Quantifying effects of laboratory curing conditions on workability, compactability, and cohesion gain of cold in-place recycling

References

• Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association. (2016). Recommendedconstruction guidelines for cold In-place recycling (CIR) using Bituminous recycling agents. Annapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, A., Mohammad, L., Elsefi, M., Button, J., & Patel, N. (2010). Effects of temperature on interface shear strength of emulsified tack coats and its relationship to rheological properties. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.3141/2180-12
   Google Scholar
• Bahia, H., Friemel, T., Peterson, P., Russell, J., & Poehnelt, B. (1998). Optimization of constructibility and resistance to traffic: A new design approach for HMA using the superpave compactor. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 67, 189–213.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaquist, R. F. (2010). Appendix E-NCHRP project 09-43 Experimental Plans, results, and Analyses. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Braham, A. (2018). Manufacturing of Asphalt Emulsions (Certificate 3). In Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Professional Development Courses, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Braham, A., Lynn, T., Steger, R., & Pyle, R. (2015). Characterizing compactability of high RAP and warm mix asphalt mixtures in the superpave gyratory compactor. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 43(3), 20130319–543. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20130319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredenhann, S. J., & Jenkins, K. J. (2015). Bituminous stabilised materials: Comparative performance of G2 and BSM-foam bases. Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA15), 11th. Sun City, South Africa, CAPSA.
   Google Scholar
• Bugni, C. (2015). Cold recycling in Montana. Montana Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, A., Mercado, M., & Schram, S. (2017). Long-term evaluation of cold In-place recycling and factors influencing performance. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casillas, S., & Braham, A. (2020a). Exploring the cost benefit value and relative emissions of pavement preservation treatments. Accepted for publication and presentation, Symposium on Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020. Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Casillas, S., & Braham, A. (2020b, January). Quantifying pavement preservation in Arkansas. Submitted with revisions to Journal of Transportation Engineering:  Part B, Pavements.
   Google Scholar
• Chappat, M., & Bilal, J. (2003). Sustainable development: The environmental road of the future, life Cycle analysis. Colas.
   Google Scholar
• Chehovits, J., & Galehouse, L. (2010). Energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions of pavement preservation processes for asphalt concrete pavements. National Center for Pavement Preservation.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, B., & Howard, I. (2016). Cold In-place recycling characterization for single-component or multiple-component binder systems. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, B., Howard, I., & Campbell, C. (2016). Cold in-place recycling moisture-related design and construction considerations for single or multiple component binder systems. Transportation Research Record, 2575, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3141/2575-04
   Google Scholar
• Cross, S. (2015, February 24). Specification resources for in-place recycling. SHRP2 Implementation Task Force Meeting. Strategic Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, S., & Jakatimath, Y. (2007). Evaluation of cold in-place recycling for rehabilitation of transverse cracking on US 412. Oklahoma Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Das, B. (2006). Principles of geotechnical engineering. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• De Sombre, R., Newcomb, D., Chadbourn, B., & Voller, V. (1998). Parameters to define the laboratory compaction temperature range of hot mix asphalt. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 67, 125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Dongre, R. (2014). United States Patent No. US 2014/0116116 A1.
   Google Scholar
• Dongre, R., & Delmar, S. (2003). New workability device for asphalt emulsion cold mixtures and hot-mix asphalt. Peterson Asphalt Conference Proceedings. Laramie, Wyoming: Peterson Asphalt Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Dongre, R., & Morari, E. (2013). Development of a simple test to determine workability and field compaction temperatures of asphalt concrete. TRB 2013 Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Ni, F., Charmot, S., & Luo, H. (2014). Influence on compaction of cold recycled mixes with emulsion using the superpave gyratory compaction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudimettla, J. M., Cooley, L. A., & Brown, E. R. (2003). Workability of hot mix asphalt. national center for asphalt technology. National Center for Asphalt Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Guler, M., Bahia, H., Bosscher, P., & Plesha, M. (2000). Device for measuring shear resistance of hot-mix asphalt in gyratory compactor. Transportation Research Record, 1723(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3141/1723-15
   Google Scholar
• Hanz, A., Faheem, A., Mahmoud, E., & Bahia, H. (2010). Measuring effects of warm-mix additives using a newly developed asphalt binder lubricity test for DSR. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting Compendium.  Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R., & Braham, A. (2016). Quantifying timing of return to traffic for asphalt cement based full depth reclamation mixtures in the laboratory. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(1), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20130288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., & Braham, A. (2016). Reducing sample size for cold in-place recycling design and testing. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44, 1698–1705. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. J. (2000). Mix design considerations for cold and half-warm bituminous mixes with emphasis on foamed bitumen. University of Stellenbosch, Department of Civil Engineering. University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Kiihnl, L., & Braham, A. (2019). Exploring the influence of pavement preservation, maintenance, and rehabilitation on Arkansas’ highway network: An educational case study. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1628960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, R., Adams, J., Castorena, C., Illias, M., Im, J. H., Bahia, H., Johannes, P. T., Chaturabong, P., & Hanz, A. (2017). NCHRP research Report 837: Performance-related specifications. National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Hosin, D. (2012). Performance evaluation of cold in-place recycling mixtures using emulsified asphalt based on dynamic modulus, flow number, flow time, and ravelling loss. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16, 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1376-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2003). Development of a mix design process for cold in-place rehabilitation using foamed asphalt. University of Iowa, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Iowa Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, C., & Bahia, H. (2018). Development of a volumetric mix design protocol for dense-graded cold mix asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, I., & Buss, A. (2018). Layer coefficients of cold In-place recycled layers from performance data. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1473863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, D. (2006). Transportation research circular E-C102: Asphalt emulsion technology. Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C., Diefenderfer, B., & Bowers, B. (2017). NCHRP research report 863: Material properties of cold in-place recycled and full-depth reclamation asphalt concrete. National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, N., Willis, R., & Julian, G. (2012). Refinement of the bond strength procedure and investigation of a specification. NCAT.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlman, B., Andrews, J., Kadrmas, A., Egan, L., & Harrawood, T. (2010). Micro surfacing eco-efficiency analysis, final Report – July 2010. BASF Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Liu, X., & Hao, P. (2008). Evaluating the shear resistance of hot mix asphalt by the direct shear test. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 36(6), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE101732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. C., Watson, D. E., Turner, P. A., & Casola, J. R. (2010). Mixing and compaction temperatures of asphalt binders in hot-mix asphalt. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, E., & Braham, A. (2018). Evaluation and compaction of laboratory-produced recycled asphalt pavement in cold in-place recycling. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, E., & Braham, A. (2019). The influence of time after crushing for cold in-place recycling on compaction and ravelling. Transportation Research Record, 2673, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119834560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar