PC-based tele-audiometry. Telemedicine and e-Health, 13(5): 501–508. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington, H.E., Aidi, T. 2017. Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a homeenvironment? Cochlear Implants International, 18(2): 97–105. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1273435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Raeve, L., van Hardeveld, R. 2014. Prevalence of cochlear Implants in Europe: What do we know and what can we expect. Journal of Hearing Science, 4: 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J.J., Jacobs, M. 2009. Survey of ENT services in Africa: need for a comprehensive intervention. Global Health Action, 19: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J.J., Tarabichi, M. 2018. Cochlear implants in developing countries: practical and ethical considerations. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 26(3): 188–189. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, T., Moonen, M., Wouters, J. 2009. Automatic testing of speech recognition. International Journal of Audiology, 48(2): 80–90. doi: 10.1080/14992020802400662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, K.H., Pengelly, M., Zerfoss, S. 2006. Cochlear implant programming using telemedicine at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Volta Voices, 2006(13): 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Daemers, K., Yperman, M., De Beukelaer, C., De Saegher, G., De Ceulaer, G. 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E): a new test toassess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International, 7(2): 92–106. doi: 10.1179/146701006807508106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govaerts, P.J., Vaerenberg, B., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K., De Beukelaer, C., Schauwers, K. 2010. Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming. Otology & Neurotology, 31(6): 908–918. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dd160b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuws, M., Pascoal, D., Bermejo, I., Artaso, M., De Ceulaer, G., Govaerts, P.J. 2017. Computer-assisted CI fitting: Is the learning capacity of the intelligent agentFOX beneficial for speech understanding? Cochlear Implants International, 18(4): 198–206. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1325093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ooster, J., Huber, R., Kollmeier, B., Bernd, T., Meyer, T. 2018, April. Evaluation of an automated speech-controlled listening test with spontaneous and read responses. Speech Communication, 98: 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, A., Rodriguez, C., Martinez-Beneyto, P., Perez, D., Gault, A., Falcon, J.C., Boyle, P. 2009. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 129(5): 533–540. doi: 10.1080/00016480802294369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., Kapteyn, T.S., Houtgast, T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. International Journal of Audiology, 43(1): 1499–2027. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel de, W., Clark, J.L., Koekemoer, D., Hall, J.W. III, Krumm, M., Ferrari, D.V., et al. 2010. Telehealth in audiology: the need and potential to reachunderserved communities. International Journal of Audiology, 49(3): 195–202. doi: 10.3109/14992020903470783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., De Ceulaer, G., Szlávik, Z., Mancini, P., Büchner, A., Govaerts, P.J. 2014. Setting and reaching targets with computer-assistedcochlear implant fitting. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: Article ID 646590.
   Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Govaerts, P.J., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K., Schauwer, K. 2011. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users. International Journal of Audiology, 50(1): 50–58. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.531294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Heeren, W., Govaerts, P.J. 2013a. Managed estimation of psychophysical thresholds. Journal of Hearing Science, 3(3): 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., ten Bosch, L., Kowalcyk, W., Coene, M., De Smet, H., Govaerts, P. 2013b. Language-Universal Speech Audiometry with Automated Scoring. Proceedings of Interspeech, 2013: 3608–3611.
   Google Scholar
• Venail, F., Legris, E., Vaerenberg, B., Puel, J.L., Govaerts, P.J., Ceccato, J.C. 2016. Validation of the French-language version of the OTOSPEECH automated scoringsoftware package for speech audiometry. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 133(2): 101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzman, S. B., Kelsall, D. C. 2020. The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Program Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol, 41(4): 452–457. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathour, J., Teunen, M., Pascoal, D., Deggouj, N., Govaerts, P.J. 2016. L'implant cochléaire avant l'âge d'un an: données quantitatives et qualitatives. Rééducation orthophonique n°268.
   Google Scholar
• Wesarg, T., Wasowski, A., Skarzynski, H., Ramos, A., Falcon Gonzalez, J.C., Kyriafinis, G., et al. 2010. Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 130(12): 1379–1388. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.492480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton, R., Patil, N.G., Scott, R.E., Ho, K. 2009. Telehealth in the Developing World. Royal Society of Medicine. London: Press/IDRC. ISBN 978-1-85315-784.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2019. Deafness and hearing loss. Retrieved from URLhttp://who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/index.html (accessed on 6 June 2019).
   Google Scholar