Transitional justice interventions in Sri Lanka: why do they keep failing?

References

• Adayaalam Centre for Policy Research, 2023. Joint Statement: On the Inadequacy of a ‘Truth and Reconciliation Mechanism’ to Achieve Post-War Transitional Justice, 19 July.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Ameer, 2022. ‘Cleansing Sri Lanka of ethnonationalism’, Colombo Telegraph, 25 February.
   Google Scholar
• Annez, Shihar and Ranga Sirilal. 2015. ‘Rajapaksa Criticizes U.N. Findings on Sri Lanka War crimes’. Reuters, 23 September.
   Google Scholar
• Attanayake, Chulanee and Roshni Kapur. 2018. ‘Maithripala Sirisena: A President Mired in Controversy’. ISAS Brief (617), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, Daniel and Amarnath. Amarasingam. 2016. ‘Introduction: Problems and Prospects for Post-War Sri Lanka’. In Sri Lanka: The Struggle for Peace in the Aftermath of War, Amarnath Amarasingam and Daniel Bass. Hurst & Co, London, 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, Elena. 2008. Tribunal-Hopping with the Post-Conflict Justice Junkies. Pittsburgh University School of Law, Pittsburgh, 368–374.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. African Union in Rift with Court. 3 July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cawthra, Gavin and Robin Luckham. 2003. Governing Insecurity: Democratic Control of Military and Security Establishments in Transitional Democracies. Zed Books Ltd, London.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Peace and Justice, BRAC University, 2020, ‘Ensuring Rohingya Victim Participation and Community Engagement in International Justice Processes’. Briefing Paper, 3.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Chile, Argentina and Guatemala’. PhD diss., Claremont Colleges. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Chr. Michelsen Institute. 2014-2017. Beyond Words: Latin American Truth Commissions’ Recommendations. Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Controversial Online Safety Bill Passed in Sri Lanka Despite Unconstitutional Claims’, Newswire, 24 January 2024a.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin-Furman, Kate. 2020. ‘Human Rights Half Measures: Avoiding Accountability in Postwar Si Lanka’. World Politics 72(1), 136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, Kathleen., 1999. ‘Revisiting the Relationship Between Retributive and Restorative Justice’, PhD diss., Griffith University. 4
   Google Scholar
• Dassanayake, Harindra B. and Rajni Gamage, 2024. ‘Post-Aragalaya Shifts in the Politics of the Buddhist Sangha’, DailyFT, 10 January.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, Sebastian von, 2017. ‘Civil War Trends and the Changing Nature of Armed Conflict’. Occasional Paper 10, March. United Nations University Centre for Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, Basil, 2022. ‘The Need to Restore Judicial Review’, Groundviews, 5 May.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseka, Bhavani, 2022. ‘Sri Lanka’s Crisis and the Power of Citizen Mobilization’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 30 June.
   Google Scholar
• Gamage, Siri. 1993. ‘Democracy in Sri Lanka: Past, Present and Future’. Asian Studies Review 17(1), 110–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, Sanchari, 2024. ‘Does Ayodhya Ram Mandir Stand Over Disputed Babri Masjid Site? “Evidence Shows … ,”’ Livemint, 16 January.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, Mario. 2017. ‘The Politics of Dealing with the Past in Deeply Divided Sri Lanka’. Harvard Human Rights Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Sri Lanka. 2023. Sri Lanka Takes Historic Step Towards Establishing an Independent Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation [EN/SI].
   Google Scholar
• Gunasingham, Amresh, 2022. ‘Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Reform Charm offensive’, East Asia Forum, 15 April.
   Google Scholar
• Gunatilleke, Gehan. 2022. ‘Coexistence and Violence: The Case for Equality of Opportunity in Sri Lanka’. Socio-Legal Review 16(1, Article 2), 31.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, Wini Fred, ‘Sri Lanka’s Evolving Crisis: Implications on Rule of Law and Constitutional Democracy’. ISAS Special Report, Issue No. 24, 27.
   Google Scholar
• Guruparan, Kumaravadivel. 2016. ‘The Politics of the Discourse on Post-War Reconciliation in Sri Lanka’. In Struggle for Peace in the Aftermath of War, eds. A. Amarasingam and D. Bass. Hurst & Co, London, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Harees, Mohamed, 2023. ‘With Impunity Remaining Normalised, What Hope for Sri Lanka?’, Colombo Telegraph, 28 August.
   Google Scholar
• Hayner, Priscilla B. 2001. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. Routledge: New York, 13–262.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, S. and M. Raheem. 2017. ‘Sri Lanka: Social Cohesion ….In the Eye of the Beholder’. In Sisk, Peacebuilding in Deeply Divided Societies, eds. D. Cox Fletcher and D. Timothy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 248.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch, 2010. Afghanistan: Repeal Amnesty Law. 10 March.
   Google Scholar
• ICC delays cases of William Ruto and Laurent Gbagbo. 2013. BBC. 4 June.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Integrate Transitions, 2020. Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism, September, 184.
   Google Scholar
• Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. ‘Displacement Data’.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission of Jurists, 2023. Sri Lanka: Proposed Online Safety Bill Would Be an Assault on Freedom of Expression, Opinion, and Information, 29 September.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group, 2015. Sri Lanka Between Elections, 12 August.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group, 2017. Sri Lanka’s Transition to Nowhere. 16 May.
   Google Scholar
• Jayatilleka, Dayan, 2022. ‘The State, Statism and the Contours of Sri Lankan Social Consciousness’. Daily FT, 22 December.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyaraj, D. B. S., 2023. ‘The Injustice Meted Out to Hill Country Tamils After independence’, DailyFT, 5 July.
   Google Scholar
• John Perry, S. J. 2012. ‘Reconciliation and Healing As the Ultimate Reality and Meaning of Peacebuilding in the Thought of John Paul Lederach with Special Reference to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Liberia’. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 35(3–4), 317–321. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Edward P. 2007. ‘Ownership Is Over-rated’, SAIS Review of International Affairs’. John Hopkins University Press 27(2), 110–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kadirgamar, Ahilan. 2018. ‘Tamil Nationalism, Political Parties, and War-Torn Political Culture’. In Political Parties in Sri Lanka: Change and Continuity, eds. A. Shashtri and J. Uyangoda. Oxford University Press, Delhi, 235.
   Google Scholar
• Kamdar, Bansari, 2020. ‘How the Return of the Rajapaksas Spells Anxiety for Tamils in Sri Lanka’. The Wire, 26 February.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, Roshni, 2020. ‘Covid-19 in India and Sri Lanka: New Forms of Islamophobia,’ Middle East Institute, 7 July.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, Roshni, 2023. ‘Ethnic Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: Another Missed opportunity’. Observer Research Foundation, 9 June.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, Roshni and Amit Ranjan, 2020. ‘New Dilemmas for Sri Lanka: Federalism and Post-War Reconciliation’, ISAS Insights, No. 612.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, Alan. Sri Lanka Needs Truth, but Not (Yet) a Truth Commission. International Crisis Group. 7 September 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, Lia. 2018. ‘Engaging with “The Everyday”: Towards a More Dynamic Conception of Hybrid Transitional Justice’. In Hybridity on the Ground in Peacebuilding and Development: Critical Conversations, eds. Wallis. ANU Press: Canberra 145.
   Google Scholar
• Kora, Andrieu. 2010a. ‘Civilizing Peacebuilding: Transitional Justice, Civil Society and the Liberal Paradigm’. Security Dialogue 41(5), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kora, Andrieu. 2010b. ‘Transitional Justice: A New Discipline in Human Rights, Mass Violence & Resistance’. Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Lambourne, Wendy. 2014. ‘What are the Pillars of Transitional Justice? The United Nations, Civil Society, and the Justice Cascade in Burundi’. Macquarie Law Journal 4, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lanka Barometer, Sri, 2023. ‘National Public Perception Survey on Reconciliation 2021,’ p 11.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Let’s Collectively Defeat the government’s Attempt to Suppress Democratic rights’, Newswire, 21 January 2024b.
   Google Scholar
• Maatram, 2023. ‘The Politics of Archaeology Spreads Discord in the North and East’, Groundviews, 23 May.
   Google Scholar
• Marasinghe, Rohini, 2023. ‘The Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Some Concerns’, Sunday Times, 30 July.
   Google Scholar
• Nebehay, Stephanie, 2015. ‘Sri Lanka Plans South Africa-Style Commission to Confront War crimes’. Reuters, 14 September.
   Google Scholar
• Orjuela, Camilla. 2005. ‘Dilemmas of Civil Society Aid: Donors, NGOs and the Quest for Peace in Sri Lanka’. Peace and Democracy in South Asia 1(1), 3–6. January.
   Google Scholar
• Palansuriya, Natasha, 2022. ‘Transitional Justice: Looking Back to Move Forward’, CEPA, 15 March.
   Google Scholar
• People for Equality and Relief in Lanka, 2022. State-Sponsored Sinhalization of the North-East March, p 24.
   Google Scholar
• ‘President Gives Priority for Ethnic Reconciliation’. The Sunday Times, 6 November 2022
   Google Scholar
• President’s Media Division of Sri Lanka-PMD, ‘The Interim Secretariat for the Truth and Reconciliation Mechanism (ISTRM) in #srilanka Organized a Forum in Colombo on February 9, Bringing Together Various Stakeholders to Discuss the Draft Bill for a Commission for Truth, Unity, and #reconciliation (CTUR). (1/6)’, Twitter, 11 February 2024’.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Protest in Jaffna Shows Solidarity with Batticaloa Farmers’, Tamil Guardian, 18 January 2024c.
   Google Scholar
• Raheem, Mirak, 2022. ‘Questions of Justice and Accountability’. Groundviews, 21 May.
   Google Scholar
• Raheem, Mirak, 2023. ‘Sri Lanka’s Commission addiction’, Groundviews, 8 May.
   Google Scholar
• Reliefweb, Executive Summary and Recommendations, 2011. ‘Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: Harder Than Ever’. 18 July.
   Google Scholar
• Satkunanathan, Ambika, 2023. ‘Sri Lanka Continues to Militarise the State, Despite the Rajapaksas’ fall’, Himal Southasian, 31 July.
   Google Scholar
• Satkunanathan, Ambika, 2024a. ‘#CTUR #transitionaljustice 1/Prez Media Division’s Tweet on Meeting Held by Interim Sec for Truth and Recon Mechanism, Which Is Part of Attempt to Show Extensive Consultations Were Held with Stakeholders, Is Inaccurate and Disingenuous. Sharing My Experiences Engaging with ISTRM,’ Twitter, 17 February.
   Google Scholar
• Satkunanathan, Ambika, 2024b. ‘How to Evade Justice: Reconciliation without accountability’, DailyFT, 2 January.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeidl, Susanne. 2011. ‘The Quest for Transitional Justice in Afghanistan: Exploring the Untapped Potential for Customary Justice’. Beyond Transitional Justice, Stefan Khittel, JOURNAL Für ENTWICKLUNGSPOLITIK XXVII(3), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Seoighe, Rachel. 2016. ‘Inscribing the victor’s Land: Nationalistic Authorship in Sri Lanka’s Post-War Northeast’. Conflict, Security & Development 16(5), 451.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Dustin. 2014. ‘Addressing Dilemmas of the Global and the Local in Transitional Justice’. Emory International Law Review 29(1), 9–104.
   Google Scholar
• Shastri, Amita. 2018. ‘Impact of Electoral Changes on Parties and the Party System in Sri Lanka’. In Political Parties in Sri Lanka, eds. A. Shashtri and J. Uyangoda. Oxford University Press, Delhi, 41–42.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Rosalind and U.S. Institute of Peace, Special Report. 2005. ‘Rethinking Truth and Reconciliation Commissions: Lessons from Sierra Leone’, 1 February
   Google Scholar
• ‘SL to Seek Extension on 2015 UNHRC Resolution on Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights’, Daily FT, 7 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sri Lanka to Withdraw from UN Rights Resolution’, VOA, 19 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Council, 2015. ‘30th Session of the Human Rights Council’, 2 October.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State, ‘The JUST Act Report: Germany’.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Institute of Peace, 1995. ‘Commissions of Inquiry: Sri Lanka’. 1 January.
   Google Scholar
• Veluppilai, Alvappillai. 2006. ‘Sinhala Fears of Tamil demands’. In Buddhism, Conflict and Violence in Modern Sri Lanka, eds. Mahinda Deegalle, Routledge: New York 95.
   Google Scholar
• Venugopal, Rajesh. 2018. Nationalism, Development and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Vinck, Patrick and Yen Phuong Huu. Pham. 2008. ‘Ownership and Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms: A Sustainable Human Development Perspective from Eastern DRC’. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2(30), 399.
   Google Scholar
• Vora, Jay. and Erika. Vora. 2004. ‘The Effectiveness of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Perceptions of Xhosa, Afrikaner, and English South Africans’. Journal of Black Studies 34(3), 302–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, Matthew and Gethin Chamberlain, 2009. ‘Sri Lanka Declares End to War with Tamil Tigers’. The Guardian, 19 May. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. ‘Right to Information’.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, Michael, T. G. Okimoto, N. T. Feather M. J. Platow, et al., 2007. ‘Retributive and Restorative Justice’. Law and Human Behavior 32(5), 375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickremesinhe, Roshini. 2022. ‘Confronting Intolerance: Continued Violations Against Religious Minorities in Sri Lanka,’. Minority Rights Group International, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Rachel, 2009. ‘Timeline: Sri Lanka Conflict’. The Guardian, 18 May.
   Google Scholar
• Winterbotham, Emily., 2010. ‘The State of Transitional Justice in Afghanistan’. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), Discussion Paper, 18 April.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, Sujith., 2013. ‘Theorising Global Governance Inside Out: A Response to Professor Ladeur’. York University, Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy, Research Paper No. 29, 281–282.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, Sujith. 2016. ‘Looking for “Justice” in All the Wrong Places: An International Mechanism or Multidimensional Domestic Strategy for Mass Human Rights Violations in Sri Lanka?’. In Sri Lanka: The Struggle for Peace in the Aftermath of War, eds. A. Amarasingam and D. Bass. Hurst & Co, London, 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, ‘Unfinished Business: A Joint United States and South Korea Jeju 4.3 Tragedy Task Force to Further Implement Recommendations and Foster Comprehensive and Enduring Social Healing Through Justice’. Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 15(2), 17.
   Google Scholar