Re-reading The Indo-Pacific as Aidagara: Watsuji Tetsurō’s Relevance to Japan’s Foreign Relations

References

• Abe Shinzō. 2012. “Asia’s Democratic Security Diamond.” Project Syndicate, December 27. Accessed on February 22, 2024. https://www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/a-strategic-alliance-for-japan-and-india-by-shinzo-abe.
   Google Scholar
• Abe Shinzō. 2013. Atarashii kuni e: utsukushii kuni e kanzen-ban. Tokyo: Bunshun shinsho.
   Google Scholar
• Abe Shinzō. 2023. Abe Shinzō kaiko-roku. Tokyo: Chūō kōron shinsha.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret S. 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory (Rev. Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asahi shimbun. 2018. “Chūgoku taikō wo kenen, ‘kōsō’ ni kaeru Indo-Taiheiyō ‘senryaku’.” November 14. Accessed on June 24, 2019: https://digital.asahi.com/articles/DA3S13767370.html?iref = pc_ss_date.
   Google Scholar
• Asahi shimbun. 2021. “Chūgoku e no Abe shinsho ‘kaki-kae’ gaikō de hajimatta sokkin-seiji.” Asahi shimbun, May 18. Accessed on May 17, 2021: https://digital.asahi.com/articles/ASP5H5QG5P4MUTFK01F.html?iref = comtop_7_01.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, Robert N. 1965. “Japan’s Cultural Identity: Some Reflections on the Work of Watsuji Tetsuro.” The Journal of Asian Studies 24 (4): 573-594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bernier, Bernard. 2006. “National Communion: Watsuji Tetsurō’s Conception of Ethics, Power, and the Japanese Imperial State.” Philosophy East and West 56 (1): 84-105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berque, Augustin. 1996. “The Question of Space: From Heidegger to Watsuji.” Ecumene 3 (4): 373-383.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, Isaiah. 1942. “Geography vs. Geopolitics.” Geographical Review 32 (4): 646-658.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2021, Government of the United Kingdom. Global Britain in a Competitive Age: The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, William A. 2016. “China’s ‘Asia Dream’: The Belt Road Initiative and the New Regional Order.” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 1 (3): 226-243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Era, Alice. 2022. “Securitizing Beijing Through the Maritime Commons: The ‘China Threat’ and Japan’s Security Discourse in The Abe Era.” The Pacific Review 37 (1): 147-180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessler, David. 1989. “What’s at Stake in The Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (3): 441-473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1997. “Aporia: A Critical Exploration of The Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365-392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edström, Bert. 1999. Japan’s Evolving Foreign Policy Doctrine: From Yoshida to Miyazawa. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Yongxuan. 2021. “Towards Relational Spatiality: Space, Relation and Simmel’s Modernity.” Sociology 56 (3): 591-607.
   Google Scholar
• Gaikō. 2021. “‘Jiyū de hirakareta Indo-Taiheiyō’ ni miru senryaku-teki shikō”, Gaikō 65 (January/February): 94-99.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Grare, Frédéric. 2021. “The EU’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: A Chance for a Clear Message to China and Europe’s Allies.” European Council on Foreign Relations. April 22. Accessed on May 24, 2021: https://ecfr.eu/article/the-eus-indo-pacific-strategy-a-chance-for-a-clear-message-to-china-and-europes-allies/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin. 2004. “In Defence of the Hartland: Sir Halford Mackinder and His Critics a Hundred Years On.” Comparative Strategy 23 (1): 9-25.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Karl. 2015. “Recognising Recognition Through Thick and Thin: Insights from Sino-Japanese Relations.” Cooperation and Conflict 51 (3): 255-271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Karl. 2016. “Routinised Recognition and Anxiety: Understanding the deterioration in Sino-Japanese Relations”. Review of International Studies 42 (4). Accessed June 2, 2024: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/routinised-recognition-and-anxiety-understanding-the-deterioration-in-sinojapanese-relations/632ADA4A6E5D97B3AB7F83086D187B43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagström, Linus. 2012. “‘Power Shift’ in East Asia? A Critical Reappraisal of Narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Dispute.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (3): 267-297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagström, Linus, and Ulv Hanssen. 2015. “War is Peace: The Rearticulation of ‘Peace’ in Japan’s China Discourse.” Review of International Studies 42 (2): 266-286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagström, Linus, and Björn Jerdén. 2010. “Understanding Fluctuations in Sino-Japanese Relations: To Politicize or to De-politicize the China Issue in the Japanese Diet.” Pacific Affairs 83 (4): 719-739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, Mark. 2008. “Power and Habitus.” Journal of Power 1 (2): 189-206.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoya, Yuichi. 2011. “The Rise and Fall of Japan’s Grand Strategy: The ‘Arc of Freedom and Prosperity’ and the Future Asian Order.” Asia-Pacific Review 18 (1): 13-24.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoya, Yuichi. 2019. “FOIP 2.0: The Evolution of Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy.” Asia-Pacific Review 26 (1): 18-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoguchi, Takashi. 2011. “Japanese Ideas of Asian Regionalism.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (2): 233-249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriye Akira. 1966. Nihon no gaikō. Tokyo: Chūkō shinsho.
   Google Scholar
• Iriye Akira. 1991. Shin Nihon no gaikō. Tokyo: Chūkō shinsho.
   Google Scholar
• Ishibashi Mari. 2018. “Infura tōshi Nitchū ga ōshū.” Nihon keizai shimbun, May 6.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Christopher. 2002. “Interman and the ‘Inter’ ‘in International Relations: Watsuji Tetsurō and the Ethics of the Inbetween.” Global Society 17 (2): 135-150.
   Google Scholar
• Kanehara Nobukatsu. 2011. Senryaku gaikō-genron. Tokyo: Nihon keizai shimbunsha.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2006. “Ajia gētowei senryaku kaigi (dai 1-kai).” November 8. Accessed July 24, 2018: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/asia/dai1/1gijiyousi.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2015. “Yomiuri kokusai keizai kondankai (YIES) kōenkai 2015 Abe sōri supīchi.” November 6. Accessed January 3, 2018: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/97_abe/statement/2015/1106yies.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2017a. “Dai 23-kai kokusai kōryūkai ‘Ajia no mirai’ bansankai Abe naikaku sōri-daijin supīchi.” June 5. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/97_abe/statement/2017/0605speech.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2017b. “APEC shunō narabi ASEAN kanren shunō kaigi shusseki-tō ni tsuite no naigai kisha kaiken.” November 14. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/98_abe/statement/2017/1114kaiken.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2017c. “Dai 3-kai Nitchū kigyōka oyobi moto-seifu kōkan taiwa (Nitchū CEO-tō samitto) kangei resepushon”. December 4. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/98_abe/actions/201712/04taiwa_kangei.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2019a. “TICAD 7 kaikai-shiki, zentai-kaigō Abe sōri kichō enzetsu.” August 28. Accessed February 6, 2020: http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/98_abe/statement/2019/0828kn.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kantei. 2019b. “TICAD 7 kyōdō kisha-kaiken.” August 30. Accessed February 6, 2020: http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/98_abe/statement/2019/0830kaiken.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kitaoka Shin’ichi. 1995. “Sengo Nippon no gaikō shisō.” In Sengo Nippon gaikō-ron-shū, edited by Kitaoka Shin’iichi. 5-42. Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, Ladis K. 1960. “The Origins and Evolution of Geopolitics.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 4 (1): 15-51.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, Joel. 2013. “Watsuji’s Phenomenology of Embodiment and Social Space.” Philosophy East and West: 63 (2): 127-152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuribayashi Fumiko and Yamagishi Kazuo. 2017. “Nikai-shi, AIIB sanka unagasu ‘dō hayaku ketsudan suruka’ Chūgoku shudō tōshi-gin.” Asahi shimbun, May 16. Accessed on January 8, 2019: https://digital.asahi.com/articles/DA3S12938927.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kustermans, Jorg. 2016. “Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices.” Millennium 44 (2): 175-196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Martin. and Kären E. Wigen. The Myth of Continents. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinder, Halford J. 2004. “The Geographical Pivot of History.” The Geographical Journal 170 (4): 298-321.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Mazé, Médéric. 2017. “Returning Struggles to The Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do About It?” International Political Sociology 11 (2): 203-220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwao Masahiro, Miura Hiroyuki. and Onaga Takao. 2016. “Afurika shien ryō yori shitsu shushō enzetsu, Chūgoku tono chigai kyōchō.” Asahi shimbun. August 28. Accessed June 24, 2019: https://digital.asahi.com/articles/ASJ8W5F5TJ8WUHBI00M.html?iref=pc_ss_date.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John. 2006. “China’s Unpeaceful Rise.” Current History April: 160-162.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John. 2014a. “America Unhinged.” The National Interest 129: 9-30.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John. 2014c. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 77-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John and Stephen Walt. 2016. “The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior US Grand Strategy.” Foreign Affairs 95: 70-83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance (MOF), Government of Japan. “Asō fuku-sōri ken zaimudaijin ken naikaku tokumei tantō daijin kakugi-go kishkaiken no gaiyō.” June 16. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.mof.go.jp/public_relations/conference/my20170616.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Government of Japan. 2015b. “Asō daijin, Kuroda sōsai kyōdō kishakaiken no gaiyō.” May 29. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.mof.go.jp/public_relations/conference/my20150529.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Miyagi Taizō. 2016. Gendai Nippon gaikō-shi. Tokyo: Chūkō shinsho.
   Google Scholar
• MOF. 2015a. “Asō fuku-sōri ken zaimudaijin ken naikaku tokumei tantō daijin kakugi-go kishkaiken no gaiyō.” April 7. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.mof.go.jp/public_relations/conference/my20150407.htm.
   Google Scholar
• MOF. 2015c. “Asō fuku-sōri ken zaimudaijin ken naikaku tokumei tantō daijin kakugi-go kishkaiken no gaiyō.” June 6. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.mof.go.jp/public_relations/conference/my20150606.htm.
   Google Scholar
• MOF. 2016. “Asō fuku-sōri ken zaimudaijin ken naikaku tokumei tantō daijin kuri-age kakugi-go kishakaiken no gaiyō.” April 28. Accessed August 8, 2018: https://www.mof.go.jp/public_relations/conference/my20160428.htm.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2015d. “Kishida gaimu daijin supīchi.” January 18. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/s_sa/sw/in/page22_001770.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2017a. “Kishida gaimu daijin rinji-kaiken kiroku.” May 1. Accessed June 19, 2019.: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000494.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2017b. “Kishida gaimu daijin kaiken kiroku.” May 12. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000499.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2017c. “Kishida gaimu daijin kaiken kiroku.” May 16. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000502.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2017d. “Kōno gaimu daijin kaiken kiroku.” August 3. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken1_000027.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2017e. “Kōno gaimu daijin kaiken kiroku.” November 2. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000590.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2018a. “Kōno gaimu daijin rinji kaiken kiroku.” January 28. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000640.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2018b. “Kōno gaimu daijin rinji kaiken kiroku.” April 16. Accessed August 8, 2018.: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000683.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2018c. Gaikō seisho. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2018d. “Hawai hōchi-shi (Beikoku) ni yoru Kōno gaimudaijin intabyū.” August 23. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/p_pd/ip/page4_004281.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2018e. “Dai 73-kai Kokuren-sōkai ni okeru Abe sōri-daijin ippan tōron enzetsu.” September 25. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/fp/unp_a/page3_002562.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. 2018f. “Kōno gaimu daijin rinji-kaiken kiroku.” August 4. Accessed June 19, 2019: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/kaiken/kaiken4_000734.html.
   Google Scholar
• Murashkin, Nikolay. 2015. “Japanese Involvement in Central Asia: An Early Inter-Asian Post-Neoliberal Case?” Asian Journal of Social Science 43 (1-2): 50-79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murashkin, Nikolay. 2018. “Not-so-New Silk Roads: Japan’s Foreign Policies on Asian Connectivity Infrastructure Under the Radar.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72 (5): 455-472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Michael. 2015. “The Critical Cosmopolitanism of Watsuji Tetsurō.” European Journal of Social Theory 18 (4): 507-522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, Stephen. 2021. “Sino-Japanese Reactive Diplomacy as Seen Through the Interplay of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision (FOIP).” China Report 57 (1): 7-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS), Government of Japan. 2008. East Asia Strategic Review 2008. Tokyo: NIDS.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, Astrid. H. M. and Graham M. Smith. 2018. “Reintroducing Friendship to International Relations: Relational Ontologies from China to the West.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 18 (3): 369-396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odin, Steve. 1992. “The Social Self in Japanese Philosophy and American Pragmatism: A Comparative Study of Watsuji Tetsurō and George Herbert Mead.” Philosophy East and West 42 (3): 475-501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto Kōji. 1998. “‘Nippon to Ajia’ ka ‘Ajia no Nippon’ ka.” In Kindai Nippon no Ajia-kan, edited by Okamoto Kōji, 1-22. Kyoto: Minerva shobō.
   Google Scholar
• Osler, Lucy, and Joel Krueger. 2022. “Taking Watsuji Online: Betweenness and Expression in Online Spaces.” Continental Philosophy Review 55 (1): 77-99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Chengzin. 2014. “The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and Geopolitical Anxieties about China’s Rise in the Asian Regional Order.” Australian Journal of International Affairs. 68 (4): 453-469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpora, Douglas V. 1997. “The Caterpillar’s Question: Contesting Anti-Humanism’s Contestations.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2/3): 243-263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese, Giulio. 2017a. “Japan's Kissinger? Yachi Shōtarō: The State Behind the Curtain.” Pacific Affairs 90 (2): 231-251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese, Giulio. 2017b. “Kantei Diplomacy? Japan’s Hybrid Leadership in Foreign and Security Policy.” The Pacific Review 30 (2): 152-168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese, Giulio, and Patalano, Alessio. 2020. “Diplomatic and Security Practice under Abe Shinzō: The Case for Realpolitik Japan.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 74 (6): 615-632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Yaqing. 2009. “Relationality and Processual Construction: Bringing Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory.” Social Sciences in China 30 (4): 5-20.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Yaqing. 2016. “A Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 18 (1): 33-47.
   Google Scholar
• Rösch, Felix. and Atsuko Watanabe. 2017. “Approaching the Unsynthesizable in International Politics: Giving Substance to Security Discourse Through Basso Ostinato?” European Journal of International Relations 23 (3): 609-629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, Ash. 2018. “The ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’ Strategy and Japan’s Emerging Security Posture.” Rising Powers Quarterly 3 (2): 113-131.
   Google Scholar
• Rumley, Dennis, Timothy Doyle, and Sanjay Chaturvedi. 2012. “‘Securing’ the Indian Ocean? Competing Regional Security Constructions.” Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 8 (1): 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Greg. 2006. “Alfred Thayer Mahan and American Geopolitics: The Conservatism and Realism of an Imperialist.” Geopolitics 11 (1): 119-140.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, Kyle Michael James. 2020. “Virtues and Ethics within Watsuji Tetsurō’s Rinrigaku.” Asian Philosophy 30 (1): 57-70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spykman, Nicholas J. 1938. “Geography and Foreign Policy, I.” The American Political Science Review 32 (1): 28-50.
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, Nicholas J. 1942. “Frontiers, Security, and International Organization.” Geographical Review 32 (3): 436-447.
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, Nicholas J. and Rollins, Abbie A. 1939. “Geographic Objectives in Foreign Policy, I.” The American Political Science Review 33 (3): 391-410.
   Google Scholar
• Standfield, Catriona. 2020. “Gendering the Practice Turn in Diplomacy.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (1): 140-165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, Harvey, and Siverson, Randolph M. 1990. “Alliances and Geopolitics.” Political Geography Quarterly 9 (3): 232-248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Philip E. 2001. The Social Construction of the Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumida, Jon. 1999. “Alfred Thayer Mahan, Geopolitician.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 22 (2-3): 39-62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Shogo. 2005. “Japan’s Socialization into Janus-faced European International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 137-64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takei Tomohisa. 2015. “Tatakai no umi kara han-ei no umi e.” Kaikankō senryaku kenkyū 5 (2): 2-20.
   Google Scholar
• Takizaki Shigeki. 2018. “Indo-Taiheiyō no ‘Seikō monogatari’ wo tsumikasane yo.” Gaikō 52: 20-27.
   Google Scholar
• Wakamiya Yoshibumi. 2006. Wakai to nashonarizumu. Tokyo: Asahi shimbun shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. The Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Atsuko. 2018. “Greater East Asia Geopolitics and Its Geopolitical Imagination of a Borderless World: A neglected Tradition?” Political Geography 67: 23-32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Atsuko. 2019. “Pacific for Whom: The Ocean in Japan.” In Critical International Relations Theories in East Asia, edited by Kosuke Shimizu, 138-156. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Watsuji Tetsurō. 1979. Fūdo: ningengaku-teki kōsatsu. Tokyo: Iwanami bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Watsuji Tetsurō. 2007a. Rinrigaku, Volume 1. Tokyo: Iwanami bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Watsuji Tetsurō. 2007b. Rinrigaku, Volume 2. Tokyo: Iwanami bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Watsuji Tetsurō. 2007c. Rinrigaku, Volume 3. Tokyo: Iwanami bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Watsuji Tetsurō. 2007d. Rinrigaku, Volume 4. Tokyo: Iwanami bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Watsuji Tetsurō. 2007e. Ningen no gaku to shite no rinrigaku. Tokyo: Iwanami bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations.” International Organization 41 (3): 335-370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391-425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Rob. and Arif Dirlik. 1995. “Introduction.” In Asia-Pacific as Space of Cultural Production, edited by Rob Wilson and Arif Dirlik, 1-14. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Zhengyu. 2018. “Classical Geopolitics, Realism and The Balance of Power Theory.” Journal of Strategic Studies 41 (6): 786-823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yachi Shōtarō. 2013. “Abe senryaku-gaikō no kakushin”. Gaikō 18: 27-33.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2017. “Japan’s Export of Infrastructure Systems: Pursuing Twin Goals Through Developmental Means.” The Pacific Review 30 (4): 494-512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2018. “Japan’s Role Conception in Multilateral Initiatives: The Evolution from Hatoyama to Abe.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72 (2): 129-144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar