Difference in cochlear length between male and female patients

References

• Alexiades, G., Dhanasingh, A., Jolly, C. 2015. Method to estimate the complete and two-turn cochlear duct length. Otology & Neurotology, 36(5): 904–907. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almuhawas, F.A., Dhanasingh, A.E., Mitrovic, D., Abdelsamad, Y., Alzhrani, F., Hagr, A., et al. 2020. Age as a factor of growth in mastoid thickness and skull width. Otology & Neurotology, 41(5): 709–714. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfarotta, M.W., Dillon, M.T., Buss, E., Pillsbury, H.C., Brown, K.D., O’Connell, B.P. 2020. Frequency-to-Place mismatch: characterizing variability and the influence on speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant recipients. Ear & Hearing, 41(5): 1349–1361. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinamon, U. 2009. The growth rate and size of the mastoid air cell system and mastoid bone: a review and reference. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 266(6): 781–786. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0941-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deep, N.L., Howard, B.E., Holbert, S.O., Hoxworth, J.M., Barrs, D.M. 2017. Measurement of cochlear length using the ‘A' value for cochlea basal diameter: A feasibility study. Cochlear Implants International, 18(4): 226–229. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1292689
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domenech-Fernandez, P., Yamane, J., Domenech, J., Barrios, C., Soldado-Carrera, F., Knorr, J., et al. 2020. Correction to: Analysis of skull bone thickness during growth: an anatomical guide for safe pin placement in halo fixation. European Spine Journal, 29(7): 1784. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06432-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutrieux, N., Quatre, R., Péan, V., Schmerber, S. 2022. Correlation between cochlear length, insertion angle, and tonotopic mismatch for MED-EL FLEX28 electrode arrays. Otology & Neurotology, 43(1): 48–55. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon, E., Rask-Andersen, H. 2013. How to predict cochlear length before cochlear implantation surgery. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 133(12): 1258–1265. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.831475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudé, B., James, C., Deguine, O., Cochard, N., Eter, E., Fraysse, B. 2006. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiology and Neurotology, 11(Suppl 1): 27–33. doi: 10.1159/000095611
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu, Q.J., Shannon, R.V. 1999. Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 20(4): 332–344. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D.D. 1996. Comparing octaves, frequency ranges, and cochlear-map curvature across species. Hearing Research, 94(1-2): 157–162. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00229-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, M., Sharma, S., Singh, S.N., Kataria, T., Lakhawat, R.S., Sharma, M.P. 2018. Measuring cochlear duct length in Asian population: worth giving a thought!. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 275(3): 725–728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4868-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, R.W., Elfarnawany, M., Zhu, N., Ladak, H.M., Agrawal, S.K. 2017a. Evaluation of cochlear duct length computations using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging. Otology & Neurotology, 38(6): e92–e99. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, R.W., Ladak, H.M., Elfarnawany, M., Agrawal, S.K. 2017b. Measuring cochlear duct length - a historical analysis of methods and results. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 46(1): 19. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0194-2
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, G., Van de Heyning, P., Vanderveken, O., Topsakal, V., Van Rompaey, V. 2022. The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch the better the hearing outcomes in cochlear implant recipients? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 279(4): 1875–1883. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06899-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, G., Van Rompaey, V., Van de Heyning, P., Gorris, E., Topsakal, V. 2020. Prediction of the cochlear implant electrode insertion depth: Clinical applicability of two analytical cochlear models. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 3340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58648-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J.D. 2007. Sex differences in the length of the organ of Corti in humans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4): EL151–EL155. doi: 10.1121/1.2710746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nateghifard, K., Low, D., Awofala, L., Srikanthan, D., Kuthubutheen, J., Daly, M., et al. 2019. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 48(1): 65. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0388-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelliccia, P., Venail, F., Bonafé, A., Makeieff, M., Iannetti, G., Bartolomeo, M., et al. 2014. Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 34(1): 42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risi, F. 2019. Considerations and rationale for cochlear implant electrode design - past, present and future. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 14(3): 382–391. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.6372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saoji, A.A., Patel, N.S., Carlson, M.L., Neff, B.A., Koka, K., Tarigoppula, V.S.A., et al. 2019. Multi-frequency electrocochleography measurements can be used to monitor and optimize electrode placement during cochlear implant surgery. Otology & Neurotology, 40(10): 1287–1291. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, H., Sando, I., Takahashi, H. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea. Computer 3-D measurement. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 111(6): 1037–1040. doi: 10.3109/00016489109100753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurzig, D., Timm, M.E., Batsoulis, C., Salcher, R., Sieber, D., Jolly, C., et al. 2018. A novel method for Clinical cochlear duct length estimation toward patient-specific cochlear implant selection. OTO Open, 2(4): 2473974X1880023. doi: 10.1177/2473974X18800238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin, K.J., Lee, J.Y., Kim, J.N., Yoo, J.Y., Shin, C., Song, W.C., et al. 2013. Quantitative analysis of the cochlea using three-dimensional reconstruction based on microcomputed tomographic images. The Anatomical Record, 296(7): 1083–1088. doi: 10.1002/ar.22714
   Google Scholar
• Shuster, B.Z., Depireux, D.A., Mong, J.A., Hertzano, R. 2019. Sex differences in hearing: probing the role of estrogen signaling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(6): 3656. doi: 10.1121/1.5111870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong, J.F., Low, D., Tham, A., Liew, C., Tan, T.Y., Yuen, H.W. 2017. Cochlear duct length-one size fits all? American Journal of Otolaryngology, 38(2): 218–221. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutkuviene, J., Cattaneo, C., Obertová, Z., Ratnayake, M., Poppa, P., Barkus, A., et al. 2016. Age- and sex-related growth patterns of the craniofacial complex in European children aged 3-6 years. Annals of Human Biology, 43(6):510-519. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1106584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Würfel, W., Lanfermann, H., Lenarz, T., Majdani, O. 2014. Cochlear length determination using cone beam computed tomography in a clinical setting. Hearing Research, 316: 65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharopoulos, G.V., Manios, A., Kau, C.H., Velagrakis, G., Tzanakakis, G.N., de Bree, E. 2016. Anthropometric analysis of the face. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 27(1): e71–e75. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahara, D., Dewi, R.D., Aboet, A., Putranto, F.M., Lubis, N.D., Ashar, T. 2019. Variations in cochlear size of cochlear implant candidates. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 23(2): 184–190. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar