What peacekeeping leaves behind: evaluating the effects of multi-dimensional peace operations in Africa

References

• Agoglia, John, Michael Dziedzic and Barbara Sotirin, 2010. Measuring Progress in Conflict Environments (MPICE). United States Institute for Peace. Available at: http://www.usip.org/publications/measuring-progress-in-conflict-environments-mpice-0 [Accessed 9 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Akpasom, Yvonne, 2016. ‘What Roles for the Civilian and Police Dimensions in African Peace Operations’. In The Future of African Peace Operations, eds. Cedric De Conning, Linnea Gelot and John Karlsrud. Zed Books, London, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig, Malte, 2014. ‘EU Peacekeeping in Africa: From Niche Selection to Interlocking Security’. International Peacekeeping 21(1), 74–90.10.1080/13533312.2014.899124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, David, 2015. ‘Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus: From Securitising Intervention to Resilience’. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development 4(1) 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Conning, Cedric, Linnea Gelot and John Karlsrud, 2016. ‘Towards an African Model for Peace Operations’. In The Future of African Peace Operations, eds. Cedric De Conning, Linnea Gelot and John Karlsrud. Zed Books, London, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dersso, Solomon, 2016. ‘Stabilisation Missions and Mandates in African Peace Operations: Implications for the ASF’. In The Future of African Peace Operations, eds. Cedric De Conning, Linnea Gelot and John Karlsrud. Zed Books, London, 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, Paul F. and Daniel Druckman, 2012. ‘Peace Operation Success: The Evaluation Framework’. Journal of International Peacekeeping 16, 209–225.10.1163/18754112-1604002
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, F. Paul and Daniel Druckman, 2010. Evaluating Peace Operations. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael and Nicholas Sambanis, 2000. ‘International Peacebuilding: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis’. American Political Science Review 94(4), 779–801.10.2307/2586208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortna, Virginia, 2004. ‘Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace after Civil War’. International Studies Quarterly 48, 269–292.10.1111/isqu.2004.48.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortna, Virginia, 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander and Andrew Bennett, 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, Michael and Paul Diehl, 2012. ‘Peacekeeping: A Barrier to Durable Peace?’. Yale Journal of International Affairs 7(1), 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, Caroline, Matthew Hoddie and Donald Rothchild, 2001. ‘Stabilizing the Peace after Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables’. International Organization 55(1), 183–208.10.1162/002081801551450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegemann, Hendrik, Regina Heller and Martin Kahl (eds.), 2013. Studying ‘Effectiveness’ in International Relations a Guide for Students and Scholar. Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen.
   Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Lisa Hultman and Håvard Nygård, 2015. ‘Evaluating the Conflict-Reducing Effect of UN Peacekeeping Operations’. University of California, Center for Effective Global Action. Available at: http://cega.berkeley.edu/assets/miscellaneous_files/122_-_Hegre_Hultman_Nygard_-_PKO_prediction_2015_-_ABCA.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Holt, Victoria and Glyn Taylor, 2009. Protecting Civilians in the Context of UN Peacekeeping Operations; Successes, Setbacks and Remaining Challenges. United Nations, New York. Available at: https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/Protecting%20Civilians%20in%20the%20Context%20of%20UN%20Peacekeeping%20Operations.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, Lisa, Jacob Kathman and Megan Shannon, 2014. ‘Beyond Keeping Peace: United Nations Effectiveness in the midst of Fighting’. American Political Science Review 108(4), 737–753.10.1017/S0003055414000446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, Lisa, Jacob Kathman and Megan Shannon, 2013. ‘United Nations Peacekeeping and Civilian Protection in Civil War’. American Journal of Political Science 57(4), 875–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, Lisa, 2010. ‘Keeping Peace or Spurring Violence? Unintended Effects of Peace Operations on Violence against Civilians’. Civil Wars 12, 29–46.10.1080/13698249.2010.484897
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Security Studies, 2014. Gender in Peacekeeping, a Practioners Manual for Police Gender in Peacekeeping. Available at: https://www.issafrica.org/uploads/Gender-in-Peacekeeping-2014-Manual.pdf [Accessed 20 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Kahl, Martin, 2013. ‘Causes, Effects and Effectiveness – Conceptual, Epistemological and Methodological Considerations’. In Studying ‘Effectiveness’ in International Relations a Guide for Students and Scholar, eds. Hendrik Hegemann, Regina Heller and Martin Kahl. Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen, 35–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, David and Chrisopher Fariss, 2014. ‘Why International Trusteeship Fails: The Politics of External Authority in Areas of Limited Statehood’. Governance 27(4), 569–587.10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolf, Peter, 2015. ‘Friedensoperationen: Wirksamkeit Und Erfolgsbedingungen [Peace operations: Efficiency and conditions for Success]’. SWP-Aktuell 68, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sambanis, Nicholas, 2008. ‘Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of United Nations Peace Operations’. The World Bank Economic Review 22, 9–32.10.1093/wber/lhm022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Ursula, 2013. ‘Gauging the Effectiveness of Post-Conflict Peace- and State-Building’. In Studying ‘Effectiveness’ in International Relations a Guide for Students and Scholar, eds. Hendrik Hegemann, Regina Heller and Martin Kahl. Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen, 217–236.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, Thierry, 2014. ‘Hybrid Peace Operations: Rationale and Challenges’. Global Governance 20(1), 95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Army, 1994. Peace Operation. Field Manual 100-23. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 2015. Peacekeeping Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/archive/2015/bnote0115.pdf [Accessed 23 August 2016].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), Peacekeeping Security Sector Reforms. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/issues/security.shtml [Accessed 23 August 2016].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG), 2001. ‘No Exit without Strategy: Security Council Decision-Making and the Closure or Transition of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations’. Report of the Secretary-General, 20 April.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG), 2005. ‘In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All’. Report of the UN Secretary-General, New York, 21 March. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/59/2005 [Accessed 3 June 2016].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Operations (UN DPKO/DFS), 2008. ‘The Capstone Doctrine, United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Principles and Guidelines’. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/documents/capstone_eng.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2016].
   Google Scholar