‘To romanticise or not to romanticise the local’: local agency and peacebuilding in the Balkans

References

• Abadi, C., 2019. ‘The Small War that Wasn’t: Why the Kosovo Conflict Still Matters Today’. Foreign Policy. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/01/02/the-small-war-that-wasnt/ [Accessed 2 January 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., 2014. ‘Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies’. International Studies Quarterly 58(4), 647–659. doi:10.1111/isqu.12171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and V. Pouliot, 2011. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3(1), 1–36. doi:10.1017/S175297191000031X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S., 2010. The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C., 2019. ‘Veteran Masculinities and Audiovisual Popular Music in Post-Conflict Croatia: A Feminist Aesthetic Approach to the Contested Everyday Peace’. Peacebuilding 7(2), 226–242. doi:10.1080/21647259.2019.1588454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakić-Hayden, M., 1995. ‘Nesting Orientalism: The Case of Former Yugoslavia’. Slavic Review 54(4), 917–931. doi:10.2307/2501399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, W., 2009. ‘Economic Development in the European Super-Periphery: Evidence from the Western Balkans’. Economic Annals 54(10), 21–44. doi:10.2298/EKA0981021B.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, R., 2001. ‘Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina’. Journal of Peace Research 38(2), 163–180. doi:10.1177/0022343301038002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict, R., 2006. Patterns of Culture. A Mariner Book, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Bergholz, M., 2016. Violence as a Generative Force: Identity, Nationalism, and Memory in a Balkan Community. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bešić, M. and N. Džuverović, 2020. ‘How Many Truths are There? Reconciliation and Agonistic Dialogue in the Former Yugoslavia’. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20(3), 455–472. doi:10.1080/14683857.2020.1793463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorkdahl, A. and I. Gusic, 2015. ‘‘Global’ Norms and ‘Local’ Agency - Frictional Peace-building in Kosovo’. Journal of International Relations and Development 18, 265–287. doi:10.1057/jird.2015.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorkdahl, A., K. Höglund, G. Millar, J. van der Lijn, and W. Verkoren, (eds.), 2016. Peacebuilding and Friction: Global and Local Encounters in Post-Conflict Societies. Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorkdahl, A. and K. Höglund, 2013. ‘Precarious Peacebuilding: Friction in Global–local Encounters’. Peacebuilding 1(3), 289–299. doi:10.1080/21647259.2013.813170.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, J., B.C. Hayes, F. Teeney, K. Dudgeon, N. Mueller-Hirth and S.L. Wijesinghe, (eds.), 2018. The Sociology of Everyday Life Peacebuilding. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., 2006. ‘State-Building in Bosnia: The Limits of ‘Informal Trusteeship’. International Journal of Peace Studies 11(1), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., 2007. ‘EU Statebuilding: Securing the Liberal Peace through EU Enlargement’. Global Society 21(4), 593–607. doi:10.1080/13600820701562850.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., 2014. ‘‘Resilience and the ‘Everyday’: Beyond the Paradox of ‘Liberal Peace”’. Review of International Studies 41(1), 27–48. doi:10.1017/S0260210513000533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conference on Yugoslavia Arbitration Commission, 1992. ‘Opinions on Questions Arising from Dissolution of Yugoslavia’. 11 January and 4 July.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, S. and N. Vaughan-Williams, 2017. ‘Fit for Purpose? Fitting Ontological Security Studies ‘Into’ the Discipline of International Relations: Towards a Vernacular Turn’. Cooperation and Conflict 52(1), 12–30. doi:10.1177/0010836716653159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, A., 2016. ‘Informality and Peacebuilding: Field Notes on the Intrinsic Reproductive Principles of Informal Economic Practices in Post-Conflict Kosovo’. International Peacekeeping 23(1), 1–28. doi:10.1080/13533312.2015.1058163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, A., 2016. ‘Reforming and Performing the Informal Economy: Constitutive Effects of the World Bank’s Anti-Informality Practices in Kosovo’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10(2), 241–260. doi:10.1080/17502977.2015.1137393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, L., 2017. ‘Against Standardization of Memory’. Human Rights Quarterly 39(2), 296–318. doi:10.1353/hrq.2017.0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denskus, T., 2007. ‘Peacebuilding Does Not Build Peace’. Development in Practice 17(4/5), 656–662. doi:10.1080/09614520701469906.
   Google Scholar
• Desch, M.C., 2007. ‘America’s Liberal Illiberalism’. International Security 32(3), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distler, W., 2018. ‘“And Everybody Did Whatever They Wanted to Do”: Informal Practices of International Statebuilders in Kosovo’. Civil Wars 20(2), 287–303. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1480581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distler, W., E.B. Stavrevska and B. Vogel, 2018. ‘Economies of Peace: Economy Formation Processes and Outcomes in Conflict-Affected Societies’. Civil Wars 20(2), 139–150. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1500164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divjak, B. and M. Pugh, 2008. ‘The Political Economy of Corruption in Bosnia and Herzegovina’. International Peacekeeping 15(3), 373–386. doi:10.1080/13533310802058927.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, M.E., 2009. High Albania. Echo Library, Teddington.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, M.E., 2012. Through the Lands of the Serb. Nabu Press, Charleston.
   Google Scholar
• Džuverović, N., 2018. ‘Why Local Voices Matter. Participation of Local Researchers in the Liberal Peace Debate’. Peacebuilding 6(2), 111–126. doi:10.1080/21647259.2018.1449186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Džuverović, N., 2019. ‘Contextualization of the Local. A Predisposition of Former Yugoslav States to Liberal Peace’. Southeastern Europe 43(2), 135–157. doi:10.1163/18763332-04302004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Džuverović, N. and A. Milošević, 2020. ‘Belgrade to Belgradians, Not Foreign Capitalists’: International Statebuilding, Contentious Politics, and New Forms of Political Representation in Serbia’. East European Politics and Societies. doi:10.1177/0888325420904441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Džuverović, N. and G. Tepšić, 2020. ‘Neoliberal Co-optation, Power Relations and Informality in the Balkan International Relations Profession’. International Relations 34(1), 84–104. doi:10.1177/0047117819897303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Džuverović, N. and J. Vidojević, 2017. ‘Peacebuilding or ‘Peacedelaying’: Social Exclusion of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons in Post-war Serbia’. Ethnopolitics 17(1), 55–70. doi:10.1080/17449057.2017.1340476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efendi, E., 1846. Narrative of Travels in Europe, Asia, and Africa, in the Seventeenth Century, by Evliyá Efendí. Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F., 2018. ‘Local Ownership as International Governmentality: Evidence from the EU Mission in the Horn of Africa’. Contemporary Security Policy 39(1), 28–50. doi:10.1080/13523260.2017.1384231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekmečić, M., 1989. Stvaranje Jugoslavije 1790-1918. Prosveta, Beograd.
   Google Scholar
• Elena, S.B., 2018. ‘The Mother, the Wife, the Entrepreneur? Women’s Agency and Microfinance in a Disappearing Post-Conflict Welfare State Context’. Civil Wars 20(2), 193–216. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1498217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, D., 2007. ‘Identity and Victimhood: Questions for Conflict Management Practice’. Occasional Paper 28, Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. and M. Pandolfi, 2013. Contemporary States of Emergency: The Politics of Military and Humanitarian Interventions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Firchow, P., 2018. Reclaiming Everyday Peace: Local Voices in Measurement and Evaluation after War. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., 1996. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. PRIO/Sage, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P., 2017. ‘Post-Yugoslav Everyday Activism(s): A Different Form of Activist Citizenship?’. Europe-Asia Studies 69(9), 1455–1472. doi:10.1080/09668136.2017.1385728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves-Brown, P., 2007. ‘Avtomat Kalashnikova’. Journal of Material Culture 12(3), 285–307. doi:10.1177/1359183507081896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, S., 2011. Aid, Peacebuilding and the Resurgence of War: Buying Time in Sri Lanka. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., 2009. ‘After the Red Passport: Towards an Anthropology of the Everyday Geopolitics of Entrapment in the EU’s “Immediate Outside”’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(4), 815–832. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01586.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., 2013. ‘If Reconciliation Is the Answer, are We Asking the Right Questions?’. Studies in Social Justice 7(2), 229–243. doi:10.26522/ssj.v7i2.1045.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., 1993. Balkan Ghosts: A Journey Through History. St. Martin’s Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kappler, S., 2013. ‘Everyday Legitimacy in Post-Conflict Spaces: The Creation of Social Legitimacy in Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Cultural Arenas’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 7(1), 11–28. doi:10.1080/17502977.2012.655614.
   Google Scholar
• Karan, M., 1985. Krvna Osveta. Partizanska knjiga, Beograd.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., 1995. ‘The Negotiator’. New Yorker, 6 November.
   Google Scholar
• Kipling, R., 1899. The White Man’s Burden: A Poem. Doubleday and McClure Co, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kostić, R., 2012. ‘Transitional Justice and Reconciliation in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Whose Memories, Whose Justice?’. Sociologija 54(4), 649–666. doi:10.2298/SOC1204649K.
   Google Scholar
• Kostic, R., 2017. ‘Shadow Peacebuilders and Diplomatic Counterinsurgencies: Informal Networks, Knowledge Production and the Art of Policy-Shaping’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11(1), 120–139. doi:10.1080/17502977.2016.1272905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovačević, Ž., 2004. Međunarodno Pregovaranje. Filip Višnjić, Beograd.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., 1962. The History of Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lemay-Hébert, N. and S. Kappler, 2016. ‘What Attachment to Peace? Exploring the Normative and Material Dimensions of Local Ownership in Peacebuilding’. Review of International Studies 42(5), 895–914. doi:10.1017/S0260210516000061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp, E., 2018. ‘Division on Ice: Shared Space and Civility in Modern Belfast’. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 13(1), 32–45. doi:10.1080/15423166.2018.1427135.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., 2010. ‘Hybrid Peace: The Interaction between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Peace’. Security Dialogue 41(4), 391–412. doi:10.1177/0967010610374312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., 2014. ‘Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies’. Security Dialogue 45(6), 548–564. doi:10.1177/0967010614550899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., 2015. ‘Where Is the Local? Critical Localism and Peacebuilding’. Third World Quarterly 36(5), 840–856. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1045482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., 2017. ‘A Material Turn in International Relations: The 4x4, Intervention and Resistance’. Review of International Studies 43(5), 855–874. doi:10.1017/S0260210517000146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. and O. Richmond, 2013. ‘The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace’. Third World Quarterly 34(5), 763–783. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.800750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaspac, N.V., 2018. ‘Suspicion and Ethnographic Peace Research (Notes from a Local Researcher)’. International Peacekeeping 2(5), 677–694. doi:10.1080/13533312.2017.1358622.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. and V. Bojicic-Dzelilovic, 2017. ‘”It’s Not Just the Economy, Stupid’. The Multi-directional Security Effects of the Private Sector in Post-conflict Reconstruction’. Conflict, Security & Development 17(4), 361–380. doi:10.1080/14678802.2017.1324663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, M., 2001. Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. Perennial, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Milekić, S., 2017. ‘War Criminal Praljak’s Death Commemorated in Croatia’. Balkan Insight, Available at: https://balkaninsight.com/2017/12/11/zagreb-commemorates-praljak-by-rejecting-verdict-12-11-2017/ [Accessed 24 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Miljanov, M., 2014. Primeri čojstva i junaštva. Algoritam, Beograd.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, G., 2011. An Ethnographic Approach to Peacebuilding: Understanding Local Experiences in Transitional States. Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Mockaitis, T., 2008. ‘Reluctant Partners: Civil-Military Cooperation in Kosovo’. Small Wars and Insurgencies 15(2), 38–69. doi:10.1080/0959231042000282625.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I., 1999. Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolić-Ristanović, V., 2008. ‘Local Conflicts and International Interventions: Victimisation of Civilians and Possibilities for Restorative Global Responses’. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 11(2), 101–115. doi:10.1080/10282580802057702.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2007. ’Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States & Situations’. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/dac/conflict-fragility-resilience/docs/38368714.pdf [Accessed 7 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Öjendal, J. and O. Sivhouch, 2015. ‘The ‘Local Turn’ Saving Liberal Peacebuilding? Unpacking Virtual Peace in Cambodia’. Third World Quarterly 36(5), 929–949. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1030387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, T., 2015. ‘Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment Towards an Agenda for Future Research’’. Third World Quarterly 36(5), 857–874. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, R., 2010. ‘Saving Liberal Peacebuilding’. Review of International Studies 36(2), 337–365. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavković, N., 1993. ‘Krvna osveta i umir kao obred prelaza i kontinuiteta’. In Zbornik Filozofskog Fakulteta, ed. I. Ilić. Filozoski fakultet, Beograd, 611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, M., 2004. ‘Rubbing Salt into War Wounds: Shadow Economies and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Kosovo’. Problems of Post-Communism 51(3), 53–60. doi:10.1080/10758216.2004.11052171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, M., 2005. ‘The Political Economy of Peacebuilding: A Critical Theory Perspective’. International Journal of Peace Studies 10(2), 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, M., M. Turner and N. Cooper, (eds.), 2011. Whose Peace? Critical Perspectives on the Political Economy of Peacebuilding. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Ramović, J., 2018. ‘Looking into the past to See the Future? Lessons Learned from Self-Management for Economies in Post-Conflict Societies of the Former Yugoslavia’. Civil Wars 20(2), 171–192. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1497859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O., A. Björkdahl and S. Kappler, 2011. ‘The Emerging EU Peacebuilding Framework: Confirming or Transcending Liberal Peacebuilding?’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24(3), 449–469. doi:10.1080/09557571.2011.586331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P., 2006. ‘Patterns of Peace’. Global Society 20(4), 367–394. doi:10.1080/13600820600929705.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P., 2006. ‘‘The Problem of Peace: Understanding the ‘Liberal Peace”’. Conflict, Security & Development 6(3), 291–314. doi:10.1080/14678800600933480.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P., 2014. Failed Statebuilding. Yale University Press, New Heaven.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P., 2010. ‘Foucault and the Paradox of Peace-as-Governance versus Everyday Agency’. International Political Sociology 4(2), 199–202. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00100_3.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P. and A. Mitchell, (eds.), 2011. Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P., S. Pogodda and J. Ramović, (eds.), 2016. The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E., 1979. Orientalism. Random House, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schierenbeck, I., 2015. ‘Beyond the Local Turn Divide: Lessons Learnt, Relearnt and Unlearnt’. Third World Quarterly 36(5), 1023–1032. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1043991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1992. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale University Press, New Heaven.
   Google Scholar
• Shapira, H., 2013. ‘The Border: Infrastructure of the Global’. Public Culture 25(2), 249–260. doi:10.1215/08992363-2020584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, C. and F. Zanker, 2014. ‘Questing the Local in Peacebuidling’. Working Papers Series: Adaptation and Creativity in Africa: Technologies and Significations in the Making of Order and Disorder, Leipzig and Halle.
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, J., 2011. ‘Expanding the Scope of Post-Conflict Justice: Individual, State and Societal Responsibility for Mass Atrocity’. Journal of Peace Research 48(2), 157–169. doi:10.1177/0022343310394696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepšić, G., 2017. ‘Building Nations Instead of Peace(s): The Bosnian Metaconflict’. Serbian Political Thought 16(2), 22–38. doi:10.22182/spt.1622017.2.
   Google Scholar
• Tepšić, G. and N. Džuverović, 2018. ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina’. In The Elgar Companion to Post-Conflict Transition, eds. H.J. Giessmann and R.M. Ginty. Edward Elgar, London, 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Todorova, M., 2008. Imagining the Balkans. OUP, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Touval, S., 2002. Mediation in the Yugoslav Wars: The Critical Years, 1990-95. Palgrave MacMillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Trojanović, S. and M. Gajić, 1901. Krv i umir kod Srba i Arnauta. Štamparija Petra Ćurčića, Beograd.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 1991. United Nations Security Resolution 721, 27 November.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 1992. United Nations Security Resolution 757, 30 May.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 1992. United Nations Security Resolution 787, 16 November.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 1993. United Nations Security Resolution 820, 17 April.
   Google Scholar
• Ustinov, P. The European, 10 June 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G., 2012. ‘Three Levels of Hybridisation Practices in Post-conflict Kosovo’. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(2), 23–36. doi:10.1080/15423166.2012.743807.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, B., 2016. ‘Civil Society Capture: Top-Down Interventions from Below?’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10(4), 472–489. doi:10.1080/17502977.2016.1192786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., 2006. Black Lamb and Grey Falcon. Canongate, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., 2005. Liberalism at War: The Victors and Vanquished. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Zaum, D. and C. Cheng, 2011. Selling the Peace: Corruption and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Zwierzchowski, J. and E. Tabeau, 2010. ‘Census-Based Multiple System Estimation as an Unbiased Method of Estimation of Casualties’ Undercount’. Conference Paper for the European Population Conference, 1–4 September 2010, Vienna. Available at: http://epc2010.princeton.edu/papers/100880/ [Accesased 24 September 2019].
   Google Scholar