International Roughness Index specifications around the world

References

• Alberta Transportation. (2015). Annual report 2014–2015. Alberta: Government of Alberta. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/Publications/production/AnnualReport2014-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1998). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2008). Mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide. A manual of practice. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2013). R 43-13 standard practice for quantifying roughness of pavements. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials. (2009). Standard test method for measuring the longitudinal profile of traveled surfaces with an accelerometer established inertial profiling reference. ASTM E950/E950M-09. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials. (2015). Standard practice for computing International Roughness Index of roads from longitudinal profile measurements. E1926-08: 2015. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Asphaltic Concrete Surface Smoothness. (2014). Asphaltic concrete surface smoothness (ACSO), Special provision no. 103F31. Ontario: Ministry of Transportation, 10 p.
   Google Scholar
• Austrian Road – Rail – Transport Research Association. (2006). Beurteilungskriterien für messtechnische Zustanderfassung mit dem System RoadSTAR [Assessment criteria for pavement condition measurements with the RoadSTAR], RVS 13.01.15. Austria: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Australroads. (2007). Guide to asset management part 5B: Roughness (Report No. AGAM05B-07), 55 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. R. (2004, October 19–24). Sectioning of road data for pavement management. Proceedings of 6th international conference on managing pavements: The lessons, the challenges, the way ahead. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Main Roads.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R. (2014). Connected vehicle approach for pavement roughness evaluation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20(1) ( Article number 04013001). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R. (2015). Precision bounds of pavement distress localization with connected vehicle sensors. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21(3) ( Article number 04014045). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program. (1999). Summary of pavement smoothness specifications in Canada and around the world. Technical Brief # 16. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada, 10 p.
   Google Scholar
• Corley-Lay, J. (2014). Pavement performance measures, how states see good, fair, and poor (Transportation Research Record, No. 2431). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Office for Standards, Metrology and Testing. (2015). Měření a hodnocení nerovnosti povrchů vozovek [Measurement and evaluation of road surface unevenness] (ČSN 73 6175: 2015). Prague: Author, 32 p (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Public Works and Highways. (2015). Adoption of International Roughness Index values for all national primary roads. Department Order No. 47. Manila: Author, 23 p.
   Google Scholar
• Deržavna Služba Avtomobil'nih Dorig Ykraini. (2012). Avtomobil'ni dorogi. ocinka rivnosti dorožnih pokrittiv za mižnarodnim indeksom rivnosti (IRI) [Highways. Evaluation of pavement evenness based on the International Roughness Index (IRI)] (SOU 45.2-00018112-078). Kiev: Author, 32 p. (in Ukrainian).
   Google Scholar
• Estradas de Portugal. (2009). Caderno de Encargos Tipo Obra: 15.03 – Pavimentação – Métodos Construtivos [The specification of work type: 15:03 – Paving – Constructive methods]. Almada: Author (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2015). Road and airfield surface characteristics – Test methods. Part 5: Determination of longitudinal unevenness indices (prEN 13036-5: 2015). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. (2014). 2013 status of the nation’s highways, bridges, and transit: Conditions & performance (Report to Congress). Washington, DC: Author, 482 p.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. (2015). National performance management measures: Assessing pavement condition for the national highway performance program and bridge condition for the national highway performance program [Proposed rule] (Document No. 2014-30085). Author, pp. 325–393.
   Google Scholar
• Feighan, K., McGowan, R., Casey, T., & O’Sullivan, A. (2015, May 18–21). Recent developments in pavement management on Irish national roads. 9th international conference on managing pavement assets, Washington, DC. Blacksburg: VirginiaTech Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, E. G., & Walker, R. S. (2013). Impact of changes in profile measurement technology on QA testing of pavement smoothness. (Technical report, report no. FHWA/TX-13/0-6610-1). Austin: Texas Department of Transportation, 188 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gáspár, L. (2012). Validating and enhancing the PMS engineering version (Annual report 2010–2011). Budapest: KTI Institute for Transport Sciences, pp. 103–109 (in Hungarian).
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, J. (2014). International Roughness Index (IRI) for construction acceptance (C-TEP-APWA pavement workshop 2014). Enoch, Alberta: Centre for Transportation Engineering & Planning (C-TEP) and the Alberta’ Public Works Association (APWA), 43 p.
