Source Governance of Social Disputes in China

References

• Ahl, Björn, and Daniel Sprick. 2018. “Towards Judicial Transparency in China: The New Public Access Database for Court Decisions.” China Information 32: 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayne, Sarah. 2020. Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Xi. 2017. “Origins of Informal Coercion in China.” Politics & Society 45(1): 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Feng, and Xin Xu. 2012. “‘Active Judiciary’: Judicial Dismantling of Workers’ Collective Action in China.” The China Journal 67: 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Chang’an Net. 2021. “Ruhe cong yuantou huajie maodun jiufen? Zhejiang shouchuang jingyan quanguo tuiguang” [How to resolve disputes from the source? National promotion of Zhejiang’s pioneering experience], February 23. Accessed August 1, 2022: https://www.chinapeace.gov.cn/chinapeace/c100047/2021-02/23/content_12454238.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, James A. 1960. “Chinese Mediation on the Eve of Modernization.” California Law Review 54: 1201-1026.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Yanhua, and Kevin J. O’Brien. 2013. “Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters.” The China Quarterly 215: 533–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, Xiaohua, and Yuning Wu. 2009.“The Developing Trend of the People’s Mediation in China.” Sociological Focus 42 (3): 228–245.
   Google Scholar
• Diamant, Neil J., and Kevin J. O’Brien. 2015. “Veterans’ Political Activism in China.” Modern China 41 (3): 278–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Yu. 2013. “Susong shehui yu wusong shehui de bianxi yu qishi: Jiufen jiejue jizhi zhong de guojia yu shehui” [Debate and Enlightenment between Litigation Society and Non-litigation Society: State and Society in Dispute Settlement Mechanism]. Faxuejia [The Jurist] 3 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gohdes, Anita R. 2020. “Repression Technology: Internet Accessibility and State Violence.” American Journal of Political Science 65 (3): 488–503.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Baogang. 2003. “Political Legitimacy and China’s Transition.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 1: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Enze. 2011. “From Domestic to International: The Politics of Ethnic Identity in Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia.” Nationalities Papers 39 (6): 941–962.
   Google Scholar
• He, Xin. 2021. “Pressures on Chinese Judges under Xi.” The China Journal 85: 49–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimer, Maria. 2006. “The Cadre Responsibility System and the Changing Needs of the Party.” In The Chinese Communist Party in Reform, edited by K. E. Brødsgaard and Yongnian Zheng, 122–138. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holbig, Heike, and Bruce Gilley. 2010. “Reclaiming legitimacy in China.” Politics & Policy 38 (3): 395–422.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Jieren. 2011. “Grand Mediation in China: Mechanism and Application.” Asian Survey 51 (6): 1065–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Jieren and Tong Wu. 2021. “Emotional Mobilization of Chinese Veterans: Collective Activism, Flexible Governance, and Dispute Resolution.” Journal of Contemporary China 30 (129): 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Jieren, Tong Wu, and Jingyan Fei. 2018. “Flexible Governance in China: Affective Care, Petition Disputes, and Regime Legitimacy.” Asian Survey 58 (4): 679–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Jieren, and Yang Zheng. 2016. “Breaking the Dilemma between Litigation and Non-litigation: ‘Diversified Mechanisms of Dispute Resolution’ in China.’” China Perspectives 2: 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Philip C. C. 2006. “Court Mediation in China, Past and Present.” Modern China 32 (3): 275–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Philip C. C. 2010. Chinese Civil Justice, Past and Present. Lanham, Maryland: Roman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Shanhe, and Yuning Wu. 2015. “Chinese People’s Intended and Actual Use of The Court to Resolve Grievance/Dispute.” Social Science Research 49: 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legal Daily. 2021. “Suyuan zhili kaichuang Zhejiang shehui zhili xingeju” [Source Governance of Social Disputes Creates a New Pattern of Social Governance in Zhejiang], January 21. Accessed July 6, 2022: https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_10883662.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Shuhu. 2020. “‘Fengqiao jingyan’ fazhan yanjin de sichong luoji: cong Mao Zedong dao Xi Jinping” [Four Logics of the Development and Evolution of “Fengqiao Experience”: From Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping]. Kexue Shehui Zhuyi [Scientific Socialism] 3: 110–115.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberthal, K. and M. Oksengerg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebman, Benjamin L. 2007. “China’s Courts: Restricted Reform.” The China Quarterly 191: 620–638.
   Google Scholar
• Liebman, Benjamin. 2009. “Assessing China’s Legal Reforms.” Columbia Journal of Asian Law 23 (1): 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Yu. 2010. “Maoist Discourse and the Mobilization of Emotions in Revolutionary China.” Modern China 36 (3): 329–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Zhongzhi. 2010. “Guanyu ‘datiaojie’ he ‘nengdong sifa’de sikao” [Some Thoughts on Grand Mediation and Judicial Activism]. Zhengfa Luntan [Tribune of Political Science and Law] 28 (4): 98–105.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Qiangqiang, and Joel Andreas. 2016. “Using Religion to Resist Rural Dispossession: A Case Study of a Hui Muslim Community in Northwest China.” The China Quarterly 226: 477–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menendez, Robert. 2020. The New Big Brother: China and Digital Authoritarianism. Washington D.C, U.S. Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Mertha, Andrew. 2009. “‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process.” The China Quarterly 200: 995–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minzner, Carl F. 2006. “Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions.” Stanford Journal of International Law 42 (1): 103–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minzner, Carl. F. 2011. “China’s Turn Against Law.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 59: 935–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minzner, Carl F. 2015. “Legal Reform in the Xi Jinping Era.” Asia Policy 20: 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Moustafa, Tamir. 2014. “Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (1): 281–299.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Kwai Hang, and Xin He. 2014. “Internal Contradictions of Judicial Mediation in China.” Law and Social inquiry 39 (2): 285–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, Kwai Hang, and Xin He. 2017. Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Kevin J., and Yanhua Deng. 2017. “Preventing Protest One Person at a Time: Psychological Coercion and Relational Repression in China.” The China Review 17 (2): 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Lynette H. 2018. “Thugs and Outsourcing of State Repression in China,” The China Journal 80: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagianneas, Straton. 2021.“Automation and Digitalization of Justice in China’s Smart Court Systems.” China Brief 21: 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, Elizabeth. 2002. “Moving the Masses: Emotion Work in the Chinese Revolution.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 7 (2): 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Rong, Jinben, Z. Cui, Q. Wang, X. Gao, H. Zenke, and X. Yang. 1998. Transformation from The Pressure System to a Democratic System of Cooperation: Reform of the Political System at the County and Township Levels. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, Justin. 2021. “Digital Authoritarianism and Implications for US National Security.” The Cyber Defense Review 6 (1): 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Changqing, Tania Sourdin, and Bin Li. 2021. “The Smart Court-A New Pathway to Justice in China?” International Journal for Court Administration 12: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Peter. 2010.“Authoritarian Legality and Informal Practices: Judges, Lawyers and the State in Russia and China.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, Thomas. 1992. Order and Discipline in China: The Shanghai Mixed Court 1911-1927. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Rachel E., Benjamin L. Liebman, Margaret Roberts, and Alice Wang. 2021. “Automating Fairness? Artificial Intelligence in the Chinese Courts.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 59: 515–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Li. 2010. “Guanyu nengdong sifa yu datiaojie” [On Active judiciary and grand mediation]. Zhongguo Faxue [China Legal Science] 1: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Ying, and Hualing Fu. 2022. “Of Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China.” China Quarterly 251: 866–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, People’s Republic of China. 2017. “Zuigao renmin fayuan guanyu jiakuai jianshe zhihui fayuan de yijian” [Opinions of the SPC on Accelerating the Construction of Smart Courts], April 12. Accessed December 3, 2022: http://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/5dec527431cdc22b72163b49fc0284.html.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, People’s Republic of China. 2019a. “Zuigao renmin fayuan guanyu Shenhua renmin fayuan sifa tizhi zonghe peitao gaige de yijian: renmin fayuan diwuge wunian gaige gangyao (2019-2023)” [The Fifth Five-year Reform Outline of the SPC on Deepening the Comprehensive Reform of the Judicial System of the Court (2019-2023)], February 27. Accessed May 5, 2022: http://m.law-lib.com/law/law_view.asp?id=637620&page=1.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, People’s Republic of China. 2019b. “Zuigao renmin fayuan yinfa ‘guanyu jianshe yizhanshi duoyuan jiefen jizhi, yizhanshi susong fuwu zhongxin de yijian’” [The SPC Printed and Distributed the Opinions on Building A One-click Mechanisms of Dispute Resolution and A One-click Litigation Service Center], August 2. Accessed April 4, 2022: http://www.hncourt.gov.cn/m/io/index.php?act=a&ch=news&cid=0&aid=178332.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, People’s Republic of China. 2020. “Zuigao renmnin fayuan guanyu yinfa‘minshi susong fanjian fenliu gaige shidian fang’an de tongzhi” [Notice of the Supreme People’s Court on printing and distributing the pilot program for the reform of the separation of complicated and simple civil procedure], January 15. Accessed September 10, 2022: http://jnanszqfy.sdcourt.gov.cn/jnanszqfy/yshj84/splcgk1/7436177/2021091316205844630.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, People’s Republic of China. 2022. “Zuigao renmin fayuan gongzuo baogao” [The Work Report of the SPC], March 15. Accessed April 4, 2022: https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_17125436.
