Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users

References

• Bernstein, J.G., Goupell, M.J., Schuchman, G.I., Rivera, A.L., Brungart, D.S. 2016. Having two ears facilitates the perceptual separation of concurrent talkers for bilateral and single-sided deaf cochlear implantees. Ear & Hearing, 37(3): 289–302. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J.G., Grant, K.W. 2009. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5): 3358–3372. doi:10.1121/1.3110132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y., van Wanrooy, E., Hill, M., Dillon, H. 2005. Binaural redundancy and inter-aural time difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. International Journal of Audiology, 44(9): 513–521. doi:10.1080/14992020500190003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington, H.E., Zeng, F.G. 2008. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1): 450–461. doi:10.1121/1.2805617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., Haggard, M., Bell, I. 1990. Magnitude of diotic summation in speech-in-noise tasks: performance region and appropriate baseline. British Journal of Audiology, 24(1): 11–16. doi:10.3109/03005369009077838.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Graaff, F., Huysmans, E., Merkus, P., Theo Goverts, S., Smits, C. 2018. Assessment of speech recognition abilities in quiet and in noise: a comparison between self-administered home testing and testing in the clinic for adult cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 57(11): 872–880. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1506168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaff, F., Huysmans, E., Qazi, O.U., Vanpoucke, F.J., Merkus, P., Goverts, S.T., Smits, C. 2016. The development of remote speech recognition tests for adult cochlear implant users: the effect of presentation mode of the noise and a reliable method to deliver sound in home environments. Audiology and Neurotology, 21(Suppl. 1): 48–54. doi:10.1159/000448355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desloge, J.G., Reed, C.M., Braida, L.D., Perez, Z.D., Delhorne, L.A. 2010. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1): 342–359. doi:10.1121/1.3436522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devocht, E.M., George, E.L., Janssen, A.M., Stokroos, R.J. 2015. Bimodal hearing aid retention after unilateral cochlear implantation. Audiology and Neurotology, 20(6): 383–393. doi:10.1159/000439344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, C.C., Tyler, R.S., Witt, S.A. 2005. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(3): 668–680. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/046).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M.F., McKarns, S.A., Spahr, A.J. 2007. Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4): 835–843. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/058).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M.F., Sheffield, S.W., Teece, K., Olund, A.P. 2014. Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear. Audiology and Neurotology, 19(1): 57–71. doi:10.1159/000355700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, U., Hocke, T., Digeser, F. 2018. Bimodal benefit for cochlear implant listeners with different grades of hearing loss in the opposite ear. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 138(8): 713–721. doi:10.1080/00016489.2018.1444281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp, M.W., Smits, C., Merkus, P., Festen, J.M., Goverts, S.T. 2017. Lexical-Access ability and cognitive predictors of speech recognition in noise in adult cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing, 21: 2331216517743887. doi:10.1177/2331216517743887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp, M.W., Smits, C., Merkus, P., Goverts, S.T., Festen, J.M. 2015. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users. International Journal of Audiology, 54(1): 48–57 (In File). doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.945623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinakis, K., Pak, N. 2014. Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(1), EL47–EL53. doi:10.1121/1.4831955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, W.J.A., Goverts, S.T., Smits, C. 2018. Speech recognition abilities in normal-hearing children 4 to 12 years of age in stationary and interrupted noise. Ear & Hearing, 39(6): 1091–1103. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, B.J., Perry, T.T., Wilhelm, C.L., Healy, E.W. 2012. Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(4): 3111–3119. doi:10.1121/1.3688511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laback, B., Egger, K., Majdak, P. 2015. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hearing Research, 322: 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laske, R.D., Veraguth, D., Dillier, N., Binkert, A., Holzmann, D., Huber, A.M. 2009. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Otology & Neurotology, 30(3): 313–318. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bd7e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, J.R., Moran, M., Hollow, R., Dowell, R.C. 2016. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults. International Journal of Audiology, 55(Suppl 2): S3–S8. doi:10.3109/14992027.2016.1146415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. 2016. Effects of age and hearing loss on the processing of auditory temporal fine structure. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 894: 1–8. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morera, C., Manrique, M., Ramos, A., Garcia-Ibanez, L., Cavalle, L., Huarte, A., et al. 2005. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 125(6): 596–606. doi:10.1080/00016480510027493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P.B., Jin, S.H., Carney, A.E., Nelson, D.A. 2003. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2): 961–968. doi:10.1121/1.1531983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana, B., Buchholz, J.M., Morgan, C., Sharma, M., Weller, T., Konganda, S.A., et al. 2017. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation in adult listeners: speech-on-speech masking and multitalker localization. Trends in Hearing, 21: 2331216517722106. doi:10.1177/2331216517722106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, R.M., Firszt, J.B., Holden, L.K., Strube, M.J. 2014. A longitudinal study in adults with sequential bilateral cochlear implants: time course for individual ear and bilateral performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3): 1108–1126. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhebergen, K.S., Versfeld, N.J., Dreschler, W.A. 2008. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners. International Journal of Audiology, 47(4): 185–188. doi:10.1080/14992020701883224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, E.C., Amlani, A.M., Paiva, D., Nozari, L., Verret, S. 2011. A meta-analysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. International Journal of Audiology, 50(12): 871–880. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.622300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleich, P., Nopp, P., D'Haese, P. 2004. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 25(3): 197–204. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000130792.43315.97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield, B.M., Schuchman, G., Bernstein, J.G.W. 2017. Pre- and postoperative binaural unmasking for bimodal cochlear implant listeners. Ear & Hearing, 38(5): 554–567. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., Festen, J.M. 2013. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(5): 3004–3015. doi:10.1121/1.4798667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., Houtgast, T. 2007. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. International Journal of Audiology, 46(3): 134–144. doi:10.1080/14992020601102170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., Theo Goverts, S., Festen, J.M. 2013. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3): 1693–1706 (In File). doi:10.1121/1.4789933<otherinfo.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., Watson, C.S., Kidd, G.R., Moore, D.R., Goverts, S.T. 2016. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners. International Journal of Audiology, 55(6): 358–365. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1137362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, Y.E., Hendriks, T., Eikelboom, R.H., Stegeman, I., Santa Maria, P.L., Atlas, M.D., Friedland, P.L. 2017. Predicting sequential cochlear implantation performance: a systematic review. Audiology and Neurotology, 22(6): 356–363. doi:10.1159/000488386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snel-Bongers, J., Netten, A.P., Boermans, P.B.M., Rotteveel, L.J.C., Briaire, J.J., Frijns, J.H.M. 2018. Evidence-based inclusion criteria for cochlear implantation in patients with postlingual deafness. Ear & Hearing, 39(5): 1008–1014. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney, G.S., Zeng, F.G., Litovsky, R., Assmann, P. 2004. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(2): 1081–1091. doi:10.1121/1.1772399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, A.E., Goupell, M.J., Litovsky, R.Y. 2019. Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(5): 2982–2993. doi:10.1121/1.5102158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R.S., Gantz, B.J., Rubinstein, J.T., Wilson, B.S., Parkinson, A.J., Wolaver, A., et al. 2002. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 23(Suppl 1): 80S–89S. doi:10.1097/00003446-200202001-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R., Bohm, M., Pesch, J., Vandali, A., Battmer, R.D., Lenarz, T. 2008. Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(4): 2249–2263. doi:10.1121/1.2875229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R.J. 2012. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 288(1–2): 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R.J., Tyler, R.S. 2003. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(3): 1617–1630. doi:10.1121/1.1539520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon, M.C., Goverts, S.T., Merkus, P., Hensen, E.F., Smits, C. 2014. The addition of a contralateral microphone for unilateral cochlear implant users: Not an alternative for bilateral cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 35(9): e233–e239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon, M.C., Smits, C., Smit, C.F., Hensen, E.F., Merkus, P. 2017. Cochlear implantation in adults With asymmetric hearing loss: benefits of bimodal stimulation. Otology & Neurotology, 38(6): e100–e106. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirn, S., Angermeier, J., Arndt, S., Aschendorff, A., Wesarg, T. 2019. Reducing the device delay mismatch Can improve sound localization in bimodal cochlear implant/hearing-Aid users. Trends in Hearing, 23: 2331216519843876. doi:10.1177/2331216519843876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirn, S., Arndt, S., Aschendorff, A., Laszig, R., Wesarg, T. 2016. Perception of interaural phase differences with envelope and fine structure coding strategies in bilateral cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing, 20. doi:10.1177/2331216516665608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirn, S., Polterauer, D., Keller, S., Hemmert, W. 2016. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 55(5): 295–304. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1128124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar