References
- Aguilar-Støen, M., 2017. ‘Better Safe than Sorry? Indigenous Peoples, Carbon Cowboys and the Governance of REDD in the Amazon’. Forum for Development Studies 44(1), 91–108.
- Alvarado, L., 2018. ‘Costa Rica Needs to Address the Contamination of Its Rivers’. Available at: https://news.co.cr/costa-rica-important-issue-contamination-of-rivers/70150/ [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Arhin, A.A., 2014. ‘Safeguards and Dangerguards: A Framework for Unpacking the Black Box of Safeguards for REDD+’. Forest Policy and Economics 45, 24–31.
- Arriagada, R.A., E.O. Sills, P.J. Ferraro and S.K. Pattanayak, 2015. ‘Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica’s PES Program’. PloS one 10(7), e0131544.
- Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica, 1949. ‘Constitución Política de la República de Costa Rica’. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnacf600.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Asiyanbi, A.P., 2016. ‘A Political Ecology of REDD+: Property Rights, Militarised Protectionism, and Carbonised Exclusion in Cross River’. Geoforum 77, 146–156.
- Barquero, M., 2018. ‘Estudio de UCR detecta residuos de plaguicidas, en bajas concentraciones, en fuentes de agua de zona norte’. Available at: https://www.nacion.com/economia/agro/estudio-de-ucr-detecta-residuos-de-plaguicidas-en/FFISZZCTM5FVHFS734VLCTMYL4/story/ [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Borge Carvajal, C., 2003. PSA Indigena. MINAE-ACLAC-FONAFIFO, San José, Costa Rica.
- Brand, U., C. Görg, J. Hirsch and M. Wissen, 2008. Regulation and the Internationalisation of the State. Routledge, London.
- Bryant, R.L. and S. Bailey, 1997. Third World Political Ecology. Routledge, London.
- Carmody, P. and D. Taylor, 2016. ‘Globalization, Land Grabbing, and the Present-Day Colonial State in Uganda: Ecolonization and Its Impacts’. Journal of Environment & Development 25(1), 100–126.
- ClientEarth, 2013. ‘Submission to the FCPF Carbon Fund on the Methodological Framework’. Available at: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2013/May2013/Binder11.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Coalition for Rainforest Nations, 2018. ‘Vision’. Available at: https://www.rainforestcoalition.org/ [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Corson, C. and I. MacDonald, 2012. ‘Enclosing the Global Commons: The Convention on Biological Diversity and Green Grabbing’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(2), 263–283.
- Costa Rica, 1977. ‘Ley Indígena, San José’. Available at: https://theredddesk.org/countries/laws/costa-rican-indigenous-law-law-6172-1977 [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Cultural Survival, 2015. ‘Costa Rica Struggles with Indigenous Land Rights’. Available at: https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/costa-rica-struggles-indigenous-land-rights [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Dooley, K., T. Griffiths, F. Martone and S. Ozinga, 2011. Smoke and Mirrors: A Critical Assessment of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. FERN and Forest Peoples Programme, Brussels.
- Engwicht, N., 2018. ‘The Local Translation of Global Norms: The Sierra Leonean Diamond Market’. Conflict, Security & Development,this issue.
- Fairhead, J., M. Leach and I. Scoones, 2012. ‘Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(2), 237–261.
- Fisher, R. and R. Lyster, 2013. ‘Land and Resource Tenure: The Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Forest Dwellers’. In Law, Tropical Forests and Carbon, eds. R. Lyster, C. MacKenzie and C. McDermott. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 187–206.
- Florian Rivero, E., 2016. Fortaleciendo capacidades de negociación, integración y representatividad en los procesos de la estrategia REDD+ para el territorio Salitre del pueblo bribri en Costa Rica (I). UICN. Conabio, Proyecto Proforco, San José, Costa Rica.
- Florian Rivero, E., 2017. Fortaleciendo capacidades de negociación, integración y representatividad en los procesos de la estrategia REDD+ para el territorio Salitre del pueblo bribri en Costa Rica (II). UICN. Conabio, Proyecto Proforco, San José, Costa Rica.
- Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO), 2017. ‘Indigenous Women Working in the Development Strategy of REDD+’. Available at: http://www.reddcr.go.cr/en/indigenous-women-working-development-strategy-redd [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), 2013. ‘World Bank Safeguard Policies and the UNFCCC REDD+ Safeguards’. Available at: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2013/june2013/FMT%20Note%20CF-2013-3_FCPF%20WB%20Safeguard%20Policies%20and%20UNFCCC%20REDD%2B%20Safeguards_FINAL.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), 2017. ‘The Carbon Fund’. Available at: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/carbon-fund-0 [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Forest Peoples Programme, 2013. ‘Costa Rica: Indigenous Peoples Suffer Violent Attacks for Demanding Recognition of Their Land Rights’. Available at: https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/topics/rights-land-natural-resources/news/2013/02/costa-rica-indigenous-peoples-suffer-violent-attack [Accessed 2 February 2018].