   Google Scholar
• Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Publicznych. (2002). System oceny stanu nawierzchni SOSN wytyczne stosowania - Załącznik B, Zasady pomiaru i oceny stanu równości podłużnej nawierzchni bitumicznych w systemie oceny stanu nawierzchni SOSN [The assessment of surface SOSN guidance for use – Annex B, measurement principles of longitudinal unevenness of bituminous pavements in pavement condition evaluation system SOSN]. Warszava: Author, 6 p. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad. (2011). Nawierzchnia z betonu asfaltowego. warstwa ścieralna wg PN-EN. D – 05.03.05a. Author, 29 p. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Highway Performance Monitoring System. (2014). Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) field manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 284 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kropáč, O., & Múčka, P. (2005). Be careful when using the International Roughness Index as an indicator of road unevenness. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 287(4–5), 989–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LanammeUCR. (2008). Variaciones a los rangos de clasificación de la red vial nacional de Costa Rica [Variations ranges classification of the Costa Rica national road network] (Proyecto N° UI-PE-03-08). San José: Universidad de Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Lietuvos Automobiliu̧ Keliu̧ Direkcijos prie Susisiekimo Ministerijos Direktorius. (2014). Įsakymas Dėl Kelių Priežiūros Vadovo I Dalies Automobilių Kelių Priežiūros Normatyvai KPV PN-14 Patvirtinimo [Order on the road maintenance. Part I – Road maintenance KPV norms PN-14 approval]. Vilnius: Author, 109 p.
   Google Scholar
• Magyar Útügyi Társaság. (2008). Út-pályaszerkezeti aszfaltrétegek [Asphalt road pavement structure layers] (ÚT 2-3.302:2008). Budapest: Author (in Hungarian).
   Google Scholar
• Majandus-ja taristuminister. (2014). Tee ehitamise kvaliteedi nõuded [Road construction quality requirements] (Regulation Nr. 15). Riga: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Majandus-ja taristuminister. (2015). Tee seisundinõuded [Road condition requirements] (Regulation Nr. 92). Riga: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Marradi, A. (2013). Harmonization in pavement smoothness rating of new and old pavements. 1st European road profile users’ group meeting. Kopenhagen: European Road Profile Users’ Group, 39 p.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, D. K., Chang, G. K., & Rutledge, J. L. (2015). Best practices for achieving and measuring pavement smoothness, a synthesis of state-of-practice (Report no. FHWA/LA.14/550). Austin, TX: The Transtec Group, Inc., 58 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministěrstvo industrii i torgovli RK. (2003). Dorogi avtomobil'nye i aerodromy. Metody izmerenija něrovnostěj osnovanij i pokrytij [Road car and airfields. Methods for measuring the roughness of layers and covers] (ST RK 1219-2003). Astana: Author, 23 p. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Ministrstvo za Promet. (2003). Lastnosti voznih površin ravnost, Tehnična specifikacija za javne ceste [Characteristics of pavement surface evenness, Technical specification for public roads] (TSC 06.610: 2003). Ljubljana: Author, 11 p. (in Slovenian).
   Google Scholar
• Ministěrstvo regional'nogo razvitija Rossijskoj Feděracii. (2012). Avtomobil'nye dorogi [Roads] (SP 78.13330). Moscow: Author, 117 p. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo dopravy, výstavby a regionálneho rozvoja. (2012). Meranie a hodnotenie nerovnosti vozoviek pomocou zariadenia Profilograph GE [Measurement and evaluation of pavement roughness using Profilograph GE] (TP 04/2012). Author, 20 p. (in Slovak).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie de Fomento. (2015). Pliego de prescripciones técnicas generales para obras de carreteras y puentes (PG-3) [PG-3 Statement of general technical requirements for construction of roads and bridges]. Spain: Author (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transportation. (2012). Ontario’s default parameters for AASHTOWare pavement ME design (Interim report). Ontario: Author, 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Rozwoju. (2015). Rozporządzenie Ministra infrastruktury i rozwoju zmieniające rozporządzenie w sprawie warunków technicznych, jakim powinny odpowiadać drogi publiczne i ich usytuowanie [Ordinance of Minister of Infrastructure and Development amending the regulation on technical conditions for public roads and their location] (No. 329). Warszawa: Author (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Mogilny, K. V., Lushnikov, N. A., & Krasikov, O. A. (2013). Meždunarodnyj indeks rovnosti dorožnyh pokrytij i ego ispol’zovanie v stranah tamožennogo sojuza [International roughness index and its use in countries of the Customs Union] (Dorogi i mosty, No. 1), pp. 92–110 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Ministěrstvo transporta i kommunikacij Respubliki Belarus. (2012). Těchničeskij koděks ustanovivšejsja praktiki. Avtomobiľnye dorogi. Pravila ustrojstva. TKP 059-2012 (02191). Minsk: Děpartament “Belavtodor” Ministěrstva transporta i kommunikacij Respubliki Belarus (MTiKRB), 55 p. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Múčka, P. (2013). Correlation among road unevenness indicators and vehicle vibration response. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(8), 771–786. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Concrete Consortium. (2013, April 2–4). State practices reports on IRI ride specifications. Technology Transfer Concrete Consortium (TTCC) and National Concrete Consortium (NCC) meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 47 p.
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Research Group. (2015). Bumpy roads ahead: America's roughest rides and strategies to make our roads smoother. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Public Roads Administration. (2014a). Vegbygging [Road construction] (Håndbok N200). Author, 528 p. (in Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Public Roads Administration. (2014b). Standard for drift og vedlikehold av riksveger [Standard for operation and maintenance of roads] (Håndbok R610). Author, 158 p. (in Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• NZ Transport Agency. (2009). State highway national pavement condition report 2009. Wellington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, G. P., & Mouratidis, A. (2014). A mathematical approach to define threshold values of pavement characteristics. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, 10(5), 568–576. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.757331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagiannakis, A., Gharaibeh, N., Weissmann, J., & Wimsatt, A. (2009). Pavement scores synthesis (Report no. FHWA/TX-09/0-6386-1). Texas Transportation Institute, 52 p.
   Google Scholar
• Patiño, M. C. A., Anguas, P. G., & Rodríguez, A. R. (1998). Índice Internacional de Rugosidad en La Red Carretera de México [International Roughness Index in Mexico road network] (Publicación Técnica no. 108). Sanfandila, Qro.: Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes, Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, 42 p.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, R. W., & Elkins, G. E. (2013). LTPP manual for profile measurements and processing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 291 p.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, R. W., & Kohn, S. D. (2002). Issues in pavement smoothness: A summary report (NCHRP Web Document 42). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, R. W., & Kohn, S. D. (2005). Quantification of smoothness index differences related to LTPP equipment type (Report No. FHWA–HRT–05–054). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration, 159 p.
   Google Scholar
• Road Directorate of the Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2005). Guidelines for road design, construction, maintenance and supervision, Volume II: Construction, Section 1: General technical conditions. Banja Luka: Author, 177 p. (in Serbian).
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M. W., Gillespie, T. D., & Paterson, W. D. O. (1986). Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements (Technical Paper No. 46). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M. W., & Karamihas, S. M. (1998). The little book of profiling. Ann Arbor: Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, 102 p.
   Google Scholar
• SSfHC. (2011). 2012 Standard Specifications for Highway Construction (SSfHC), Vol. 1. British Columbia: Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, 471 p.
   Google Scholar
• SSHCM. (2014). Standard Specification, Highway Construction and Maintenance (SSHCM), Revisions 2014. Nova Scotia: Transportation and Public Works, 530 p.
   Google Scholar
• SSO. (2012). Smoothness Specifications Online (SSO). Austin, TX: The Transtec Group. Retrieved January 20, 2015, from http://www.smoothpavements.com
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Zhang, Z., & Ruth, J. (2001). Modeling indirect statistics of surface roughness. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127(2), 105–111. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(105)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweere, G. T. H., VanZwteten, J., Eijbersen, M. J., & Hulpen, H. (1996). Wegverhardingen op termijn bekeken. Technisch Verslag SHRP NL in periode 1990–1995 [Road pavements observed on the long term. Technical Report SHRPNL in 1990–1995]. Ede: Foundation CROW (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Technical Center of Estonian Roads. (2001). Condition analysis of paved state roads of Estonia using EPMS. Tallinn: Author, PMS Group, 9 p. (in Estonian).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, F. (2005). Automated road segmentation using a Bayesian algorithm. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131(8), 591–598. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:8(591)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafikverktet. (2012). Underhĺllsstandard belagd väg 2011 [Paved road maintenance standard in 2011] (Rep. No. 2012:074). Borlänge: Author, 44 p. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket. (2014). Bitumenbundna lager [Bitumen layers] (TDOK 2013:0529). Borlänge: Author, 121 p. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, G. B., Arrieta, F. E., & Jiménez, R. B. (2008). Determinación de un procedimiento de ensayo para el cálculo del IRI [Determination of a test procedure for calculating the IRI] (Proyecto No. UI-03-08). San José: Unidad de Investigación en Infraestructura Vial del LanammeUCR (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, J., & Alvarenga, E. (2005). Determinación del Ìndice de Regularidad Internacional (IRI) [Determination of International Roughness Index]. República de El Salvador: Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transporte, Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, W. J. (2007). Implementation of an International Roughness Index for Mn/DOT pavement construction and rehabilitation (Report MN/RC-2007-09). St. Paul: Research Services Section Minnesota Department of Transportation, 133 p.
   Google Scholar