Investigation of shear strength of interface between roadbase and geosynthetics using large-scale single-stage and multi-stage direct shear test

References

• Abu-Farsakh, M., Coronel, J., & Tao, M. (2007). Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(7), 540–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaro, M. C., Miura, N., & Bergado, D. T. (1995). Soil geogrid reinforcement interaction by pullout and direct shear tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 18(2), 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anubhav, & Basudhar, P. K. (2010). Modeling of soil-woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(4), 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., Horpibulsuk, S., Maghoolpilehrood, F., Samingthong, W., Du, Y.-J., & Shen, S.-L. (2015). Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid reinforced foamed recycled glass using a large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/235424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., Rahman, M. A., Piratheepan, J., Bo, M. W., & Imteaz, M. A. (2013). Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(8), 1077–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D5321. (2002). Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. ASTM Designation: D5321-02. ASTM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bergado, D. T., Chai, J. C., Abiera, H. O., Alfaro, M. C., & Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1993). Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 12(4), 327–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergado, D. T., Ramana, G. V., Sia, H. I., & Varun. (2006). Evaluation of interface shear strength of composite liner system and stability analysis for a landfill lining system in Thailand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24, 371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuyan, H., Scheuermann, A., Bodin, D., & Becker, R. (2017). Use of time domain reflectometry to estimate moisture and density of unbound road materials: Laboratory calibration and field investigation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2655, 71–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2655-10
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zhang, J., Xiao, Y., & Li, J. (2015). Effect of roughness on shear behavior of red clay-concrete interface in large-scale direct shear tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52, 1122–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. B., Vieira, C. S., & Lopes, M. L. (2015). Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces – influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type. Geosynthetics International, 22(3), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, J. K., & Fredlund, D. G. (1988). Multistage direct shear testing of unsaturated soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 11(2), 132–138.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaaowd, I., McCartney, J. S., Thielmann, S. S., Sanders, M. J., & Fox, P. J. (2017). Shearing behavior of tire-derived aggregate with large particle size. I: Internal and concrete interface direct shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143(10), 04017078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazirbaba, K. (2017). Large-scale direct shear and CBR performance of geofibre-reinforced sand. Road Materials and Pavement Design. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1310667
   Google Scholar
• Hormdee, D., Kaikeerati, N., & Angsuwotai, P. (2012). Evaluation on the results of multistage shear test. International Journal of GEOMATE, 2(1), 140–143.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, R. A. (1996). Soil reinforcement with geotextiles. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, R. A., Milligan, G. W. E., Sarsby, R. W., & Dubois, D. (1984). Interaction between soil and geogrids. In: Symposium on Polymer Grid Reinforcement in Civil Engineering, ICE, London, Paper 1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., & Manjunath, V. R. (2000). Soil-geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(1), 238–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. N., Ho, Y. H., & Huang, J. W. (2009). Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(1), 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F.-Y., Wang, P., Geng, X., Wang, J., & Lin, X. (2016). Cyclic and post-cyclic behaviour from sand–geogrid interface large-scale direct shear tests. Geosynthetics International, 23(2), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. N., Zornberg, J. G., Chen, T. C., Ho, Y. H., & Lin, B. H. (2009). Behavior of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(12), 1863–1871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, M. L. (2002). Soil-geosynthetic interaction. In S. K. Shukla (Ed.), Geosynthetics and their applications (pp. 57–61). London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, S., Gutierrez, M., Diplas, P., & Petrie, J. (2011). Determination of the shear strength of unsaturated soils using the multistage direct shear test. Engineering Geology, 122(3), 272–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejad, F. M., Noory, A., Toolabi, S., & Fallah, S. (2015). Effect of using geosynthetics on reflective crack prevention. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16(6), 477–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.943128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeira, E. M. (2009). Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(5), 368–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeira, E. M., & Milligan, G. W. E. (1989). Large scale direct shear tests on reinforced soil. Soils and Foundations, 29(1), 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Piratheepan, J., Arulrajah, A., & Disfani, M. M. (2013). Large-scale direct shear testing of recycled construction and demolition materials. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, 2(1), 25–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/ACEM20120009
   Google Scholar
• Richards, E. A., & Scott, J. D. (1985). Soil geotextile frictional properties. Second Canadian Symposium on Geotextiles and Geomenbranes, Edmonton. 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sakleshpur, V. A., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R., Siddiki, N. Z., & Choi, Y. S. (2017). Large-scale direct shear testing of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base over weak subgrade. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1321419
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, S. K. (2002). Geosynthetics and their applications. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sobhan, K., & Tandon, V. (2008). Mitigating reflection cracking in asphalt overlays using geosynthetic reinforcements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 9(3), 367–387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2008.9690124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Chehab, G. R., & Palomino, A. (2008). Evaluation of geogrids for stabilising weak pavement subgrade. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9(6), 413–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430802279827
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, C. S., Lopes, M. L., & Caldeira, L. M. (2013). Sand–geotextile interface characterisation through monotonic and cyclic direct shear tests. Geosynthetics International, 20(1), 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, C. S., & Pereira, P. M. (2016). Interface shear properties of geosynthetics and construction and demolition waste from large-scale direct shear tests. Geosynthetics International, 23(1), 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Williams, D. J., & Serati, M. (2018a). Influence of anchorage angles on pull-out resistance of geotextile wrap around anchorage. Geosynthetics International, 25(4), 378–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Williams, D. J., & Serati, M. (2018b). Measurement of shear strength and interface parameters by multi-stage large-scale direct/interface shear and pull-out tests. Measurement Science and Technology, 29(8), 085601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aacb8a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Williams, D. J., Serati, M., & Vangsness, T. (2018). Effects of scalping on direct shear strength of crusher run and crusher run/geogrid interface. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(9), 04018206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora-Barraza, D., Calzada-Pérez, M. A., Castro-Fresno, D., & Vega-Zamanillo, A. (2011). Evaluation of anti-reflective cracking systems using geosynthetics in the interlayer zone. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(2), 130–136. ISSN 0266-1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zornberg, J. G. (2011). Advances in the Use of Geosynthetic in Pavement Design. Invited Keynote Paper, Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Geosynthetics, India Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India, September 23–24, 3–21.
   Google Scholar