- Forests News, 2018. ‘Durban Talks Both Good and Bad for REDD+, Says Expert’. Available at: https://forestsnews.cifor.org/6507/durban-talks-both-good-and-bad-for-redd-says-expert?fnl=en [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Geist, H. and E. Lambin, 2002. ‘Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation’. BioScience 52(2), 143–150.
- Gómez-Baggethun, E., R. de Groot, P.L. Lomas and C. Montes, 2010. ‘The History of Ecosystem Services in Economic Theory and Practice: From Early Notions to Markets and Payment Schemes’. Ecological Economics 69, 1209–1218.
- Gover, K., 2016. ‘REDD+, Tenure and Indigenous Property: The Promise and Peril of a Human Rights-Based Approach’. In Research Handbook on REDD+ and International Law, ed. C. Voigt. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 249–288.
- Gregory, G. and I. Vaccaro, 2015. ‘Islands of Governmentality: Rainforest Conservation, Indigenous Rights, and the Territorial Reconfiguration of Guyanese Sovereignty’. Territory, Politics, Governance 3(3), 344–363.
- Howson, P., 2018. ‘Slippery Violence in the REDD+ Forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia’. Conservation and Society 16(2), 136–146.
- Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC), 2011. X Censo Nacional de Población y VI de vivienda 2011-Territorios indígenas principales indicadores demográficos y socioeconómicos. INEC, San José, Costa Rica.
- International Labour Office (ILO), 2017. Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change. ILO, Geneva.
- Jodoin, S., 2016. ‘The Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Forest-Dependent Communities in the Complex Legal Framework for REDD+’. In Research Handbook on REDD+ and International Law, ed. C. Voigt. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 157–185.
- Kashwan, P., 2017. Democracy in the Woods: Environmental Conservation and Social Justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Le Billon, P., 2016. ‘Key Note’. Presentation at the POLLEN Conference ‘Political Ecologies of Conflict, Capitalism and Contestation (PE-3C)’, University of Wageningen.
- Lederer, M., L. Wallbott and S. Bauer, 2018. ‘Tracing Sustainability Transformations and Drivers of Green Economy Approaches in the Global South’. Journal of Environment and Development 27(1), 3–25.
- Lee, D. and T. Pistorius, 2015. The Impacts of International REDD+ Finance. Climate and Land Use Alliance, San Francisco.
- Levin, K., C. McDermott and B. Cashore, 2008. ‘The Climate Regime as Global Forest Governance: Can Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) Initiatives Pass a “Dual Effectiveness” Test?’. International Forestry Review 10(3), 538–549.
- McDermott, C., 2013. ‘REDD+ and Multi-Level Governance: Governing for What and for Whom?’. In Law, Tropical Forests and Carbon, eds. R. Lyster, C. MacKenzie and C. McDermott. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 84–101.
- Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE), 2016. Forest Reference Emission Level/Forest Reference Level. Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat for Technical Review according to Decision 13/CP.19. FONAFIFO, San José, Costa Rica.
- Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE), 2017. Emission Reductions Program to the FCPF Carbon Fund. FONAFIFO, San José, Costa Rica.
- Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE), 2017. Plan De Implementación De La Estrategia Nacional REDD+ Costa Rica. FONAFIFO, San José, Costa Rica.
- Peluso, N.L. and M. Watts, 2001. Violent Environments. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
- Phelps, J., 2015. ‘REDD+ Forest Carbon Investments, Biodiversity and the Promise of a Green Economy’. In Biodiversity in the Green Economy, eds. A. Gasparatos and K.J. Willis. Routledge, New York, 262–285.
- Porras, I., D.N. Barton, M. Miranda and A. Chacón-Cascante, 2013. Learning from 20 Years of Payments for Ecosystem Services in Costa Rica. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
- Prause, L., 2018. ‘Land Grabs as “Shrinking Spaces” for Civil Society?’. Resources and Conflict. Available at: http://resources-and-conflict.org/2018/01/land-grabs-as-shrinking-spaces/ [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD Desk), 2014. ‘REDD in Costa Rica’. Available at: https://theredddesk.org/countries/costa-rica [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Robbins, P., 2004. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
- Rosendal, G.K. and P.J. Schei, 2014. ‘How May REDD+ Affect the Practical, Legal and Institutional Framework for ‘Payment for Ecosystem Services’ in Costa Rica?’. Ecosystem Services 9, 75–82.
- Sánchez-Azofeifa, G.A., A. Pfaff, J.A. Robalino and J.P. Boomhower, 2007. ‘Costa Rica’s Payment for Environmental Services Program: Intention, Implementation, and Impact’. Conservation Biology 21(5), 1165–1173.
- Sandbrook, C., F. Nelson, W.M. Adams and A. Agrawal, 2010. ‘Carbon, Forests and the REDD Paradox’. Oryx 44(3), 330–334.
- Sassen, S., 2013. ‘When Territory Deborders Territoriality’. Territory, Politics, Governance 1(1), 21–45.
- Savaresi, A., 2016. ‘The Legal Status and Role of Safeguards’. In Research Handbook on REDD+ and International Law, ed. C. Voigt. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 126–156.
- Schilling, J., C. Saulich and N. Engwicht, 2018. ‘Introduction: A Local to Global Perspective on Resource Governance and Conflict’. Conflict, Security & Development, this issue.
- Springate-Baginski, O. and E. Wollenberg (eds.) 2010. REDD+, Forest Governance and Rural Livelihoods: The Emerging Agenda. CIFOR, Bogor.
- Sunderlin, W.D., C. de Sassi, E.O. Sills, A.E. Duchelle, A.M. Larson, I.A.P. Resosudarmo, A. Awono, D.L. Kweka and T.B. Huynh, 2018. ‘Creating an Appropriate Tenure Foundation for REDD+: The Record to Date and Prospects for the Future’. World Development 106, 376–392.
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2011. ‘Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Sixteenth Session, Held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Decision 1/CP.16’. Available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf [Accessed 2 February 2018].
- United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN OHCHR), 2015. ‘Report on the Grave and Persistent Violation of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Costa Rica’. 87th Session of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, 3–28 August 2015. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:y38CYmeRUwcJ:https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CERD/Shared%2520Documents/CRI/INT_CERD_NGO_CRI_21202_E.doc+&cd=1&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&client=firefox-b-ab [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD), 2010. ‘Frequently Asked Questions and Answers – REDD+ and the UN-REDD Programme’. Available at: http://www.unredd.net/index.php?view=download&alias=6207-un-redd-faqs-and-answers-june-2010-1-6207&category_slug=additional-resources-1312&option=com_docman&Itemid=134 [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD), 2014. ‘Targeted Support 2nd Request Response Aug 2014 Approval’. Available at: https://unredd.net/documents/global-programme-191/targeted-support-2472/countries-3630/costa-rica-2481/13682-ts-cri-2nd-request-response-aug-2014-13682.html [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD), 2018. ‘About REDD+’. Available at: http://www.unredd.net/about/what-is-redd-plus.html [Accessed 8 August 2018].
- Voigt, C., 2016. ‘Introduction: The Kaleidoscopic World of REDD+’. In Research Handbook on REDD+ and International Law, ed. C. Voigt. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1–7.
- Voigt, C. and F. Ferreira, 2015. ‘The Warsaw Framework for REDD+: Implications for National Implementation and Access to Results-Based Finance’. Carbon & Climate Law Review 9(2), 113–129.
- Wallbott, L., 2014. ‘Indigenous Peoples in UN REDD+ Negotiations: “Importing Power” and Lobbying for Rights through Discursive Interplay Management’. Ecology and Society 19(1), 21.
- Wallbott, L., 2016. ‘The Practices of Lobbying for Rights in the Anthropocene Era: Local Communities, Indigenous Peoples and International Climate Negotiations’. In Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene. Institutions and Legitimacy in a Complex World, eds. P. Pattberg and F. Zelli. Routledge, New York, 213–230.
- Wallbott, L. and G.K. Rosendal, 2018. ‘Safeguards, Standards and the Science-Policy Interfaces of REDD+: Greening Land Use through Forest-Based Mitigation in Costa Rica?’. Journal of Environment and Development 27(1), 99–125.
- Werksman, J., 2010. ‘Q&A: The Legal Character and Legitimacy of the Cancun Agreements’. Available at: http://www.wri.org/stories/2010/12/qa-legal-character-and-legitimacy-cancun-agreements [Accessed 28 September 2018].
- Wissen, M., 2011. Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse in der Internationalisierung des Staates. Konflikte um die Räumlichkeit staatlicher Politik und die Kontrolle natürlicher Ressourcen. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster.