Initial hearing preservation outcomes of cochlear implantation with a slim perimodiolar electrode array

References

• Adunka OF, Gantz BJ, Dunn C, Gurgel RK, Buchman CA. (2018). Minimum reporting standards for adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 159(2):215–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschendorff A, Briggs R, Brademann G, et al. (2017). Clinical investigation of the Nucleus slim modiolar electrode. Audiol Neurotol, 22:169–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J, Preis M, Shemesh R, Hadar T, Nageris B.(2010). Animal model of cochlear third window in the scala vestibuli or scala tympani. Otology & Neurotology, 31:985–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KD, Melton MF, Shonfield H, Kraskin M, Wolf J. (2015). Preserved low-frequency hearing following 20-mm cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 36(2):240–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchner A, Schüssler M, Battmer RD, Stöver T, Lesinski-schiedat A, Lenarz T. (2009). Impact of low-frequency hearing. Audiol Neurotol Basel, 14:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson ML, Driscoll CLW, Gifford RH, et al. (2011). Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 32(6):962–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J, Payne MR, Campbell LJ, Bester CW, Newbold C, Eastwood H, et al. (2017). Electrode impedance fluctuations as a biomarker for Inner Ear pathology after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 38(10):1433–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochlear Ltd. EA32 electrode insertion safety & performance study. Internal Doc Ref 473386, Unpublished Raw Data, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cuda D, Murri A. (2017). Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology, 274(12):4141–4148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Seta D, Torres R, Russo FY, Ferrary E, Kazmitcheff G, Heymann D, et al. (2017). Damage to inner ear structure during cochlear implantation: correlation between insertion force and radio-histological findings in temporal bone specimens. Hearing Research, 344, 90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanasingh A, Jolly C. (2017). An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs. Hearing Research, 356:93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann DR, Peng R, Fang Y, McMenomey SO, Roland JT, Waltzman SB. (2015). Effects of loss of residual hearing on speech performance with the CI422 and the Hybrid-L electrode. Cochlear Implants International, 16(5):277–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford RH, Dorman M, Skarzynski H, et al. (2013). Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear and Hearing, 34(4):413–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassepass F, Aschendorff A, Bulla S, Arndt S, Maier W, Laszig R, et al. (2015). Radiologic results and hearing preservation with a straight narrow electrode via round window versus cochleostomy approach at initial activation. Otology & Neurotology, 36(6):993–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter JB, Gifford RH, Wanna GB, et al. (2016). Hearing preservation outcomes with a mid-scala electrode in cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 37(3):235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iso-Mustajärvi M, Matikka H, Risi F, Sipari S, Koski T, Willberg T, et al. (2017). A new slim modiolar electrode array for cochlear implantation: a radiological and histological study. Otology & Neurotology, 38(9):e327–e334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurawitz MC, Büchner A, Harpel, T, Schüssler, M, Majdani, O, Lesinski-Schiedat, A (2014). Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 19(5):293–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Böhnke F, Adunka O, Arnold W. (2006). Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode. Hearing Research, 221(1–2):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mady L, Sukato D, Fruit J, et al. (2017). Hearing preservation: does electrode choice matter? Otolaryngoly-Head Neck Surgery, 157(5):837–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McJunkin JL, Durakovic N, Herzog J, Buchman CA. (2018). Early outcomes with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Otology & Neurotology, 39(1):e28–e33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran M, Dowell RC, Iseli C, Briggs RJS. (2017). Hearing preservation outcomes for 139 cochlear implant recipients using a thin straight electrode array. Otology & Neurotology, 38(5):678–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordfalk KF, Rasmussen K, Hopp E, Bunne M, Silvola JT, Jablonski GE. (2016). Insertion depth in cochlear implantation and outcome in residual hearing and vestibular function. Ear and Hearing, 37(2):e129-e137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connell BP, Hunter JB, Wanna GB. (2016). The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 1(6):169-174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillsbury HC 3rd, Dillon MT, Buchman CA, Staecker H, Prentiss SM, Ruckenstein MJ, et al. (2018). Multicenter US clinical trial With an electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) System in adults: final outcomes. Otology & Neurotology, 39(3):299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-deMiguel A, Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Falcon-Gonzalez JC, Ramos-de Miguel A. (2017). Hearing preservation with the slim modiolar electrode nucleus CI532 cochlear implant: a preliminary experience. Audiology and Neurotology, 22, 317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Roh KJ, Park S, Jung JS, Moon, IS, Kim, SH, Bang, MY, et al. (2017). Hearing preservation during cochlear implantation and electroacoustic stimulation in patients with SLC26A4 mutations. Otology & Neurotology, 38(9):1262–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland JT, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, Parkinson AJ; Multicenter Clinical Trial Group. (2016). United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system. Laryngoscope, 126(1):175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa Maria PL, Domville-Lewis C, Sucher CM, Chester-Browne R, Atlas MD. (2013). Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation–hearing and quality of life after 2 years. Otology & Neurotology, 34(3):526–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheperle RA, Tejani VD, Omtvedt JK, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Hansen MR, et al. (2017). Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing. Hearing Research, 350:45–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaul C, Dragovic AS, Stringer AK, O'Leary SJ, Briggs RJ. (2018). Scalar localisation of peri-modiolar electrodes and speech perception outcomes. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 132(11):1000–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield SW, Jahn K, Gifford RH. (2015). Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(2):145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Matusiak M, Lorens A, Furmanek M, Pilka A, Skarzynski PH. (2016). Preservation of cochlear structures and hearing when using the Nucleus slim straight (CI422) electrode in children. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 130(4):332–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, Arauz, SL, Atlas, M, Baumgartner, W, et al. (2013). Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngology Supplement (Stockholm), 133:3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svrakic M, Roland JT, McMenomey SO, Svirsky MA. (2016). Initial operative experience and short-term hearing preservation results with a mid-scala cochlear implant electrode array. Otology & Neurotology, 37(10):1549–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydlowski S. Beyond hearing preservation: supra-threshold bone conduction and air-bone gap post-cochlear implantation. Poster presented at the: American Cochlear Implant Alliance Cochlear Implant Symposium; October 24, 2013; Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir S, Ferrary E, Borel S, Sterkers O, Bozorg Grayeli A. (2012). Hearing preservation after cochlear implantation using deeply inserted flex atraumatic electrode arrays. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 17(5):331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Abel KM, Dunn CC, Sladen DP, et al. (2015). Hearing preservation among patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 36(3):416–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanna GB, O’Connell BP, Francis DO, et al. (2018). Predictive factors for short- and long-term hearing preservation in cochlear implantation with conventional-length electrodes. The Laryngoscope, 128(2):482–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodson E, Smeal M, Nelson RC, Haberkamp T, Sydlowski S. (2020). Slim perimodiolar arrays are as effective as slim lateral wall arrays for functional hearing preservation after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 41(6):e674–e679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar