954
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific papers

Evaluation of wheel tracking and field rutting susceptibility of dense bituminous mixes

, , &
Pages 90-109 | Received 06 Apr 2017, Accepted 25 Aug 2017, Published online: 14 Sep 2017

References

  • Ahlrich, R. C. (1996). Influence of aggregate gradation and particle shape/texture on permanent deformation of hot mix asphalt pavements (No. WES/TR/GL-96-1). Vicksburg, MS: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Geotechnical Lab.
  • Anderson, D. A., & Kennedy, T. W. (1993). Development of SHRP binder specification. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 62, 481–507.
  • Apeagyei, A. K. (2011). Rutting as a function of dynamic modulus and gradation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(9), 1302–1310. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000309
  • Arizona Department of Transportation. (2008). Standard specification for road and bridge construction. AZ: Author.
  • Aschenbrener, T. (1995). Evaluation of Hamburg wheel-tracking device to predict moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt. Transportation Research Record, 1492, 193–201.
  • Bahia, H. U., & Anderson, D. A. (1995). The new proposed rheological properties of asphalt binders: Why are they required and how do they compare to conventional properties. In John C. Hardin (Ed.), Physical properties of asphalt cement binders (pp. 1–27). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
  • Bahia, H. U., Hanson, D. I., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., Khatri, M. A., & Anderson, R. M. (2001). Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design (No. Project 9-10 FY’96).
  • Bahia, H. U., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., & Khatri, A. (1999). Superpave protocols for modified asphalt bitumens (Fourteenth Quarterly Progress Report for NCHRP Project 9-10), report submitted to NCHRP.
  • Birgisson, B., Roque, R., Kim, J., & Pham, L. V. (2004). The use of complex modulus to characterize the performance of asphalt mixtures and pavements in Florida (Final Report, 4910-4501). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Transportation.
  • BIS: 1202. (1978). Determination of specific gravity. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • BIS: 1203. (1978). Determination of penetration. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • BIS: 1205. (1978). Determination of softening point. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • BIS: 15462. (2004). Polymer and rubber modified bitumen – specification. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.
  • BIS: 2386 (Part I). (1963). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, part 1 particle shape and size. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • BIS: 2386 (Part IV). (1963). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, part 1 mechanical properties. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • BS-EN:12697-26. (2003). Bituminous mixtures – Test methods for hot mix asphalt, Part 22: Wheel Tracking. Brussels: CEN-CENELEC Management Centre.
  • Bodin, D., Grenfell, J. R., & Collop, A. C. (2009). Comparison of small and large scale wheel tracking devices. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10(sup1), 295–325. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2009.9690248
  • Brown, E. R., Kandhal, P. S., & Zhang, J. (2001). Performance testing for hot mix asphalt (Report, 01-05). Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
  • Chen, J. S., & Tsai, C. J. (1999). How good are linear viscoelastic properties of asphalt binder to predict rutting and fatigue cracking? Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 8(4), 443–449. doi: 10.1361/105994999770346747
  • Chen, X., Huang, B., & Xu, Z. (2007). Comparison between flat rubber wheeled loaded wheel tester and asphalt pavement analyzer. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 8(3), 595–604. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2007.9690090
  • Choubane, B., Page, G. C., & Musselman, J. A. (1998). Investigation of the asphalt pavement analyzer for predicting pavement rutting (Research Report FL/DOT/SMO/98, 427). Florida Department of Transportation.
  • Chowdhury, A., & Button, J. (2002). Evaluation of superpave shear test protocols (FHWA/TX-02/1819-1). College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
  • Collins, R., Shami, H., & Lai, J. (1996). Use of Georgia loaded wheel tester to evaluate rutting of asphalt samples prepared by Superpave gyratory compactor. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1545, 161–168. doi: 10.3141/1545-21
  • Cooley, L. A., Kandhal, P. S., Buchanan, M. S., Fee, F., & Epps, A. (2000). Loaded wheel testers in the United States: State of the practice. Auburn, AL: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
  • D’Angelo, J. A. (2009). The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10(sup1), 61–80. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2009.9690236
  • D’Angelo, J., Kluttz, R., Dongre, R. N., Stephens, K., & Zanzotto, L. (2007). Revision of the Superpave high temperature binder specification: The multiple stress creep recovery test (With Discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 76, 123–162.
  • Delgadillo, R., Cho, D., & Bahia, H. (2006). Part 1: Bituminous materials: Nonlinearity of repeated creep and recovery binder test and relationship with mixture permanent deformation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1962, 3–11. doi: 10.3141/1962-01
  • Desmazes, C., Lecomte, M., Lesueur, D., & Phillips, M. (2000). A protocol for reliable measurement of zero-shear-viscosity in order to evaluate the anti-rutting performance of binders. Proceedings of the papers submitted for review at 2nd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume congress, Barcelona, Spain. Book 1-session 1.
  • De Visscher, J., & Vanelstraete, A. (2004). Practical test methods for measuring the zero shear viscosity of bituminous binders. Materials and Structures, 37(5), 360–364. doi: 10.1007/BF02481684
  • Dongré, R., D’Angelo, J., & Copeland, A. (2009). Refinement of flow number as determined by asphalt mixture performance tester: Use in routine quality control – quality assurance practice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2127, 127–136. doi: 10.3141/2127-15
  • Faheem, A., Bahia, H., & Ajideh, H. (2005). Estimating results of a proposed simple performance test for hot-mix asphalt from Superpave gyratory compactor results. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1929, 104–113. doi: 10.3141/1929-13
  • Gabet, T., Di Benedetto, H., Perraton, D., De Visscher, J., Gallet, T., Bańkowski, W., & Sauzéat, C. (2011). French wheel tracking round robin test on a polymer modified bitumen mixture. Materials and Structures, 44(6), 1031–1046. doi: 10.1617/s11527-011-9733-x
  • Goh, S. W., You, Z., Williams, R. C., & Li, X. (2011). Preliminary dynamic modulus criteria of HMA for field rutting of asphalt pavements: Michigan’s experience. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137(1), 37–45. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000191
  • Hand, A. J. (1998). Relationships between laboratory measured HMA material and mixture properties and pavement performance at WesTrack.
  • He, Y., Harvey, J., Zhou, J., & Liu, A. (2016). Characterization of permanent deformation using AMPT repeated-load-triaxial and RSCH tests for mechanistic-empirical design and practical considerations. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28(12), 04016169. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001686
  • Hou, H., Wang, T., Wu, S., Xue, Y., Tan, R., Chen, J., & Zhou, M. (2016). Investigation on the pavement performance of asphalt mixture based on predicted dynamic modulus. Construction and Building Materials, 106, 11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.178
  • Kaloush, K., Witczak, M. W., Roque, R., Brown, S., D'Angelo, J., Marasteanu, M., & Masad, E. (2002). Tertiary flow characteristics of asphalt mixtures. In Asphalt Paving Technology 2002.
  • Kandhal, P. S., & Cooley, L. A., Jr. (2003). Accelerated laboratory rutting tests: Evaluation of the asphalt pavement analyzer (NCHRP Report 508). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press.
  • Kandhal, P. S., & Mallick, R. B. (1999). Evaluation of asphalt pavement analyzer for HMA mix design. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
  • Kennedy, T. W., Huber, G. A., Harrigan, E. T., Cominsky, R. J., Hughes, C. S., Von Quintus, H., & Moulthrop, J. S. (1994). Superior performing asphalt pavements (Superpave): The product of the SHRP asphalt research program (Report No. SHRP-A-410). Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
  • Kvasnak, A., Robinette, C. J., & Williams, R. C. (2007). Statistical development of a flow number predictive equation for the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting (No. 07-1000).
  • Lai, J. S., & Lee, T. M. (1990). Use of a loaded-wheel testing machine to evaluate rutting of asphalt mixes. Transportation Research Record, 1269, 116–124.
  • Laukkanen, O. V., Soenen, H., Pellinen, T., Heyrman, S., & Lemoine, G. (2015). Creep-recovery behavior of bituminous binders and its relation to asphalt mixture rutting. Materials and Structures, 48(12), 4039–4053. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0464-7
  • Martin, A. E., & Park, D. W. (2003). Use of the asphalt pavement analyzer and repeated simple shear test at constant height to augment superpave volumetric mix design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129(5), 522–530. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(522)
  • McGennis, R. B., Anderson, R. M., Kennedy, T. W., & Solaimanian, M. (1995). Background of superpave asphalt mixture design and analysis (National asphalt training center demonstration project 101. Final report, December 1992-November 1994 (No. PB–95-221495/XAB)). Lexington, KY: Asphalt Inst.
  • Miller, T., Ksaibati, K., & Farrar, M. (1995, January). Utilizing the Georgia loaded-wheel tester to predict rutting. 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  • Mohammad, L., Wu, Z., Obulareddy, S., Cooper, S., & Abadie, C. (2006). Permanent deformation analysis of hot-mix asphalt mixtures with simple performance tests and 2002 mechanistic-empirical pavement design software. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1970, 133–142. doi: 10.3141/1970-16
  • Monismith, C. L., & Tayebali, A. A. (1988). Permanent deformation (rutting) considerations in asphalt concrete pavement sections (with discussion and closure). St Paul, MN: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc (Vol. 57).
  • Morea, F., Agnusdei, J. O., & Zerbino, R. (2011). The use of asphalt low shear viscosity to predict permanent deformation performance of asphalt concrete. Materials and Structures, 44(7), 1241–1248. doi: 10.1617/s11527-010-9696-3
  • Morea, F., Zerbino, R., & Agnusdei, J. (2014). Wheel tracking rutting performance estimation based on bitumen Low Shear Viscosity (LSV), loading and temperature conditions. Materials and Structures, 47(4), 683–692. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0088-3
  • MoRTH. (2013). Ministry of road transport and highways. Specifications for Road and Bridge Works, 5th Revision, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, India.
  • MS-2. (2015). Asphalt mix design methods, Asphalt Institute 7th ed. (Manual Series No -2). Lexington, KY: The Asphalt Institute.
  • Pellinen, T., & Witczak, M. (2002). Use of stiffness of hot-mix asphalt as a simple performance test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 80–90. doi: 10.3141/1789-09
  • Perraton, D., Di Benedetto, H., Sauzéat, C., De La Roche, C., Bankowski, W., Partl, M., & Grenfell, J. (2011). Rutting of bituminous mixtures: Wheel tracking tests campaign analysis. Materials and Structures, 44(5), 969–986. doi: 10.1617/s11527-010-9680-y
  • Phillips, M. C., & Robertus, C. (1996). Binder rheology and asphaltic pavement permanent deformation; the zero-shear-viscosity. Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Volume 3. Paper E&E. 5.134, Strasbourg.
  • Prowell, B. D., Zhang, J., & Brown, E. R. (2005). Aggregate properties and the performance of superpave – designed hot mix asphalt (NCHRP Report 539). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • Rao, S. K., Das, J. K., & Roy Chowdhury, P. (2007). Asphalt Mix design – refusal density approach for heavily trafficked roads. Journal of Indian Roads Congress, 68(1), 53–64.
  • Reddy. (2007). Investigation of rutting failure in some sections of national highway-2 between KM. 317 and KM. 65. Transportation Engineering Section, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Kharagpur, India.
  • Reddy, I. S. (2009). Rutting characteristics of bituminous mixes (Ph.D thesis (Unpublished)). IIT, Kharagpur.
  • Rodezno, M., Kaloush, K., & Corrigan, M. (2010). Development of a flow number predictive model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2181, 79–87. doi: 10.3141/2181-09
  • Roy, N., Veeraragavan, A., & Krishnan, J. M. (2016). Influence of confinement pressure and air voids on the repeated creep and recovery of asphalt concrete mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17(2), 133–147. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.925622
  • Rushing, J. F., Little, D. N., & Garg, N. (2014). Selecting a rutting performance test for airport asphalt mixture design. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15(sup1), 172–194. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2014.926626
  • Shenoy, A. (2001). Refinement of the Superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127(5), 357–362. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(357)
  • Shenoy, A., & Romero, P. (2002). Standardized procedure for analysis of dynamic modulus |E*| data to predict asphalt pavement distresses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 173–182. doi: 10.3141/1789-19
  • Sinha, V. K., Singh, H. N., & Sekhar, S. (2007). Rutting in flexible pavements – a case study. Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, 68(3), 177–191.
  • Sousa, J. B., Craus, J., & Monismith, C. L. (1991). Summary report on permanent deformation in asphalt concrete (No. SHRP-A-318). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Sousa, J. B., Durrani, A. Z., & Raja, Z. I. (2002). Application of the repeated simple shear test at constant height in the prediction of permanent deformation performance of asphalt mixes in Pakistan. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 3(2), 151–165. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2002.9689919
  • SP-2. (2004). Superpave Mix Design (4th ed.). (Superpave Series No.2). Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
  • Stuart, K. D. (2002). Understanding the performance of modified asphalt binders in mixtures: High-temperature characterization (No. FHWA-RD-02-075). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology.
  • Stuart, K. D., & Izzo, R. P. (1995). Correlation of Superpave G*/sin δ with rutting susceptibility from laboratory mixture tests. Transportation Research Record, 1492, 176–183.
  • Sybilski, D. (1996). Zero-shear viscosity of bituminous binder and its relation to bituminous mixture’s rutting resistance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1535, 15–21. doi: 10.3141/1535-03
  • Tayebali, A., Khosla, N., Malpass, G., & Waller, H. (1999). Evaluation of superpave repeated shear at constant height test to predict rutting potential of mixes: Performance of three pavement sections in North Carolina. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1681, 97–105. doi: 10.3141/1681-12
  • Texas Department of Transportation. (2014). Standard specification for construction and maintenance of highways, streets and bridges. TX: Author.
  • Uzarowski, L. (2006). The development of asphalt mix creep parameters and finite element modeling of asphalt rutting (Ph.D thesis). University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Van de Loo, P. J. (1976). Practical approach to the prediction of rutting in asphalt pavements: The Shell Method. Transportation Research Record, (616), 15–21.
  • Walubita, L. F., Zhang, J., Das, G., Hu, X., Mushota, C., Alvarez, A. E., & Scullion, T. (2012, January). Comparison of the Hamburg, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation. 91st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
  • West, R. C. (1999). A ruggedness study of the asphalt pavement analyzer rutting test. Memorandum to the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Group and New APA Owners.
  • White, T. W., Haddock, J. E., & Rismantojo, E. (2006). Aggregate tests for hot – mix asphalt mixtures used in pavements (NCHRP Report 557). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • Williams, R., & Prowell, B. (1999). Comparison of laboratory wheel-tracking test results with Wes track performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1681, 121–128. doi: 10.3141/1681-15
  • Witczak, M. W., Kaloush, K., Pellinen, T., El-Basyouny, M., & Von Quintus, H. (2002). Simple performance test for superpave mix design (NCHRP Report 465). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Yu, H., & Shen, S. (2012). An investigation of dynamic modulus and flow number properties of asphalt mixtures in Washington State (Report No. TNW, 2). Retrived from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.304.4837&rep=rep1&type=pdfhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.304.4837&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Zhang, J., Alvarez, A. E., Lee, S. I., Torres, A., & Walubita, L. F. (2013). Comparison of flow number, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.013
  • Zhang, J., Cooley, L., Jr. & Kandhal, P. (2002). Comparison of fundamental and simulative test methods for evaluating permanent deformation of hot-mix asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 91–100. doi: 10.3141/1789-10
  • Zhou, F., & Scullion, T. (2003). Preliminary field validation of simple performance tests for permanent deformation: Case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1832, 209–216. doi: 10.3141/1832-25

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.