   Google Scholar
• Teiwes, Frederick. 2018. Leadership, Legitimacy, and Conflict in China. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tiberiu, Dragu, and Yonatan Lupu. 2021. “Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights.” International Organization 75: 991–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiberiu, Dragu, and Adam Przeworski. 2019. “Preventive Repression: Two Types of Moral Hazard.” American Political Science review 113 (1): 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevaskes, Susan. 2007. Courts and Criminal Justice in Contemporary China. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Trevaskes, Susan. 2010. Policing Serious Crime in China: From “Strike Hard” to “Kill Fewer.” Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trevaskes, Susan, Elisa Nesossi, Flora Sapio, and Sarah Biddulph. 2014. The Politics of Law and Stability in China. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, James. 1990. “Mediation in the People’s Republic of China.” In Theory and Research in Conflict Management, edited by M. Afzalur Rahim, 109–119. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yueduan. 2020. “Overcoming Embeddedness: How China's Judicial Accountability Reforms Makes Its Judges More Autonomous.” Fordham International law Journal 43: 737–766.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yueduan. 2021. “Detaching Courts from Local Politics? Assessing the Judicial Centralization Reforms in China.” China Quarterly 246: 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissler, Roselle L. 2004. “The Effectiveness of Court-connected Dispute Resolution in Civil Cases.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22 (1): 55–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Jie. 2021. “Specialty Mediation Committees for Medical Disputes in China.” China: An International Journal 19 (4):166–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinhua Net. 2021. “Zhongyang jingji gongzuo huiy juxing, Xi Jinping Li Keqiang zuo zhongyao jianghua” [Jinping and Li Keqiang Delivered Important Speeches at the Central Economic Work Conference], December 21. Accessed June 8, 2022: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-12/21/content_5350934.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua Net. 2022. “Woguo zong dui zong duoyuan jiefen tiaojie chenggonglv chaoguo 67%” [The Mediation Success Rate of China’s Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanism Exceeds 67 Percent], August 23. Accessed October 25, 2022: http://www.news.cn/2022-08/23/c_1128939719.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Youping. 2015. “Dancing with Shackles: Judges’ Engagement in Court Conciliation of Chinese Civil Cases.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 28 (1): 209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Bin. 2022. “Historically Remaining Issues: The Shanghai-Xinjiang Zhiqing Migration Program and The Tangled Legacies of The Mao Era in China, 1980-2017.” Modern China 48 (4): 721–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Zhaofei. 2020. “Longshan jingyan yu zhongguo falv wenhua chuantong” [“Longshan Experience” and Chinese Legal Cultural Tradition], June 5. Accessed July 6, 2022: http://rmfyb.chinacourt.org/paper/html/2020-06/05/content_168813.htm?div=-1.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Xin. 2021. “Shuzi Zhejiang jianshe de lishi huigu” [Historical Review of Digital Zhejiang Construction]. July 2. Accessed June 3, 2022: https://www.zjds.org.cn/zhyj/37777.jhtml.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yanling. 2022. “Zongguo zhihui fayuan jianshe chegxiao xianzhu, pingjun meige gongzuori tiaojie jiwanjian jiufen” [Remarkable Achievements Have Been Made by China’s Smart Courts, Which Mediate Tens of Thousands of Disputes Per Working Day on Average], October 14. Accessed October 25, 2022: http://henan.china.com.cn/legal/2022-10/14/content_42137867.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Taisu, and Tom Ginsburg. 2019. “China’s Turn toward Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law 59 (2): 306–385.
   Google Scholar
• Zhejiang Daily. 2019. “Zhijin yishanmen, huajie baixingshi; Putuo: maodun jiufen huajie ‘zuiduo paoyidi’” [Only Entering One Door to Resolve People’s Problems; Putuo: Resolving Disputes Running “One Place at Most], August 9. Accessed June 20, 2022: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1641344545553025570&wfr=spider&for=pc.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Ruoting, and Jieren Hu. 2020. “Outsourced Lawyers in China: Third Party Mediators and Their Selective Response in Dispute Resolution.” China Information 34 (3): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Kai, and Xiaojun Yan. 2014. “The Quest for Stability: Policing Popular Protest in the People’s Republic of China.” Problems of Post-Communism 61 (3): 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, Wenjia, and Feng Chen. 2015. “‘Mediate first’: The Revival of Mediation in Labor Dispute Resolution in China.” The China Quarterly 222: 380–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar