Survey of selective electrode deactivation attitudes and practices by cochlear implant audiologists

References

• Bierer, J.A. 2010. Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends in Amplification, 14(2): 84–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bierer, J.A., Litvak, L. 2016. Reducing channel interaction through cochlear implant programming may improve speech perception. Trends in Hearing, 20: Article 233121651665338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey, P., Arndt, P., Bergeron, F., Bredberg, G., Brimacombe, J., Facer, G., et al. 1996. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotology, 1(5): 293–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boisvert, I., Reis, M., Au, A., Cowan, R., Dowell, R.C. 2020. Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: a scoping review. PloS One, 15(5): e0232421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L.M., Zwolan, T.A., Wakefield, G.H. 1997. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(1): 440–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croghan, N.B.H., Duran, S.I., Smith, Z.M. 2017. Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(6): EEL537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danieli, F., Dermacy, T., do Amaral, M.S.A., Reis, A.C.M.B., Gnansia, D., Hyppolito, M.A. 2021. Auditory performance of post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients using electrode deactivation based on postoperative cone beam CT images. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 278(4): 977–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P.W., McKay, C.M., Busby, P.A., Grayden, D.B., Clark, G.M. 2000. Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 21(6): 597–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debruyne, J.A., Francart, T., Janssen, A.M.L., Douma, K., Brokx, J.P.L. 2017. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance. International Journal of Audiology, 56(3): 174–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, R.C., Hollow, R., Winton, E. 2004. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130(5): 575–581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garadat, S.N., Zwolan, T.A., Pfingst, B.E. 2013. Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners. Audiology and Neurotology, 18(4): 247–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A.E., Nicholas, J.G., Moog, J.S. 2007. Estimating the influence of cochlear implantation on language development in children. Audiological Medicine, 5(4): 262–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedley-Williams, A.J., Sladen, D.P., Tharpe, A.M. 2003. Programming, care, and troubleshooting of cochlear implants for children. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(1): 46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingson, C., Messersmith, J.J. 2018. Cochlear implant practice patterns: the U.S. trends with pediatric patients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 29(8): 722–733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henshall, K.R., McKay, C.M. 2001. Optimizing electrode and filter selection in cochlear implant speech processor maps. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12(9): 478–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heutink, F., Verbist, B.M., van der Woude, W.-J., Meulman, T.J., Briaire, J.J., Frijns, J.H.M., et al. 2021. Factors influencing speech perception in adults with a cochlear implant. Ear & Hearing, 42(4): 949–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiel, A.-L., Gerard, J.-M., Decat, M., Deggouj, N. 2016. Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 273(9): 2495–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyer, J., Elkins, E., Hazlewood, C., Watson, S.D., Arenberg, J.G., Parbery-Clark, A. 2019. Assessing cognitive abilities in high-performing cochlear implant users. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. Frontiers Media SA.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L.K., Finley, C.C., Firszt, J.B., Holden, T.A., Brenner, C., Potts, L.G., et al. 2013. Factors affecting open-Set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear & Hearing, 34(3): 342–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L.E., Kidd, G.R., Lentz, J.J. 2013. Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7. Frontiers Media SA.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenway, B., Tam, Y.C., Vanat, Z., Harris, F., Gray, R., Birchall, J., et al. 2015. Pitch discrimination. Otology & Neurotology, 36(9): 1472–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labadie, R.F., Noble, J.H. 2018. Preliminary results with image-guided cochlear implant insertion techniques. Otology & Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 39(7): 922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labadie, R.F., Noble, J.H., Hedley-Williams, A.J., Sunderhaus, L.W., Dawant, B.M., Gifford, R.H. 2016. Results of postoperative, CT-based, electrode deactivation on hearing in prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients. Otology & Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 37(2): 137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, T.G., Wise, A.K., Fallon, J.B., Shepherd, R.K. 2011. Spiral ganglion neuron survival and function in the deafened cochlea following chronic neurotrophic treatment. Hearing Research, 282(1-2): 303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, D.S., Vincent, C., Venail, F., Van de Heyning, P., Truy, E., Sterkers, O., et al. 2012. Pre-, Per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. M. S. Malmierca (Ed.) PLoS One, 7(11): e48739. Public Library of Science (PLoS).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B): 467–477.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew, R., Undurraga, J., Li, G., Meerton, L., Boyle, P., Shaida, A., Selvadurai, D., Jiang, D., Vickers, D. 2017. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 354: 86101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew, R., Vickers, D., Boyle, P., Shaida, A., Selvadurai, D., Jiang, D., Undurraga, J. 2018. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 367: 74–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes, J., Chinnici, J. 2006. Cochlear implants—considerations in programming for the pediatric population. Retrieved from http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/cochlear-implants-consideratsions- in-programming-1011
   Google Scholar
• Messersmith, J.J., Entwisle, L., Warren, S., Scott, M. 2019. Clinical practice guidelines: cochlear implants. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 30(10): 827–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.A., Teagle, H.F.B. 2002. An introduction to cochlear implant technology, activation, and programming. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33(3): 153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, J.H., Gifford, R.H., Hedley-Williams, A.J., Dawant, B.M., Labadie, R.F. 2014. Clinical evaluation of an image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy. Audiology and Neurotology, 19(6): 400–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, J.H., Hedley-Williams, A.J., Sunderhaus, L., Dawant, B.M., Labadie, R.F., Camarata, S.M., Gifford, R.H. 2016. Initial results with image-guided cochlear implant programming in children. Otology and Neurotology, 37(2): e63e69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K., McDermott, H., van Hoesel, R., Dawson, P., Cowan, R. 2016. Factors predicting postoperative unilateral and bilateral speech recognition in adult cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing. Ear & Hearing, 37(2): 153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagi, E., Svirsky, M.A. 2018. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: a computational approach. Hearing Research, 370: 316–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, S.M., Saeed, S.R., Meerton, L., Moore, D.R., Vickers, D.A. 2013. Clinical use of electrode differentiation to enhance programming of cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 14(sup4): 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sarant, J.Z., Blamey, P.J., Dowell, R.C., Clark, G.M., Gibson, W.P.R. 2001. Variation In speech perception scores Among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 22(1): 18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, W.H., Bradham, T.S. 2012. Cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 45(1): 111–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S.L., Pichora-Fuller, M.K. 2015. Associations between speech understanding and auditory and visual tests of verbal working memory: effects of linguistic complexity, task, age, and hearing loss. Frontiers in Psychology. (Vol. 6). Frontiers Media SA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., Smits, C., De Ceulaer, G., Zir, E., Harman, S., Jaspers, N., et al. 2014. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the Art. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, D., Degun, A., Canas, A., Stainsby, T., Vanpoucke, F. 2016. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 115–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylikoski, J., Savolainen, S. 1984. The cochlear nerve in various forms of deafness. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 98(5-6): 418–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N. 2017. Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(3): EEL243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwolan, T.A., Collins, L.M., Wakefield, G.H. 1997. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(3): 3673–3685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar